Tag Archives: pro

Update: Continued Regulated Expansion Will Bode Well For PPL Corp.

Company offers an impressive yield of 4.1% and has strong growth prospects. PPL aggressively working to increase regulated operations and sell unregulated assets. Company stays on track with initiatives to strengthen regulated operations. I continue to stay bullish on PPL Corp. (NYSE: PPL ); the company offers an impressive yield of 4.1%. Along with the high yield, the company has strong growth prospects. PPL Corp. has been incurring capital spending to strengthen its regulated operations, which will augur well for its future growth. Also, the company has been aggressively working to increase its regulated operations and sell its unregulated assets. The company stays on track with its initiatives to strengthen its regulated operations, which will add value for shareholders and bode well for its stock price. Moreover, as the company continues to expand its regulated operations, its earnings and cash flow stability will improve. The company reported a strong financial performance for 4Q’14. PPL registered an operating EPS of $0.58 for 4Q’14, better than the consensus of $0.53. Total revenues for 4Q’14 were $4.02 billion, up from $2.82 billion in 4Q’13. The company also provided the 2015 EPS guidance for its regulated operations of $2.05-$2.25. As the company continues to expand its regulated operations, the company increased its long-term growth target. The company provided a new multi-year EPS growth target of 4%-6% (annual growth) from 2015 through 2017, higher than its previous guidance of at least 4%. Also, the company has been taking aggressive initiatives to sell its unregulated assets and expand its regulated operational base, as I stated in my previous article. The company sold its hydro-assets for $900 million in 2014. And it is scheduled to completely spin-off its Supply segment (unregulated assets) by 2Q’15. As the company has been selling its unregulated assets, this will allow the company to direct its capital to strengthen its regulated operations. Currently, the company generates almost 85% of its earnings from regulated operations, which is expected to increase to 100%, as the company is aggressively selling its unregulated operations. The company’s impressive capital spending outlook continues to be an important growth catalyst. The company has planned to spend $18 billion from 2015 through 2019, which will drive its growth. Earnings growth in 2015 will be mainly driven by corporate restructuring efforts, and growth beyond 2015 will be backed by regulated utility capital spending. As the company has been expanding its regulated operations, it will offer cash flow stability and augur well for its stock price. PPL Corp. has been correctly expanding its regulated operations. The company is expected to complete the sale of its supply segment by 2Q’15. Increasing exposure to regulated operations will reduce the company’s business risk and provide cash flow stability. Also, the company offers an impressive yield of 4.1%. The company has also been increasing its regulated operations, which will positively affect its stock price. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

11 Stocks Plus Cash Saw $24,000 Grow To Over $1 Million

Summary Start in 1985 with a $2,000 investment in cash. Make one $2,000 investment at the end of the year from 1986 through 1996. Investments are assumed to be made in an IRA to shelter from taxes. The first $2,000 was invested in cash to pay for commissions and other fees. The average investor can save a tidy sum for retirement. It takes some luck, perseverance, and a buy and hold approach. The portfolio constructed would generate $22,400 in dividends for 2015. The portfolio was constructed by entering stock symbols into a spreadsheet in random order. The model assumed a $2,000 a year investment from 1985 through 1996 or 12 years. The first – year investment of $2,000 was invested in cash to account for commissions and other fees. The results are not actual results, but hypothetical results. Dividends that would have been earned on investments have been ignored or assumed to have been invested in stocks that blew up and went to zero ($0.00). The results generated most likely are influenced by a survivor basis. Nevertheless, the exercise proved useful. Data was obtained from company websites and or Yahoo Finance. The performance results are handicapped by not accounting for dividends paid since purchase nor assuming they are reinvested. The portfolio results presented are conservative to consider a worst case rather than an unrealistic best case. This is part one. The second part will cover the years 1998 through 2014. The model portfolio is shown below. (click to enlarge) Chart of the stock performance since inclusion into the model portfolio is shown below. Kellogg (NYSE: K ) K data by YCharts Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE: ADM ) ADM data by YCharts Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX ) SBUX data by YCharts The Home Depot (NYSE: HD ) HD data by YCharts Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM ) XOM data by YCharts Stryker (NYSE: SYK ) SYK data by YCharts Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT ) CAT data by YCharts Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCHW ) SCHW data by YCharts JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM ) JPM data by YCharts Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT ) WMT data by YCharts Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ) MSFT data by YCharts Bottom line: With a little luck and experience, it is possible for a modest investment to grow into a nice nest egg. What do you think? Disclosure: The author is long ADM, SYK, SCHW, JPM, MSFT. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Are you Bullish or Bearish on ? Bullish Bearish Neutral Results for ( ) Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Submit & View Results Skip to results » Share this article with a colleague

