Tag Archives: contractor

Innergex Renewable Energy’s (INGXF) CEO Michel Letellier on Q3 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Executives Marie-Josée Privyk – Director, Communications and Sustainable Development Michel Letellier – President and Chief Executive Officer Jean Perron – Chief Financial Officer Analysts Rupert Merer – National Bank Financial Sean Steuart – TD Securities Nelson Ng – RBC Capital Markets Ben Pham – BMO Capital Markets Jeremy Rosenfield – Industrial Alliance Securities Innergex Renewable Energy Inc. ( OTC:INGXF ) Q3 2015 Earnings Conference Call November 10, 2015 4:00 PM ET Operator Good day, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to Innergex Renewable Energy’s Conference Call for the Third Quarter 2015 Results. [Foreign Language] [Operator Instructions] I would like to remind everyone that this conference call is being recorded today, Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 4 p.m. Eastern Time. I will now turn the conference over to Marie-Josée Privyk, Director, Communications and Sustainable Development. Please go ahead. Marie-Josée Privyk Thank you. [Foreign Language] Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. I am here today with Mr. Michel Letellier, President and CEO of Innergex and Mr. Jean Perron, Chief Financial Officer. Please note that the presentations will be in English. However, you are welcomed to address your questions either in French or English. [Foreign Language] I would also like to point out that journalists are invited to call us afterwards if they wish to address any questions. In a minute, Mr. Perron will provide some details on our financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2015. Mr. Letellier will then provide an overview of our operating activities and outlook and we will then open the Q&A session. The financial statements and the MD&A have been filed on SEDAR and are readily accessible via the Internet. You may also access the press release, financial statements and the MD&A on the Innergex website in the Investors action. During this presentation, we will refer to financial measures such as adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow and payout ratio that are not recognized measures according to IFRS as they do not have a standardized meaning. Please be advised that this conference call will contain forward-looking information that reflects the corporation’s expectations with respect to future results or developments. For explanations concerning the principal assumptions used by the corporation to derive this forward-looking information and the principal risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, I invite you to consult the first pages of the company’s MD&A as well as its Annual Information Form. I now turn the conference to Mr. Perron. Jean Perron Thank you, Marie-Josée. Good afternoon. The quarterly results for Q3 2015 show production of 91% of the long-term average due mainly to below average water flows at the six 50% owned facilities of the Harrison Hydro entered partnership in British Columbia. Production for the first nine months stands at 99% of long-term average. Revenues for the quarter were $3.7 million lower than in 2014 due to the BC facilities. Revenues for the nine months were $17 million higher than last year. The increase is due to higher water flows in Québec and BC, higher wind regimes and to the acquisition of SM-1 in June 2014. Adjusted EBITDA was $3.2 million lower compared to Q3 2014. Adjusted EBITDA for year-to-date was $14.1 million higher than in 2014. The increase is mainly due to the higher production since the beginning of the year. Finance cost for the quarter were similar to Q3 2014 while since the beginning of the year, they are down $2.8 million compared to last year due to the lower inflation compensation interest. During the quarter, the $27 million loss was realized on derivatives financial instruments resulting from the settlement of the MU bond forwards contracts upon closing of $311 million financing of the project. Similar loss were incurred in the previous quarters for the Big Silver, Boulder Creek and Upper Lillooet River bond forwards upon closing the financing of the projects. The realized losses are a result of the decrease in benchmark interest rates between the date the bond forwards were entered into in late 2013 and the settlement dates. It will be compensated by lower restricted fixed interest rates ranging from 2.41% to 4.76% for up to 40 years term loans compared to higher interest rates set at the time of the hedges. These losses were funded with proceeds from the project financings and do not impact the free cash flows. The corporation recognized unrealized gains on derivative financial instruments of $24 million due mainly to the reversal of the unrealized loss accrued upon settlement of bond forward contract of MU. Together with the settlement of the Big Silver, Boulder Creek and Upper Lillooet River, bond forwards in previous quarters resulted in a $79 million unrealized gain since the beginning of the year. The $311 million MU financing was closed in September and was the last one for all of our projects on the construction. In March of this year, we closed the Boulder Creek and Upper Lillooet River $491 million financings and in June, we closed the Big Silver $197 million financing. In August, we issued a new convertible debenture for $100 million bearing interest rate of 4.25%. We used $42 million of the proceeds to repurchase the former convertible debenture bearing an interest rate of 5.75% while $38 million of debenture was converted into 3.7 million common shares. As a result, a total of $1.1 billion of financing was completed since the beginning of the year. We do not need any additional liquidity to complete the construction of our firefight projects. An amount of $160 million remains unused and available on our revolving corporate credit margin of $425 million. We also bought back 700,000 shares as of September 30 and an additional number of 460,000 since then. Overall, the slightly below average quarter combined with a very strong first quarter allowed us to basically be on target since the beginning of the year. As a result and combined with a very good fourth quarter in 2014, our trailing 12 months free cash flow ending on September 30 reached $84 million compared to $51 million for the same period last year and our payout ratio improved to 74% from 113%. Since the beginning of Q4 2014, our production has been somewhat below the long-term average, mainly at our hydroelectric facility in Québec. We remain confident in our ability to reach our long-term average production figures year-over-year. This concludes my review the results. I would be happy to answer your questions later on during the call and I will now turn it back to Michel. Michel Letellier Good afternoon. Thank you, Jean. So, as you learn we have been busy doing our project finance, but we are also quite busy in continuing the construction activities. Very glad to report as of yesterday, we released a press release that Tretheway Creek in BC has been commissioned in the date of the October 27, which we were just waiting for the BC Hydro confirmation and they did that last Friday, so quite happy and also very happy to report that we managed to build it on time and this time under budget. We are basically $7 million under budget. So, that’s about 6%. So, very glad, and I am very proud of the team that managed to do that in BC. On the – still in BC, Upper Lillooet and Boulder, as you remember, we have had the fire this summer. So, we have been quite busy restarting the construction in September. We are engaging with the insurance company to make sure that we are covered for the losses, both material and also some possible delay. So, we are still working the schedule to catch up the loss of time that we had experienced this summer. We wrote in the MD&A that we may slip a few months. Upper Lillooet and Boulder were supposed to be put in COD late in the fourth quarter of next year. So, we may slip a few months either on Upper or Boulder, but we are working very hard in trying to catch up. So, we don’t have a definitive date. And mind you that we are covered for the losses resulting of the fire. So, we don’t think we will have any material financial aspect for any delay. The construction has resumed and is doing fine. We are basically working hard on the tunnel. This is the tunnel or I guess the critical date to finish the projects. Powerhouse in the line, are going very well. Mechanics are being delivered. So all-in-all, the project is going very well, just the silly fire was slowing down – have slowed down the construction during the summer time. Still in BC, we have Big Silver Creek as well. We have been very active this summer in the last few months. A matter of fact, more than 90% of the civil work is done in Big Silver. Tunnel is done, penstock is done. Powerhouse is done at almost 90%. Intake bypass is done as well. All in all, we are quite in advance in terms of civil works, but we still have to receive the mechanics pieces and also finishing the transmission line during winter and spring. So Big Silver looks very good in terms of schedule and also in terms of capital costs along budget. And the project, the MU project, the – if we come back in wind in Quebec, the Gaspé Peninsula the 150 megawatt wind farm is doing very well as well. We have completed all the base, all the road and we have advanced also on the collector system. So everything we had planned to do this year has been done and the contractor will finalize some work during the next few weeks. But then, we will leave the site for the winter and we will reconvene next spring in order to start the installation of towers and blades and obviously focusing on putting the date for December next year. We have also completed the financing of MU as Jean has spoken and we are very proud of that financing. It helped and we did get a little bit better terms and quite happy with our partner on the financing of MU. If we look towards the post 2016 date, if we look into the international market, I don’t know if you have read our press release, but we are happy to report that we have had a letter of intent with the CFE, which is the federal electricity commission of Mexico. That letter of intent is very interesting in terms of future potential with CFE and trying to develop small hydro. When we say small hydro, the letter mentioned a project 200 megawatt. Again, I think that I have been saying in the past that we have an angle there in Mexico that focused on small hydro. We think it’s interesting because there is not that many player that are present in Mexico for hydro development. So hence, the letter of intent with CFE is a good proxy on what we can try to do in Mexico. Obviously, it’s still a lot of work before having any project done with CFE, but I am quite happy to have been able to sign such a letter. It shows the – I guess, the commitment towards developing hydro from CFE, which is a good thing. We are definitely looking into other possibility in Mexico. We have been traveling quite a bit. We have been meeting with quite a bit of potential partner in Mexico. So we are confident that Mexico will be a good turf for us to develop both hydro and maybe wind as well and solar, so very enthusiastic about Mexico. We are waiting also to learn from the government in the next few weeks what type of RFP there will be coming up. I think one RFP is coming very soon. So we will be watching and we will be trying to take advantage of future RFP definitely in Mexico for 2017. We have been busy also in France mainly, trying to develop contacts and future partnership with local developer. There too, I think we have been successful in meeting with a good potential, still a little bit of work to do in France for us. The market seems to be positive there for the wind development. So our focus will be mainly internationally, again Mexico and France. We are not changing our priority in terms of market. And I guess, giving the project finance that we have done and as Jean has mentioned, we don’t need more equity. We are maintaining the forecast for 2017 of $105 million worth of cash flow. I think that we feel very comfortable with our development progress and construction. It’s important to – for us to deliver those, but they are very advanced. So we feel very comfortable now to focus on the growth and being very active in terms of international development. So on that note, I will take any question. Marie-Josée Privyk Thank you, Michel. So this completes our presentation. We now invite you to ask your questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Rupert Merer with National Bank Financial. Your line is now open. Rupert Merer Good afternoon everyone. Michel Letellier Hello Rupert. Rupert Merer Can we have a little more color on Mexico and the CFE, how many sites do you think you will analyze with them initially and how long do you think that process would take to come up with a site and if you do come up with a site or some interesting sites, how long do you think it will be before you could have some under construction or even reaching COD? Michel Letellier Well as you know, hydro development project, either in BC or in Mexico takes more time than hydro, a little bit quicker, I guess in