Tag Archives: undefined

Weather Fed Rate Hike Fears With Global Low-Volatility ETFs

The Fed rate hike possibility probably never appeared as strong as it seems now. A better-than-expected job data recently along with strong manufacturing, construction spending and automobile sales confirmed the passage of winter blues and solid recovery in the U.S. economy. This has bolstered market sentiments that the Fed will normalize its interest rate policy this September or October. The market has already started to position itself for a September lift-off timeline as bond yields took an upturn. Higher interest rates might derail the stock market rally as many investors will now throng to the fixed-income world in search of high current income. Not only this, the ripples of the Fed tightening will spread into several corners of the investing universe. Most importantly, emerging economies which enjoyed prolonged easy money inflows will now be spots of vulnerability. The International Monetary Fund’s deputy managing director recently cautioned of “considerable” downside risks associated with the rippling effect of looming Fed rate hike, per Reuters. Several markets and asset classes will likely see disruptions once the decision is taken. To add to this, the rest of the developed world is yet to gain ground and the Greek debt concern seems a constant worry in the Euro zone. In such a baffling backdrop, seeking refuge in low volatility products rather than sticking to highly risky options and enduring the Fed-infused storm can help investors. Since the effect of the Fed rate hike will not be limited to the U.S. market, investors can choose from across the global options. These global low-volatility products could be intriguing choices for those who want to stay invested in equities, but like the idea of focusing on minimum volatility. Low-volatility ETFs generally tend to offer positive risk-adjusted gains, though not enormous. iShares MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: EFAV ) EFAV looks to replicate the performance of international equity securities that have lower absolute volatility. This equal-weighted ETF invests about $2.5 billion in 205 holdings. No single stock makes up more than 1.53% of the portfolio. Country wise, the fund appears more focused on Japan and United Kingdom equities, with the duo having a little less than 50% allocation in the fund. EFAV charges about 20 bps in fees. So far this year (as of June 8, 2015), the fund is up 8%. It currently carries a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a Low risk outlook. iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: AXJV ) This fund, just a year old, follows the MSCI AC Asia ex-Japan Minimum Volatility (USD) Index and intends to offer better risk-adjusted returns to investors. The $5.4 million-product is heavy on nations like China, Taiwan and South Korea while sectors like financials, technology and industrials take up big chunks. AXJV has about 184 securities in total in its basket and charges 35 bps in fees for its service. Individual holdings wise, the fund is quite diversified considering that no stock accounts for more than 1.95% of the basket. The top three holdings – Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, BOC Hong Kong Holdings and AIA Group combine to take up roughly 5.2% of assets. The Zacks Rank #3 ETF is up 7.9% in the year-to-date frame. iShares MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: EUMV ) This fund has accumulated $9.8 million within one year of operation. It tracks the MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility Index giving exposure to 126 European stocks having lower volatility characteristics relative to the broader European developed equity markets. The product charges a bit cheaper fee of 25 bps a year while average daily volume is paltry at about 6,000 shares causing relatively high trading costs. Like many other funds in the space, the ETF provides higher diversification benefits with none of the securities making up for more than 1.59% of assets. In term of country exposure, United Kingdom takes the largest share at 35.61%, followed by Switzerland (17.96%), Germany (10.3%) and France (10.2%). The fund is up 6.4% so far this year (as of June 8, 2015) and has a Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy). VelocityShares Equal Risk Weighted Large Cap ETF (NASDAQ: ERW ) ERW tracks the VelocityShares Equal Risk Weighted Large Cap Index. This index uses a methodology to measure a stock’s risk and then distributes the risk in each of its stock equally by weighing their risk exposure individually. The index comprises most of the S&P 500 Index stocks, but individual exposure depends on their expected risk. The stocks with lower expected risk will account for a percentage of the index that is larger than in the S&P 500. This overlooked fund has managed to amass an asset base of nearly $2.6 million. The fund charges a fee of 65 basis points annually and has returned 4.5% so far this year (as of June 8, 2015) while SPY has added about 1.4% during the same time frame. ERW has a Zacks ETF Rank #3. Original Post

Bulls Hiding Behind Bears

