Tag Archives: nysearcaiwm

Book Review: Free Capital

Summary Guy Thomas profiles twelve private investors. The interviewees remain anonymous and speak frankly about their successes and failures. Free Capital is an inspirational and educational read. The Market Wizards of U.K. amateur investors. Actuary, private investor and honorary lecturer Guy Thomas put together a terrific read called Free Capital: How 12 Private Investors Made Millions in the Stock Market after a thorough process of selecting and interviewing over 20+ private investors. The book consists of interviews with twelve private investors. It could have been part of the Market Wizards series by Jack. D. Schwager and an appropriate subtitle would have been: Interviews with the U.K. best amateur investors . If you enjoyed the Market Wizard series you are almost certain to like this book. The final selection of interviewees is made up of investors employing a variety of styles. The author segments the styles as follows: Geographers: top-down investors. Start from a macro perspective and search companies that will benefit from that trend. Surveyors: bottom-up investors who look at individual company financials. Activists: Investors taking an active approach to their investments. Putting a large percentage of their portfolio in a name and developing a conversation with management. Eclectics: Go back and forth between styles or don’t fit the other styles. It even includes one day trader and varies from activists to buy and hold dividend investors. Every investor interviewed had been highly successful with many racking up the balance of their U.K. tax-free, limited contribution accounts, up to well over a million. A feat than can only be accomplished by highly skillful investors. Thomas was also careful to monitor results of the interviewees over a market cycle to ensure their strategies could withstand a bear market. What is the book about? First and foremost the book in an inspirational read. Although a few of the investors in the book are exceptionally intelligent, many appear to be just above average in intelligence and some had to deal with severe setbacks in life or very tough starting conditions. Most of the people profiled struggled to keep their pre-investment career on track. Yet, they were able to achieve tremendous success through investing. They accomplished this through a variety of strategies. An important takeaway is that when you study investing, stick to a strategy that suits you and keep at it ultimately you should be able to achieve financial freedom. For many in this book, becoming a private investor enabled them to get away from company politics. Why you shouldn’t read Free Capital First of all to enjoy this book it is required you are interested in the practice of active investing. If you a convinced passive investor you will not like this book very much. The interviewees are all U.K. based private investors. The author guards their real identity which allowed them to speak frankly. The book really stands out in its genre because the people profiled do not try to talk up their strategies, try to look smart or otherwise try to boost their own ego. However, if you are looking for sophisticated literature, you should read the papers authored by Thomas (highly recommended as well). Who should read Free Capital? Read Free Capital if you are looking for an inspirational read. Quite a bit of actionable advice is dished out by the various interviewees but there are no stock tips. Of course stock tips wouldn’t have a very long shelf life any way. The book is especially valuable if you are developing your style as a private investor. You may not yet realize that it is also possible to be an activist investor from your home office. Even though most people day trading end up broke, some prosper. Perhaps you are considering to become a full time investor because you hate your career but do not dare to take the plunge yet. These people did it but all took precautions. You may think you are handicapped because you don’t have a finance or business background but neither did these people and they destroyed their benchmarks. Free Capital is certainly one of the best investment books I read in 2015 and I highly recommended it.