Mexico. Development period and then permitting can take let’s say, 18 months to 3 years in Mexico. And construction depending on the complexity of the construction, if we have to make tunnels and anything between 2 years and 3 years is usually how long it takes to build. So if you had those plus a few months to study and so forth, it would be difficult to think that we would have anything in operation in less than 5 years from now. So it’s a long game, but once you have built hydro, I guess you have been for a long time. The nice thing about Mexico is that many places you can own the land. So you then own the facility for eternity. So it’s something we like to have in our portfolio, this type of project, private project versus land, rent. To answer your question how many, there is – it is not limited by I would say, the amount of good potential there. So a lot of hydro potential in Mexico, but we have to focus on project that will be competitive. Hydro, as you know is becoming a little bit more expensive or the reverse being more positive. I guess that wind is becoming more competitive and less costly. So in order to be successful in hydro, we have to be creative. We have to find good sites and also we have to find sites with some potential capacity in terms of pounding or small reservoir. So we are focusing on those. And obviously, that limits the amount of project that we can focus, but there is a lot of potential in Mexico in terms of hydro, certainly enough for us to be happy and grow. But I guess that we have to focus on a few and the perfect size for us is anywhere between 30 to 100 to 125 megawatts. Those are the sweet spot, especially if we can find a little bit of head pond or reservoir. Those would be perfect target for us. Rupert Merer And this first, this stage of the process of your LOI, where you are looking at sites, how long do you think that first stage of the process takes before you are successful in identifying a location? Michel Letellier Well, CFE has already some kind of a list of project that they would like to prioritize. They have shared with us a few watersheds that they think are of, I would say, a best interest. So, we are right now in the process of I guess studying those. It can easily take 6 to 8 months to do a good job in trying to establish priorities and do a little bit of engineering. Rupert Merer Okay, excellent. I will get back into queue. Thank you. Operator Your next question comes from Sean Steuart with TD Securities. Please go ahead. Sean Steuart Thanks. Good afternoon, everyone. Michel Letellier Hi, Sean. Sean Steuart A follow-up question on Mexico, I am wondering if you can just go into a bit more detail on the procurement framework there. I gather it will be competitive RFPs. Are you anticipating these will be hydro-specific procurements or is it more of a general renewable procurement, of which you will submit hydro projects? Maybe just a bit more detail on the procurement framework. Michel Letellier It will be quite, I would say, extensive, the type of possibilities. One will be CFE coming up with RFPs, specifically for what they could describe as clean energy and high efficient combined cycle will probably be accepted in those definition of clean energy but there will be a minimum amount of renewable energy in those call. So, we will know soon how much, but that will be meaningful what I am gathered. So, this is the first, I guess, wave. There will still be the ability for developer to make venture with big customer, local industrial that wants to secure their long-term supply of electricity. We will still be able to go and invest or co-invest or sign the collateral EPA with developers. So, that’s another possibility. And of course, there will be the wholesale market with a system, where you will have green credit attached to the renewable energy component, which is a little bit more difficult to forecast, because the rules are not completely clear yet, but those will be basically the three what is to participate in the Mexican market. Sean Steuart Okay, understood. And as recently as I think a couple of quarters ago, you had mentioned Peru as a country of potential interest. I gather that’s off the table now. Is that the correct assumption? Michel Letellier For the time being, we want to consider more Mexico and France. It doesn’t mean that we wouldn’t come back to Peru, but Peru is a smaller market, has some very good feature of having EPA with – in U.S. dollar, but – and having active small RFP going on. But what we have been doing in Mexico has been proven to so far being I would say of a better interest for the time being. Sean Steuart Okay, thanks for the detail. That’s all I have. Operator [Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from Nelson Ng with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Nelson Ng Great, thanks. Just one follow-up question on the Mexico opportunities, so can you just clarify is the Mexico potential RFP completely separate from the letter of intent with the CFE or after you identify like attractive hydro sites, would those sites get RFPed or do you have an exclusive arrangement with the CFE to kind of develop and own those assets without a competitive process? Michel Letellier Twofold. One doesn’t preclude the other meaning that CFE could, theoretically, bid its own project into an RFP or could decide to develop in – I mean in a joint venture for their own needs, because CFE will still be the prime, I guess, supplier for mainly the small industrial individual and small commercials. So, CFE will eventually need its own production as well. So, both, they can supply in – they can submit project together with us in future RFP or they can decide to develop their own project and joint venture to supply their demand for themselves in terms of utility as well, so both can be done, Nelson. Nelson Ng Okay. So, just to clarify, with this letter of intent, you are kind of working with the CFE to assess various sites and then after you determine that those sites are attractive, I guess hydro development opportunities, what you are saying is they might do it on their own or they might work with… Michel Letellier No, meaning that – no, if we work together, we can decide to either submit the project together into an RFP or that the project will be dedicated for CFE own delivery of kilowatts, because CFE has a portfolio that is basically aging and they have all diesel plant that are – will be decommissioned soon. So, they will have to replenish that as well. So, they will do it by RFP and also by own – their own supply. Nelson Ng Okay, got it. And then just moving on to France, I guess, could you just elaborate on the strategy there? I guess, given that some of the wind farms in France are pretty small like how are you going to get critical mass? And I was just thinking if you are successful on one or two wind facilities in France, they might not kind of hit your critical mass if you only own like one or two sites? Michel Letellier Yes, that’s a good point. What we said in the beginning is that we want a foothold there and probably an attractive acquisition for us of some size would be probably the best strategy to enter the market and then after that trying to take advantage of small developer to help develop the market in terms of joint venture. We have seen few interesting proposals. There is an active M&A market in France, which like I said could range from 50 megawatt to 150 megawatt type of volume, where you would have 5, 6 or 7 small 10, 15, 20-megawatt projects. And those are attracting obviously some attention, but not necessarily a huge attention from all the big players that – or the type of attraction we have seen in North America, especially with the yieldco in the U.S. Now, it might change, mind you, but I don’t want to say too much, but we have been active and we have been missing couple of opportunity, but not by far. So, we are adjusting our aim and I think that we will be busy in France. There is project that seems to make sense in terms of acquisition to be accretive for us and to basically provide us with a minimum foothold that would make sense from us to start from there. Nelson Ng I see. And then just in terms of your balance sheet, can you give us an idea of I guess what size of acquisition or development you can potentially do without having to go to the market with equity? Michel Letellier Well, Jean just mentioned that we have a little bit more than let’s say $150 million worth of free margin in our credit line and mind you that soon in 2017, we will have anywhere between $35 million and $40 million so worth of free cash flow from our operation. So I mean, we definitely we cannot do a huge acquisition, but we can certainly start a small acquisition or contribute to commit to you construction project. As we mentioned if we start the construction in Mexico in hydro, we won’t have to put all the money upfront, it’s going to take a few years to build up. So just with our free cash flow from 2017, we can invest the seed money and the early equity money in project development. So unless we find a bigger acquisition, we don’t intend or we don’t have to go to that right away. Nelson Ng Okay, thanks. Just one last question, in terms of MU wind, the project cost is $340 million, does that include the amount that would be refunded from Hydro Quebec? Jean Perron Well, it is net of this amount. Nelson Ng Sorry. It’s net of the amount. Okay, thanks. Operator Your next question comes from Rupert Merer with National Bank. Please go ahead. Rupert Merer Hi. So looking now to 2017, you talked about $35 million to $40 million of free cash flow and that can help support your growth, can you talk us through your current dividend policy and what we can expect to see for target payout ratios for next few years and how are you going to balance between your future investment needs, your dividend policy and maybe your NCIB as well? Michel Letellier Yes. It’s always same question and trying to answer the same way all the time. It’s – I said we have initiated an increase in the dividend in the last 2 years. I am hoping that we can maintain a growth in the dividend. I don’t think that jumping the dividend to a big amount in 1 year would create a trend and would be rewarded right away by the market. But I think that if we can find home for our equity in the development and creating value for our shareholders, my view is trying to raise the dividend on a steady course and increase it over the years, always by providing accretive development to our shareholders. But obviously, by – it’s something that we never had in the recent years. We will have a payout ratio. We will have room in 2017 to take those decisions. Obviously, if we don’t find good home for that equity, we will reward our shareholder by raising the dividend. But I think that if we can find a good growth that creates value for our shareholders, we will balance that. We said that a long-term payout ratio of 80% is maybe a good ratio. How fast are we getting to that 80%? Obviously by 2017, without giving you the right – the exact amount of payout ratio, you guys can calculate it fairly well. We are saying that we are going to have $105 million of free cash flow. And right now, we are paying a little bit over $63 million – let’s say, $63 million of dividend, so quite easy to make the calculation. I think it’s a good problem to have and it’s a – I guess it’s a strategy that we are discussing at the Board all the time. But definitely growing the dividend is very important to us. We understand that for shareholders, it’s important as well. The important thing for us is to grow and to have it sustainable and to show the growth that will be also sustainable. So we have been prudent in the last few years even though our payout ratio was still fairly tight. We have increased the dividend twice by $0.02. Hopefully, we will try to do the same thing going forward and maybe increasing the rate of dividend. But I am still very positive about future outcome. Like I said, we have been focusing in the last few years on delivering our growth portfolio. And I think we have done a good job in doing it. We finalized all the project finance. So $1 billion, a little bit more than $1 billion of financing last year and project finance was taking quite a bit of our internal time. So that once this is done, I think that we will focus and I cannot promise, but we are definitely focused on delivering growth for 2017. Rupert Merer Great. Thanks for the color. Operator Your next question comes from Ben Pham with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Ben Pham Thank you. And I have a couple of cleanup questions for me. On the payout ratio the last 12 months, pretty low number that you reported, are you expecting to be below 100% for this year? Michel Letellier Yes. On the forecast, yes. Ben Pham Yes. Jean Perron Yes. But I think we need to remember that Q4 2014 was something really above average for production. So the effect, that’s the reason why the payout ratio was so low for now because we are including this next quarter, we are going to be using this Q4 2014 results. Ben Pham Okay. That’s what I was really trying to ask indirectly. The – and I was wondering your buyback program, how should we think about that, is that more to mitigate the DRIP dilution? Michel Letellier Well, the DRIP dilution is a lot