Tag Archives: function

2 Sectors Gaining On Steady Labor Market

Recently released economic data indicated that the labor market is witnessing robust recovery. A significant decline in the initial claims figure released Thursday further reaffirmed the strong improvement. Several sectoral data published lately showed that the retail and housing sectors are gaining the most from this improving labor market trend. Steady Labor Market The U.S. Department of Labor reported that jobless claims declined from the prior week’s level of 279,000 to 267,000 for the week ending June 13, significantly below the consensus estimate of 276,500. This marked the fifteenth consecutive week of initial claims tally remaining below 300,000, marking its lengthiest stretch below this level in nearly 15 years. Meanwhile, according to nonfarm payroll data released earlier this month, the economy created a total of 280,000 jobs in May, witnessing the largest job addition since Dec 2014. Also, except for March, the labor market witnessed healthy job additions throughout the year after creating nearly 2.95 million jobs in 2014 – its highest in 15 years. Though the unemployment rate marginally rose to 5.5% in May, the rate is expected to decline gradually to Fed’s target this year. Average hourly wages also saw an impressive year-on-year gain of 2.3%, indicating a strong recovery in labor market conditions. Trending Sectors Retail Retail is one of the main sectors to benefit significantly from the steady labor market this quarter. Last week, the U.S. Department of Commerce reported that retail sales increased 1.2% in May from the previous month to $444.9 billion, significantly higher than April’s revised gain of 0.2%. It was also reported that retail sales rose 2.1% year over year through the March to May period. Meanwhile, March’s gain was revised upward to 1.5%, marking the highest monthly gain in almost five years. Separately, the University of Michigan and Thomson Reuters’ preliminary reading of consumer sentiment was at 94.6 in June. This was more than the consensus forecast of an increase to 91.2 as well last month’s figure of 90.7. Another report released this month also revealed that consumer credit increased at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 7.25% in April. All of these data go to show that the economy is on a solid footing. Impressive recovery in this sector is likely to have a positive impact on retail ETFs including the Market Vectors Retail ETF (NYSEARCA: RTH ) and the SPDR S&P Retail ETF (NYSEARCA: XRT ) . While RTH carries a Zacks ETF Rank #1 (Strong Buy), XRT holds a Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy). Hence, investors may bet on these two ETFs to gain from the improving retail environment. Housing This is another sector that has rebounded strongly in the second quarter overcoming the negative impact of a harsh winter in the first banking largely on strong labor market conditions. The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo housing market index rose five points from May to 59 in June, in line with the September 2014 reading. September’s reading was, by the way, the highest since Nov 2005. This was also the highest reading in the last nine months. Despite a decline in housing starts, most of the housing data released recently reveals that the housing sector is ready to make considerable gains. While building permits have hit a near six-year high in May, U.S. construction spending touched its highest level in more than six years in April. Separately, a significant rise in home prices also signaled an increase in demand in the housing market. Housing market recovery in the second quarter boosted homebuilder ETFs like the PowerShares Dynamic Building and Construction Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: PKB ) and the SPDR Homebuilders ETF (NYSEARCA: XHB ) . In the past three months, PKB and XHB gained around 5.2% and 2.3%, respectively. Both these ETFs carry a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold). These ETFs are likely to gain further on a brighter outlook on housing and are thus likely to remain on investors’ radar. Originally posted on Zacks.com

Growth And Upside Potential Highlight American Electric Power’s Bullish Credentials Going Forward

