Tag Archives: active-managers

Why Active Managers Like Volatility

With quantitative easing finished and the Fed poised to raise rates, we are already starting to see stocks exhibit more volatility. We expect that to continue, and that stocks will rise or fall based on their fundamentals. In this environment, we believe active management is likely to become increasingly important to achieving sufficient returns. Capital markets offered some surprises for investors last week. Stocks rose globally with the Dow Jones Global Index rising 0.72%, while US stocks rallied with the S&P 500 hitting another record high. In addition, Treasury bonds sold off and oil continued its multi-week rebound. Clearly, asset classes are rotating and moving in different directions. A good example of this rotation can be found in the energy sector. Energy stocks have disappointed since last summer, falling in lockstep with the price of oil. However, in the past few weeks the price of oil has rapidly reversed course, helping energy stocks to rebound. The average energy-sector equity mutual fund returned almost 12% in the past month (as of February 13, 2015), well above every other sector fund average, according to Morningstar. Home and Away We’re also seeing divergent paths among fourth-quarter earnings reports. So far, earnings season has been positive, beating expectations. But there’s a substantial difference between companies that derive their earnings domestically from companies that derive their earnings largely from outside the United States. Why? Because the rising dollar has dragged down their fourth-quarter earnings results. A look at factory activity over the past few months drives home this point. The ISM manufacturing index has dropped to 53.5 in January from 57.6 in November. Weakness in foreign demand pushed new export orders down to their lowest level since November 2012. The caveat is that, like the price of oil, the dollar could reverse course relative to other currencies and the above scenario could change. Divergence can also be found in economic growth in the euro zone. For the fourth quarter, the euro zone skirted a recession and actually delivered modest growth. However, growth varied widely across member countries. Germany and Spain both saw their economies grow 0.7% in the quarter, beating expectations. Not surprisingly, some European countries didn’t fare as well, with both France and Italy falling short of expectations and Greece experiencing a -0.2% growth rate. Despite the disparity in growth, sovereign bond yields may not be dramatically different between these countries (except Greece) thanks to investors’ belief that the European Central Bank will stand behind this debt. Still, the performance of their stock markets could be where we see that growth gap reflected. The Perils of Indexing At Allianz Global Investors, we have long argued that once quantitative easing ended, we would see a change in the market environment. In other words, a move away from QE – which served as a rising tide lifting all boats – to an environment where stocks rise and fall on their individual fundamentals. We worry that the large number of investors who have enthusiastically embraced indexing in the past decade will be negatively impacted in this market environment, where we’re likely to see far more volatility, asset-class rotation and overall differentiation among individual securities. Unfortunately, indexing generally does not allow investors to avoid those companies that can be hurt by a rising dollar or the falling price of oil. And indexing does not allow investors to pivot when the dollar begins falling or the price of oil again changes course. In addition, as we look out on 2015, we expect relatively low stock returns. This again makes the case for active investing as investors will need to make active bets in an effort to surpass low market returns. In short, there are periods when markets are more conducive to index investing, as we saw over the past few years, but this environment isn’t one of them. We hope investors recognize the importance of active management in this unique and ever-changing market environment. We believe, a “buy the index and go home” strategy in times of uncertainty could come back to haunt investors.

