Tag Archives: nysearcaefa

Lipper Fund Flows: Domestic Equity Funds Lose While Markets Gain Ground

By Jeff Tjornehoj Stock markets rebounded this past week after Greece came back to the bargaining table with its creditors and acceded to even harsher demands than it had rejected a week earlier and after stocks in China appeared to slow their freefall. For the fund-flows week ended July 15, the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 535 points to end above 18,000 and regained ground it had lost over the prior three weeks of the Greek debt drama. Equity mutual fund investors withdrew an estimated $4.4 billion net for the week. Not surprisingly, they pulled money from domestic equity mutual funds (-$1.6 billion), which have been out of favor much of this year. Equity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) saw net inflows of $3.6 billion, although investors may have been taking profits, selling off financial services products (-$1.6 billion). The week’s biggest individual equity ETF recipient was the S PDR S&P 500 Trust ETF ( SPY , +$4.4 billion ) , while huge selling hit the F inancial Select Sector SPDR ETF ( XLF , -$1.5 billion ) and the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF ( EFA , -$975 million ) . Bond mutual fund investors continued to redeem shares of funds in Lipper’s High Yield Funds classification, which had net outflows of $272 million, while ETF investors in the same classification added a net $1.5 billion. Overall, taxable bond mutual funds saw net inflows of $473 million for the week. Mutual fund investors pulled some cash out of Core Bond Funds (-$234 million) and added a scant $97 million to Core Plus Bond Funds. Bond ETF investors pushed $2.2 billion into their accounts to create combined (mutual funds and ETFs) net inflows of $2.6 billion. The week’s top destinations for bond ETF investors were the iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF ( HYG , +$1.0 billion ) and the SPDR Barclays Capital High Yield Bond ETF ( JNK , +$420 million ) . Municipal bond mutual fund investors pulled $75 million from their accounts for the eleventh weekly net outflows in a row. Money market funds saw net outflows of $9.4 billion, of which institutional investors pulled $9.3 billion and retail investors redeemed $100 million. Share this article with a colleague

A Market Needing To Resolve Divergences In 2015

As 2014 has come to a close, investors have turned their attention to 2015 and looking for clues as to what the market and economy have in store for the new year. Below are divergences that unfolded in 2014 which raises the question of how they will be resolved this year. The resolution of these divergences will likely have implications on the performance of an investor portfolios this year. Oil Prices Knowing the stock market is not the economy and vice versa , determining factors contributing to the significant decline in oil prices is important. Certainly, increased supply is influencing the decline in crude prices. Equally though, as we have noted in several earlier articles, we believe lack of demand is also a contributing factor. The importance of the reduced demand leads strategists to raise the question of whether the global economy is entering a slowdown. To date, the U.S. seems to have shaken off the potentially negative impact of slowing economies outside its borders. Given the interconnectedness of the economic world today though, can the U.S. continue on its growth path while many other economies in the developed and emerging world struggle with growth? As the below chart indicates, historically, falling oil prices have been associated with slowing global GDP. Aubrey Basdeo, Managing Director at Blackrock, noted the potential negative impact of an extended run of low oil prices in an article late last year titled, Free Fallin’ . The article’s conclusion, Wherever the price ends up, it’s likely it’ll stay there for a while. We don’t see demand increasing, especially with China cooling off. In the short-term that could be good news for our economy – lower gas prices mean people have more money to spend – but it remains to be seen just how our country will be impacted by a sub-$60 oil price. The longer it stays low, though, the more difficult things could get. Highlighted in the Felder reference below was a comment by Howard Marks’ in a recent investor letter , “It’s historically unprecedented for the energy sector to witness this type of market downturn while the rest of the economy is operating normally. Like in 2002, we could see a scenario where the effects of this sector dislocation spread wider in a general ‘contagion.'” High Yield Bonds: Reduced Investor Risk Appetite The performance of high yield bonds has an above average positive correlation to the performance of equities. In short, as the economy grows, companies tend to experience better earnings growth. This improved earnings outlook generally leads to improved equity returns. Broadly, as companies generate better earnings growth, highly leveraged ones tend to experience an improved outlook as well. This in turn reduces the risk of default with highly leveraged companies. Consequently, high yield bond prices are bid up as investors are attracted to the higher yields provided by high yield debt in an environment where default risk seems lessened. A recent article by Jesse Felder of The Felder Report took an in depth look at the long term and short term price movements of high yield (NYSEARCA: HYG ) relative to a riskless 3-7 year Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA: IEI ) and the S&P 500 Index . As the first chart below shows, the high yield relative to treasury bond investment tracks closely with the S&P 500 Index. Felder notes in his article, Clearly, the chart above demonstrates that the strength in junk risk appetites led stocks off the lows back in 2009. Over the past summer, however, junk bonds started to lag stocks for the first time since the bull began (or lead lower, depending on your perspective). Since then the divergence has only gotten wider with each subsequent new high in the stock market [as seen in the below chart]: Large Caps Versus Small Caps And The Dollar The one asset allocation decision investors and advisers needed to get right in 2014 was to overweight U.S. equities, large caps more specifically, versus broad international. As can be seen in the two charts below, U.S. large cap stocks had a decisive performance edge versus developed international (NYSEARCA: EFA ), emerging markets (NYSEARCA: EEM ) and small cap equities (NYSEARCA: IWM ). With economies currently weaker outside the U.S. and interest rates lower in many European countries, foreign investors have allocated investment dollars to the U.S. This flow of funds into the U.S. has contributed to downward pressure on U.S. interest rates as well as continued upward pressure on the U.S. Dollar. The top chart above shows a longer view of the trade weighted US Dollar and its recent strength, although strong shorter term, the strength does not look exhausted when viewing the longer term chart. The implication of a stronger dollar has to do with the potential earnings headwind for large multinational companies. In a slow growing economy, the currency headwind can take a bite out of corporate profit growth. If this occurs, small and mid size companies are less exposed to exchange rates as business for these companies is mostly generated domestically. Lastly, the U.S. equity markets opened higher on the first trading day of the new year, but quickly turned lower near the time the ISM Manufacturing Index was reported. The manufacturing index was reported at 55.5 which was below consensus expectations of 57.5. This was the slowest rate of monthly growth in six months. Econoday noted, “growth in new orders slowed substantially, to 57.3 from November’s exceptionally strong 66.0, while backlog accumulation also slowed, to 52.5 from 55.0. Production slowed to 58.8 vs. 64.4….The abundant run of manufacturing reports point to year-end slowing in a sector which is oscillating going into the New Year.” The above highlights are just a few divergent factors that have developed recently. From a positive perspective, the equity markets have a tendency to climb the proverbial ” wall of worry .” We will cover more of our thoughts on these topics in our upcoming year end Investor Letter.

