Tag Archives: setpageviewname

The Joy Of Portfolio Boredom

The word boring is worth exploring further as it is a very important building block of long-term investment success. Getting rich slowly or maybe the more modest goal of getting financially comfortable slowly means some pretty plain vanilla portfolio construction. The more exciting a portfolio is on the way up, the more “exciting’ it will be on the way down. Last week I stumbled across an article that favorably critiqued an alternative-strategy ETF for being boring which is its objective. “Boring” is not the stated objective in the prospectus but terms like market neutral, absolute return, low correlation to equities and some others really are about boredom. You can judge for yourself whether a given fund that is supposed to be boring is indeed boring, as not every fund will deliver on its stated objective. The word boring is worth exploring further as it is a very important building block of long-term investment success. Ten years ago I wrote a post called Getting Rich Slowly and while I have no idea whether the phrase was a Random Roger original, I think it captures the path that most people want to take in terms of realistic participation in capital markets. Getting rich slowly, or maybe the more modest goal of getting financially comfortable slowly, means some pretty plain vanilla portfolio construction. How you get to plain vanilla probably depends on the level of engagement you want to have in markets but from the top down it should start with blending together things like equities, fixed income and a small slice to alternatives (what for years I’ve been referring to as diversifiers) with relatively simple products and/or individual issues in such a way where all three sleeves avoid trading in lockstep, but over a long period of time gives a chance for having enough money when you need it, which presumably is at retirement. As we have discussed many times before, one of the biggest impediments to long-term financial success is succumbing to emotion at the worst possible times, which can mean panic selling your portfolio at a low or repeatedly panic buying hot stocks at their highs after a pundit just extrapolated past returns on stock market television. I had the opportunity to moderate a panel that included Dr. Richard Thaler about behavioral economics/finance, and one thing he talked about as a very common bias is loss aversion, which basically means that pound for pound people feel losses far more than they feel gains. Take that out a little further and it explains why people often react to large declines like they’ve never happened before; the tendency to think this one is different. The more exciting a portfolio is on the way up, the more “exciting’ it will be on the way down. Investors of course don’t mind excitement when it is resulting in gains, but the longer it goes on, the more complacent they become in terms of forgetting the last decline or using hindsight bias to explain away the last decline. Investors don’t want boring until the market peaks out, which of course is plenty guessable but not knowable. If there is no way to know when the market will peak and losses trigger twice the emotion that gains do, then right there is the argument for boring all of the time. Again, the context for boring is not no equities but if you can buy into the idea that an adequate savings rate, proper asset allocation and not panicking are the most important determinants to long-term portfolio success then the focus shifts more in line with the true long-term objective. You are very unlikely to remember what your portfolio did in the 3rd quarter of 2013 or what the market did that quarter, without looking, because it doesn’t matter in the context of your long-term financial plan. An exception would be if that was the quarter you retired. The only other way some random calendar quarter from your past is likely to matter is if you made some sort of catastrophic mistake like selling out in the first quarter of 2009. The conclusion for me is a diversified portfolio of equities that at the very least offers decent upside participation, fixed income exposure that offers some ballast to normal equity volatility and a little exposure to diversifiers, as I said above, that hopefully allows for managing volatility and correlation such that the potential for panic is at least partially mitigated. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: To the extent that this content includes references to securities, those references do not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold such security. AdvisorShares is a sponsor of actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and holds positions in all of its ETFs. This document should not be considered investment advice and the information contain within should not be relied upon in assessing whether or not to invest in any products mentioned. Investment in securities carries a high degree of risk which may result in investors losing all of their invested capital. Please keep in mind that a company’s past financial performance, including the performance of its share price, does not guarantee future results. To learn more about the risks with actively managed ETFs visit our website AdvisorShares.com .