Investors Have Been Selling But Haven’t Yet Decided What To Buy

“The stock market is almost magical because it always leads the economy. It goes down long before the economy drops and then heads higher long before the economy rebounds. It always has.” -Kenneth L. Fisher If you look at the details of fund flows during the last several months, then you will discover that there have been net outflows from many funds of U.S. risk assets. This includes most U.S. equity and U.S. bond funds. As more and more time passes from the all-time peaks for many U.S. equity indices, investors are progressively realizing that the likelihood for additional gains is less than the probability that we have begun what could eventually become a full-fledged bear market. The S&P 500 reached its highest point of 2134.72 on May 20, 2015, which was more than five months ago. Investors hate to tamper with the status quo if they are comfortable with it, so very few people sold near the spring highs. In recent weeks, there have been notable outflows especially on days when U.S. equities have been declining. The more that time passes and additional lower highs are registered for the S&P 500, the Nasdaq, the Russell 2000, and similar indices, the more that people will realize that their portfolios are losing money rather than making money. Since the losses have been modest overall, these outflows haven’t nearly approached the record withdrawals which were made during the first quarter of 2009. However, there has been a notable total decline in the money committed to U.S. risk assets, while the amount of money in safe deposits including money market funds has surged in recent months. One interesting observation is that, prior to the recent climb in the popularity of safe time deposits, these had reached all-time low levels relative to the amount of money invested in riskier assets. It is likely that, obtaining only around one percent interest or less on their bank accounts and near zero in their money market funds, many investors were encouraged to shift into far more speculative alternatives. They convinced themselves, with the able assistance of financial advisors, that they were nearly as safe in high-dividend blue chip U.S. stocks or high-yield corporate bonds as they were in the bank. In reality, they have been taking enormously greater risk, because most of these assets lost more than half their value during their respective bear markets of 2007-2009. However, most advisors politely didn’t bring up this inconvenient fact, and most people would rather not think about what is possible while focusing instead on what is ideal. Now that reality has slowly begun to reassert itself, investors have been moving back into time deposits-but haven’t yet taken more than a tiny percentage of this money and invested it in other assets. Historically, whenever there is a recent surge in safe time deposits, most of the money ends up being reallocated into securities which are perceived to contain greater upside potential. The only exception tends to be near the very end of a bear market, when risk assets are plummeting and investors are frightened into safety at any cost. Since we are far from such a situation today, asset reallocation usually means chasing after whatever has recently been climbing the most in percentage terms. If 2015 ends with a net loss for most U.S. equity and bond funds, then those funds which have enjoyed net gains will stand out noticeably among a sea of red. Other investors look for whatever has rebounded the most from its recent bottom, or for various kinds of moving average crosses and other signals. Therefore, whichever assets outperform from now through the end of 2015 are likely to be especially visible and to receive increasingly positive media, analyst, and advisor coverage. The persistence of such upbeat discussion will be accompanied by strong inflows. So far, there haven’t been any sectors which have featured many such standout assets. However, this could change soon, because there is such a huge disparity between the world’s most overpriced assets and the most undervalued ones. The list of overvalued securities includes many U.S. stocks and bonds and global real estate. The most compelling bargains can generally be found among commodity-related and emerging-market assets which in many cases have been trading at lower prices than during their worst levels of 2008-2009. Because they are so inexpensive, they can gain enormously in percentage terms and yet remain far below their respective peaks from the first half of 2008 or in many cases from April 2011. If this happens, then they will be able to continue to gain dramatically until the final months of 2016 or the early months of 2017. It is too early to say whether this kind of activity will occur or not, although historically most U.S. bull markets end with a period of rising inflationary expectations. It is rare for the economy to go into a recession without first experiencing an inflationary binge. During the most recent bear market of 2007-2009, we had a sharp and unexpected inflationary climb for roughly one year from the summer of 2007 through the summer of 2008. Since literally a hundred central banks worldwide including the U.S. Federal Reserve are eager for higher inflation, we are likely to get exactly what they want. Wage inflation has been moderately accelerating in the U.S., while prices have been generally slower to follow suit. Most investors are continuing to moderately sell their previous favorites, while sitting on the fence in indecision about what to do with the money. If you follow the fund flows during the next few months, you are likely to learn a lot about what will happen for another year or more. There are supporting clues from the media, which have become less enthusiastic about U.S. assets but continue to generally favor them because they appear to many to be the only game in town. Most news articles regarding commodities or emerging markets are gloomy, especially when there have been recent price declines for anything in these sectors. It appears that precious metals and the shares of their producers may already have bottomed, while energy producers are possibly following suit while emerging markets are mostly bringing up the rear. If all of these are able to outperform, then especially with the best-known U.S. benchmark indices continuing to struggle, investors will begin to take notice of the top-performing securities and will become increasingly eager to own them. The financial markets have always been a paradox, in which more people are eager to buy something after it has doubled than before it has done so. It is surely the same this time, so most people won’t actually participate until it is too late to enjoy the lion’s share of the potential percentage gains. If an asset goes from 10 to 50, then buying it at 20 might seem to surrender only one fourth of the profit since 20 is one fourth of the way from 10 to 50. However, the gain from 10 to 50 is 400% while the increase from 20 to 50 is 150%, so you actually give up 5/8 of the total profit instead of just 1/4. The financial markets are inherently geometric rather than arithmetic, which is why it works out this way. The key is that those who buy before a rally end up gaining far more than those who wait until a rebound has been “confirmed”. Also, there is really no such thing as confirmation; whenever something has allegedly established a new uptrend, it often first suffers a sharp short-term correction to punish those who were tardy in jumping aboard the bandwagon. Tax tip: If you own shares or funds which are trading near multi-year bottoms and you are a U.S. resident, you can take advantage of their currently depressed prices if these assets are in your 401(k), 403(b), SEP-IRA, Keogh, traditional IRA, or other non-Roth retirement account. You can convert these shares from your account to a Roth IRA and pay taxes based upon their present low valuations. As these eventually rebound, all future gains will be completely tax free. In the event that these shares don’t recover but end up retreating further in price, you can choose to undo your conversion, which is known as a recharacterization. You can then wait at least 30 days, or until the following calendar year-whichever is later-and then convert them again. There is no limit to how many times you can repeat this process and there are no income or other restrictions in making such conversions and recharacterizations, as long as each recharacterization is done on or before October 15 of the year following the date when the conversion had been done. It’s like being able to go back in time and “unbuy” something which doesn’t go up in price. It’s heads you win, and tails you also win. Unfortunately, I do not know of an equivalent strategy which is permitted in any other country besides the United States. Disclosure: In August-September 2013, and at various points during 2014-2015, I have been buying the shares of emerging-market country funds whenever they have appeared to be most undervalued. Since June 2013, I have added periodically to funds of mining shares-and more recently energy shares-especially following their most extended pullbacks. I have also been accumulating HDGE whenever U.S. equity indices are near their peaks; HDGE is an actively-managed fund that sells short U.S. equities. I believe that U.S. assets of almost all kinds have become dangerously overvalued. From my largest to my smallest position, I currently own (NYSEARCA: GDXJ ), (NYSEARCA: KOL ), (NYSEARCA: XME ), (NYSEARCA: COPX ), (NYSEARCA: SIL ), (NYSEARCA: HDGE ), (NYSEARCA: GDX ), (NYSEARCA: REMX ), (NYSEARCA: EWZ ), (NYSEARCA: RSX ), (NYSEARCA: GLDX ), (NYSEARCA: URA ), (NYSEARCA: IDX ), (NYSEARCA: GXG ), (MUTF: VGPMX ), (NYSEARCA: ECH ), (NYSEARCA: FCG ), (NYSEARCA: VNM ), (MUTF: BGEIX ), (NYSEARCA: NGE ), (NASDAQ: PLTM ), (NYSEARCA: EPU ), (NYSEARCA: TUR ), (NYSEARCA: SILJ ), (NYSEARCA: SOIL ), (NYSEARCA: EPHE ), and (NYSEARCA: THD ). In the late spring of 2014, I sold all of my SCIF which had briefly become my fourth-largest holding, because euphoria over the Indian election was irrationally overdone and this fund had more than doubled. I have reduced my total cash position to roughly 3% of my total liquid net worth in order to increase my holdings in the above assets. I sold all of my SLX by acting whenever steel insiders were doing likewise. I also sold all of my FCG but I have been repurchasing it following its recent collapse because there has been intense buying by top corporate insiders of companies which produce natural gas. I expect the S&P 500 to eventually lose about two thirds of its recent peak value, with its next bear-market bottom occurring within several months of October 2017. The Russell 2000 Index and its funds including IWM have only modestly surpassed their highs from the first week of March 2014, while the Russell Microcap Index (NYSEARCA: IWC ) marginally surpassed its zenith from March 6, 2014. The S&P 500 Index set a new all-time high on numerous occasions during the same period, and may have completed its final top for the cycle at 2134.72 on May 20, 2015. This marks a classic negative divergence which previously occurred in years including 1928-1929, 1972-1973, and 2007. Those who have “forgotten” or never learned the lessons of previous bear markets are doomed to repeat their mistakes.

