Tag Archives: author

2015 Could Be A Good Year For Europe ETFs

European equities could outperform in 2015. However, potential investors should hedge currency risk with Eurozone hedged-equity ETFs. Region outlook and focus on hedged-equity ETFs. European equities and related exchange traded funds could outperform in 2015, capitalizing on lower energy prices, an improved export outlook and potentially more European Central Bank easing. For instance, the iShares MSCI EMU ETF (NYSEARCA: EZU ) and the SPDR EURO STOXX 50 (NYSEARCA: FEZ ) both focus on Eurozone countries. Alternatively, investors seeking to capture Eurzone market exposure can also consider a hedged-equity ETF that will help diminish the negative effects of a depreciating euro currency. For example, the Deutsche X-Trackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBEU ), iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EMU ETF (NYSEARCA: HEZU ) and WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity Fund (NYSEARCA: HEDJ ) hedge against the euro currency and would outperform a non-hedged Europe equity ETF if the euro currency continues to depreciate. DBEU, though, takes a slightly broader approach to the European markets, including about a 40% combined tilt toward the United Kingdom and Switzerland. HEZU and HEDJ only cover Eurozone member states. Wall Street analysts believe that European equities could be one of the best places to invest in 2015, reports Sara Sjolin for MarketWatch . “Europe was a market ‘darling’ this time last year, then became a pariah,” economists at Morgan Stanley said in a research note. “[Now] we like European equities, (especially cyclicals) and European ABS.” Mislav Matejka, chief European equity strategist at J.P. Morgan, even predicts that Eurozone stocks could outperform U.S. equities next year. Specifically, the investment banks are pointing to three factors that will support the region: the ECB, a cheap euro currency and low oil prices. ECB President Mario Draghi has hinted that the central bank could introduce further stimulus in early 2015 and even enact a bond purchasing program. “The mantra is ‘Don’t fight the ECB’ – the central bank is set to inject €1,000 billion and to add sovereign bonds to its buying program,” analysts at Société Générale said in a research note. While the euro currency has depreciated 10% against the U.S. dollar so far, analysts believe there is more room to fall after the ECB enacts further easing. Consequently, the weak euro will help bolster the Eurozone’s large exporting industry, making goods cheaper for foreign buyers. Morgan Stanley predicts the cheap currency could add at least 2% to earnings per share for European companies next year. Lastly, lower energy prices will have an immediate effect on consumers, allowing Europeans to spread around their cash for discretionary purchases and spur growth. Additionally, the cheap oil will lower input costs for companies’ profit margins and lift earnings. Furthermore, analysts believe that if the ECB begins a quantitative easing plan, the financial sector will be a key beneficiary. Most major Eurozone banks are already in good shape and should capitalize on improved credit supply and loan demand. For targeted Europe financial exposure, investors can take a look at the iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (NASDAQ: EUFN ) . However, the ETF does not hedge against currency risks. Max Chen contributed to this article .