Funds For A Crazy Volatile Market

Even though I believe the market is ready for at least a 5-10% correction, I always keep a good part of our portfolios and our clients’ portfolios invested. Why? For these reasons… resulting in these buys! Why? Because the market goes up, not down, about two-thirds of the time. Because no one has a crystal ball. Because we believe in building a Lifetime Portfolio. And because great companies have a way of protecting “somewhat” on the downside by the power of their ability to keep their earnings strong and increase their market share. This makes them less ulcer-producing, as do the kinds of mutual funds that own such gems. One such ulcer-averse fund is Brown Advisory Flexible Equity (MUTF: BIAFX ). This is a very low-turnover fund with a stable of great growth companies, a near 7% cash cushion and less than 1% expenses. BIAFX has not kept pace with the S&P since the 2007 crash, preferring to stick with rock-solid quality rather than chase the more-profitable biotech, social networking, etc. companies that have powered the current market. But for a downturn and recovery? I’ll take these 25 holdings over just about any other 25 I can think of. Next are two small-cap funds. Our discipline demands that we keep a percentage of our funds in small cap value, but that is the segment that has really had the best run over the past few years. What to do? In our case, we have decided to stick with small cap value but to do so in a hedged manner. We have selected two mutual funds that have large cash cushions because they are disciplined enough to buy only when they can find real value and not just because they are “missing out” on something. The most extreme example of this is a fund Morningstar gives only a single star, its lowest rating, to: Intrepid Small Cap (MUTF: ICMAX ). That’s because Intrepid’s current cash position is 74%. Yes, you heard right – 74%. Like me, they are having real trouble finding stocks to buy that actually fit inside the envelope of small cap “value.” Rather than do as so many other fund managers have done – drifted into a different more volatile style box – when ICMAX sells a winner and can’t find a replacement, they choose to stay in cash. This has not harmed their performance. They have soundly thrashed both the S&P 500 and the Small Cap Value benchmarks over the past 10 years. What it has harmed is their assets under management as short-sighted buyers declare, “I’m not paying you to hold cash.” That is so untrue! Sometimes cash is king. Sometimes you want to hold a cushion against an untoward event. And if your niche is small cap value and there is no value to be found, then cash for some hopefully short period of time is a very smart place to be. Especially if, via smart stock selection, you make more money than others using just 26% of your portfolio… Morningstar is kinder to Teton Westwood Mighty Mites AAA (MUTF: WEMMX ), awarding it 4 stars for similarly brilliant performance over time. WEMMX holds only 22% in cash, but they follow an equally strict discipline. As they sell more of their holdings, I expect to see their cash holdings increase as well, although they declare themselves to be a “small cap blend” (value as well as growth) fund. I like the holdings of WEMMX even more than ICMAX and I like the discipline they both bring to investing. ————— As Registered Investment Advisors, we believe it is essential to advise that we do not know your personal financial situation, so the information contained in this communiqué represents the opinions of the staff of Stanford Wealth Management, and should not be construed as “personalized” investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results, rather an obvious statement but clearly too often unheeded judging by the number of investors who buy the current #1 mutual fund one year only to watch it plummet the following year. We encourage you to do your own due diligence on issues we discuss to see if they might be of value in your own investing. We take our responsibility to offer intelligent commentary seriously, but it should not be assumed that investing in any securities we are investing in will always be profitable. We do our best to get it right, and we “eat our own cooking,” but we could be wrong, hence our full disclosure as to whether we own or are buying the investments we write about. Disclosure: I am/we are long WEMMX, ICMAX, BIAFX. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Unitil Corp.: Small And Dull Isn’t Necessarily A Bad Thing

Summary Electricity and natural gas distributor Unitil Corp. has seen its share price fall by 13% YTD even as its earnings were boosted by frigid winter conditions in its service area. The company has an impressive record, with its share price outperforming between FY 2010 and FY 2014 and strong net income and EPS CAGRs over the same period. A lack of market penetration in its service area and investments in expanded natural gas capacity should enable the company to continue its earnings growth trend in coming years. Its shares are not undervalued at present, although bearish sentiment from a rising interest rate could create an attractive long investment opportunity. Existing investors are encouraged to maintain their positions while potential investors are encouraged to initiate long positions if the share price falls below $30.40 in response to interest rate news. Electricity and natural gas distributor Unitil Corp. (NYSE: UTL ) has seen its share price and trailing diluted EPS move in opposite directions over the last several months, with the former falling by 13% since late February even as the company’s earnings were boosted by a harsh Northeast winter (see figure). The company has been an above-average performer on the S&P Utility Index since the beginning of FY 2010 and hasn’t reduced its dividend since its incorporation in 1984. This track record has not been enough to shield Unitil from the bearish sentiment that has afflicted the utility sector in anticipation of rising interest rates later this year, however. This article considers Unitil as a potential long investment in light of its falling share price and strong earnings YTD. UTL data by YCharts Unitil Corp. at a glance Unitil is a New Hampshire-based utility public holding company that provides electricity to 102,400 customers and natural gas to 75,900 customers in the states of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Maine. The company serves its customers via its five wholly-owned subsidiaries. Unitil Energy Systems is an electric distribution utility serving 74,000 customers in central New Hampshire, including Concord. Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light distributes electricity to 15,700 natural gas customers and 28,600 electricity customers in northern Massachusetts. Northern Utilities is a natural gas distribution utility with 62,200 customers in coastal New Hampshire and Maine, while Granite State Gas Transmission owns and operates an 86-mile underground natural gas pipeline that runs throughout Unitil’s subsidiary natural gas service areas in New Hampshire and Maine. While these subsidiary utilities are all regulated, Unitil also owns Usource LLC, which is an unregulated energy brokering and management firm that serves as agent for 1,200 customers. Unitil has been one of the better performers in the utility sector, with its shares outperforming both the S&P 500 and the S&P Utility Index between the beginning of FY 2010 and end of FY 2014 even as it has been largely ignored by analysts (only one analyst participated in its most recent earnings call ). This performance can be attributed to several factors, including access to inexpensive debt that has allowed it to finance a 54% increase in its net PP&E value, a favorable regulatory structure that has allowed it to report consecutive increases to ROE since FY 2012, and low customer penetration within its existing natural gas distribution system. The company has also benefited from its exposure to natural gas distribution, which has grown steadily since the end of 2011 (see figure) as increased shale gas extraction caused prices to plummet. This has been a boon to natural gas distributors in the form of rising sales volumes and revenues. Unitil has experienced CAGRs of 17% and 12% for its net income and diluted EPS, respectively, since FY 2012. Meanwhile, natural gas distribution now generates 55% of the company’s sales margin versus 45% for electricity (as of FY 2014). US Natural Gas Consumption data by YCharts Q1 earnings report Unitil reported very strong Q1 earnings at the end of April in the wake of an especially cold and snowy winter in the Northeast U.S. Consolidated revenue came in at $172.2 million, up 10.3% from $156.1 million YoY and beating the consensus estimate by 7.8% (see table). Natural gas revenue increased by 8.3% over the previous year’s Q1 to $100.3 million while electricity revenue increased by 13.6% to $70.3 million. The only subsidiary to report flat revenue was Usource, where revenue remained unchanged at $1.6 million. The revenue gains were driven by strong natural gas sales, which increased by 6.8% YoY; electric sales gained only slightly to 0.3%. The former’s strong performance was the result of a combination of the cold weather, with Q1 containing 4% more heating days versus the previous year and 14% more versus the long-term average, and FY 2014’s 3% increase in total customers. Unitil Corp. Financials (non-adjusted) Q1 2015 Q4 2014 Q3 2014 Q2 2014 Q1 2014 Revenue ($MM) 172.2 119.8 76.6 73.3 156.1 Gross income ($MM) 61.6 50.7 39.3 36.6 57.3 Net income ($MM) 13.6 9.4 1.6 1.1 12.6 Diluted EPS ($) 0.98 0.68 0.11 0.08 0.91 EBITDA ($MM) 39.8 31.3 18.5 17.4 35.8 Source: Morningsta r (2015). Gross income rose by 7.5% YoY due to a 6.3% increase to the consolidated natural gas sales margin and a 10.4% increase to the consolidated electricity sales margin. The distribution of the sales margin between natural gas and electricity remained almost unchanged from the previous Q1 at 63% and 37%, respectively (residential and commercial natural gas consumption peaks in the winter when heaters are running whereas electricity consumption is higher in the summer when air conditioners are in use, explaining the difference between the Q1 distribution and the FY 2014 distribution). These increases caused net income to improve by 8% YoY to $13.6 million from $12.6 million, resulting in a diluted EPS of $0.98 versus $0.91 YoY that beat the analyst consensus by $0.04. EBITDA rose to $39.8 million from $35.8 million the previous year. The EPS improvement and beat were both largely attributable to the winter weather, with management stating in the Q1 earnings call that the higher number of heating degree days boosted EPS by $0.02 compared to the previous year and $0.08 compared to the long-term average in the service area. The weather was not the only positive factor, however, as natural gas therm sales increased by 5% YoY on a weather-normalized basis due to a combination of more customers and the rapid fall in the price of natural gas that occurred in the second half of 2014. The impressive earnings performance brought Unitil’s trailing ROE up to 9.2% overall, compared to 8% and 8.2% in FY 2012 and FY 2013, respectively. Unitil ended the quarter with $11.2 million in cash, down from $14.3 million the previous year (see table) due to infrastructure investments over the previous four quarters. The company’s current ratio improved YoY from 1.11 to 1.28 despite this cash decrease, however, while its total assets grew by 12% thanks to an 11% increase to net PP&E compared to Q1 2014. While Unitil’s balance sheet isn’t as strong as some other utilities, in combination with the company’s earnings growth record it is sufficient to