Tag Archives: handle

Sri Lanka – Do The Elections Represent A Green Or Red Light To Investors?

Summary 2-term President Rajapksa loses despite calling election 2 years early. President Sirisena calls for National Government in ‘Rainbow Coalition’. China’s Economic Influsence likely to be reduced, but any shortfall likely to be made up from elsewhere. India likely to play a more prominent role in economic activity. The election is a milestone in Sri Lanka’s maturing democracy and may well represent a milestone in its economic progression. Background On Thursday January 8th 2015, Sri Lanka went to the polls in a Presidential election. This election had been called 2 years early by President Rajapaksa following evidence of declining support for a President that had once been hailed as a national hero . Indeed, his party’s previous dominance had allowed him to change the constitution and permit his seeking a third term. However, despite this wavering support, few expected him to actually lose the election. In the event, Maithripala Sirisena, a former health minister in Mr. Rajapaksa’s cabinet, won the election and was immediately installed as President. Whilst polls had shown the 2 candidates to be level pegging, this result remained shocking. It is thus necessary to consider whether this is evidence of a maturity in Sri Lankan politics or a dangerous change of course following a period of solid economic advance. The Election Despite rumors that elements of the police and army were intimidating anti-Government supporters prior to the election, the poll went ahead in a relatively peaceful fashion. Around lunchtime on the 9th, President Rajapaksa conceded defeat and left the Presidential Residence. That evening, President Sirisena was inaugurated as President and congratulations poured in on a smooth transition from the country’s neighbours and indeed from US Secretary of State Kerry . However, on January 11th, news emerged that the transition may not have been as smooth after all. An aide to President Sirisena announced that President Rajapaksa had approached the police and military seeking support to remain in office. An attempted coup was claimed . However, even if this is correct, the police and military refused to support Mr. Rajapaksa and a peaceful transition has been effected. It seems highly unlikely that Mr. Rajapaksa will make any further attempt to unseat his successor following his rejection by the security forces. Moreover, it is likely that this initiative will be used by President Sirisena and his supporters led by the United National Party (‘UNP’), as a way of pressuring Mr. Rajapaksa’s Sri Lankan Freedom Party (‘SLFP’) ahead of April’s parliamentary elections. From this perspective, it seems likely that the Rajapaksa family’s dominance of Sri Lankan politics (and indeed business life) is at an end. Winners and Losers The principle losers from this election are the Rajapaksa family and China. It was no secret that members of the Rajapaksa family had benefited from their family connection to the President. Whether by holding official office or by their involvement in business deals, the ‘first family’ had clearly benefited. One of the first questions private equity or strategic investors made was which part of the family would be involved and what their expectations would be. Their involvement in the country’s business life cannot be removed overnight. A comparison may be made with some of the business associates of President Suharto of Indonesia whose influence certainly waned following his removal from office, but didn’t disappear. However, it is equally clear that Mr. Rajapaksa’s loss was at least partially owing to discontent with the nepotism that had marked his rule. Many of the transactions in which they had been involved were with Chinese investors . Indeed, a simple overview of Sri Lanka’s international relations during President Rajapaksa’s rule involves China supplying the armaments and finance required to extinguish the LTTE and in return being given a prominent role in the country’s economic expansion. Whilst this certainly involved providing access to money and equipment that has propelled the rebuilding of Sri Lanka’s infrastructure at a rapid rate, critics pointed to the Chinese investment as being a quid pro quo for securing a naval base in the Indian Ocean. Such Chinese involvement naturally put pressure on Sri Lanka’s relationship with neighbouring India. President Sirisena has already talked about China being a good friend to Sri Lanka but warned about not being behoven to any one nation. Additionally, his election manifesto included the cancellation of the Colombo Port City project, a US$1.3 billion project to reclaim land and build everything from high rise offices and apartments to a Formula 1 Grand Prix track. If he carries out these promises, it is clear to annoy China on both economic and strategic grounds. Indeed some have hailed the defeat of President Rajapaksa as destroying China’s overall Indian Ocean Foreign Policy and placing a dent in its ambitions to build a global network of ports. This is likely to be exaggerating things a little, at least at this stage. It is easy to point to India as being the strategic winner from this election. It understandably held concerns about China’s influence both economically and militarily in Sri Lanka. Additionally, the economic policies of the ruling BJP are more in line with the UNP in Sri Lanka than they were with the more left wing Rajapaksa administration. Additionally, the religious minorities of Sri Lanka were solidly behind President Sirisena, and polls indicate that the size of their turn out was a major influence in his victory. Whilst President Sirisena and his key supporters are Sinhalese, it is likely that their policies will be more accommodative of minorities than had been the case with the previous