Tag Archives: pro

Why You Should Be Looking At The Uranium Sector To Grow Your Portfolio

Summary Global demand for uranium is set to grow for the long term, which will cause an inevitable rise in prices. Japan is set to restart its nuclear industry with its first reactor ready to restart in August. Asian demand for energy, driven by China, S. Korea and India will demand significantly more uranium than is presently available. This is the first article of two wherein I will lay out the case that uranium prices are set to soar in the near future, perhaps as soon as the end of this year and/or into 2016. I will also provide a suggestion on an easy way to invest in the uranium sector with the potential to reap significant return on your invested capital. In my next article, I will provide investors interested in this sector with information on a number individual companies involved in the mining/production of uranium. These suggestions can be a source basis for your own further research/due diligence with the goal of providing your portfolios with a significant boost in value. The Market for Uranium According to the World Nuclear Association, the world’s nuclear power reactors currently require about 68,000 tonnes of uranium each year. The supply is provided from both mines and other sources, such as nuclear weapons stockpiles and civil stockpiles held by utilities and governments. ( source ) In 2014, the world’s total production of uranium from mining activity was 56,217 tonnes, a shortfall of 12,000 tonnes of the current requirement for world reactors. Through 2013, highly-enriched uranium from weapons stockpiles had displaced approximately 8850 tonnes of U3O8 production from mines each year, meeting about 13 to 19 percent of world reactor requirements. ( source ) Individuals who follow the uranium market are aware of the Megatons to Megawatts deal that was signed in 1993 between the USA and Russia. It was an agreement whereby the USA, “over a 20-year period, would purchase 500 tonnes of Russian ‘surplus’ high-enriched uranium (HEU) from nuclear disarmament and military stockpiles. These were to be bought by the USA for use as fuel in civil nuclear reactors. In return, the USA transferred to Russia a similar quantity of natural uranium to replace that used to downblend the HEU.” (source) This deal concluded at the end of 2013. At present, there are 437 operating nuclear power plants worldwide, and there are 60+ new plants under construction in 13 countries plus Taiwan. China has 26 operating reactors and 24 under construction . India has 21 operating reactors and 6 under construction . The USA has 5 reactors under construction and has plans to build 5 more new reactors . South Korea is planning to bring 4 reactors online by 2018 and another 8 by 2030. (for more information, see here ). Nuclear power capacity is steadily increasing on a global basis. Plant upgrading is resulting in significant capacity increases . e.g., Switzerland’s 5 plants have had their capacity increased by 13.4%, Spain’s 9 reactors have had capacity increased by 13% and numerous other countries have had capacity increased through upgrading or are in the process of doing so. Plant life extension programs are maintaining current capacity, especially in the U.S. Currently, Japan has all of its nuclear reactors shut down. As many of you reading this know, this was the result of the 2011 Fukushima accident caused by the tsunami that hit Japan March 11, 2011. However, on July 10, 2015, Kyushu Electric Power Co. announced that its Sendai Nuclear Power Unit No. 1 had completed fuel loading in preparation for its restart in August. It’s 2nd unit may be restarted as soon as September. Japan is slowly moving towards getting its nuclear industry going again. As of the end of the financial year to March 31, 2015, Japan had imported a record 7.78 trillion ($65 billion) of natural gas in order to make up for the shortfall in energy that was previously generated by the nuclear industry. Importing that much LNG has had a negative impact on Japan’s economy, making it significantly more expensive for industry to operate and squeezing profits. It has also caused an increase in household utility bills. The importing of so much LNG has also caused Japan to begin posting trade deficits, something unheard of prior to the shutting down of all of the nuclear reactors. Presently there are 25 reactors in Japan that are seeking a restart and the government, led by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, wants to start as many as possible “to meet the nation’s energy needs and grow the economy.” ( source ) The restarting of Japan’s nuclear reactors should have a positive impact on the price of uranium. The psychological barrier to investing in the sector that shutting down its reactors caused will be removed and this should be bullish for the price. The restarts will also boost the confidence of investors in the industry as a whole and the long-term prospects for the nuclear power industry. Although Germany is planning to decommission all of its nuclear power plants by 2020, there is a real fear by taxpayers in the country that they will have to foot the bill for the increase in prices that are going to be an inevitable cost of shuttering the nuclear power industry. So, will Germany reverse course and eventually go back to using nuclear energy or power generation? Time will tell, but even the country does get completely out of nuclear power generation, it really won’t have any negative impact on the inevitable rise in prices ahead. This is because of the Asian move towards nuclear energy to meet the massive need for power in that area of the world, home to 4.47 billion people. In East through to South Asia, there are currently 123 operating nuclear power reactors, 41 under construction and firm plans to build 92 more, while many more are proposed. The greatest growth in nuclear power generation is expected in China, South Korea and India. ( source ) How To Invest In The Sector Aside from investing in individual uranium mining and processing companies, some of which I will highlight in my next article on this subject, one way to invest in this sector is through the Global X Uranium ETF (NYSEARCA: URA ). See the chart below. (click to enlarge) URA tracks the Solactive Global Uranium Index and both the index and the ETF include companies involved in the exploration, mining, and harnessing of uranium. Some of the top holdings include Cameco Corp. (NYSE: CCJ ), Uranium One (TSE-UUU), and Hathor Exploration (TSX-HAT). You can see from the chart above that the ETF has seen its price decimated by the melt down (pun intended) in the sector since 2011 and the fall in the price of uranium, which currently sits at a spot price of Nevertheless, for contrarions, this presents a great time to consider investing some funds in this space, especially as the uranium price, currently sitting at approximately $36/pound, is bound to begin rising in response to the inevitable demand/supply imbalance created by the need for more and more affordable and clean energy sources, especially in Asia. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a long position in URA over the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Why Do Fundamentals Matter?

