Tag Archives: function

A Market Needing To Resolve Divergences In 2015

As 2014 has come to a close, investors have turned their attention to 2015 and looking for clues as to what the market and economy have in store for the new year. Below are divergences that unfolded in 2014 which raises the question of how they will be resolved this year. The resolution of these divergences will likely have implications on the performance of an investor portfolios this year. Oil Prices Knowing the stock market is not the economy and vice versa , determining factors contributing to the significant decline in oil prices is important. Certainly, increased supply is influencing the decline in crude prices. Equally though, as we have noted in several earlier articles, we believe lack of demand is also a contributing factor. The importance of the reduced demand leads strategists to raise the question of whether the global economy is entering a slowdown. To date, the U.S. seems to have shaken off the potentially negative impact of slowing economies outside its borders. Given the interconnectedness of the economic world today though, can the U.S. continue on its growth path while many other economies in the developed and emerging world struggle with growth? As the below chart indicates, historically, falling oil prices have been associated with slowing global GDP. Aubrey Basdeo, Managing Director at Blackrock, noted the potential negative impact of an extended run of low oil prices in an article late last year titled, Free Fallin’ . The article’s conclusion, Wherever the price ends up, it’s likely it’ll stay there for a while. We don’t see demand increasing, especially with China cooling off. In the short-term that could be good news for our economy – lower gas prices mean people have more money to spend – but it remains to be seen just how our country will be impacted by a sub-$60 oil price. The longer it stays low, though, the more difficult things could get. Highlighted in the Felder reference below was a comment by Howard Marks’ in a recent investor letter , “It’s historically unprecedented for the energy sector to witness this type of market downturn while the rest of the economy is operating normally. Like in 2002, we could see a scenario where the effects of this sector dislocation spread wider in a general ‘contagion.'” High Yield Bonds: Reduced Investor Risk Appetite The performance of high yield bonds has an above average positive correlation to the performance of equities. In short, as the economy grows, companies tend to experience better earnings growth. This improved earnings outlook generally leads to improved equity returns. Broadly, as companies generate better earnings growth, highly leveraged ones tend to experience an improved outlook as well. This in turn reduces the risk of default with highly leveraged companies. Consequently, high yield bond prices are bid up as investors are attracted to the higher yields provided by high yield debt in an environment where default risk seems lessened. A recent article by Jesse Felder of The Felder Report took an in depth look at the long term and short term price movements of high yield (NYSEARCA: HYG ) relative to a riskless 3-7 year Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA: IEI ) and the S&P 500 Index . As the first chart below shows, the high yield relative to treasury bond investment tracks closely with the S&P 500 Index. Felder notes in his article, Clearly, the chart above demonstrates that the strength in junk risk appetites led stocks off the lows back in 2009. Over the past summer, however, junk bonds started to lag stocks for the first time since the bull began (or lead lower, depending on your perspective). Since then the divergence has only gotten wider with each subsequent new high in the stock market [as seen in the below chart]: Large Caps Versus Small Caps And The Dollar The one asset allocation decision investors and advisers needed to get right in 2014 was to overweight U.S. equities, large caps more specifically, versus broad international. As can be seen in the two charts below, U.S. large cap stocks had a decisive performance edge versus developed international (NYSEARCA: EFA ), emerging markets (NYSEARCA: EEM ) and small cap equities (NYSEARCA: IWM ). With economies currently weaker outside the U.S. and interest rates lower in many European countries, foreign investors have allocated investment dollars to the U.S. This flow of funds into the U.S. has contributed to downward pressure on U.S. interest rates as well as continued upward pressure on the U.S. Dollar. The top chart above shows a longer view of the trade weighted US Dollar and its recent strength, although strong shorter term, the strength does not look exhausted when viewing the longer term chart. The implication of a stronger dollar has to do with the potential earnings headwind for large multinational companies. In a slow growing economy, the currency headwind can take a bite out of corporate profit growth. If this occurs, small and mid size companies are less exposed to exchange rates as business for these companies is mostly generated domestically. Lastly, the U.S. equity markets opened higher on the first trading day of the new year, but quickly turned lower near the time the ISM Manufacturing Index was reported. The manufacturing index was reported at 55.5 which was below consensus expectations of 57.5. This was the slowest rate of monthly growth in six months. Econoday noted, “growth in new orders slowed substantially, to 57.3 from November’s exceptionally strong 66.0, while backlog accumulation also slowed, to 52.5 from 55.0. Production slowed to 58.8 vs. 64.4….The abundant run of manufacturing reports point to year-end slowing in a sector which is oscillating going into the New Year.” The above highlights are just a few divergent factors that have developed recently. From a positive perspective, the equity markets have a tendency to climb the proverbial ” wall of worry .” We will cover more of our thoughts on these topics in our upcoming year end Investor Letter.