Stock Picking, Intricate As Love

The combination from creating a 20 stock portfolio is a number beyond this earth. A simpler indexing approach provides several benefits like low unsystematic risk and low cost. You can still be active and pursue a source of alpha while also retaining the benefits of index investing. In ABC’s ‘The Bachelor’, the road to love involves weeks of flirting, romance, cat fights, twist and turns, where one guy is introduced to 25 lovely girls. Picking 1 out of 25 girls must be a lot of work. Likewise, researching stocks is a lot of work and arguably not as fun as dating. But you have many choices. The S&P 500, often used as a proxy for the total US stock market, offers 500 choices. If one were trying to create a 20 stock portfolio, how much work would be appropriate and what are the possibilities? Instead of trying to quantify the workload necessary, an especially subjective matter, let’s gauge the implications of the variables involved in picking stocks by looking at all the resulting combinations that are possible. For our group of stocks, let’s take the S&P500, consisting of 500 individual stocks. To take out capitalization weighting effects, we will actually use the S&P 500 equal weighted index, which includes the same constituents as the capitalization weighted S&P 500. Picking a certain number of stocks out of 500 is a simple calculation using binomial coefficients, mathematics used since the 10th century in India. Binomial coefficients are a family of positive integers that occur as coefficients in the binomial theorem. The coefficients that appear in the expansion are usually written as: This method is applicable because selecting stocks from a group is essentially picking k objects from a population of n distinct objects without replacement and without regard to order. If we select 20 stocks for our portfolio, there are 266719851283743829654740530950952475 combinations of selecting 20 stocks out of a group of 500, calculated from simply applying binomial coefficients: To grasp the magnitude of this amount, if each combination was the height of a flat dollar bill, the stack of dollar bills would scale up from the earth to the sun about 195 quintillion times. (quintillion is a billion billions). Likewise, the stack of dollar bills would go from our Sun to its nearest star, Proxima Centauri 726 trillion times. Comparatively, if the Voyager 1 spacecraft (speed=38000mph) were to go to Proxima Centauri, it would take over 73 thousand years to arrive. The many different possible portfolios are staggering, even when limiting selection only within the S&P500. With so many, inevitably one combination, picked arbitrarily at random could beat a combination created by a professional. This sheds light on the often heard claim that a monkey can out-pick a mutual fund manager. But nobody should pick stocks, bonds, or other securities at random. You wouldn’t pick your next boyfriend, girlfriend, potential spouse at random. You would expect a better outcome if you are discerning in your selection. Accordingly, thousands of discerning mutual fund managers seek superior performance and some actually achieve it. Of course, magazines like Forbes report time and again that the majority of professional can’t beat the index. However, the Wall Street Journal ran an expert vs. random dart throwing simulation for 14 years, but declared no clear winner. No clear winner will ever be discovered in this holy war, because of the staggering number of possibilities. One way to simplify investing is to invest in the index. Indexing provides several benefits like low cost and low unsystematic risk, even lower than a 20 stock portfolio. You do not have to be entirely passive. Instead of being active in the securities selection layer, another approach is to be active at asset allocation layer, using index investing. (click to enlarge) When constructing your portfolio, consider where you should put most of your effort. One approach employed by many professionals focuses on a top-down investment strategy attempting to exploit opportunities among a set of assets, positioning a portfolio into assets or sectors that show the most potential for gains. The strategy focuses on the relative performance of asset classes rather than on the performance of individual securities. With more focus on the asset allocation layer, one can still seek a source of alpha while also retaining the benefits of index investing. Further, the derivative securities used to actively asset allocate are highly liquid and low cost to transact for example, (NYSEARCA: SPY ),(NYSEARCA: EFA ),(NYSEARCA: BND ). Additional disclosure: Article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.