Alpha Generation For Active Managers

We are currently seeing a lot of attractive opportunities in the high-yield market. They don’t really seem to reflect the true opportunity we are seeing in the market. This is where active management is especially important. By: Heather Rupp, CFA, Director of Research for Peritus Asset Management, the sub-advisory firm of the AdvisorShares Peritus High Yield ETF (NYSEARCA: HYLD ) As we discussed in our recent blog (see ” The Opportunity in Volatility “), we are currently seeing a lot of attractive opportunities in the high-yield market discounts and yields that we haven’t seen in some time. And while we have seen the yields in the high-yield indexes and the products that track them increase over the last six months, they don’t really seem to reflect the true opportunity we are seeing in the market. For instance, the yield-to-worst on the Barclays High Yield index is 6.46% 1 , and many of the large index-based products are reporting yields around 6%. While this is certainly better than the index yields of sub-5% that we saw in mid-2014, this level at face value isn’t something we’d be really excited about. So then why are we excited about today’s high-yield market and see this as an attractive entry point? Digging into what is held in the index, we see 33% of the issuers in index trade at a yield-to-worst of 5% or under 2 . The large majority of this low-yielding contingency consists of quasi-investment grade bonds, rated Ba1 to Ba3. Not only does this group provide a low starting yield, but would expose investors to more interest rate sensitivity if and when we do eventually see rates rise (given the lower starting yields). On the flip side, 30% of the issuers in that index are trading at a yield-to-worst of 7.5% and above 2 , which in today’s low-yielding environment, with the 5-year Treasury around 1.2%, seems pretty decent. This group is certainly not dominated by the lowest rated of names, and within this group, we are seeing an eclectic mix of businesses and industries. Yes, there are segments of this group that we are not interested in. For instance, we have been outspoken on our concerns for many of the domestic shale producers in the energy space, given that we saw these as unsustainable business models when oil was near $100, and those issues will certainly be acerbated with oil at $50 as cash to mitigate the rapid well decline rates and to service heavy debt loads quickly runs out. But there are also what we see as great mix of business and industries that we would be interested in committing money to, especially at these levels. This is where active management is especially important. We view active management as about managing risk and finding value. Yes, it is about managing credit risk (determining the underlying credit fundamentals and prospects of each investment you make – basically doing the fundamental analysis to justify an investment in a given security) and managing call risk (paying attention to the price you are paying for a security relative to the next call price to address the issue of negative convexity), as we have written about at length before. Yet, one risk factor that is often overlooked is that of purchase price. By this, we mean buying at an attractive price. While it isn’t very intuitive, because it often seems that the risk is less when markets are on a roll and moving up, but really the lower the price you pay for a security, the lower the risk (you have less to lose because you put less in up front). Jumping in on the popular trade certainly doesn’t reduce your risk profile. Rather, you want to purchase a security for a price less than you think it is worth. As we look at much of the secondary high-yield market, especially many of the B and CCC names that have been out of favor over the past several months, we are seeing a more attractive buy-in for selective, active managers, which we believe lowers our risk. And there remains a segment of “high yield” that isn’t at prices or yields that we would consider attractive, and we will avoid investments in those securities. Alpha generation involves buying what we see as undervalued securities with the goal of generating excess yield and/or potential capital gains. Today, we are seeing this opportunity for potential alpha generation for active managers. 1 Barclays Capital US High Yield Index yield to worst as of 1/30/15. Formerly the Lehman Brothers US High Yield Index, this is an unmanaged index considered representative of the universe of US fixed rate, non-investment grade debt. 2 Based on our analysis of the Barclays Capital High Yield index constituents as of 1/30/15. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) Business relationship disclosure: AdvisorShares is an SEC registered RIA, which advises to actively managed exchange traded funds (Active ETFs). This article was written by Heather Rupp, CFA, Director of Research of Peritus, the portfolio manager of the AdvisorShares Peritus High Yield ETF (HYLD). We did not receive compensation for this article, and we have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. This information should not be taken as a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, including AdvisorShares Active ETFs, this information is provided for educational purposes only. Additional disclosure: To the extent that this content includes references to securities, those references do not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold such security. AdvisorShares is a sponsor of actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and holds positions in all of its ETFs. This document should not be considered investment advice and the information contain within should not be relied upon in assessing whether or not to invest in any products mentioned. Investment in securities carries a high degree of risk which may result in investors losing all of their invested capital. Please keep in mind that a company’s past financial performance, including the performance of its share price, does not guarantee future results. To learn more about the risks with actively managed ETFs visit our website AdvisorShares.com .