less. If you remember, we killed the discount in last quarter. So now the DRIP participation is less than 5% roughly. No, I think it’s – given the fact that we had done the debenture and the conversion and the price was fairly weak, so we thought that it was a good timing to buy some shares. Ben Pham Okay. And I am just wondering you had some early comments about the Mexican hydro strategy in terms of the timing being maybe 3 years to 5 years and that really potentially gives you some visibility in the 2020 timeframe. So I am just wondering what are you guys thinking about ‘17, ‘18, ’19, you have got a lot of cash generation coming up. I mean is that – are you guys banking on a French wind acquisition near-term to really get some growth in that period? Michel Letellier That can certainly be of interest, Ben. But I answered the question for brand new hydro with CFE, meaning that no development whatsoever have – would have been made. But there is some possibility of being partner in Mexico or somewhere else where project have been advanced and maybe it’s only construction periods, so maybe 3 years. So you end up being maybe in 2019 or even in 2018 if we are talking about wind somewhere else. So I mean, it’s a mix of that. But definitely existing facility in France with a decent accretion for us could be of an interesting strategy to fill up 2017 growth, Ben Pham Okay, I appreciate the answers. Thank you. Operator Your next question comes from Jeremy Rosenfield with Industrial Alliance Securities. Please go ahead. Jeremy Rosenfield Thanks. Good afternoon guys, just there is a lot of focus I think, on the interim period as Ben was just alluding to the 2017, ‘18, ‘19. What about the possibility of potentially consolidating some ownership interest, where you own maybe 50% or so of an asset, is there an opportunity or do you think that you could look at that type of strategy with maybe more, I would say aggressiveness than you might have looked at in the past? Michel Letellier There is couple of projects as we definitely have a potential partner. Upper Lillooet and Boulder are owned by Creek Power. Our partner is Ledcor. We have options once those projects are ensued the need to buy them back. So, this could be a possibility. Our First Nation partner, we don’t want to buy them back. Well, if they wish to we are always welcome to try to help them, but we strongly believe that having the First Nation on long-term basis is important, especially with the community-based projects. So, the other big partner is Trans-Canada in Québec, who knows if Trans-Canada wants to sell some part of those assets would be welcome – will be certainly interested, but there is plenty, plenty of M&A around small project here and there. And we are seeing all kinds of things. And I think that last year was very difficult for M&A, especially in the U.S. with the yieldco, and it’s difficult to see and to predict how the yieldco will behave, but we certainly saw some reaction right away with some developer that thought that they had a deal and then suddenly the deal is disappearing and they are kind of reaching out. So, I think that there will be a little bit more opportunity in M&A or when we see M&A, small developer that wants to have a partner to start with their construction, because for some reason, they don’t necessarily have all the equity. And I think we have a good reputation to be a good partner in many ways. So, I am not worried about being in 2017 or ‘18. We will find a way. It’s just – maybe that message and it’s still I guess that you guys are concerned that we don’t have anything in the pipeline in those years, but we have been focusing so much on delivering and making sure that the project were online and on time. I think that Innergex is a different company now in terms of cash flow and its ability and I guess our ability now to take a little bit more focused on getting outside Canada will payout soon. We have been very successful in Canada in the past. We have shown that we have been able to compete with many other competitors. So, I don’t see why we cannot compete somewhere else especially that we have a philosophy of being open book with partners. And so far the first contact we had in Mexico and in France have been very, very positive in this way. And we have been very – we have been welcomed in Mexico and France. So, I am very positive about finding the ways and I am not concerned about filling the gap. We are focused, but we are not concerned. Jeremy Rosenfield Okay, good. That’s my only question. Operator And Ms. Privyk, there are no questions at this time. Marie-Josée Privyk Thank you. Thank you everyone. We appreciate this opportunity to provide an update on our company and please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any other questions. [Foreign Language] Operator Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our conference call. Please note that a replay of the conference call will be available on the Innergex website. The press release, financial statements and the management’s discussions and analysis are also available on the Innergex website at www.innergex.com in the Investors section. Thank you. You may now disconnect your lines.

ONEOK’s (OKE) CEO Terry Spencer on Q2 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE ) Q2 2015 Earnings Conference Call August 05, 2015 11:00 AM ET Executives T.D. Eureste – Manager, Credit and Finance Terry Spencer – President and CEO Derek Reiners – SVP, CFO and Treasurer Kevin Burdick – VP, Natural Gas Gathering and Processing Sheridan Swords – SVP, Natural Gas Liquids, ONEOK Partners Walt Hulse – EVP of Strategic Planning and Corporate Affairs Wes Christensen – SVP, Operations Phil May – VP, Natural Gas Pipelines Analysts Christine Cho – Barclays Capital Chris Sighinolfi – Jefferies & Company Kristina Kazarian – Deutsche Bank Craig Shere – Tuohy Brothers John Edwards – Credit Suisse Michael Blum – Wells Fargo Securities Becca Followill – US Capital Advisors Eric Genco – Citigroup Matt Niblack – HITE Hedge Operator Good day everyone, and welcome to the Second Quarter 2015 ONEOK and ONEOK Partners Earnings Call. Today’s call is being recorded. And at this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. T.D. Eureste. Please go ahead. T.D. Eureste Thank you and welcome to ONEOK and ONEOK Partners’ second quarter 2015 earnings conference call. A reminder that statements made during this call that might include ONEOK or ONEOK Partners’ expectations or predictions should be considered forward-looking statements and are covered by the Safe Harbor provisions of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. For a discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ, please refer to our SEC filings. Our first speaker is Terry Spencer, President and CEO of ONEOK and ONEOK Partners. Terry? Terry Spencer Thank you, T.D. Good morning and many thank you for joining today and for your continued interest in ONEOK and ONEOK Partners. On this conference call is Walt Hulse, Executive Vice President of Strategic Planning and Corporate Affairs; Derek Reiners, our Chief Financial Officer; Wes Christensen, Senior Vice President, Operations; Sheridan Swords, Senior Vice President, Natural Gas Liquids; Kevin Burdick, Vice President, Natural Gas Gathering and Processing; and Phil May, Vice President, Natural Gas Pipelines. As noted in our second quarter earnings results release yesterday afternoon, key financial and operational information discussed during our first quarter earnings call has been updated in a short presentation and is posted on ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ Web site. Please refer to this presentation and to the earnings releases for various explanation and key metrics. With the information that has already been provided, I intend to keep my remarks brief today and focus on a few key areas. We’ll spend the majority of our time answering your questions. To begin, even in this continued weak commodity price environment, we expect that both ONEOK and ONEOK Partners will end the year within our 2015 financial guidance ranges. And as we exit 2015, we expect 2016 to continue to benefit from the completed and soon to be completed capital growth projects in the natural gas liquids, natural gas pipelines and natural gas gathering and processing segments. We are seeing volume growth through the first half of the year as anticipated, particularly regarding natural gas liquids gathered and fractionated and natural gas gathered and processed. We expect these volume increases to continue into 2016. Overall, the Partnerships’ year-to-date performance positions us to achieve our natural gas gathering volume and financial objectives for the year. I will now turn the call over to Derek for a brief discussion of ONEOK Partners’ and ONEOK’s financials. Derek? Derek Reiners Thank you, Terry. Starting on partnership, 2015 EBITDA contribution continues to ramp up as strong volume growth is shaking up as we anticipated. We expect to grow our EBITDA in the second half of 2015 and be within our 2015 financial guidance EBITDA range of $1.51 billion to $1.73 billion. Our EBITDA growth follows the volume growth. Even in this lower commodity price environment, the Partnership’s year-to-date EBITDA of $712 million is only $40 million less than in the same period in 2014, which was a record in environment with much higher commodity prices. Our coverage ratio has improved to a 0.88 times coverage in the second quarter of 2015 and we expect continued improvement in our coverage the balance of the year. The partnership has a solid balance sheet and ample liquidity to support our current capital program including access to our commercial paper program and credit facility. As of June 30, ONEOK Partners had an adjusted debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 4.5 times. As we said, investment grade credit ratings of ONEOK Partners remain very important to us. Through the first half of 2015 our ATM program was a very effective tool for issuing equity and we continue to evaluate the overnight equity markets and other sources of capital. We will continue to take a balanced approach and remain disciplined when issuing debt and equity. Additional equity is needed to continue to support our capital projects. We continue to remain confident in our ability to raise necessary capital to fund our capital projects at ONEOK Partners. At ONEOK our liquidity remains strong with a $150 million in cash and undrawn $300 million credit facility, and a debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 2 times at June 30. We continue to retain access cash at ONEOK as we navigate these uncertain times. Terry, that concludes my remarks. Terry Spencer Thank you, Derek. Now let’s take a closer look at each of our business segments, starting with our natural gas liquids segment. The segment’s 2015 year-to-date results were supported by solid second quarter performance. The segment’s year-to-date operating income exceeds year-to-date 2014 operating income. This becomes a more useful statistic when you consider that first quarter 2014 results rightly benefited from a historically high demand for propane and that in 2015 the segment has experienced lower realized NGL product price differentials and narrower NGL location price differentials. So even though year-over-year the segment was competing with the 2014 propane benefit, operating income so far in 2015 has exceeded first half 2014 totals because of the continued strong growth of fee based revenues and volumes. Our integrated NGL system continues to benefit from providing non-discretionary fee-based services to NGL producers by connecting growing natural gas liquids supply in the Rocky Mountain, Mid-Continent and Permian regions with key market centers. The natural gas liquids gathered volume on the Bakken NGL pipeline reached approximately 100,000 barrels per day in July and is expected to reach approximately 105,000 barrels per day in the fourth quarter 2015. This is an increase of approximately 20,000 barrels per day from what we expected in the first quarter as a result of decreased ethane rejection in the Rocky Mountain region. We will talk more about the reduced ethane rejection in a moment. The average bundle gathering and fractionation rate on the Bakken NGL pipeline is more than $0.30 per gallon. Moving to our fractionated volume. In addition to the increased ethane fractionated due to the decreased ethane rejection, we also saw more than 20,000 barrels per day of incremental interruptible volumes on our system in the second quarter as we were able to utilize our fractionation assets to meet market demand. We expect to continue to see approximately that level of incremental interruptible volume from our system into the fourth quarter. As a reminder, we do not include interruptible volumes in our fractionation volume guidance. And finally, in recent weeks, we have seen Conway to Mont Belvieu ethane price differentials range from $0.02 to $0.03 per gallon and we expect this range to continue for the rest of this year. As you know our natural gas pipelines business is primarily fee-based with long-term firm demand charge contracts. We continue to develop new projects and opportunities to grow our fee-based earnings. Just last week we announced plans to expand our ONEOK WesTex Intrastate Natural Gas Pipeline System