Summary Many investors understandably reflect on the past two bear markets in stocks with dread. But just because the S&P 500 Index is down does not mean that major segments within the stock market cannot go up at the same time. It also does not mean that other asset classes are not enjoying roaring bull markets. A truly diversified portfolio strategy should be continuously exploring this opportunity set from both a timing and allocation standpoint. Many investors understandably reflect on the past two bear markets in stocks with dread. Not only did many have a bad experience the first two times around, but they look at today’s bull market and may have some concern that a third go around may be lurking around the corner. But investors should not fear. For just because the major stock market indices such as the S&P 500 Index took a beating the last time around, it does not mean that every stock on the planet went down. And it also does not mean that a lot of investors in other frequently overlooked asset classes were not able to generate handsome returns while investors were fleeing out of stocks. More often than not, one can always find bulls hiding behind bears in investment markets. You just have to look for them. Remembering The 2000 to 2003 Bear Market In Stocks Our first look is at the S&P 500 Index (NYSEARCA: SPY ) in the aftermath of the tech bubble bursting. From its peak in March 2000 until its final bottom in March 2003; in a word, it was ugly, as S&P 500 Index lost nearly half of its value even after dividends over this time period. (click to enlarge) But even sticking with the broader market, here is the first important point to recall. Stocks typically do not go down in a straight line. For during the 2000 to 2003 bear market, the S&P 500 Index did provide investors with several tradable rallies in with positive returns in excess of double digits along the way. The key was identifying the trend to catch these rallies. But capturing this upside, of course, is far easier said than done, and many investors would understandably rather not be bothered with attempting to trade the market in this manner. (click to enlarge) Fortunately for investors, the stock market at the time provided abundant upside opportunities. After all, a great deal of the damage from the tech bubble was sustained in the technology sector (NYSEARCA: XLK ), which lost a remarkable -82% at the depths of the 2000 to 2003 bear market. (click to enlarge) So as long as you were out of the way of the once high-flying technology sector at the time, you likely fared much better than the broader market. Viewing the stock market on a sector basis demonstrates why. Of the eight other GICS sectors that are represented by the Select Sector SPDR Indices, only four even entered into bear market territory at down -20% from the S&P 500 Index peak in March 2000. Among the cyclical sectors, Industrials (NYSEARCA: XLI ) were down -37%, Consumer Discretionary (NYSEARCA: XLY ) was down -26%, Materials (NYSEARCA: XLB ) were down -23% and Energy (NYSEARCA: XLE ) fell -19%. What is more notable is the timing of these declines, as three of these four sectors were still in positive territory from the peak of the S&P 500 Index in March 2000 up until June 2002. In other words, if you were still fully in stocks more than two years after the start of the bear market, you were likely well attuned to the risks around you at that point. (click to enlarge) As would be expected, the performance among defensive stocks was even better. Consumer Staples (NYSEARCA: XLP ) only fell -13%, Health Care (NYSEARCA: XLV ) was down just -18%, Utilities (NYSEARCA: XLU ) dropped by -31% and interest rate sensitive financials were lower by -19%. In short, three of four sectors avoided bear market territory altogether. Moreover, Consumer Staples were up as much as +30% and Financials and Utilities as much as +10% as late as early 2002. What the heck happened to utilities at the time? This was a time when the typically staid utilities were deregulating and engaging in such ventures as electricity trading and telecom activities. Many have returned to their more traditional activities in the years since. (click to enlarge) Of course, the stock market is not the only place to allocate capital, and many investors in different asset classes enjoyed tremendous upside returns while stocks were moving lower. Some were in fact in impressive bull markets. For example, long-term U.S. Treasury bonds (represented here by the Vanguard Long Term Treasury Fund (MUTF: VUSTX )) were soaring by as much as +45% during the bear market in stocks. And gold (NYSEARCA: GLD ) gained over +20% after a slow start, as the shift toward a weak dollar in early 2001 helped spark the dawn of a new secular bull market in the yellow metal. (click to enlarge) The key takeaway from the 2000 to 2003 bear market — as long as you were out of the way of the frothiest areas of the market at the time, which were technology, media and telecom stocks — you likely fared much better. Much of the declines in value that you sustained would have been concentrated over a fairly short time of less than a year from the summer of 2002 through the spring of 2003. And if you were diversified beyond stocks in other uncorrelated to negatively correlated categories like Treasuries (NYSEARCA: TLT ) and gold, you may have even been able to break even if not generate a positive return over the duration of this stock bear market from 2000 to 2003. Remembering The 2007 to 2009 Bear Market In Stocks Now the bear market in stocks that accompanied the financial crisis from 2007 to 2009 was far more unforgiving. But that still does not mean that gains were not there to be had for those that were positioned