administration. Hence his call for a ‘rainbow coalition’ Invest or Wait? Let’s consider the key questions at this time: · Will President Sirisena change economic course in Sri Lanka to the detriment of investors? o Highly unlikely. His key supporters (UNP) have a more pro-business posture than the SLFP and have been critical of policies (such as the land reform bill) that were deterring to foreign investors. · What will the impact be of cancelling the Colombo Port City project and the planned integrated resorts (casinos)? o The Port City was certainly a massive project and the construction and engineering would certainly have added to the local economy. However, there were major doubts about its ambition and viability. o Given recent revenue contraction in casinos from Macau to Singapore and the planned launch of casino based projects in many other East Asian countries, it is questionable whether building such projects in Colombo would have had a big impact on tourist arrivals and expenditure. Sri Lanka has a wealth of attractions for tourists and many would argue that it can continue to accelerate its tourism industry without resorting to gambling. · Are the upcoming Parliamentary Elections important? o President Sirisena has pledged to reverse the trend of increasingly centralized Presidential power that evolved during President Rajakasa’s terms and strengthen parliament. However, this may be the largest uncertainty given the composition of the coalition which supported his candidacy. o There is little doubt that this coalition was more ‘anti-Rajapaksa’ than it was ‘pro-Sirisena’. Equally, that Sirisena comes from the left-leaning SLFP but now is supported by the right-leaning UNP creates uncertainty. He talks of a “rainbow cabinet’ but this may turn out to be a more effective sound bite with echoes of Mandela than a sustainable coming together of previous enemies. o President Sirisena now has 3 months during which he must bring together elements of multiple parties into a coalition which will support him and demonstrate leadership prior to the election. This will require an impressive level of political maneuvering and only time will tell whether he can pull this off to create a balanced but effective government. The worst case scenario is for the coalition to fracture and leave him without a power base. o His Prime Minister, Ranil Wickremsinghe, was the driving force behind the selection of Mr. Sirisena and is the leader of the UNP. The day to day relationship between these two gentlemen is going to be critical as if Sirisena is regarded as being a puppet of the UNP, then the coalition could fracture rather easily. · Should we be concerned about China being annoyed? o In a word…’No’. Whilst there is little doubt that a return of Rajapaksa would have been China’s preference, they will not want to endanger their access to this strategically important island. Whilst the military benefits of Sri Lanka were often focused upon, the economic benefits of having a trans-shipment option that is lower cost and arguably more convenient to Singapore or Malaysia is also key to Chinese interests. o As mentioned above, this may also allow India and Sri Lanka to become friendlier, particularly given the friendship of Messrs Modi and Wickremsinghe. It would be no surprise if Mr. Modi was one of the first visitors to Sri Lanka, bringing with him promises of additional trade and support. · What about the response of other Countries? o The removal of Mr. Rajapaksa who was the architect of the crushing of the Tamils may bring Sri Lanka closer to its Commonwealth brethren as well as the US. This may well translate directly into expanded financial support as well as giving the country the ability to face the events that accompanied the ending of the civil war without being punished for retaining as President the architect of these events. o It is likely that international relations will improve under Mr. Sirisena and Sri Lanka may once again focus on promoting its many strengths rather than defend its recent history. Conclusion Whilst there are reasonable uncertainties about President Sirisena’s political leadership and his ability to build a sustainable coalition, the positives from this election exceed the doubts. International investment will be more balanced and strategic investors are less likely to be frozen out by preference for ‘first family’ initiatives or Chinese investment. Despite this, credit has to be given to President Rajapaksa for the great strides that Sri Lanka has made over recent years. The country now has a solid foundation of infrastructure including power generation and transportation from which it can build. In m y previous article , I argued that there were many reasons to be positive about Sri Lanka over the coming decade. I see no reason for concern that these reasons have been diluted and indeed believe that stronger growth can now be achieved. Today, Pope Francis arrives in Sri Lanka on an official Papal visit. The timing is appropriate as he will be being greeted by a President who has made reconciliation between religions a key issue. From this perspective, it is an effective ‘Christening’ of the new administration. Only time will tell whether President Sirisena will reward the electorate’s confidence, but the signs are positive and assuming that he can harness the spirit of co-operation and renewal that Pope Francis is certain to preach, the country is set for strong further growth. Investment options for prospective investors in Sri Lanka remain limited. The Ceylon Stock Exchange is small, illiquid and volatile. In essence, it is more of a private equity market for the time being. However, we believe that this will change over coming months as Sri Lanka focused investment vehicles emerge. To this end, emerging market investors should keep at least one eye on Sri Lanka given its strong potential.