in the Texas Panhandle and Permian Basin. The expansion which will complement our previously announced Roadrunner Gas Transmission Pipeline joint venture is already 90% subscribed with 25 years firm demand charge agreements. These projects and the expansion of our Mid-Western Gas Transmission Pipeline System are continued examples of our committeemen to stable long-term fee-based earnings growth. The natural gas gathering and processing segment’s second quarter results were significantly improved over the first quarter. Earnings for this segment are still expected to be significantly weighted towards the second half of the year which is in line with the expected growth of our 2015 natural gas gathered and processed volumes. We have greater confidence in our Williston Basin volume projections with six months of operating performance under our belt and good visibility into the remainder of 2015. The segment is seeing the benefit of rigs concentrated in the most productive areas, new well connections, two compressor stations completed, and the current flared gas inventory. We expect Williston Basin volume in the third quarter to reach approximately 650 million cubic feet per day as we continue to bring on additional field infrastructure. Additionally, our new well connections continue to exceed our expectations as we completed nearly as many in the first half of 2015 as we did in the first half of 2014. We remain on track to fill our plans to approximately 685 million cubic feet per day in the fourth quarter as we complete gathering system and compression projects through the second half of the year. These new compressor stations will not only fill our existing plants but also will provide capacity to ramp up volumes at our Lonesome Creek plant, which is expected to be completed late in the fourth quarter 2015. In the Mid-Continent our volumes increased quarter-over-quarter due to incremental interruptible gathering and processing services we provide to third parties from time to time as demand dictates. In addition, a key producer in the Cana-Woodford as expect has now started the process of completing wells drilled in the first half of the year. Our commercial team continues to make progress with customers on its recontracting efforts and has same positive results in increasing our fee based margin while providing enhanced services to our customers. Additionally, we reduced the level of ethane rejection in the Rocky Mountain region in June 2015 to maintain downstream NGL product quality specifications to ensure continued reliable delivery of high quality NGL products to meet the needs of our downstream markets. We expect the decreased level of ethane rejections to continue. Our producer customers are continuing to find ways to reduce drilling cost, and are doing more with less. Said another way, our producer customers are increasing volume with fewer but more efficient rigs and advanced completion technologies are increasing well production rates to levels the industry has never seen before. Our positive operating performance through the first half of the year, combined with what our producer customers are communicating to us, has given us greater confidence in our 2015 natural gas gathering and processing volumes and momentum into 2016. Much like 2015, our 2016 volume growth is expected to be led by growth in the Williston Basin. In the Williston we connected more than 260 new wells in the second quarter 2015, bringing our year-to-date total to more than 560 new well connections. We still expect to reach our 2015 new well connection goal of more than 700 wells and our 2016 goal of more than 600 new wells. That continues to be an inventory of flared gas in the Williston Basin and we estimate approximately 145 million cubic feet per day is dedicated to the Partnership with the majority of the wells flaring already connected to our system. As I touched on earlier, our producer customers are doing more with less. There’re approximately 40 rigs drilling in the most productive areas at any given time on our acreage dedication in Northeast McKenzie, North Dunn and Southern Williams Counties. Additionally wells in the high producing areas continue to exhibit significant performance improvements; producing two to three times more natural gas than lower producing areas. Additionally, more than 900 wells, which have been drilled but not completed, remain in the basin. The continued drilling flared natural gas inventory, improved well performance and significant backlog of uncompleted wells is expected to continue and help contribute to the Partnership reaching its 2016 natural gas gathered volume expectations. Our strong natural gas liquids and natural gas volume growth in the second quarter support the volume outlook we’ve been communicating and provide our stakeholders additional visibility to support our volume growth outlook for the second half of the year; and most importantly, our financial guidance expectations for 2015 and the momentum into 2016. As always, thank you for your continued support in ONEOK and ONEOK Partners and thank you to our dedicated employees for your hard work and continued commitment to our Company. Operator, we’re ready for the questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator Thank you [Operator Instructions]. And we will take the first question today from Christine Cho with Barclays. Please go ahead. Christine Cho I just wanted to start with the reduced ethane in the Rockies. When you say to maintain downstream product quality specifications, are you talking about meeting natural gas pipeline specs? Terry Spencer No Christine we’re talking about natural liquids specifications…. Christine Cho So…Yes, more color would be helpful. Terry Spencer Sure, and Sheridan, I’ll let you talk about it. Sheridan Swords The NGLs coming out of the Bakken have a high oxygen content, and as we fractionate that oxygen, it’s been driven into the propane, and the butane and to be able to get that by bringing more ethane on, we can driven it into the EP or we can treat it and we continue to make sure that the propane is on spec for delivery into the end use market. Christine Cho And then I guess a molecule [ph] from the Rockies. How much does that generate? I am assuming it’s not the full $0.30 that we usually look at for Bakken. Terry Spencer It is — we are having, it’s close to that number but there is some offset versus that current ship wrecker pays are demand charges that we have. So this is going to offset, it gives demand charges as well. So it’s not the full $0.30. Christine Cho Okay, but not something for off ’15? Terry Spencer It’s close, yes. Christine Cho Okay. I guess one of your competitors is in the process of connecting two of their NGL pipelines that would bring 50,000 barrels per day of propane from the Marcellus into the Midwest. Do you have any thoughts that you could share with us about what that level of supply could potentially use to the spread between Belvieu, Conway. Is that kind of supply going over along Conway or is that already enough excess capacity between Conway and Belvieu that it could easily go to Gulf Coast without any problems or does it just pretty prevent Conway from ever trading at a premium, again like it did last year. Any color would be helpful? Terry Spencer Christine what I would say is that obviously more volume into the Mid-Continent has nothing but improved spreads. We do think there is the ability to move some propane from Conway down to Mont Belvieu, especially if you displaced out a product. So these are all back spot ones that you may move more propane than butane and more propane than the EP or ethane that you have. But we do think there is capacity to move incrementally more volume between the two. But I think it will normally have a widening effect on the spread and it will have a dampening effect on Conway ever trading over Belvieu, you are correct. Christine Cho Okay. And then I guess last question from me. You guys have done a sizable amount of equity on the ATM year-to-date but like you said you are going to have to do more and because I think the market has somewhat of a wide range out there and what that number is, it kind of puts a bigger overhang on OKS. So that’s EBITDA you guys report is always different than what I calculate and I suspect it’s because of the project credit that’s in there but how far does the credit rating agencies go in giving you that credit, is it year, 18 months, two years, any color on how they have used your balance sheet would be helpful? Derek Reiners Sure Christine, this is Derek. On an unadjusted basis, our debt-to-EBITDA has shown a 5.1 and we reported 4.5 on an adjusted basis, you are correct. The principal difference there is the material projects that we have on our way that we receive some credit for in our covenants so that’s that delta. On a run rate basis, you are probably 1 or 2 basis points lower than that if you just took four quarter — or excuse me second quarter and multiply that by 4. The agencies I think give us some credit for that, I am not exactly sure to what extent, they don’t exactly share all their calculations with us. But they certainly understand that as we’re in construction mode, we will be issuing equity and debt for that matter ahead of the realization of the earnings from those projects. And so I think there is some benefit afforded to us in that regard. Cleary agencies look forward and think about the nature of those projects and the earnings from those projects going forward as they think about, how does our leverage looks going forward. Christine Cho Thank you for the color. Derek Reiners You bet. Terry Spencer You bet. Thanks Christine. Operator And we will now go to Chris Sighinolfi with Jefferies. Chris Sighinolfi Hey good morning Terry. Terry Spencer Hey good morning Chris. Chris Sighinolfi Thanks for the added color this morning also thanks to Walt and T. D. for the slide presentation and the added disclosure, it’s very helpful to us. So I just want to say thanks. Terry Spencer You are quite welcome. Chris Sighinolfi Couple of questions, I guess the follow on with where the screen going originally, the slide 4 where you have the volumetric data since the April update, clearly the Bakken NGL volumes are up materially from April end of July and you expected peak rates for the fourth quarter. You mentioned Terry the effects of reduced ethane rejection and interruptible volumes on 2Q and the guidance. But the wondering sort of those factors 2Q with an upside price for you on those fronts. So what are you seeing in the Bakken and I guess what gives you confidence with the forecast and could we see further upside from the products that you mentioned as we move into the back half? Terry Spencer Well Chris I mean we have increased confidence because our producers are performing and we continue to have lots of discussions to get a better understanding of where they are and what their plans are and they are executing those plans and as we said they are continuing to improve their cost structure and improve their technology and really significantly outperformed even in the midst of slight rig reductions in some cases. So we’ve got good visibility into the quarter and that’s the reason why we feel so confident about the volumes. That plays right into the natural gas liquids segment particularly as we produced more natural gas liquids out of the Rocky’s and we produced more natural gas liquids out of the Mid-Continent that benefits the NGL segment. So it’s about visibility, it’s about continued communication with these producers. Chris Sighinolfi And so on the, I guess the downstream spec element, the Sheridan’s comments. Is there further upside on that element, what you saw in Q2 and thus far in 3Q? Or are we fairly comfortable with their specs look like given base level and production volumes on is different? Sheridan Swords Well, one thing I would say is that in 2Q we discovered that we stated the ethane recovery or decreased ethane rejection in June, so you would have a full three months in the third quarter and full three months in the fourth quarter. So we think the level of ethane, or close to the level ethane that we were extracting today, is enough to bring these products into the spec and we can handle and get into the end use market. Chris Sighinolfi Sticking with that slide, slide number four, for a moment, it seems like the steepest projected ramp in July volumes to year end is on the West Texas system. So I just had a couple questions there. First, what is driving the ramp? Two, it looks also like the blended tariff rate on the system maybe came up a penny from the April update. I’m wondering if that was due to any recontracting if I am over-reading or reading too much and it’s something like there is something else going on. And then three, Terry you had mentioned when you bought that asset the potential to fractionate barrels coming off gathering Permian volumes. So just wondering when we might expect to see the approach of that effort or if you could give us something on it? Terry Spencer The first thing I’d say is July is down a little bit, the 2 15 is down a little bit from the fact that we had some outages on the system that caused the volume to be down. Also the reason the $0.04 we’ve gone from $0.03 to $0.04 just because we have increased the tariff rates on the