correctly. From a stock market perspective, it was a fairly unforgiving time. Overall, the S&P 500 Index declined by -54%, and unlike the preceding bear market it managed to take just about every sector down with it. (click to enlarge) The standout to the downside, of course, was the financial sector, which lost -82% of its value. (click to enlarge) Cyclicals in general followed the path of the S&P 500 Index to the downside. The lone exception was the Energy and Materials sectors, which made a decent go of it through the summer of 2008 before finally capitulating to the downside. (click to enlarge) Defensive sectors did hold up better, but not enough where one would feel good about their overall experience. Consumer Staples stocks fared the best having fallen by -27%, while Health Care and Utilities were down in the neighborhood of -40%. What was notable, however, was that both Consumer Staples and Utilities were still in positive territory in the second half of 2008 before finally giving up to the downside once the effects of the Lehman failure and its aftermath started to spread like wildfire. (click to enlarge) Up to this point, we already have a key takeaway for stock investors. Yes, the entire stock market was soundly beaten during the financial crisis bear market by the time March 2009 rolled around, but it is not as though every sector was completely obliterated all at once. We were more than a year into the bear market at the time by the summer of 2008, and four out of nine stock market sectors were still in positive territory. The lesson? Even the worst of bear markets gives you time to act and get out if needed, as long as you are not invested at the epicenter of the problem, which was the financial sector this time around. But for the investor that wishes to avoid such losses that might come with any future bear market in stocks, what are they to do? The answer — recognize that to be invested does not mean that you must be exclusively invested in the stock market. Nor do you have to be exclusively invested anywhere else for that matter, including bonds, commodities, cash or anything else for that matter. For just as the stock market was struggling through a difficult bear market from 2007 to 2009, a number of other asset classes were enjoying rousing bull markets. Case in point. Let’s revisit long-term U.S. Treasuries. While it was a bear market in stocks at the time, it was a roaring bull market in U.S. Treasuries. Overall, the category advanced by more than +50% at a time when the stock market was down by more than -50%. Not too shabby. How about gold? The metal that so many like to deride gained +36% over the course of the financial crisis bear market. (click to enlarge) And for those that are more aggressively inclined, those that were short the stock market through a broadly defined unleveraged instrument such as the ProShares Short S&P 500 (NYSEARCA: SH ) at that time nearly doubled their investment. Another possibility is to allocate on the margins to the VIX and other volatility instruments (NYSEARCA: VXX ). (click to enlarge) It is critically important to note, however, that such inverse approaches are not for the faint of heart. Moreover, they must be handled with care from a timing standpoint. For anyone that has tried to short the market or incorporate an exposure to volatility in their portfolio since March 2009, the experience has been absolutely excruciating. It is also important to note that just because an asset class performed well during a past bear market in stocks does not mean it will necessarily do so the next time around. This, of course, is part of the ongoing portfolio analysis and monitoring to determine exactly what asset classes might perform best the next time around. Bottom Line When contemplating the next bear market in stocks, whether it comes tomorrow or three years from now (it has to happen sometime), investors should not be thinking about selling out of the stock market and running for the hills. Instead, they need to stay in the trenches and have a plan. Think about where the unstable hot zones might be in the current stock market and look to tread lightly in those areas. Consider where the more stable stock market segments reside today and search for opportunities to add incrementally to allocations. Remember that when the bear market finally starts, it is not going to take down every stock all at once. Some might even rise throughout much of the entire experience. And perhaps most importantly, remember that stocks are not the only place where your money has to be allocated if you are participating in capital markets today. More than ever, today’s markets offer investors a broad and diverse arsenal from which to draw to optimize their portfolio from an asset allocation standpoint and look to gain even when the broader stock market may be falling. Disclosure : This article is for information purposes only. There are risks involved with investing including loss of principal. Gerring Capital Partners makes no explicit or implicit guarantee with respect to performance or the outcome of any investment or projections made. There is no guarantee that the goals of the strategies discussed by Gerring Capital Partners will be met. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: I am long stocks via the SPLV as well as selected individual names. I am long Treasuries via the IEF. I also hold a meaningful allocation to cash at the present time.

