Tag Archives: handle

Consumer Staples ETF: XLP No. 4 Select Sector SPDR In 2014

Summary The Consumer Staples exchange-traded fund finished fourth by return among the nine Select Sector SPDRs in 2014. Along the way, the ETF had a big up month in November (5.54 percent) and a big down month in January (-5.16 percent). Seasonality analysis indicates the fund could have a tough first quarter. The Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLP ) in 2014 ranked No. 4 by return among the Select Sector SPDRs that chop the S&P 500 into nine morsels. On an adjusted closing daily share-price basis, XLP ascended to $48.49 from $41.90, a climb of $6.59, or 15.73 percent. Accordingly, it led its parent proxy SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) by 2.26 percentage points and lagged its sibling Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLU ) by -13.01 points. (XLP closed at $48.96 Monday.) XLP ranked No. 3 among the sector SPDRs in the fourth quarter, when it behaved better than SPY by 3.36 percentage points and worse than XLU by -4.92 points. And XLP ranked No. 7 among the sector SPDRs in December, when it performed worse than XLU and SPY by -4.52 and -0.69 percentage points, in that order. Figure 1: XLP Monthly Change, 2014 Vs. 1999-2013 Mean (click to enlarge) Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on analyses of adjusted closing monthly share prices at Yahoo Finance . XLP behaved a lot better in 2014 than it did during its initial 15 full years of existence based on the monthly means calculated by employing data associated with that historical time frame (Figure 1). The same data set shows the average year’s weakest quarter was the first, with a relatively small negative return, and its strongest quarter was the fourth, with an absolutely large positive return. Generally consistent with this pattern, the ETF had a huge gain in the fourth quarter last year. Figure 2: XLP Monthly Change, 2014 Versus 1999-2013 Median (click to enlarge) Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on analyses of adjusted closing monthly share prices at Yahoo Finance. XLP also performed a lot better in 2014 than it did during its initial 15 full years of existence based on the monthly medians calculated by using data associated with that historical time frame (Figure 2). The same data set shows the average year’s weakest quarter was the first, with a relatively small positive return, and its strongest quarter was the fourth, with an absolutely large positive return. Clearly, this means there is no historical statistical tendency for the ETF to explode in Q1. Figure 3: XLP’s Top 10 Holdings and P/E-G Ratios, Jan. 9 (click to enlarge) Note: The XLP holding-weight-by-percentage scale is on the left (green), and the company price/earnings-to-growth ratio scale is on the right (red). Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on data at the XLP microsite and FinViz.com (both current as of Jan. 9). It is an article of faith (and statistical interpretation) hereabouts that so-called PUV analysis is better than psychoanalysis in determining Mr. Market’s state of mind. So what is PUV analysis? It is basically the study of the behaviors of XLP, XLU and the Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLV ) in comparison with their sibling Select Sector SPDRs. If the PUV cluster of ETFs ranks in or near the top third of the sector SPDRs by return during a given period, then I believe market participants are in risk-off mode; if the PUV cluster of ETFs ranks in or near the bottom third of the sector SPDRs by return over a given period, then I think market participants are in risk-on mode. Given the relative performances of the low-beta PUV cluster members (aka XLP, XLU and XLV) that led them to finish in three of the top four spots among the sector SPDRs last year, I believe market participants were in risk-off mode. And I think they will continue to be so this year, with changes in policy at the U.S. Federal Reserve the biggest reason why. Despite the long-term sector rotation into the PUV cluster at this late stage of the economic/market cycle, the valuations of XLP’s top 10 and other holdings may be a drag on the ETF’s price appreciation in the foreseeable future (Figure 3). Numbers reported by S&P Senior Index Analyst Howard Silverblatt supported this hypothesis Dec. 31, when he pegged the P/E-G ratio of the S&P 500 consumer-staples sector at 2.12, which is pretty rich for the blood of at least one PUV analyst (i.e., me). Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein by the author do not constitute an investment recommendation, and they are unsuitable for employment in the making of investment decisions. The opinions expressed herein address only certain aspects of potential investment in any securities and cannot substitute for comprehensive investment analysis. The opinions expressed herein are based on an incomplete set of information, illustrative in nature, and limited in scope. In addition, the opinions expressed herein reflect the author’s best judgment as of the date of publication, and they are subject to change without notice.