Valuation Challenges When PEs Are Expanding: 2 Examples

One hallmark of this secular bull market is expanding PE/cash flow multiples. Thus valuations based upon recent historical multiples can be deceiving. I give an example from one stock and one broad ETF. Everyone knows we have been in a cyclical bull market since the spring of 2009. I have argued elsewhere we are now in the early stages of a secular bull market that should continue well into the next decade. One argument supporting this view is to point out that the PE compression which characterized the earlier years of the 21st century has ceased. I shall illustrate this with a few charts shortly. Why is this important to investors? Many analysts judge the attractiveness of the market or a particular stock by comparing PE multiples (or cash flow multiples) with traditional and recent (say, the past decade) multiples. A stock selling at 45x earnings when historically it commanded a multiple closer to 18x is likely to be overvalued and less attractive as an investment or source of dividend income. If we are in a period of rising multiples, however, comparing current PEs to those of the past few years may make companies appear overvalued, when in fact they remain attractive investments going into a brighter future. We can use Teleflex (NYSE: TFX ) as an example. The Value Line chart below shows that TFX traditionally has commanded a cash flow multiple of 10.5x. Well above this (e.g. 2007) was an attractive time to sell, below it (e.g. 2003 and certainly 2009) were great entry points. What should we make of the current multiple, which is closer to 20x cash flow? (click to enlarge) source: Value Line The quick conclusion is that TFX is overvalued and buyers should not pull the trigger. But what if we are in a period of rising multiples, for reasons i made clear yesterday ( here )? This is even more likely given that medical technology is an emerging super field and has been a market leader for several years now. Combining fundamental analysis with charts and some technical snooping might shed more light, and useful trading information, on this challenge. The chart below shows that TFX has been in a bull market since 2009 and ascending in a broad channel as shown in white. If you look at the white channel, TFX touched the upper boundary (it was “overvalued”) in April of this year. But instead of selling off and churning like it did for almost two years back in 2010, the shares have worked their way higher. Maybe we should assume the price range is better defined by the red channel now. Oddly enough, that also suggests it is now fully valued. But the point where a prospective buyer might want to reacquire the shares is quite different. If the higher evaluation (red channel) mode is now in force, that price is approaching $100 as the new year unfolds. Using the old valuation channel, a buyer wouldn’t be interested until the price falls well into the $70s. This might be mere curve fitting but for the fact that broad indexes and ETFs such as the S&P500 Trust (NYSEARCA: SPY ) show almost exactly the same phenomenon. Compare the white and red channels in SPY below. (click to enlarge) source: freestockcharts.com Is this new channel reflective of higher valuations? Yes: (click to enlarge) source: etrade . While some expansion might have occurred in the early years of the bull market because earnings (the denominator in PE) are lagging indicators, it certainly is not the case now: corporate earnings growth is strong. And likely to get stronger! Already third quarter GDP growth came in at 5%, and second quarter GDP was revised higher. The full effect of lower oil prices still has to fully work into the economy, and the fiscal prudence of a Republican House (and now Senate) seems destined to continue. While it may be an ad hoc/seat of the pants process, investors would be well advised to revise their tolerable PE/cash flow multiples on stocks higher in the next few years. Get ready to buy Teleflex shares if a correction brings prices back to the high nineties.

Opportunities In Russia?