Will The Fed Push Back Down GLD?

Summary The FOMC will convene again next week. If the FOMC hints about raising rates anytime soon, this could drag down GLD. The recovery of the U.S. dollar and rise in long-term treasury yields will keep pressuring down GLD. The recent strong labor report brought up the odds of the FOMC coming closer towards raising rates. It also cooled down the gold market. Nonetheless, the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) is still flat for the year even though the U.S. dollar and long-term yields have picked up again in recent weeks. The FOMC isn’t expected to make any big changes in the upcoming meeting. But the price of GLD could start coming down again if the FOMC even drops a hint about raising rates in its upcoming meeting. The better-than-expected non-farm payroll report along with the sharp rise in JOLTS – number of job openings reached 5.38 million while market expectations were set at 5.03 million – have both driven a bit higher the implied probabilities of a rate hike in September to 33% and for December to 70%. The FOMC will convene on June 16-17 and release the press statement on June 17 accompanied with a press conference and release updated economic outlook. On the one hand, the GDP contracted back in Q1 and inflation is still contained below 2%. On the other hand, the U.S. labor market continues to show recovery, and there are possible speculative bubbles in the housing and stock markets, which could be popped once interest rates start to rise again. In the meantime, even though the FOMC is considering normalizing its monetary policy, this doesn’t mean the M2 isn’t growing – as of May, M2 is up by 5.3% year on year. This higher M2 comes despite the tumble in oil prices in the past few months. But the rise in M2, which is another indication for the changes in U.S. inflation, hasn’t driven up the price of GLD in recent years, as presented in the chart below. Moreover, the core PCE , which is the indicator the FOMC follows, has gone down to 1.2% – the lowest level in over a year. This low level doesn’t vote well for the FOMC to turn hawkish in the coming meeting. (click to enlarge) Source: FRED, Google Finance Despite the rise in M2, the U.S. money base remained relatively flat and rose by only 0.7% year over year. But this hasn’t resulted in a sharp rise in the money base as it was the case back when the FOMC implemented QE1, QE2, and QE3. After ending QE3, the FOMC only continued purchasing new bonds to substitute expiring bonds in order to maintain its big balance sheet. Thus, it would take a 180-degree change in the FOMC’s policy for the gold market to heat up again. The weakness of the Euro and other major currencies mainly due to ECB’s QE program, the Greek bailout talks also play a minor role in keeping the Euro weak, is likely to further drive up the U.S. dollar, which doesn’t help the price of gold or the price of GLD. Another factor that could keep slowly bringing down GLD is the recovery of long-term treasury yields, which have picked up in recent weeks. The correlations among GLD and long-term yields, as seen below, are negative and strong and suggest that if yields keep rising, GLD could also start to come down. (click to enlarge) Source: U.S Department of Treasury and Bloomberg Final note The upcoming FOMC meeting could be another nail in the gold market’s coffin – especially if the FOMC turns more hawkish by improving its outlook and providing a clearer picture about raising rates. Currently, the market doesn’t expect the FOMC to make any major changes to the policy and the Fed could remain dovish, which helps to keep GLD from tumbling. The major shift is only likely to occur closer to the end of the year – when the FOMC is more likely to raise rate, assuming the U.S. economy continues to progress in its current pace. Until then, the stronger U.S. dollar and higher long-term treasury yields are likely to keep GLD slowly dwindling. For more, please see: 3 Questions About Gold Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.