Tag Archives: nysearcashy

Dual Momentum August Update

Scott’s Investments provides a free “Dual ETF Momentum” spreadsheet, which was originally created in February 2013. The strategy was inspired by a paper written by Gary Antonacci and available on Optimal Momentum . Antonacci’s book, ” Dual Momentum Investing: An Innovative Strategy for Higher Returns with Lower Risk “, also details Dual Momentum as a total portfolio strategy. My Dual ETF Momentum spreadsheet is available here , and the objective is to track four pairs of ETFs and provide an “Invested” signal for the ETF in each pair with the highest relative momentum. Invested signals also require positive absolute momentum, hence the term “Dual Momentum”. Relative momentum is gauged by the 12-month total returns of each ETF. The 12-month total returns of each ETF is also compared to a short-term Treasury ETF (a “cash” filter) in the form of the iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: SHY ). In order to have an “Invested” signal, the ETF with the highest relative strength must also have 12-month total returns greater than the 12-month total returns of SHY. This is the absolute momentum filter, which is detailed in depth by Antonacci, and has historically helped increase risk-adjusted returns. An “average” return signal for each ETF is also available on the spreadsheet. The concept is the same as the 12-month relative momentum. However, the “average” return signal uses the average of the past 3-, 6-, and 12- (“3/6/12”) month total returns for each ETF. The “invested” signal is based on the ETF with the highest relative momentum for the past 3, 6 and 12 months. The ETF with the highest average relative strength must also have an average 3/6/12 total returns greater than the 3/6/12 total returns of the cash ETF. Portfolio123 was used to test a similar strategy using the same portfolios and combined momentum score (“3/6/12”). The test results were posted in the 2013 Year in Review and the January 2015 Update. Below are the four portfolios, along with current signals: (click to enlarge) As an added bonus, the spreadsheet also has four additional sheets using a dual momentum strategy with broker-specific, commission-free ETFs for TD Ameritrade, Charles Schwab, Fidelity, and Vanguard. It is important to note that each broker may have additional trade restrictions, and the terms of their commission-free ETFs could change in the future. Disclosures: None. Share this article with a colleague

Adding XIV, Inverse Volatility ETF, Enhances The Performance Of A Stocks And Bonds Portfolio

Summary A hypothetical portfolio composed of MDY, QQQ, SHY and TLT performed quite well since its inception in 2003, even during the bear market of 2008-09 and the 2011 market correction. Adding XIV to the portfolio increases the performance range significantly. The enhanced portfolio performed well during the 2011 market correction. In this article we investigate the effect of adding a volatility component to a portfolio of stock and bond ETFs that is known to perform well during market downtrends. We decided to add the VelocityShares Daily Inverse VIX Short-Term ETN (NASDAQ: XIV ), a fund initiated on 11/29/2010. Since XIV historical price data is available only from December 2010 on, and we need 65 trading days for estimating market parameters, we were able to simulate our optimal allocation strategy starting with March 2011. We performed an analysis of the difference in performance of the basic and enhanced portfolios over a 52 months period. Here is the composition of the volatility enhanced portfolio: SPDR S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA: MDY ) PowerShares QQQ Trust ETF (NASDAQ: QQQ ) iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: SHY ) iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TLT ) VelocityShares Daily Inverse VIX Short-Term ETN ( XIV ) Basic information about the funds was extracted from Yahoo Finance and is shown in table 1. Table 1. Symbol Inception Date Net Assets Yield Category MDY 5/4/1995 17.04B 1.08% Mid-Cap Blend QQQ 3/31/1999 45B 1.01% Technology Large-Cap SHY 7/22/2002 9.17B 0.42% Short Term Treasury Bond TLT 7/22/2002 17.04B 2.70% Long Term Treasury Bond XIV 11/29/2010 497M 0.00% Inverse Volatility The data for the study were downloaded from Yahoo Finance on the Historical Prices menu for MDY, QQQ, SHY, TLT, XIV. We use the daily price data adjusted for dividend payments. The portfolio is managed as dictated by a variance-return optimization algorithm developed on the Modern Portfolio Theory (Markowitz). The allocation is rebalanced monthly at market closing of the first trading day of the month. The optimization algorithm seeks to maximize the return under a constraint on the portfolio risk determined as the standard deviation of daily returns. In table 2 we list the total return, the compound average growth rate (CAGR%), the maximum drawdown (maxDD%), the annual volatility (VOL%), the Sharpe ratio and the Sortino ratio of the volatility enhanced portfolio. We simulated the performance of the portfolio under three targets of the volatility of the returns: low, mid and high. Table 2. Performance of the volatility enhanced portfolio from March 2010 to June 2015   TotRet CAGR NO.trades maxDD VOL Sharpe Sortino LOW risk 84.84% 15.26% 52 -6.90% 9.71% 1.57 2.04 MID risk 130.38% 21.28% 50 -9.83% 13.93% 1.53 2.03 HIGH risk 152.63% 23.89% 50 -12.56% 17.06% 1.40 1.82 SPY 71.93% 13.35% 0 -18.61% 15.15% 0.88 1.11 In figure 1 we show the equity curves for the portfolio with the three targets of the volatility. (click to enlarge) Figure 1. Equity curves for the volatility enhanced portfolio adaptively optimized with a low, mid, and high volatility constraint. Source: This chart is based on calculations using the adjusted daily closing share prices of securities. We also simulated the optimal allocation for maximizing the return without any volatility constraints. The results for the basic portfolio (MDY+QQQ+SHY+TLT) and the volatility enhanced portfolio (same ETFs + XIV), are shown in table 3. Table 3. Performance of portfolios optimized for maximum return without volatility constraints.   TotRet CAGR NO.trades maxDD VOL Sharpe Sortino Basic 113.00% 19.10% 16 -13.83% 15.10% 1.27 1.84 Enhanced 462.22% 49.06% 15 -39.00% 46.53% 1.05 1.22 The equity curves of the portfolios are shown in figure 2. (click to enlarge) Figure 2. Equity curves for the basic and the volatility enhanced portfolio optimized for maximum return without any volatility constraints. Source: This chart is based on calculations using the adjusted daily closing share prices of securities. As can be seen from table 3 and figure 2, the enhanced portfolio can achieve extremely high returns. Those high returns come with a high increase of the volatility of the returns. This behavior is not surprising, given the high volatility of the XIV fund. Fortunately, the XIV fund accumulates gains due to its daily rebalancing while the VIX futures are in contango because it buys the cheaper current month VIX future and it sells the more expensive next month VIX future. Of course, the rebalancing causes losses while the VIX futures are in backwardation. We compared the returns of the portfolios over the bear market of 2008, and the market corrections of 2010 and 2011. The results are shown in table 4. Table 4 Total returns of the portfolios during market downturns Time Period SPY Basic Port. Enhanced Port. 4/2011 – 9/2011 -16.22% 15.09% 11.12% As seen in table 4 both the basic and the enhanced portfolios were profitable during the 2011 market correction. We know that the basic portfolio was profitable during the 2008-09 bear market. We expect that the enhanced portfolio would also perform well, but we do not have historical data to verify it. Conclusion By adding a volatility based fund to a portfolio of stock and bond funds, we obtained a portfolio that is capable of delivering exceptionally high returns during stock bull markets. By allocating the funds based on a return-variance optimization algorithm with volatility constraints, one can achieve high returns with limited down risk during market corrections. Additional disclosure: The article was written for educational purposes and should not be considered as specific investment advice. Disclosure: I am/we are long QQQ,SHY. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