Lumber Is The Canary In The Homebuilders’ Coal Mine

Summary Lumber prices have historically tracked quite well with homebuilder stocks. Homebuilders have also recently surged past the S&P in recent months. With the deceleration in price gains still going on and Fed support quickly evaporating, there is nothing left to prop up this industry. While I have been generally skeptical of the supposed recovery in homebuilder stocks, I have limited my analysis to trends in home prices and the ability of the American consumer to handle a mortgage at current prices. For me, this analysis is sufficient to show that homebuilder stocks are in a pretty large bubble. In the following article, though, I plan to show the value of homebuilder stocks relative to lumber prices, which themselves are a good economic indicator, but also tend to follow the valuation of homebuilder stock. The Tight Relationship of Lumber and Homebuilders (click to enlarge) In the preceding chart, I have plotted the SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (NYSEARCA: XHB ) and spot lumber prices. A clear correlation emerges from before 2009 to around 2013. What we also see is that around 2013, while lumber prices crashed, homebuilder stocks continued onward, and more recently have even seen some gains. Generally lumber prices are thought to track the economy quite well. While many economic analysts have been bullish on the future of the US economy, commodity and bond markets have been showing for more than a year now signs of languish. A plot of corporate bond prices would show much the same thing as lumber prices in this graph, as they also have stalled starting around the beginning of 2014. More interestingly, other commodities have started to follow along in this weakening trend, with oil recently showing a spectacular fall and copper following along. Commodity markets are showing signs of warning about the future of the economy. Lumber especially has shown a historical tight relationship with the value of homebuilder stocks, and given what has happened over the past two years, we ought to be worried about the future prospects for share prices. The next plot that I have shown is the past 6 months of the relationship between lumber and XHB. (click to enlarge) What we see from this chart of the relative valuation of XHB to lumber prices is that they have traded in a relatively tight range. Starting in 2015, however, we notice a sharp spike upwards that was quickly corrected. Over the past few days this relative valuation has shot up again. Given the last swift correction in this ratio, we can probably expect homebuilders to go down in the near-term. The homebuilder rally seems to be losing steam, as the market reacted violently to this push above historical highs. Future Prospects for Timber (click to enlarge) In order to predict future movements in the price of wood, shown above is a graph of the iShares S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index Fund (NASDAQ: WOOD ). Chaikin Money Flow analysis shows strong price growth ending around the middle of September, interrupted by a strong selloff in October, corresponding quite nicely with the overall stock market. Interesting is that since then there was a brief rise in money flow, but even while this has slowed noticeably, the price appreciation has still continued. This seems like price gain without much support, and so even timber prices themselves may be unsustainable in the medium term. What is more worrying for timber prices is the state of the overall economy. Consistently low oil will likely result in slowed economic activity as oil exploration companies drastically reduce capex spending. With decreased capital spending, we can assume downward pressure on GDP growth, which is an ominous sign for timber, as well as for housing. Technical Analysis of XHB (click to enlarge) Technical analysis of XHB itself shows signs of weakness. At the end of November XHB reached a value of about 33.50, at which point momentum was lost and the stock began to fall. While XHB has been higher since then, it also has not been able to make any real progress. Volatility in XHB has drastically increased since that time, and perhaps a greater source of worry is the Chaikin Money Flow, which turned definitely negative throughout December and has not been solidly positive since then. The market seems to find the current valuation as high enough. Summary and Action to Take XHB has seen to lost momentum, as it has not been able to have a solid increase in value since the end of November. In addition, the trend of homebuilders with XHB is approaching historic highs, and this has been met with swift correction in XHB. The long term trend shows definite signs of worry, as lumber has not agreed with the high current valuation of XHB. Now would be a great time to sell any shares of XHB, as the stock is not likely to go any higher from here on. For a more speculative investment, shorting XHB would likely be a good idea. A long time horizon is probably needed for that trade to play out, though, as XHB has been able to keep this high relative valuation for more than a year now, and only time will tell how long it will be able to keep this up. In addition, if you want to play on the underlying weakness of the US economy, shorting the WOOD ETF may be the way to go. If GDP is unable to sustain itself, then timber prices will go down along with it. This is a very speculative move, however, since timber itself does not show signs of being overbought like the homebuilders. Still, timber is going to hurt if the economy slows. I still take shorting homebuilders as the safer option since not only will they fall if the economy stumbles, but they are also presently overvalued and due for a correction even if GDP does not change much. Disclosure: The author is short XHB. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.