Southern Company Doesn’t Look As Good As It Did 12 Months Ago

Summary I’ve recommended buying SO twice over the past 12 months, once at a dividend yield of 5.00% and once at 4.84%. At the current price per share of $49.70, shares are yielding only 4.19%, which I believe is too low, considering the slow rate of dividend growth. I will reconsider if the stock drops by 10% or more. Shares in Southern Company (NYSE: SO ) are currently trading at a price of $49.70, which is $8.32 or 20.1% higher than twelve months ago. I’ve recommended buying SO twice over the past 12 months, once in January of 2014, when the dividend yield reached 5.00%, and once in June, at a current yield of 4.84%. With the recent growth in share price however, the yield has gone down and investors getting in at the current level will get a yield on cost of only 4.19%. SO data by YCharts The dividend growth rate for SO is very low, at 3.74% over the past 3 years and 3.90% annually over the past 5 years. This means it would take 5 years to get back to the yield on cost of 5.0% investors could get 12 months ago. SO Dividend Per Share (5 Year Growth) data by YCharts SO’s revenue for the current fiscal year is expected to reach $18.17 billion, which is an increase of 6.9% to last year’s $17.09 billion. For next year, a further 3.1% increase to $18.73 billion is expected. The trailing twelve month revenues stand at $18.38 billion. The average price to sales ratio for SO over the past 5 years has been 2.2, which is well above the industry average of 1.5 . The current market cap is $44.72 billion. Here’s what SO’s p/s ratios look like at today’s prices:   Dollar amounts Price to sales ratio % above 5 year average Price per share at p/s = 2.2 Trailing twelve month revenue $18.38 billion 2.43 10.5% $44.98 Current FY expected revenue $18.17 billion 2.46 11.8% $44.45 Next FY expected revenue $18.73 billion 2.39 8.6% $45.76 SO Revenue (5 Year Growth) data by YCharts Southern’s 5 year average p/e ratio stands at 18.7. If we aply this multiple to the trailing twelve month earnings per share of $2.34, we get a price per share of $43.76, which is well below the current price. Earnings per share for the current fiscal year are expected to be somewhat higher, at $2.80, putting the forward p/e ratio at 17.8. For next fiscal year, EPS is expected to grow a further 2.5%, to $2.87, which means the 1 year forward p/e ratio is 17.3. SO PE Ratio (NYSE: TTM ) data by YCharts SO Current Ratio (Quarterly) data by YCharts I usually look for current ratios in excess of 1.0, as this indicates current assets are larger than current liabilities. However, with utility companies such as SO, a slightly lower current ratio isn’t an immediate cause for concern, as income streams tend to be very steady and reliable. As we can see in the next graph, SO’s long term debt has slowly but surely been growing in recent years. Low interest rates mean the company is more than able to finance this debt, as net interest costs over the past 12 months were only $800 million, or 4.35% of the company’s trailing twelve month revenue. SO Total Long Term Debt (Quarterly) data by YCharts Conclusion: Buying SO at a dividend yield of 5.0% would have been a great idea. However, considering the company’s slow dividend growth rate, investors getting in now would likely have to wait for roughly 5 years to get to a yield on cost of 5%. Both on a p/e and p/s ratio basis, the company appears expensive compared to historical averages. The long term debt is growing, which isn’t a problem so long as interest rates stay low. I don’t see any reasons to buy at these levels, but may reconsider if the stock drops by 10% or more from its current price of $49.70. Disclaimer: I am not a registered investment advisor and do not provide specific investment advice. The information contained herein is for informational purposes only. Nothing in this article should be taken as a solicitation to purchase or sell securities. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. It is up to investors to make the correct decision after necessary research. Investing includes risks, including loss of principal.