maintain a BBB+ credit rating from S&P. Furthermore, while cash on hand is not substantial, it is augmented by $88 million remaining in credit facility liquidity. Management was comfortable enough with the state of the company’s finances at the end of FY 2015 to increase the quarterly dividend by 1.4%, resulting in a forward yield of 4.2% based on an annual dividend of $1.40. While not as high as some of the bigger utility names – the widely-followed utility Southern Company (NYSE: SO ) has a forward yield of 5.2% at present – it is higher than the sector average. The iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (NYSEARCA: IDU ) has a 3.57% yield before expenses, for example. Unitil Corp. Balance Sheet (restated) Q1 2015 Q4 2014 Q3 2014 Q2 2014 Q1 2014 Total cash ($MM) 11.2 8.4 10.1 12.0 14.3 Total assets ($MM) 1,040.8 1,000.2 916.5 900.6 928.0 Current liabilities ($MM) 140.4 129.4 76.0 102.6 131.7 Total liabilities ($MM) 757.5 726.9 648.6 629.8 654.0 Source: Morningstar (2015). Outlook Unitil offers potential investors with a number of advantages over other utilities in addition to its high dividend yield. First, the company only has 60% penetration within its existing natural gas distribution system, leaving it with 50,000 potential future customers without the need for investment into expanded service areas. This gap allowed it to achieve a customer growth rate in FY 2014 that was 3x the region average. Furthermore, roughly 70% of the company’s existing natural gas distribution system is made of new, high-durability materials, minimizing the amount of capex that needs to be directed toward the replacement of existing capacity. Unitil therefore has the ability to generate continued earnings growth in coming years via existing capacity, supporting a continuation of its net income CAGR of 17%. Unitil is in the process of expanding its service areas to meet expected natural gas demand in the Northeast U.S. despite its ability to meet new customer growth with its current capacity. Northern Utilities is in the process of expanding its natural gas service areas to increase the company’s potential customer growth in coming quarters. Electricity isn’t being ignored either, with a sufficient number of new substations being constructed in New Hampshire to meet expected load growth in the state. There are a number of reasons to expect natural gas and electricity demand to increase in Unitil’s service area. First, the regional economy has fared quite well of late, with the unemployment rates in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Maine all falling well below the U.S. average (see figure). This trend, combined with the continued presence of inexpensive natural gas prices, will eliminate constraints on natural gas consumption. Finally, all three states benefit from their reliance on relatively clean feedstocks for electricity generation compared to other states. Coal as a source of electricity has come under a great deal of pressure from state and federal regulators in recent months. That fuel is responsible for only a small fraction of the electricity produced in Unitil’s service area, however, with nuclear power, natural gas, and renewables generating the vast majority of electricity there. Coal’s regulatory difficulties have boosted the fortunes of natural gas and will benefit those companies such as Unitil that generate income by distributing the latter. New Hampshire Unemployment Rate data by YCharts Valuation Analyst estimates for Unitil’s diluted EPS in FY 2015 and FY 2016 have remained quite stable over the last 90 days, reflecting the lack of volatility in the company’s outlook. The consensus estimate for FY 2015 has remained unchanged at $1.90 while that for FY 2016 has fallen only slightly from $2.00 to $1.98. While the presence of only two analyst estimates would normally call these numbers into question, the performance stability of regulated entities suggests that they will be close to the company’s actual results. If so, they will represent the company’s best earnings since at least FY 2010, continuing a growth trend that has been in place since that year. Unitil’s share price at the time of writing of $33.37 yields a trailing P/E ratio of 17.9x and forward ratios for FY 2015 and FY 2016 of 17.5x and 16.9x, respectively (see figure). All three of these numbers are solidly in the middle of their respective ranges since the beginning of 2012, suggesting that the firm’s shares are fairly valued at present. UTL PE Ratio (NYSE: TTM ) data by YCharts Conclusion Unitil Corp. has been something of an unsung hero among public regulated utilities over the last five years, outperforming both its sector and the broader market since the beginning of FY 2010 even as it has gone largely unnoticed by analysts. Both of these developments can be attributed in large part to the company’s focus on a small service area in a relatively rural part of the country. This lack of size and volatility shouldn’t deter investors, however, as the company’s recent track record has demonstrated. While I believe that Unitil is in a position to continue its record of steady earnings and dividend growth by increasing its market penetration within its existing service area and expanding its natural gas service area, the lack of a clear value argument at present and the prospect of bearish sentiment continuing to negatively impact utilities’ share prices as the first interest rate increase by the Federal Reserve in almost a decade grows closer prevent me from initiating a long investment at this time. Existing investors should hold their positions, however, and I will look to join them in the event that the company’s FY 2015 P/E ratio falls below 16x (or $30.40 based on the current consensus estimate). Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a long position in UTL over the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.