pipeline closer to market than from what it was. So you’re seeing an increase in rates on the existing volume there. We continue to think that we’ll have ramp up there as we talk to more producers out there and we think there is opportunity for that to grow. As you point out that the West Texas pipeline has the lowest margin on our system, so it doesn’t have the biggest impact. Chris Sighinolfi And then on the fractionation side of it longer-term, just give an update on where we stand. Terry Spencer We continue to talk to producers and processors out in the Permian who are looking for a bundled service, not just transportation to fractionation and delivery into the end use market. So as we stated when we bought this pipeline, we think the ability to bring that bundled service to customers of the West Texas pipeline greatly enhance our ability to bring product to the line. And so we are in negotiations with various people on the line to be able to do that. Chris Sighinolfi Sheridan, anything to talk about? Sheridan Swords No, I didn’t have anything to add, Chris. Chris Sighinolfi I guess one final thing on the asset side, it looks like Stateline de-ethanizer was moved out a little bit. Given the comments around reduced ethane rejection, I’m just wondering what drove that and any and that that movement in time would have on cost or return. Kevin Burdick The de-ethanizer was pushed back is regarding to the details of the design and it was really two drivers. One was as we work with our contractor. There was some long lead time equipment that got in and pushed the dates out a little bit. And then as we recast the dates when we apply for winter construction and looked at the efficiency we have when we run our projects through the winter, that cost us some time to — don’t think it will have a material impact on our ’16 what we’re thinking there. Chris Sighinolfi One final thing for me, just, Derek, the 4.5 times debt to EBITDA leverage metric that you quoted, that is consistent with how we interpret the covenants on the credit facilities, is that right? Kevin Burdick Yes, that’s correct. It is exactly the way that we file with our banks for covenant compliance. Chris Sighinolfi Okay, perfect. Thanks a lot for the added color today, guys, and congrats on a great quarter. Kevin Burdick You bet. Thanks Chris. Operator And we’ll go to Kristina Kazarian with Deutsche Bank. Kristina Kazarian Quick follow-up, first on leverage levels, can you talk — I note you guys talked about this a little bit in two of the previous questions. But can you talk a little bit more about what I should be thinking on in terms of where the rating agencies want you guys to go on like a year-end run rate basis to keep an IG rating, and what that would mean for the use of the ATM or maybe even a block, and how you think about that given where the different currencies are trading right now? Derek Reiners The agencies I think have put out some guidance for us in their most recent updates. I think Moody’s talks about a 4.5 times and S&P talks about 4.25 to be in those ranges. So certainly we think about that as we consider our equity needs during the year. We’ve said many times the ATM has been a good tool for us and certainly would expect to continue to use that in the future. But again, we have to kind of balance the balance sheet needs, the leverage with the issuing equity at a higher yield certainly than we would like to see. And of course as to additional you pay distributions on those units and so that impacts your coverage. So it’s a balance and certainly we have regular communications with the agencies and let them know what our plans are. Kristina Kazarian And then bigger picture, I know we often talk about the desire to move more from POP to fee-based and to kind to get the business and at some in time you said you guys have sustained like the one-time coverage just off fee-based. I know you mentioned, again say in the press release but can we talk about progress that’s been made there and time frame to that actually occurring in your mind? Terry Spencer Yes, I will just make a high level comment. It’s going very well. Producers are engaged with us. We’ve had success. We’ve had some contracts. We are converted more to a fee-based structure than POP. So we are expanding the fee-based component and shrinking the commodity sensitive component that’s gone — it’s gone well. Producers, they want additional services, other things added to their contracts with us, other features and we are working with them on those. So it’s going well. When you think about the regions in which we operate and particularly in the Williston Basin, it’s not like hundreds of contracts we’re having to address, its key producers and just it’s not a whole bunch of contracts, okay? So we expect to have some success as we continue to move forward, have success fairly quickly. Kristina Kazarian And so when we think about that, is it like a ’16, ’17, ’18, how just roughly frame enough maybe? Terry Spencer Yes, it’s going to be more of 2016 benefit to us. Kristina Kazarian Perfect. Thanks guys. That was it from me today. Terry Spencer You bet. Thank you. Operator And we will go to Craig Shere with Tuohy Brothers. Craig Shere Good morning and congratulations. Terry Spencer Thanks Craig. Craig Shere So when you — in the last questioning when you were saying Terry 2016 benefit and some of the conversion to more fee-based from POP processing and contracting, is that to suggest that the vast majority if not all of the distribution could be covered by fee-base by then or is that more a longer term? Terry Spencer Now that’s Craig — that would be a longer term proposition for us, okay. I think it’s a practical goal, I think it makes more sense than perhaps trying to target a percentage of fee and percentage of commodity exposure but definitely it’s a longer term goal. Craig Shere Okay. And Derek expressed the balance between topping ATM and keeping in mind the practical yields these units are trading at in the public market. Even with today’s gains I think we are at stair step of lower price point than what you got on the ATM issuances in the second quarter. Is there a point at which you are just not interested in public issuances and at which without considering major structural changes that the OKE free cash flow and balance sheet strength could be used to bridge funding needs for few quarters? Derek Reiners Yes, Craig this is Derek. I think that’s a good point. Certainly OKE has some additional cash on its balance sheet today and it has certainly got capacity to raise capital there at more attractive yields today. I think it is important to step back and think about the underlying assets of the Partnership and the types of projects that we have, even at these higher yields those projects make sense. And so it’s something we certainly think about very often but and we could consider other types of securities other than just a common unit, we could consider — OKE might consider participation in some form or fashion as well to help that need as well. Craig Shere And Terry as we think about bottlenecks in infrastructure in terms of actually filling out the Bakken Express Pipeline, I know that right now at the $45 oil that’s not what people are thinking about. But thinking overtime, filling up that pipeline at $0.30 plus pricing that’s bundled pricing including all downstream infrastructure. Is the bottleneck there fractionation that would need to be added and how we should think about how much more fractionation is needed to fill up that pipe in terms of the full issue of ethane rejection? Terry Spencer Well Craig it’s a combination of both pipe and fractionation capacity. We are certainly not anywhere near to that point yet but if you think about it very broadly and longer term, if need to get to that kind of next stair step level of production assuming the prices stabilize and rebound, when we think about expanding that whole infrastructure it’s got to be pipes, it’s a combination of lubs, it’s pumps and it’s fractionation capacity you got potentially in the Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast. So you have to think about it broadly, I wouldn’t characterize it as just one particular component. Craig Shere And is there a bookmark you can give in terms of — or book-ins you can give in terms of how billions of dollars of infrastructure we are talking about? Terry Spencer I’ll let Sheridan. Sheridan Swords Well, what I would say, Craig, the other thing to realize is that fracs are not exclusive to one basin. Our system is we can move Y grade around. So would we have to add more fracs if we add more volume out of the Bakken? Possibly if we bring more volume as we’re seeing more volume come out at the Scoop, the Stack and some of those areas, as that comes on that fills up our existing frac capacity as well, so it’s go in there. But right now we think we have enough frac capacity for the volume on the Bakken today as it grows even in a C3 plus rejected volume. We do see a great opportunity out at the Central Oklahoma with the Stack and what’s going on down there in the Scoop that we think — we do think in the future we will be building more fracs. Craig Shere On a separate note, I was a bit surprise the optimization margins weren’t more robust in the quarter, because propane spreads actually got pretty decent even though ethane was pretty anemic still. Can you update us on your ability to capture specific propane differentials even amidst the anemic ethane margins? Sheridan Swords Well, I think the biggest thing you have to look at is when you look at the propane differential through the second quarter — you have to realize if you are going to the LONESTAR facility, which had the highest spread there’s restrictions in getting to that facility. So a lot of what we were able to capture was between Conway and the non-TET or enterprise mark. So that was down cents per gallon from that. We continue to, on the propane side, we continue to convert a lot of our optimization capacity to fee-based. So when we do that that reduces our ability to get a wider spread on margins on what we do ship down there, because we have to ship more and more volume for our third-party people that have, we’ve given them Belvieu access. Craig Shere And just one more, the Bakken gathered NGL volumes are only forecast to rise 5% from July to the fourth quarter. But gathered volumes are guided to rise 14% from 2Q to 4Q. Can you elaborate on that? Sheridan Swords The reason that gathered volumes are continuing to go up, it is definitely a growth out of our Bakken, but we also see growth coming out of the Mid-Continent as we continue to go forward on that. So I think that may be where you are seeing some of that growth happen. Craig Shere I guess — I am sorry, the first number was the NGL volumes and second was the guest gathered volumes all out of Bakken. Sheridan Swords Okay. Kevin Burdick Craig, this is Kevin. On the gathered volumes when you look at the information we provided in the quarter, that is not necessarily a quarterly average that’s saying we will reach that capacity at some point. So, if you just do that math, that’s not saying that there is a, what your number was that’s the average growth, quarter-over-quarter, that just taking look at kind of a peak volume in the third quarter and a peak volume in the fourth quarter. Craig Shere So the numbers are a bit apples and oranges. That helps. Thank you very much. Operator We’ll go to Jeremy Tonet with J.P. Morgan. Unidentified Analyst This is actually Chris on for Jeremy. I guess as noted earlier, I appreciate the color, extra color on the slide deck. When you look at the volume outlook for the second half of 2015 you noted that captured flare gas was one of the key drivers and you also have an inventory of about 145 million cubic feet a day in ONEOK’s dedicated area. And so, we were wondering whether there would be — whether that would be more weighted towards the second half of 2015 or how much of that goes into 2016? Terry Spencer Well, yes, there is a considerable amount in the second half, but it certainly gives you considerable momentum going into 2016. So, it is going to carry you well into 2016 along with the newly completed wells and the backlog of uncompleted wells. So it is all kind of working together. Kevin, you got anything to add to that? Kevin Burdick No, I would just — the one statistic that I think is very interesting to kind of describe some of the improved performance is, if you look at the numbers provided by the state from January to May, oil production when up I think it was around 10,000 barrels a day. But gas production, which was basically flat or maybe a 1% increase, gas production actually went up about 150 million cubic feet a day during that same timeframe. So that demonstrates that as oil states flat with the improved gas to oil ratios, the improved performance gas oil ratios, the improved performance, the gas volumes have continued to go up. Unidentified Analyst Thanks, that’s helpful. I guess moving to West Texas LPG, your JV partner there noted some pretty big expectations in terms of increased pipeline distributions. And so we’re wondering, relative to your plans with that at the time of the acquisition, how are things trending? And with the recent tariff developments and your expectations for I guess returns going