Summary Company has encouraging fundamental outlook due to increased efforts on getting a broader regulated asset base. Continuous investments in regulated operations such as transmission business give it huge opportunity for future rate base growth. AEP’s on-track cost containment plan will better its future earnings growth prospects. I have a bullish stance on American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP ); the company’s focus on getting a broader, regulated asset base and its escalated growth investments in the transmission business will better its long-term growth trajectory. In addition, the resolution of the company’s previously filled rate cases with West Virginia and Kentucky by the end of this month will strengthen its future top-line and cash flows. Owing to the attractive outlook of AEP’s future cash flows, I believe its dividend payment will remain attractive for investors. Moreover, the company’s on-track cost savings plan, “Lean deployment”, will continue improving its bottom-line. Furthermore, my price target calculation suggests a potential upside of approximately 25% for AEP. AEP’s Strategic Growth Drivers Remain Intact In the recent past, increased focus on infrastructure development investment by utilities has been positively affecting the industry fundamentals and performance. For 1Q’15, the earnings growth of the U.S. Utility Industry was 8.4% , well above the S&P-500’s growth of only 2.4% year-on-year. As far as AEP is concerned, the company has made great strides in becoming a high-quality regulated utility, with improved execution and better management of its intelligent strategic growth efforts. One of the most important strategic growth drivers, increased focus on regulated asset base, has been helping its financials grow at a decent pace. In fact, AEP’s management has reiterated their intentions to sell the company’s unregulated business under its plan of growing its regulated utility business; the decision is on hold until state regulators make a final decision about the company’s proposal regarding state subsidized purchase power agreement that will help it maintain 3,100MW of coal-fired capacity. AEP has requested regulators make the final decision regarding this matter, at least by October ’15. The prevailing uncertainty around the acceptance of the PPA agreement and the recent industry merchant divestitures make me believe that the company will either sell or spinoff its Ohio-based power generating subsidiary and the proceeds from the sale would be reinvested to support its growth-generating regulated transmission business. In fact, one of its former competitors, Dynegy, is interested in buying AEP’s unregulated assets. Since the transmission business is one of the most promising businesses of AEP, I believe reinvesting cash proceeds from the unregulated business sale in the transmission business will strengthen its long-term growth potentials. Moreover, the sale of Ohio plants (unregulated assets) will support its strategic move, which is away from de-regulated operations to regulated ones. In fact, the company has several multibillion-dollar projects in place for the next five-to-ten years, in order to grow its regulated asset base by improving the operational performance of its transmission business. Currently, AEP stands tall in the U.S. utility business with its major stake in several advanced transmission projects, and moving ahead, further increases in transmission project-related investments will improve its fundamentals. As part of its long-term growth plan, AEP has announced hefty investment of almost $4.8 billion in transmission projects from 2015 to 2017; I believe that these up-scaled investments in the transmission business will help the company’s rate base expand, which will increase its future cash flows and ROE. Moreover, increase in its earned returns will better AEP’s EPS growth. Furthermore, the company’s previously filed rate cases in West Virginia and Kentucky are expected to gain approval at the end of this month. AEP has requested a $227 million rate increase in West Virginia and a $70 million rate increase in Kentucky, which will allegedly go into effect on 1st July 2015. I believe that these recent rate hikes will portend well for raising the level of earned returns for the company and will add towards the certainty of its cash flow base success in the years ahead. On the bottom-line, AEP’s multi-year cost saving plan “Lean deployment” is working really well to get it a leaner cost base. Thus far, the company has completed the implementation of lean deployment at 13 distribution districts, whereas work at almost 19 more is still in process. Moreover, on the transmission business side, AEP has completed work on just one area and four more are scheduled for completion, this year. Given the fact that the implementation of lean deployment is keeping the company’s operational and management (O&M) expense down, I believe with the ongoing execution, cost efficiency gains from the lean deployment plan will keep on improving AEP’s earnings growth level. Safe & Sustainable Returns AEP’s strong growth prospects have been helping its cash flows grow and support its management’s dividend policy. With the increasingly healthy cash payments under its attractive dividend payment policy, the company has earned a strong five-year dividend growth rate of around 4.87%. Keeping track of its attractive dividend payment plan, AEP had recently announced another quarterly dividend payment of $0.53 , which translates into a dividend yield of 3.95% . Given the company’s strong strategic growth prospects and due to its management’s strong commitment towards paying healthy dividend payments, I believe AEP will have cash flows available to make and increase dividends in the years ahead. Guidance The company’s management has reaffirmed its guidance for 2015. AEP expects full year 2015 EPS to be in a range of $3.40-to-$3.60 . Also, it has maintained its stance about achieving long-term earnings growth in a range of 4%-to-6%. Thus far, the company has done pretty well in achieving allowed ROEs at its regulated subsidiaries; I believe its correct growth efforts and cost controls will help AEP achieve its anticipated 4%-to-6% growth rate in the years ahead. Risks The company’s future growth prospects will continue to face the risk of potential negative regulatory restrictions in its service territory. In addition, AEP’s inability to pull off well-timed, constructive regulatory rate base approvals by negotiating with FERC might pressurize its future growth prospects. Moreover, the company’s ongoing and planned development plans, if not properly executed, might burden its bottom-line with cost overruns. Furthermore, unfavorable temperature trends, environmental regulations and unforeseen negative economic changes are key risks hovering over its stock price performance. Price Target I reiterate my previously calculated price target of $69 for AEP, which was calculated using a dividend discounting method. In my price target calculations, I used cost of equity of 6% and nominal growth rate of 3%. Based on my price target, the stock offers potential price appreciation of 25%. Conclusion The company has an encouraging fundamental outlook due to its increased efforts on getting a broader regulated asset base. In fact, continuous investments in regulated operations such as the transmission business give it a huge opportunity for future rate base growth, which increases certainty about its future cash flows and earnings base. Moreover, the company’s on-track cost containment plan will better its future earnings growth prospects. As a matter of fact, the healthy future earnings growth will strengthen its cash flows, which will support its dividends. Furthermore, my price target calculations suggest a potential upside of approximately 25% for the stock. Analysts have also anticipated a healthy next five-years growth rate of 4.92% for AEP. Due to the aforementioned factors, I am bullish on AEP. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Thinking In Temporal Extremes Can Be Bad For Your Wealth