With a booming market, everyone forgets fundamentals. Someone, the other day, told me that “You don’t need profits to pay bills” when talking about Amazon. If that’s not a sign of euphoria and not understanding how wealth is built, I don’t know what is. The reason fundamentals matter in the long run is that wealth is built on cash flow, profit, and overall returns. Yes, a company can profit but if you’re paying too much for that profit, it’s going to hurt you in the long run because there will be a time when your investment is out of style and everyone will revert back to fundamentals. It happens in every bear market. People flee the exciting fast growing stocks that aren’t doing as well financially to go to companies that generate cash flow and build their balance sheet. Not only in stocks. Real estate as well. The last 15 years have been a boom in real estate, even after a big bust. Real estate is driven by income. I randomly pulled 28 markets that I could think of in this country and looked at their median income growth and their real estate value growth since 1990. The direct correlation from one city to another wasn’t exactly there, but when you looked at all 28 cities as a whole, they were very much in line. Median income growth was 2.32% per year on average and the average real estate growth was 2.6% per year. Not exact, but close. During the recent 15 years of booms in major markets (that were also in my 28 city analysis), we were seeing 15-20% growth per year even though income wasn’t growing NEARLY as much. Then we saw a massive drop in prices and another rebound, so everyone assumes that the past problems were past problems. We shall see. The bottom line is that everything reverts to the mean. We are never exactly fairly valued. We are either overvalued or undervalued in every investment asset. You are either a buyer or seller of assets. It’s that simple. I choose to wait until asset prices get to the point where they are undervalued enough to make me feel that above-average returns will be experienced based on historical averages. Does it require A TON of patience? Absolutely. Is it frustrating at times? 100%. To hear the so-called “experts” tell me that I’m missing it and I don’t understand and “This time is different” has become annoying. But I stick to fundamentals. And at the end of the day, they win out. Fundamentals are the only true way to measure value. You have to find out what truly defines the price of an asset and buy when the asset is selling for below that fundamental point. Is it just one thing? No. But is it a ton of complicated points? Absolutely not. There are a few things that matter when looking at investments and it is the job of a true investor to understand what those are and where they have stood historically (not just over 25 years but over 60+ years). Share this article with a colleague

‘Insurance’ For A Declining Market?

It isn’t only US insurers that are in a sweet spot right now. These three European insurers / financial services providers are worth a look, too! They are big and liquid, making your due diligence easier. If world markets take it on the chin in the coming weeks I would consider it an intermediate-term buying opportunity – for some sectors. If Europe, in particular, is hit hard enough to provide great opportunities, we’ll be at least selective buyers. If we can buy cheaply enough, I’m OK holding even if we didn’t get the lows. We buy in a range of value ; we aren’t trying to get the exact low! One possibility many are considering is the Global X FTSE Greece ETF (NYSEARCA: GREK ). Let them. Me? I won’t touch it. Yes, it closed cheap on Thursday and is likely to open even cheaper on Monday. And it sells at a 3% discount to its NAV. But it’s the composition of the fund that makes it uninteresting to me. Rather than being comprised of Greek consumer staples, infrastructure, shipping, food companies etc., firms that are needed by the Greek people whether they are in the EZ or not, 22% of the ETF is in one stock: Coca-Cola HBC ( OTCPK:CCHGY ) – which is a Swiss company now, no longer Greek. I can buy 22% of GREK just by buying one Swiss stock. Another 25% is in Greek banks, which may or may not remain solvent, and nearly 10% more is in a lottery and sports betting firm in Greece. Maybe if it goes to a deeper discount and the banks look like they’ll make it… Otherwise, no way. Ironically, the Greek fiasco will most likely weaken the euro yet again. A weaker Euro means European companies like Daimler ( OTCPK:DDAIF ), VW ( OTCQX:VLKAY ), Unilever (NYSE: UL ), Roche ( OTCQX:RHHBY ), Coca Cola HBC, and others that exports to other nations, will be selling at a favorable exchange rate and are likely to, at least temporarily, be able to under-cut their competition in the US, Asia and elsewhere. Which means opportunity. We already own 1000 shares of Allianz SE ( OTCQX:AZSEY ), the giant Germany-based insurance and financial services giant that is, among other things, the parent of PIMCO, which all by itself has $1.6 trillion in assets under management. Two of Allianz’s competitors look good to me today, as well. France’s AXA SA ( OTCQX:AXAHY ) was founded in 1852 and Switzerland’s Zurich Insurance ( OTCQX:ZURVY ) in 1872. They’ve both seen far bigger calamities than the current one and survived, including bank panics, the Great Depression and two world wars. This? Poof! This is nothing! Both are global insurance companies that offer just about every kind of insurance imaginable. They also offer investment advice, mutual funds and other products to extend their reach in the financial services arena. They are depressed right now because they have had exposure to Greek headlines, eurozone turmoil, Italian bonds, etc. But both have credibly marked their portfolios to market and both are writing huge amounts of business well beyond Europe. AXA is the parent, for instance, of both Equitably Life and MONY here in the US. It trades at a PE of 11, a Price/Sales ratio of 0.50, a Price/Book of 0.80, and pays a yield of 4.26%. Zurich has a typically bulletproof Swiss balance sheet, has hedged a large part of its equity exposure, and is actively delivering products and services in more than 170 countries. The stock has a 12 P/E, a Price/Sales of 0.6, a Price/Book of 1.3, and yields just over 6%. Please note that, in the European tradition, both firms pay their dividend just once per year! Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Disclosure: I am/we are long AZSEY, ZURVY. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.