forward? Terry Spencer Well, it is going very well. With the tariff increases as well as the volume prospects that we continue to develop, we’ve got high expectations for the pipeline, it’s a great fit with our existing infrastructure, it is of course putting in this premiere basin that we wanted to be in for some time and sets ourselves for continued growth. The performance from a financial perspective is going to improve significantly with these tariff increases and as the volumes continue to be added it’s going to be — it is and it is going to continue to be a major contributor to the segment’s profit. Unidentified Analyst So relative to your planned into time of the acquisition, would you say that’s higher or? Terry Spencer I think the — what our expectations when we had the acquisition we’re progressing right along those expectations. Unidentified Analyst Thanks, it’s helpful. And then I guess lastly from me. On the re-contracting front in terms of your percentage of proceed contracts. For 2016, would you expect any kind of lower returns from those contract negotiations or what kind of give and take do you have with producer customers in that regard. Anything there would be helpful? Terry Spencer Well the strategy is to enhance our returns and obviously these contracts have been affected by the lower commodity price environment and certainly at these price levels and the resulting margins it makes it difficult to realize an acceptable return. So we are not going to sacrifice return and as we continue to work with these producers and provide enhanced services and we have demonstrated that we have been able to put contracts together that make sense and get our returns to an acceptable level. Unidentified Analyst Thanks. Appreciate the color. Terry Spencer You bet. Operator And we will go to John Edwards with Credit Suisse. John Edwards Yes, good morning everybody and congrats on a nice quarter. Just coming back to the financing questions, you have indicated you are open to alternative approaches here. So I take it that you would also include things like subordinating yields, take units, perhaps even cash injections from OKE using OKE equity. Would that be fair? Terry Spencer Yes, that would be fair. We continue to evaluate all of those levers. John Edwards And then I am just curious on the projects that have been suspended Terry, kind of what’s the thoughts behind those perhaps any color on when you think you would be able to bring those back into say execution mode? Terry Spencer No specific dates at this particular point in time but again we continue to assess the current market environment which is very volatile and uncertain. It is — and we continue to assess the environment and when the environment makes sense and when the producers need that capacity certainly we will fire those projects back up, okay. Right now we are continuing to — we are still in a wait and see mode on those suspended projects. John Edwards Okay and then just any thoughts regarding your plans with all the recent increases in M&A activity? Terry Spencer Well, our plans are going to be the same. We are going to stay organically focused to the extent of we participate in M&A from a strategic asset standpoint that is we — when people ask me about M&A I am like okay yes we are interested in M&A particularly as it relates to strategic asset acquisitions like our West Texas pipeline in the Permian. So yes we are going to stay active and focused and look at opportunities. But at the end of that day what happens out there in the M&A arena, we don’t have a whole lot of control over that. We will just keep our heads down and stay focused and continue to drive risk out this business and serve our customers. John Edwards Okay. Great. That’s it from me. Thanks. Terry Spencer Yes. Operator Next is Michael Blum with Wells Fargo. Michael Blum Hi, thanks, so two quick ones. Just one more question on the West Texas LPG pipeline. When you acquired the asset you laid out a plan to spend a significant amount of capital over the next few years and expand the capacity of the line, obviously you have executed on increasing rate already. Has anything changed there or is that still all kind of on plan? Sheridan Swords Hi Michael this is Sheridan. Yes, we have been talking to quite a few producers out there that will backstop expansion. So we are progressing as planned on that and we are very hopeful hear pretty soon that we will be able to come out and announce expansion of the pipeline. So the Permian has still been resilient. We are still seeing growth and we are getting most people call on us about trying to get on this platform, as we still think with the assets that we have we can be extremely competitive versus the marketplace out there. Michael Blum And then just I apologize if I missed this but could you quantify the reduction in ethane rejection you saw this quarter? Sheridan Swords In the Bakken is about 20,000 barrels a day in June. So that’s 20,000 barrels a day in June, so you can put over about 7,000 barrels a day on average for the quarter. Operator We’ll go to Becca Followill with U.S. Capital Advisors. Becca Followill If this already been asked, if it has just tell me to go listen to — look at the transcripts, but on the ethane rejection, why is it occurring now? What has changed in having to add more ethane in to help the spec? Terry Spencer Well, Becca, I think the short answer, and I will let Sheridan follow-up, but I think the short answer is just the volume growth, significant volume growth that we kind of broke over to a point where the NGL production has gotten so big to the point where now this issue emerging is something significant. Sheridan Swords Yes, I would say you are exactly right. It is fundamentally that we’ve had end use people call us and say that the propane is off spec and we need to clean it up. Becca Followill So, it is just you reached a tipping point? Sheridan Swords Yes, that’s right. Becca Followill And then going forward, as you continue to produce volumes and you will have to produce more ethane in order to keep it in balance, is that correct? Sheridan Swords It will be. We are working on a long-term plan that we can clean this up at our fractionators so that we do not have to continue to extract this ethane. But that is going to take some time to construct and get in place. But we are working, our engineers are working on a long-term solution. Terry Spencer And the only thing I will add is that is not done for free. Becca Followill So your shippers will have to pay for that? Terry Spencer Likely so. Operator And next line is Eric Genco with Citi. Eric Genco I just wanted to go back to the — and I guess not to beat a dead horse. The percent of proceeds to fee based. Your fee-based rate ticked up to $0.39 from sort of the mid-30s this quarter. Is that related to your efforts to move towards more fee-based? Terry Spencer I think the short answer is yes. Eric Genco And I guess as I was looking at it last night, is the strategy then to move towards more of a fee-based cut or a hybrid contract structure where maybe if commodity prices are low you get an extra fee payment? Because your equity volumes for NGLs and for residue gas actually ticked up a bit relative to the overall production levels. And I would have thought if that was moving towards fee-based that that would have been down or flat. So, I was just curious to whether this is more of a hybrid move or whether this is a pure conversion. Kevin Burdick Eric, this is Kevin. It will be — it is a combination. I mean there we talk about converting to more of a fee-based margin. There are a variety of ways that we get there. One is, like you said, is just increasing the fees and increasing the POP percentages, that kind of trade-off. There is other ways that accomplish the same thing. So our goal, like Terry has talked previously, is each of our customers is different. They are looking for different services. Those different services may require different strategies in how we go about working with them to get to the right mix of what is that. But in all the scenarios, it does result in a higher fee, but it may not, a fee-based margin, but it may not necessarily correlate to a lower equity volume. Terry Spencer And, Kevin, the only thing I would add to that is that when you think about our business as a whole, we’re keenly focused on bringing new fee-based opportunities and fee-based projects to the table. And in Phil’s business segment, as we mentioned in the remarks, the Roadrunner pipeline and its OWT expansion are important. And on OWT expansion, in particular, is a good example of the additional projects that have spun off as a result of this Roadrunner project in establishing a conduit to those markets in Mexico. So we’ll be very focused and remain very focused on fee-based opportunities and that will help bring that fee-based percentage up as we go forward. Eric Genco So is it fair to say then that that $0.39, at least, probably while commodity prices remain low, is probably fairly sticky at this point? And then perhaps as commodity prices recover maybe that falls back a little bit to where it should have been, but it doesn’t matter because you have retained the upside in these contracts? Terry Spencer No, I don’t think so, Eric. I think that as we continue to renegotiate that fee should go up. So, yes, I don’t think that that rate is going to be driven much by or affected much by a move in commodity prices. Eric Genco And I had a couple other quick ones just to sort of — some of the numbers you gave on the last quarter’s conference call, and I think you repeated them, but I just want to double check. So there is about 900 drilled uncompleted wells in the Bakken right now and I think last quarter you said about 50% is on your acreage, so that is basically the same –? Terry Spencer That is correct, roughly 50%. Eric Genco And I think you said last quarter that there were 50 rigs drilling on your acreage. I was curious; did you give a number for that today? Terry Spencer Yes, we did. Eric Genco Okay, what was that? I’m sorry. I missed that. Terry Spencer We’re in the 40 range right now. Eric Genco 40 range…. Terry Spencer Yes, and again that moves up and down. But all of that has been in line with our expectations. Eric Genco Okay. Terry Spencer The only thing I would add to that is keep in mind that these IP rates is the average initial production rates on these wells just continue skyrocket. And I was just reading some materials the other day from some of our customers or some of our producers rather, and it’s really remarkable the improvement that we are seeing. So even if you see rig reductions we are seeing these increased IP rates that are more than offsetting some of those reductions. Eric Genco I think that’s fair, I think in some of the instances we’ve been looking at — some assumptions it takes about 24 days to drill well and some of these things but we are hearing some things maybe it’s fallen down to almost the 16 range for some people so. I guess we would count as not the end all be all that it used to be. Terry Spencer Yes. Eric Genco I also just wanted to ask real quick. Of the 900 drilling completed wells in the basin what you view is sort of being an equilibrium number for that? I mean there’s always going to be some number of uncompleted wells and I was just curious overall for the basin what do you think is normal? Terry Spencer That’s a tough one to answer. I mean because especially as producers have shifted almost entirely now to kind of the multi-well pads and those stick a rig and at a spot and then drill several wells and that — so you kind of have an artificial working inventory if you will of completed — of uncompleted wells. I think there is some as we have talked with others in North Dakota is that 300, 400 ranges that will kind of always be there as a working inventory as long as you are at this kind of a rig count, you may be in that range. But again that can fluctuate as again as rigs move around and what, where and how they are drilling. Eric Genco Okay. Well, thank you very much. That’s all I had. Terry Spencer Thank you. Operator We will go to Andy Gupta with HITE Hedge. And it appears he does not have a question. So we will go to Matt Niblack with HITE. Please go ahead. Matt Niblack Hi. I just wanted to make sure I understood what you said at the beginning of the call properly that you had ample of liquidity particularly given how credit metrics are calculated by your borrowers that there is no need to issue okay equity at these FX valuations? Terry Spencer Well I don’t know that I have said that. We have been pretty clear that we expect to continue to issue equity as we balance our credit metrics with issuing at this price. Matt Niblack Okay. But you said you’re going at least avoid the disruptive overnight offering given the ATM program? Terry Spencer Well I mean we talk about the overnight markets all the time and we certainly continue to look at that option. As we said many times the ATM program has worked pretty well for us. We were able to get quite a bit done in the second quarter, so to avoid that overnight market issue but I can’t wool that out for you. Matt Niblack Okay. Thank you. Operator And that will conclude our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn it back for any additional or closing remarks. Terry Spencer Thank you. Our quite period for the third quarter starts when we close our books early October and extensive earnings are released after the market closes on November 3rd, followed by our conference call on November 4. Thank you for joining us and have a good day. Operator Thank you very much and that does conclude our conference for today. I would like to thank everyone for your participation and have a great day.