Energy Funds Worst Performers In 2014 As Oil Price Crash

Energy mutual funds finished the year as the biggest loser after registering a 16.7% year-to-date loss. The other losers were Natural Resources, Equity Precious Metals and Miscellaneous Sector, which slumped 12.5%, 10% and 0.2%, respectively. For the energy sector, the slump was unavoidable given the nosedive that crude prices suffered in the second half of the year. Currently, oil is deeply entrenched into bearish territory and has fallen below the $60-a-barrel level following OPEC’s decision to hold production unchanged, the effects of booming shale supplies in North America and a stagnant European economy. Moreover, a stronger dollar has made the greenback-priced commodity more expensive for investors holding foreign currency. The cut in global crude demand growth by major energy consultative bodies has put the final nail in the coffin. The concerns have dealt severe blow to the energy sector, and as evident from the fact that energy mutual funds category was the biggest loser in 2014. Let’s look at the funds that were the biggest losers last year, and with unfavorable Zacks Mutual Fund Rank they continue to be funds that should be dropped from investors’ portfolios. The 2014 Crude Selloff The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude price lost momentum in June and has since then been showing weakness. This is primarily owing to plentiful North American shale supplies in the face of lackluster demand expectations, sluggish growth in China and the prevailing softness in the European economy. Strengthening of the U.S. dollar also impacted the demand for the greenback-priced crude as it is now expensive for importers to buy oil. Amid the soft oil pricing scenario, the international cartel of oil producers’ – Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) – stand against oil output cut on Thanksgiving Day added to the supply concern. We believe that the decision reflects the strategic move by Saudi Arabia − which holds the top spot in terms of total production among the 12 OPEC members − to get an advantage over U.S. shale producers. This is because shale oil, which has been witnessing large-scale production in the U.S over the last few years, is relatively expensive. Hence, in the environment of tumbling oil price, it will be difficult for U.S. shale producers to garner sufficient earnings to stay afloat in the industry. OPEC also cut its 2015 forecast consumption by 280,000 barrels per day from its previous expectation, walking in the same track as U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) which trimmed its demand outlook for next year by 240,000 barrels per day. Moreover, U.S investment bank Morgan Stanley has given a weak crude pricing projection as it does not expect prices to recover next year. All these acted as dampeners, which dragged down the oil price nearly 50% since mid June. WTI crude is now trading at $57.33 per barrel, a five-year low. In our view, crude prices in the next few months are likely to exhibit a sideways-to-bearish trend, mostly trading in the $55-$65 per barrel range. As North American supply remains strong and demand looks underwhelming, we are likely to experience further pressure in the price of a barrel of oil. 3 Worst Performing Energy Funds The following energy funds were the worst performers in 2014 based on year-to-date loss they suffered. These funds should be dropped from portfolio, as they carry unfavorable Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4 (Sell) or Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5 (Strong Sell) as we expect the funds to underperform its peers in the future. Remember, the goal of the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is to guide investors to identify potential winners and losers. Unlike most of the fund-rating systems, the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is not just focused on past performance, but the likely future success of the fund. These funds also have high expense ratios. Rydex Energy Services C (MUTF: RYVCX ) seeks growth of capital. The fund invests a majority of its assets in equities of small to mid-cap Energy Services Companies that are domestically traded. It also invests in derivatives. The fund may also buy American Depositary Receipts for exposure to non-Us energy companies. RYVCX currently holds a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4 (Sell) and has lost 29.4% year to date. It has lost 39.2% over the last six months. The fund carries an expense ratio of 2.37% as compared to category average of 1.53%. BlackRock Energy & Resources Investor B (MUTF: SSGPX ) invests a lion’s share of its assets in equities of global energy and natural resources companies. It also invests in companies belonging to utilities sector. The fund mostly focuses on small-cap firms. The non-diversified company invests without limit across the globe and usually in at least three countries. SSGPX currently holds a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4 (Sell) and has lost 26.2% year to date. It has lost 37.1% over the last six months. The fund carries an expense ratio of 2.1% as compared to category average of 1.53%. RS Global Natural Resources C (MUTF: RGNCX ) seeks growth of capital over the long term. The fund invests most of its assets in companies considered by the fund’s investment team to be primarily involved in natural resources industries. The fund invests in companies from a minimum of three countries. RGNCX currently holds a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5 (Strong Sell) and has lost 23.5% year to date. It has lost 36.5% over the last six months. The fund carries an expense ratio of 2.21% as compared to category average of 1.47%.