Russian companies may offer the best values in the world currently. Buying assets for pennies on the dollar. An excellent contrarian play is developing. “After an extremely strong performance by U.S. markets this year, it is our belief that emerging markets will be more in focus next year as investors rotate into underperforming areas. Of these markets, Russia, has the lowest fundamental valuation. With new positive light shining on President Vladimir Putin, after having negotiated a peaceful solution to Syria’s chemical weapons program, and the world watching the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia; we expect the government controls to loosen providing an economic boost on top of a general recovery in equity prices.” That was an excerpt taken from a letter I wrote to clients in November of last year, 2013. My timing was nearly perfect in choosing the precise opposite moment to go long Russian equities. The comments occurred at what would prove to be the high-water mark for the Russian equity markets to date. What seemed like unrelated developments in neighboring Ukraine would prove to be a harbinger for things to come. In December 2013 more than 800,000 protesters occupied Ukraine’s Kiev city hall and Independence Square in Ukraine. And by February 22nd, after months of violence and the resignation of Ukrainian Prime Minister Mykola Azarov, the government collapsed as protesters took control of presidential administrative buildings and President Yanukovych fled the country. Less than a week later “pro-Russian” gunmen responded to the collapse of the regime by seizing key buildings in the Crimean capital, Simferopol. On March 16th, Crimea seceded from Ukraine and two days later Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a bill absorbing Crimea into Russia. Since Crimea’s annexation, violent clashes between the new Ukrainian government and pro-Russian militants have continued along the Russian-Ukrainian border. Tensions between the European Union, along with the U.S., and Russia continued to mount as violence escalated. On July 30, 2014 the EU and U.S., along with other NATO nations, announced sanctions against Russia. Little progress toward a peaceful outcome has been made in the months since. The sanctions imposed in July were directed at Russia’s economy. Specifically against the financial sector and the majority government-owned Russian banks. Additional trade restrictions were aimed at the energy and defense industries along with individuals and entities whose overseas assets were frozen. Sanctions have continued to strengthen and have been adopted by additional countries around the world putting a severe strain on the Russian economy. Even before the sanctions, Russia’s perceived involvement in the fighting had already taken a toll on Russian equities as their markets fell by 25% by the spring of 2014, as seen here by the Market Vectors Russia ETF (NYSEARCA: RSX ): By autumn, the Russian real economy was showing the strains from the bite of sanctions. As if things could not have been getting any worse for Russian markets the price of oil had also begun a precipitous fall in June of this year and has not yet stopped even with the price of crude having been cut in half. While prices seem to have stabilized in the past couple of weeks it is still unclear as to whether or not that massive fall is now over or if we might still see more downside pressure. Just over half of Russia’s stock market capitalization is made up of oil and gas producers. As is always the case, oil producers have fallen in tandem with Brent Crude prices helping to push the overall Russian markets down an impressive 47% this year, making it the worst performer anywhere in 2014. As a result of oil’s depreciated price and the sanctions against their financial industry, the Russian Ruble has collapsed 70% against the U.S dollar putting even further pressure on the economy as the price of necessary imports become unaffordable. All of the above factors have pushed Russia into what is expected to be a deep recession next year. Data released by the Economy Ministry of Russia on December 29th showed the country’s GDP shrinking 0.5% in November. This was the first contraction since September 2009 during the global financial crisis and follows forecasts for GDP to fall as much as 4.7% in 2015 if oil prices remain at current levels. So the question now is whether or not all of this bad news has been priced into an already fundamentally ‘cheap’ market? Over the past 10 years Russian shares have traded at a discount to other emerging markets with an average Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 7.1. This discount reflects the country’s political risks as well as its dependence on the cyclical energy industry. While a discount is deserved, current valuations are reaching levels of absurdity. The U.S. based ETF RSX, whose stated goal is to “replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Market Vectors Russia Index”, is the simplest way for U.S. investors to gain exposure to the overall Russian market. Currently the companies owned in the ETF portfolio have an average P/E of 6.55 and a Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 1.08. While certainly a discount to the country’s long term average it doesn’t exactly scream “bargain” at those valuations. A closer look at individual companies however yields a much different picture. Gazprom ( OTCQX:GZPFY ), the country’s largest company by market cap, currently trades at a P/E of 1.66 with a (P/B) ratio at 0.18. Sberbank ( OTCPK:SBRCY ), the country’s largest bank, trades at a P/E of 1.91 with a P/B at 0.35. OAO Tatneft ( OTCPK:OAOFY ), an oil and gas exploration company, trades at a P/E of 3.21 and P/B at 0.53 All of these companies are directly impacted by current and potential future sanctions, low oil prices, and the overall economic decline. They deserve to be trading at discounts to their foreign peers and historical averages. However, current valuations for these companies are absurdly low considering that they do have real value in their owned assets and their potential future earnings. When you can purchase $1.00 worth of assets for $0.18, as is the case with Gazprom based on their P/B ratio, or $0.35 and $0.53 on the dollar with Sberbenk and Tatneft respectively; I believe it to be a worthwhile endeavor to take a closer look at the potential opportunity. It is unlikely that all-out war will break out between NATO and Russia, as it would benefit no one. I also find it more likely that sanctions will begin to ease rather than tighten as the European Union is suffering economically from the imposed sanctions as well. It looks more and more likely that the EU will also fall into recession next year and I would expect them to start pushing back against any further sanctions suggested by the U.S. in an attempt to restore their own economies. It’s also important to remember that Europe is highly dependent on Russian energy exports for their own well-being and while finding replacement sources is not impossible it is substantially more expensive. While market participants’ sentiments may not have reached the point of maximum pessimism, and additional problems can certainly arise; at some point this market will bottom. Russia will continue to not only exist in the future but grow economically. An excellent contrarian play is developing. I wouldn’t attempt to call a bottom at current levels but when the situation does begin to improve, either through conciliatory actions by the Russian government leading to easing of sanctions or a price recovery in oil, or both, the market upside could be substantial for the brave few who take advantage at the right time.