Bonds, dividend investing, ETF investing, currencies “}); $$(‘#article_top_info .info_content div’)[0].insert({bottom: $(‘mover’)}); } $(‘article_top_info’).addClassName(test_version); } SeekingAlpha.Initializer.onDOMLoad(function(){ setEvents();}); We dance round in a ring and suppose, but the secret sits in the middle and knows. –Robert Frost One of the biggest problems any asset allocator must overcome is the problem of time in a portfolio. I call this the intertemporal conundrum . This describes how our financial lives are extremely dynamic and multi-temporal. That is, they are not one linear time line. Instead, they tend to be a series of short-terms inside of a long-term. This often makes the textbook application of the “long-term” inapplicable with regards to asset allocation. So, as much as we all know it’s silly to think too short-term it’s not totally irrational. After all, being involved in such dynamic financial markets gives us the urge to act and to try to take control of our outcomes in order to reduce uncertainty. We often act because we know there is an inherent short-termism in our financial lives. As I’ve stressed on many occasions , there’s no such thing as a truly “passive” portfolio. But we should be careful not to confuse this with the idea that being too short-term is intelligent. After all, we know that the financial markets tend to be highly unpredictable in the short-term. We also know that the financial markets tend to become more predictable the longer we hold onto assets. This is because the price changes involve too many random variables to be predictable in the short-term. In addition, we know that taxes and fees create potentially insurmountable hurdles so we should implement portfolios that seek to reduce these frictions as best as possible. Generally, our attempts to “take control” of our outcomes in the short-term end up costing us in the long-run. So, we want to think short-term because this gives us comfort and helps mesh with our inherently short-term financial lives. But we also know that thinking too short-term is bad for our wealth because this just churns up taxes and fees inside of highly unpredictable time frames. Then again, we know that we don’t necessarily have a textbook long-term in our financial lives. And we also know that some degree of activity will be necessary at times during the course of our lives so a static “long-term” view doesn’t mesh with inherently dynamic financial markets and financial lives. So, we have quite a temporal conundrum here. Managing this multi-temporal problem is not always easy. The textbook idea of the “long-term” doesn’t fit our financial lives. But we also know that it’s self defeating to be too short-term. So, the key involves finding that happy medium. This is why I like to think of the markets in a cyclical sense. This gives us the ability to construct portfolios that reduce tax and fee inefficiencies, but also take advantage of the fact that our financial lives are dynamic and so are the financial markets. Thinking in extremes is generally bad for your portfolio. And this is particularly important when applying the problem of time to a portfolio. And so, as is generally the case in life, we find comfort living in the extremes without realizing that the middle is often where the secret sits. Share this article with a colleague