Duke Energy: A Good Buy?

Summary Duke Energy has had an incredible year so far. The company has shown tremendous growth over the course of the year 2014. Net income for Duke Energy during the third quarter of 2014 amounted to $1.27 billion, up by 27% compared to $1 billion in the third quarter of 2013. International Energy and Commercial Power divisions are expected to contribute more toward Duke Energy’s growth, owing to global and domestic expansion and investments into several high-end power projects. Duke has investments of up to $2 billion lined up over the next 7 years which include a major natural gas pipeline in North Carolina. The current period of sliding share prices will represent an ideal entry point for potential investors since Duke Energy has set solid growth prospects in place. Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ) has had an incredible year so far. The company has shown tremendous growth over the course of the year 2014 with revenues as well as earnings rising. The company has also managed to outperform analysts’ consensus estimates consistently in the quarters so far. The company benefited significantly from the energy boom in the US economy. As the US economy continues to grow, demand for energy has surged incredibly by the industrial sector in particular. Investors have remained confident in Duke’s ability to generate growth. The energy company’s share prices clearly indicate the positive investor sentiment generated by Duke during the year 2014. The prices have been rising consistently over the course of the year, extending the course of their upward climb to almost 5 years. The last 5 years have been highly rewarding for Duke as the energy sector has gained considerable momentum during this time period as well. Share prices for the company have grown from $68 in January 2014 to a five-year high level of $86.83 in December . The company’s shares are currently trading near the $84 mark. Overview of Duke’s Last Reported Financial Performance Duke Energy last reported its earnings back in November. The energy company reported its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2014. During the quarter, the company generated revenues of $6.4 billion, up by a slight margin of 3% as compared to $6.2 billion in the year ago quarter. Operating income for Duke during the quarter amounted to $1.62 billion, down slightly from $1.66 billion in the same quarter of the previous year. Operating incomes fell on account of higher selling costs as well as higher depreciation charges. Net income for Duke Energy during the third quarter of 2014 amounted to $1.27 billion, up by an incredible 27% as compared to $1 billion in the third quarter of 2013. Earnings per share for Duke during the quarter thus amounted to $1.27. It is important to note that Duke Energy continued its strong dividend payout tradition during the quarter and rewarded investors with a dividend of $0.80 per share. Dividends rose from $0.78 per share in the year ago quarter. Future Outlook for Duke Energy Duke Energy has been able to generate tremendous growth during the year owing to a positive market for energy companies. With the growing US economy, energy companies have been facing high demand, and they have been facilitated in meeting that demand as a result of booming crude oil and coal output globally as well as domestically. The company’s Regulated Utilities division has been the principal driver behind its growth and has accounted for more than half of the company’s revenues over the years. However, going forward, the company’s International Energy and Commercial Power divisions are expected to contribute more toward Duke Energy’s growth, owing to global and domestic expansion and investments into several high-end power projects. With demand growth in the US expected to slow down in the coming years, Duke Energy, through its International Energy segment, can generate growth by focusing on its overseas operations. Latin America in particular is expected to show considerable demand growth for electricity over the coming years. Electricity demand in Brazil is expected to grow almost 5% as the manufacturing sector of the country expands. Duke can also look towards the European market for further global expansion. Duke also plans to take advantage of the latest trends in electricity generation with wind and solar power projects in the pipeline that stand to generate 500 MW of electricity. Moreover, Duke has investments of up to $2 billion lined up over the next 7 years which include a major natural gas pipeline in North Carolina. The company’s share prices are currently following a declining trend, but that was because investors had sold shares as prices reached the five year high level. However, with revenues as well as earnings expected to rise in the coming years as the company generates positive returns from its power projects, share prices have a definite upside. Earnings are expected to grow 5% on average over the next 5 years. Conclusion Duke Energy has generated incredible growth over the course of the last 5 years, owing to a favorable US market and enhanced operational efficiency. The company is looking towards overseas operations in order to compensate for slowing demand growth in the US economy. Duke has effectively modified its portfolio in order to account for the latest trends in the energy sector with wind and solar power projects lined up for the future as well. The company also remains committed towards further enhancing operational efficiency and cutting down costs to further fuel earnings growth. The current period of sliding share prices will represent an ideal entry point for potential investors. Investors will gain significantly owing to the solid growth prospects that Duke has to offer. Now that you’ve read this, are you Bullish or Bearish on ? Bullish Bearish Sentiment on ( ) Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Why are you ? Submit & View Results Skip to results » Share this article with a colleague