Northland Power’s (NPIFF) CEO John Brace on Q1 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Executives John Brace – CEO Paul Bradley – CFO Sean Durfy – President and CDO Analysts Nelson Ng – RBC Capital Markets Paul Lechem – CIBC Rupert Merer – National Bank Sean Steuart – TD Securities Matthew Akman – Scotiabank Steven Paget – FirstEnergy Northland Power, Inc. ( OTCPK:NPIFF ) Q1 2015 Earnings Conference Call May 12, 2015 10:00 AM ET Operator Welcome to the Northland Power Conference Call to Discuss the 2015 First Quarter Results. During the presentation all participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder this conference is being recorded Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 10 AM Easter Time. Conducting this call for Northland Power are John Brace, Chief Executive Officer; Sean Durfy, President and Chief Development Officer; Paul Bradley, Chief Financial Officer; and Adam Beaumont, Director of Finance. Northland Power management has asked me to caution you that their summary of results and responses to your questions may contain forward-looking statements that include assumptions and are subject to various risks. Actual results may differ materially from management’s expected or forecasted results. Please read the forward-looking statements section in yesterday’s news release announcing Northland Power’s results and be guided by its content in making investment decisions or recommendations. The release is available at www.northlandpower.ca. I’d now like turn the call over to John Brace. Please go ahead. John Brace Thank you very much operator and good morning everyone. The first couple of months since 2015 have been some of the positive in over 25 years at Northland Power. Our transformation from an independent generally focused power producer into an international developer and owner of sustainable energy infrastructure is well underway. We have long defined our business strategy as one of focusing on measured growth that enables us to deliver sustainable returns. Our activity and result so far in 2015 demonstrate that we are applying the strategy with equal parts of boldness and diligence. Paul will provide more detail on our financial results shortly but I can tell you that while our quarterly adjusted EBITDA was marginally lower than the same period last year is result of us taking advantage to some exceptional opportunities in the natural gas market due to high prices last winter our overall results were in line with our expectations. The first three months of 2015 saw a successfully complete over $2 billion of debt and equity financing or taking big steps forward when our European offshore wind portfolio and Ontario renewable projects. In March we closed financing on a total of €1.2 billion for a second 332 megawatt offshore wind project called Nordsee One located approximately 40 kilometers off the coast of Germany in the North Sea. We also closed financing on our 100 megawatt Grand Bend wind project located in Ontario with the projected cost of $384 million. Both Nordsee One and Grand Band are now under construction. Construction is also progressing well on our 600 megawatt Gemini offshore wind project in the Netherlands and our four remaining Ground-mounted Solar projects here in Ontario above which I’ll talk more shortly. Our 2015 focus is on successfully delivering or advancing all of these projects and so far so good I look forward to provide any more detailed presentation on our progress at our upcoming AGM on May 19th I can tell you in the mean time that all construction projects are proceeding well. On Gemini production at the 200 kilometers of electrical interconnection cables which you can see illustrated on the covers of our 2014 annual report is nearing completion and installation out at sea has already started. Almost 90% of the 150 monopile foundations for the turbines have been made in progress on the two offshore high voltage substation platforms is significant. The remainder of the project components are in production and onshore construction is also taking place. As part of our due diligence for Northland and under our rules as members of the Gemini Board of Directors both Paul Bradley and I have been visiting some of the Gemini manufacturing facilities. These have included the electric cable, monopiles, transition pieces, offshore platforms and foundations and the turbine manufacturing facilities. I can tell you that seeing the scale and size of the equipment being produced and the huge number of components that have already been made is extremely impressive. What is most important however is that overall things are progressing well and so far both Gemini and Nordsee are proceeding on schedule and on budget. We are creating infrastructure that will meet the electricity needs of millions of people for many years into the future while supporting the Europe Union’s clean energy transformation. We see a healthy appetite and therefore significant opportunities for this version in technology. In fact a new report from global data indicates that Germany is set to overtake the UK as the global leader for annual offshore wind turbine installations in 2015 with over 2,000 megawatts estimated to be added this year. Globally annual offshore wind installations are expected to more than double and we are excited to be a part of this growing industry. And here at home, well on the smaller scale we’re also building important clean energy infrastructure at our Grand Ben Wind project which is a 50-50 partnership with two first nations. Excavation has already begun along the underground transmission line, the turbines and other major components are on order. Construction will continue throughout 2015 and the project is anticipated to start producing electricity in the first half of 2016. Finally, progress on our four remaining Ground-Mounted Solar Projects, divide into two parts. First is the completion of the construction. As we told you on our last call, Ganotec Inc. has taken over construction on the remaining four projects. Construction on all four sites is progressing well, and they are expected to be complete in 2015. Second, thus a situation with the original contractor H.B. White; whom we terminated at the end of last year for breach of the EPC contract. Expectedly the wait in the number of subcontractors have filed liens and claims on the projects and we have filed our own claims against White for cost, losses and damages for breaches of the contract. It will undoubtedly take some time for these legal matters to be sorted out and we are convinced of the legitimacy of our position. In the meantime the projects will be finished and in production. Despite these challenges, we remain confident that overall, our Ground-Mounted Solar portfolio will meet return expectations and deliver attractive reliable results over the long term. Moving to an update on our long term assets, I’d also like to provide to you an update of the global adjustment phase that affects three of our interior power projects agreements. Back in March, the quarter rolled in favor of Northland and other power producers in relation to the escalators in our power purchase agreements. Disappointingly but I suppose unsurprisingly the ruling was appealed by the contract counterparty. We feel confident that the courts will continue to rule in our favor as the case progresses through the legal system. I am also pleased to remind you that our Kirkland Lake facility has already signed a new 20-year contract for the 30 megawatt gas peaking portion of that generation station. The details of an agreement for the final base load gas field portion of the facility are being papered. We are also working trying to ensure a long future for our Kirkland facility, however as power purchase agreements extension expired as of midnight last night at which time we cease to generating electricity. We’ve not yet permanently shut down the facility or decreased our efforts towards attaining a contract renewal or further extension. Our staff remained employed as we continue to do everything we can to secure a new agreement. We have the support of the community in the region. The facility is critically important to North Eastern Ontario and its forestry industries and our host community in Kirkland. We will continue to work hard to find a solution, building a sustainable future for our host communities translates to a sustainable investment for our shareholders. On that note the quarter has seen significant activity from the financing perspective. As part of the over $2 billion in debt and equity financing that I mentioned at the start, we successfully completed over $400 million of convertible debentures and common share offerings during the first quarter. The proceeds were used to help fund our investments in the Nordsee One and Grand Bend projects. In February, we closed the sale of our interest in the Frampton wind project for net proceeds of approximately $10 million. To achieve our continued growth objectives we are applying our proven strategies on an ever increasing scale. The result is in increasingly diverse portfolio of clean and creating a long term energy assets. I would now like to turn the microphone over to Paul for further discussion on our financial results. Paul Bradley Thank you, John. I’d like to extend my thanks to everybody for joining us this morning. As John mentioned it’s been extremely busy quarter for us. Last night, Northland Power released its 2015 first quarter results. Northland’s plant operations for the most part met or exceeded our expectations for the quarter, with the company generating $97 million of adjusted EBITDA. As John noted, the first quarter of last year that’s 2014, produced exceptionally strong results. The period of high natural gas prices provide us with opportunities to curtail electricity production and resell the natural gas at certain facilities, which created unexpectedly high natural gas resell margins. So as those spikes and gas prices did not recur this year, Northland’s performance reflected the more normal level of operations resulting in a 5% decrease in adjusted EBITDA from the same quarter last year and free cash flow down $50 million, 11% lower. The sites of the non-recurring gas resale’s margins, other key factors that affected our adjusted EBITDA for the quarter included the following. Higher interest income earned on Northland’s portion of the Gemini subordinated debt, inclusion of Mclean’s which became operational in May 2014 as well as the non-recurrence of the write-off of deferred development cost into 2014. These increases to adjusted EBITDA were more than offset by several items. First a onetime charge associated with an IESO generator cost recovery program for Thorold. Second, lower performance incentive fees earned from Cochrane and Kirkland Lake, also may be due to the 2014 gas resale margins. Third, lower investment income largely due to higher dividends for Panda-Brandywine in 2014. And lastly increased corporate management and administration cost. Northland’s free cash flow are 50 million for the quarter were 7 million lower than the same quarter in 2014 for the same reason as a decrease in adjusted EBITDA and largely due to the high level gas resale in 2014. Other factors contributing the lower free cash flow over 2014 include an increase in net interest expense increase primarily due to the inclusion of interest on the claims and Ground-mounted Solar Phase II debt, interest on the convertible debentures from those issued in January and interest on Northland’s corporate term facility; also an increase in scheduled debt repayments from these new debt facilities. These net decreases in free cash flow were partially offset by the net proceeds from the sale of the Frampton wind farm in 2015. Our dividend payout ratio for the quarter was 81% versus 63% in 2014 on a total dividend basis, including the effective dividends invested through Northland’s DRIP program, the cash dividend payout was 60% compared to 49% in the first quarter of 2014. The increase in payout ratio reflects the decreased free cash flow and the new share capital issuances to fund Nordsee One, Grand Bend and in Gemini projects. This is in line with our expectations as we execute on our development and construction program. The GAAP net loss of 26 million exceeded the prior year primarily as a result of the non-cash fair value accounting loss on interest rate swaps at Gemini and Nordsee One. This net loss does not reflect the economic substance of the projects, because the interest rate swaps are used to effectively fix the interest rates at Gemini and Nordsee One. These fair value adjustments are non-cash items that will reverse over time and have no impact on the cash obligations of Northland towards projects. Turning to Northland’s financing activities this quarter. We have continued the vigorous pace of 2014. In the first three months of the year we completed