Bad News Is Good News: A Contrarian View Of China Investing

A Healthy Balance Between Monetary and Fiscal Support. Government to Remain Accomodative. Oil Sinks, Airlines Take Flight. When China celebrates its new year next month, we will transition into the Year of the Ram, also known as the Year of the Goat or Sheep. If you believe in luck, this could be a good sign. The ram comes eighth in the 12-zodiac cycle, and in Mandarin, “eight” sounds very similar to the words meaning “prosper,” “wealth” or, in some dialects, “fortune.” As you might imagine, the Chinese consider the number to be very lucky. But of course successful investing involves so much more than luck. In a time when not only China but much of the rest of the world is trying to get its groove back, it’s important to be cognizant of the factors that shape the markets, including changing government policy. We often say that government policy is a precursor to change, so it’s important to follow the money. With that in mind, I asked portfolio manager Xian Liang to outline a few of the most compelling cases to remain bullish on the Asian giant. Below are some highlights from our discussion. A Healthy Balance Between Monetary and Fiscal Support Back in October, I pointed out that one of the main contributors to the European Union’s sluggish growth is its inability to balance its monetary and fiscal policies. It has been eager to tax everything and everyone who moves. Waiting for European Central Bank (ECB) President Mario Draghi to act often feels a little like waiting for Godot. Investors’ patience is wearing thin. China, on the other hand, is much more responsive and actively committed to making full use of both policies in its arsenal to spur its cooling economy. On the monetary side, according to Xian, are interest rate cuts and a loosening of reserve requirements for certain deposits. The goal is to ease access to loans for businesses and individuals seeking to purchase big-ticket items such as homes. As a result, Chinese entrepreneurs have increasingly been able to start more businesses. (click to enlarge) Jobs growth has been so robust, in fact, that the government has managed to attain its job creation target outlined in its current Five-Year period ahead of schedule and by a wide margin. The country has grown millions of jobs with great efficiency, even as GDP sags. Although the Chinese housing market has stagnated in recent months, these new monetary measures will help it pick up steam. Already we’re seeing some improvement, with home property stocks moving higher. Regulations are an indirect taxation of the economy, whereas deregulation unleashes entrepreneurial spirit. (click to enlarge) On the fiscal front, the government is reportedly planning to spend $1.6 trillion over the next two years on infrastructure projects in various industries-300 separate infrastructure programs, to be exact, according to BCA Research. As I pointed out last month, many of these projects will largely involve high-speed rail, both domestically and abroad. China has already secured multiple construction deals with countries ranging from Brazil, South Africa, Nigeria, India, Russia, the U.S. and others. Government to Remain Accommodative There are a couple of reasons the Chinese government has accelerated support to capital markets, according to Xian: One, a significant deflationary threat has been driven by slumping energy prices. And two, there are potentially lower exports to commodity producing nations. Indeed, sluggish global demand has contributed to China’s weak December purchasing manager’s index (PMI), which dropped to an 18-month low of 50.1. China has been quick to respond to lower PMI data with a drop in interest rates. (click to enlarge) But Where There’s Bad News, Good News Is Often Not Far Behind The silver lining to falling commodity prices is that since China is a net-importer of raw materials-crude oil especially-the country has been able to save tremendously on its oil and gas bills. Back in November, I reported that for every dollar the price of a barrel of oil drops, China’s economy saves about $2 billion annually. From its peak in June, crude has slipped close to $50-you do the math. This has served as a major wealth transfer from oil-producing countries into China’s coffers. Oil Sinks, Airlines Take Flight Speaking of crude, declining oil prices-they’re currently below $50 per barrel-have been good for airlines, Chinese companies included. As you can see, there’s been a clear inverse relationship between crude oil returns and airline stocks. (click to enlarge) China is the largest investor in U.S. government bonds. The country has accumulated close to $1.3 trillion, so a strong dollar and falling oil prices benefit its economic flexibility. More middle-class Chinese might be able to afford to travel abroad, specifically here to the U.S., where inevitably they will spend their money. (click to enlarge) According to Carl Weinberg, founder and chief economist of High Frequency Economics: Chinese President Xi Jinping has estimated that there will be more than a half-billion Chinese tourists traveling to the West in the next 10 years. You can work out the impact if all of them came to New York and spent $2,000 or $3,000 each. That would be enough to add a half-percentage point to U.S. GDP every year over the next decade. Reasonable Stock Valuation Chinese stocks are currently valued below their own historical averages as well as those among other global emerging markets, making them both attractive and competitive. “Odds favor mean reversion to continue,” Xian says. “The better the Chinese markets perform, the more global liquidity they might attract.” Chinese stocks, as expressed in the MSCI China Index, are currently a much better value than those in the S&P 500 Index, trading at 10 times earnings whereas the U.S. is trading at 18 times. (click to enlarge) A-Shares Still a Huge Draw Chinese A-Shares surprised the market by breaking out last summer, having delivered 66 percent for the 12-month period. It looks like a breakout from the long-term bear market. (click to enlarge) What’s more, the upside is unlikely to have been exhausted. Although they aren’t as stellar of a bargain as they once were, they’re not yet overvalued, and retail and institutional investors might accumulate on pullbacks. For the A-Shares market, we have recently added exposure to A-Shares in one of our funds to capture more attractive valuation. In today’s environment, we believe the safer bets are investable H-Shares, which are driven by A-Shares and, in 2014, returned 15.5 percent. H-Shares comprise the vast majority of the fund’s exposure to Chinese equities, with further exposure gained through A-Shares exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The Ram Is the New Bull As GARP (growth at a reasonable price) hunters, we’re prudently optimistic about the upcoming year and anticipate great things out of the world’s second-largest economy. China’s government and central bank are committed to jobs and manufacturing growth as well as policy easing. Its stocks are reasonably valued, and low commodity prices should continue to offset slowing global demand. As Xian eloquently put it last month: China’s leadership appears to be delivering on the promises it made in November 2013 at the Third Plenary Session, specifically the liberalization of the financial sector and reform of the role capital markets play in allocating resources. This leadership is determined and committed to putting China on the right path. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Foreign and emerging market investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and less public disclosure, as well as economic and political risk. By investing in a specific geographic region, a regional fund’s returns and share price may be more volatile than those of a less concentrated portfolio. The HSBC China Services PMI is based on data compiled from monthly replies to questionnaires sent to purchasing executives at more than 400 private service-sector companies. The MSCI China Free Index is a capitalization weighted index that monitors the performance of stocks from the country of China. The S&P 500 Stock Index is a widely recognized capitalization-weighted index of 500 common stock prices in U.S. companies. Standard deviation is a measure of the dispersion of a set of data from its mean. The more spread apart the data, the higher the deviation. Standard deviation is also known as historical volatility. Fund portfolios are actively managed, and holdings may change daily. Holdings are reported as of the most recent quarter-end. Holdings in the China Region Fund as a percentage of net assets as of 9/30/2014: Air China Ltd. 0.00%, China Eastern Airlines 0.00%, China Southern Airlines Co. 0.00%. All opinions expressed and data provided are subject to change without notice. Some of these opinions may not be appropriate to every investor. By clicking the link(s) above, you will be directed to a third-party website(s). U.S. Global Investors does not endorse all information supplied by this/these website(s) and is not responsible for its/their content.