Lipper Fund Flows: Domestic Equity Funds Take $2.4 Billion Dive

For the flows week ended August 5, investors watched the Dow Jones Industrial Average stumble through five straight days of losses. The week ended with an ADP report that said private employers added 185,000 jobs in July, well below estimates of 210,000 and suggesting a less-robust economic picture that might stave off a rate hike from the Federal Reserve. However, shortly afterward, the ISM index of service sector activity came in much stronger than expected for July, jumping from 56.3 points to 60.3 (anything over 50 indicates economic expansion). On Monday, the SPDR Select Sector Energy (NYSEARCA: XLE ) exchange-traded fund (ETF) fell 2% for a second straight day and by Wednesday was trading at prices last seen in August 2012. Equity mutual fund investors made net redemptions of $2.0 billion for the week and not surprisingly, they pulled money from domestic equity mutual funds (-$2.4 billion). Equity ETFs saw net outflows of $1.6 billion as investors pulled the plug on PowerShares QQQ ((NASDAQ: QQQ ), -$1.3 billion), SPDR S&P 500 ((NYSEARCA: SPY ), -$1.1 billion), and iShares Russell 2000 ((NYSEARCA: IWM ), -$808 million). The $14.2-billion Deutsche MSCI EAFE Hedged ((NYSEARCA: DBEF ), +$946 million) led the inflows list. Bond mutual fund investors, like their equity counterparts, took a risk-off attitude as they redeemed shares. Overall, taxable bond mutual funds saw net outflows of $1.2 billion for the week, while bond ETFs saw $454 million of net outflows. Funds in Lipper’s Loan Participation Funds (-$598 million) and High Yield Funds classifications (-$407 million) led category outflows. HY ETF investors redeemed a net $793 million for the week, while loan ETFs had flat activity. The week’s biggest ETF withdrawals occurred at iShares iBoxx $HY Corp ((NYSEARCA: HYG ), -$481 million) and iShares 20+ Treasury ((NYSEARCA: TLT ), -$169 million). Municipal bond mutual fund investors pulled $348 million from their accounts-for the thirteenth net outflow in the past 14 weeks. Money market funds saw net inflows of $20.3 billion, of which institutional investors added $15.5 billion and retail investors added $4.8 billion. Share this article with a colleague