Gross Shocks Conventional Wisdom

Bill Gross told investors this week to Beware the Ides of March, or the Ides of any month in 2015 for that matter. When the year is done, there will be minus signs in front of returns for many asset classes. The good times are over. Gross is the legendary bond fund manager who left the company he founded, PIMCO, for a job as a portfolio manager at Janus Global Unconstrained Bond Fund, so most people pay attention when he writes. The prediction came inside the January Investment Outlook for investors. But for the mainstream financial media, he might as well have expelled foul smelling gas at a crowded party. The media quickly pointed out how contrarian his forecast is. For example, the Bloomberg reporter wrote: Gross is putting himself way out on a limb: Not one of Wall Street’s professional forecasters predict the S&P 500 will drop in 2015. Their average estimate calls for an 8.1 percent rise. And while the global economy looks weak, the U.S. has been heating up, with GDP up 5 percent in the third quarter. Of course, he forgets that mainstream financial experts and economics have failed to see every recession for the past century, especially the latest. They have failed because their business cycle theory asserts that recessions and the stock market collapses that precede them are random events. In other words, @#$% happens! So while insisting that business cycles are random events and by definition unpredictable, they continue to insist they can predict them! Gross makes one mistake that shows the bad influence behavioral finance has inflicted on him. He wrote, Manias can outlast any forecaster because they are driven not only by rational inputs, but by irrational human expressions of fear and greed. Stock and bond market “bubbles” are not manias; humans are not irrational with their money and the current market levels don’t illustrate greed or fear. As my forecasts show, the stock market reflects historically high profits plus greater tolerance for risk by investors. And the bond market is responding rationally to the Fed’s loose monetary policy. Fortunately, Gross doesn’t follow mainstream economics. His rationale comes from the “debt super cycle.” Gross attributes the theory to the research and investment advisory firm Bank Credit Analyst, but the cycle has been a major theme of the Bank for International Settlements for years. You can find a good intro in Claudio Borio’s The financial cycle and macro economics: What have we learnt? In short, the theory says that debt increases when central banks pump money into the economy through artificially low interest rates and open market operations, that is, buying bonds, also known as quantitative easing. Much of the debt increases the value of capital that has been used as collateral on loans and makes further borrowing on the same collateral possible. Credit continues to expand, asset prices rise and GDP increases as part of the expansion phase until debt service burdens become too great for businesses or households to bear, causing them to cut back on spending. As a result, asset prices fall and banks demand more collateral for outstanding loans. Some companies default and the financial system spirals downward, taking the economy with it. The latest debt super cycle extended almost 20 years peak-to-peak, from about 1989 to 2007. Business cycles last up to 8 years, but when a recession coincides with a peak in the debt cycle, it’s much more severe. There is a lot of truth in the debt super cycle theory. But it doesn’t explain why debt service becomes unbearable. After all, if asset prices are increasing and the economy is growing, debt service should become easier. The debt theory needs the Austrian business-cycle theory to make it whole. Debt service becomes a burden when sales fall in the capital goods sector because sales are soaring in the consumer goods sector. This is Hayek’s Ricardo Effect kicking in. However, the debt theory helps flesh out some of the financial aspects of the ABCT. So what does Gross advise investors to do? He recommends buying Treasuries and high quality corporate bonds. He cautions that rising interest rates could hurt such investments, but if the debt cycle theory is correct, that won’t happen in 2015. Only contrarians like Gross make money when the market morphs from a bull to a bear.