2014 Commodity Exposure: Futures Vs. ETFs

Throughout the year, we track a simple strategy of buying the 12 month out Futures contract against the commodity ETFs that supposedly track those very same futures, to see just how the performance lines up; knowing that ETFs typically are the ones that underperform because of the contract roll. For more on how this looks long term, see our recent deeper look into the United States Oil ETF, LP (NYSEARCA: USO ) . But regardless of whether you’re tracking correctly – the concept of buying and holding commodities, whether it be via futures, or via ETFs via futures – isn’t proving to be all that great anyway, with an average performance of -7%, compared to the ETFs -11% (and -12% and -16% if don’t include Coffee). It was one of the worst years ever for long only commodities, with the PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking ETF (NYSEARCA: DBC ) falling -28% {Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results}. We’re biased, of course; but we think the better way to have commodity exposure in your portfolio is a “Long/Short” Commodity Strategy; which profits from the rise or fall in prices. We’re talking about Managed Futures, which as a whole, had one of its best years since 2008 . {Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results}. (Disclaimer: Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results) (Disclaimer: Sugar uses the October contract, Soybeans the November contract.) Long/Short Ag Trader CTA = Barclayhedge Ag Traders Index) Now that you’ve read this, are you Bullish or Bearish on ? Bullish Bearish Sentiment on ( ) Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Why are you ? Submit & View Results Skip to results » Share this article with a colleague