ETFReplay.com Portfolio For January

The ETFReplay.com Portfolio holdings have been updated for January 2015. I previously detailed here and here how an investor can use ETFReplay.com to screen for best performing ETFs based on momentum and volatility. The portfolio begins with a static basket of 15 ETFs. These 15 ETFs are ranked by 6 month total returns (weighted 40%), 3 month total returns (weighted 30%), and 3 month price volatility (weighted 30%). The top 4 are purchased at the beginning of each month. When a holding drops out of the top 5 ETFs, it will be sold and replaced with the next highest ranked ETF. Starting in 2015, the basket of 15 ETFs will be reduced to 14 in order to further simplify the strategy. PowerShares DB Agricultural Commodities (NYSEARCA: DBA ) has been removed. The 14 ETFs are listed below: Symbol Name RWX SPDR DJ International Real Estate PCY PowerShares Emerging Mkts Bond WIP SPDR Int’l Govt Infl-Protect Bond EFA iShares MSCI EAFE HYG iShares iBoxx High-Yield Corp Bond EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets LQD iShares iBoxx Invest Grade Bond VNQ Vanguard MSCI U.S. REIT TIP iShares Barclays TIPS VTI Vanguard MSCI Total U.S. Stock Market DBC PowerShares DB Commodity Index GLD SPDR Gold Shares TLT iShares Barclays 20+ Year Trsry SHY iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Treasry Bnd Fd In addition, ETFs must be ranked above the cash-like ETF SHY in order to be included in the portfolio, similar to the absolute momentum strategy I profiled here . This modification could help reduce drawdowns during periods of high volatility and/or negative market conditions (see 2008-2009), but it could also reduce total returns by allocating to cash in lieu of an asset class. The top 4 ranked ETFs based on the 6/3/3 system as of 12/31/14 are below: 6mo/3mo/3mo TLT iShares Barclays Long-Term Trsry LQD iShares iBoxx Invest Grade Bond VNQ Vanguard MSCI U.S. REIT SHY Barclays Low Duration Treasury For January, 50% of our current position in SHY will be sold and the proceeds used to purchase VNQ. The strategy continues to hold TLT, LQD, and a reduced position in SHY. Beginning in 2014, we track both the 6/3/3 strategy (same system as 2013) as well as the pure momentum system, which will rank the same basket of 15 (now 14) ETFs based solely on 6 month price momentum. There is no cash filter in the pure momentum system, volatility ranking, or requirement to limit turnover – the top 4 ETFs based on price momentum will be purchased each month. The portfolio and rankings will be posted on the same spreadsheet as the 6/3/3 strategy. The top 4 six month momentum ETFs are below: 6 month Momentum TLT iShares Barclays Long-Term Trsry VNQ Vanguard MSCI U.S. REIT VTI Vanguard Total U.S. Stock Market LQD iShares iBoxx Invest Grade Bond The 6 month momentum system maintains positions in TLT, VNQ, and VTI. PCY will be sold and the proceeds used to purchase LQD. Below is a 2-year equity curve for the conservative strategy: (click to enlarge) Below is a 1-year equity curve for the aggressive strategy: (click to enlarge) Disclosures: None