over $2 billion of debt and equity financings as we advanced our projects into construction. To assistant funding our Nordsee One and Grand Bend wind projects, we issued as convertible debenture offering in the amount of 158 million and a common share offering with gross proceeds of 281 million which includes the private placement of 50 million from our Founder and Chairman, Jim Temerty. The funds will also be used to refurnish working capital and general corporate purposes. Approximately 70% of Nordsee One’s €1.2 million project cost will be provided from a non-recourse bank loan for multiple international commercial lenders. Reflecting the strength of the project the financing was over-subscribed and completed in only six months from the commencement of the bank debt process. Late in March, we also completed financing on the Grand Bend wind project. The total project cost is expected to be 384 million and approximately 85% of the projects required financing has been provided by an institutional style fixed rate amortizing loan. The total co-generation bank term loan coming due in September was refinanced for 183 million with its maturity extended to March 2030, with this financing Northland has extinguished all of its project refinancing liquidity risk and has locked in all interest rates towards project debt. Northland also entered into foreign exchange contracts to effectively fix the foreign exchange conversion rate on substantially all projected euro denominated cash inflows from Nordsee One over the fixed cash period. As you can see it was extremely busy quarter for Northland’s financing team. For our financial outlook for 2015 Northland continues to expect our adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of 380 million to 400 million in 2015. We are currently guiding towards the lower end of the range allowing unfavorable outcomes of the contract extension of Cochrane and potentially different interim arrangements on the appeal of the global adjustment court case and should these two items come out as we don’t expect then we have some allowance at our guidance for that. For payout ratio in 2015 we continue to expect the ratio to be in the range of 100% to 115% of free cash flow on a total dividend basis. As we have said in the past Northland’s payout ratio is expected to exceed 100% on a total dividend basis, until Gemini and Nordsee are completed in 2017. On a net basis however, including the impact of reinvested dividends through the DRIP, we expect the cash dividends to be 75% to 85% of free cash flow. As demonstrated by all the financing activity this quarter, management’s continued objective is to effectively manage our balance sheet and minimize the amount of dilutive equity raised while prudently maintaining healthy credit metrics. And with that I will turn the call back to John for concluding remarks before taking your questions. John Brace Thank you, Paul. I believe our results this quarter demonstrate significant progress towards achieving our 2015 commitments. Results are gratifying to see the Northland team’s efforts acknowledged by the international finance and business community through awards from a number of prestigious publications. Some of these we told you about on our last call but here is a summary of all of the awards, Projects Finance International, Power Deal of the year Europe awarded to our Gemini project, Infrastructure Journal and Project Finance Magazine, Win Deal of the Year Europe and overall winner for Europe and Africa awarded to Gemini, Netherlands Canadian chamber of Commerce Northland named 2014 business of the year, Environmental Finance Win Deal of the year of the year 2015 awarded to Gemini and Investor Relations Magazine awarded Paul Bradley, best Investor Relations Canada by our CFO. It has been over 25 years since we opened our first facility in Cochrane, Ontario and we have since transformed into an international power producer. We are now in the period of significant growth and we are focused on successfully delivering in that growth while continuing to deliver on our commitments to our investors. We believe our ability to marry entrepreneurialism and prudence that are focused on effectively managing risk will hoping to forge the worldwide shifts to sustainable energy is helping to divine Northland as a leader an innovator and a company to watch. We have big things ahead of us and we look forward to showing you what were capable of. As we grow, we remained focused on our core promise to deliver sustainable value that our shareholders can depend on today and well into the future. That includes our formal remarks. And would be pleased to take your questions at this time. Operator if you can please hand over questions. Question-and-Answer Session. Operator Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Nelson Ng with RBC Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question. Nelson Ng Great, thanks. Good morning everyone. Just the quick question on Cochrane, so if the facility stops running for period until hopefully get another contract are there any issues with the biomass or a gas supply and do you expect the facility to be running mainly on gas if it becomes bigger? John Brace There is several parts to answer my question like Nelson first we are doing our best to make sure that gas supplies and wood supplies will still be available to us when we get to start our facility up again if the plan were to continue on operating as it was than it would be gas and biomass that as it has always been, if negotiations with the government were to proceed in a fashion that it would be turned into a partly peaking facility then one could expect that the gas part of that would be that probably the biomass would continue on in more or less a base load mode we are making sure as from a contractual point of view and a physical point of view that we laying up the facility in the interim period here while we’re now running to be capable of generating well long with into the future. Nelson Ng Okay, thanks. And then I have a few questions about Nordsee One, in terms of send we on the turbines I’m sure that banks are pretty comfortable with the turbines given the financial close has been achieved but can you provide some color in terms of like from your perspective in terms of like the technology risk like I understand the turbines are pretty big like 6.5 megawatts and it’s not that common out there right now and I’m not sure if the website is updated but I think Senvion’s website indicates that there is about 4 off shore in projects with those blades operating so can you just give me a sense of how your perspective of the technology risk? John Brace This very part answer with slide going to a longer one Nelson was there were very comfortable with the turbines it’s in fact one of them Senvion is one of the larger turbine producers for the off shore wind industry. The turbine were using is already been deployed in other wind farms and is in operation and so and has a good track record so there is one known issue to do with the bearing’s on the turbine and Senvion has both the short term fix and a long term program in place for dealing with that and you can bet that in our contract to Senvion their contractual provisions they relate to keeping us immune as it were from any difficulties with the bearing which I think frankly reflects Senvion’s confidence in the future and also center bridge their recent purchase risk confidence in Senvion as a long term performer in the off shore wind industry. On top of that off course as you mentioned the banks and the banks due diligent engineers have been all through it and Senvion’s turbines are the ones we are using for our project and their prior track record come up with good marks. Nelson Ng I see. And then just one kind of follow up question on Senvion, so you mentioned that they were recently acquired I think earlier this year for 1.2 billion. Can you talk about counter party risk and any changes in the direction of the company or the company’s strategy? Paul Bradley Yes. I think Nelson net net we were positively impressed by the [Centerbridge] acquisition, Senvion has always been — and for those who don’t know Senvion is rename of REpower and everyone knows REpower is one of the first turbine companies in the wind business and they’ve always been a consistent performer year-over-year and a very solid technology. With [Centerbridge’s] acquisition it basically took a very weak and unhealthy pattern out of the picture and the concern always was hate as the company get rated or the assets gate rated to help the weak pattern. The acquisition and we were pretty to a number of the dates around the acquisition from both [Centerbridge] and the company, but the company actually has a number of protections in place that put us in a much better position overall. And also the acquisition price reflects the strength of Senvion’s ability to produce income. So I think once we got through all of our due diligence of the acquisition we were net net very happy about the file. Nelson Ng Thanks, Paul. And then just one last question relaying to your general overhead cost I think management and [win] cost have increased, I was just wondering in terms of I guess directionally do you expect those cost to continue to increase over the next few years with the two offshore wind projects I guess being commissioned in 2017. And then also I wanted to ask whether the development cost will kind of ramp up going forward and whether you’ve started spending development cost in Latin America yet? Paul Bradley I’ll talk about the first one, we’ve been over the past year but probably back end loaded to earlier in 2015 has been building in the necessary infrastructure to take us from kind of a fairly small Canadian base company to a company that’s positioning itself to be powerhouse in a much broader market and much bigger project. So that as you can imagine take some infrastructure from systems and compliance and all kinds of internal folks. So you’re seeing us walk away through that I certainly wouldn’t want — all believe for a moment that’s a trend but there is a bit of the step that we’re going through at the current time for the overhead cost. We’re seeing some good productivity coming out of it and from the risk management standpoint and from other elements that it’s the right thing to do and it was time for us to do some of it. So period no time like the present to make those investments. I’ll let Sean cover from the development side, Sean Durfy, our President and Chief Development Officer. Sean Durfy Thanks, Paul. Nelson, from the perspective of development costs our costs are in line and somewhat lower actually due to development expenses than we had last year. And we’re also very prudent in how we go about spending development cost once we get further into the development cycle. When it comes to Latin America we’re still very much in the origination stage of development so very little excessive cost going into that, in other words we don’t have foreign deals yet. So we’re still very much in the origination phase so lower expense cost. Operator Our next question comes from the line of Paul Lechem with CIBC. Please proceed with your question. Paul Lechem Thank you. Good morning. I’m just wondering for Cochrane, if the plant remain shut down for the balance of Q2, what should we expect in terms of cost just to maintain that facility until potentially a new deal is struck? John Brace Paul, we’re not going to nearly go into that I mean Cochrane is less than 2% of our current take on everything no matter what you do to it. So we haven’t really tried to pull us out as you can imagine there is some competitive attention here with our off take or not disclosing orderly on our financial information so if don’t mind we’ll passing that question. Paul Lechem Fair enough. On the Brand Bend still, bit of an update in the last call you gave an update — expected to build the project, is that number that you gave last quarter that still what you believe you can bring these facilities in under. John Brace Yes. Paul Lechem The 75 to that 13 project is still help? John Brace Yes. Paul Lechem Okay. And lastly on Gemini, can you give us over the next few months what milestone should we expect maybe between now and the next call on the Gemini construction. Thanks. Paul Bradley The main thing that will happen on July 1st under our environmental permit were allowed to start installing the monopile foundations for the turbines. So on our next call presumably we’ll be able to tell you something about the number of foundations that have already been late. In addition to that there should be fair amount of the offshore cable, the export cable about 200 kilometers of undersea cable I mentioned in the earlier remarks laid on the ocean floor and depending on the exact timing we may be close to sending the offshore platforms out to sea but can’t remember when our next call is actually scheduled for the date, it’s August so they should be out. Operator Our next question comes from the line of Rupert Merer with National Bank. Please proceed with your question. Rupert Merer So looking at your construction pipeline as a few projects moved to financial close. [I imagine] you put all your equity into those projects today, is that correct? John Brace That’s correct. Let`s say typically Rupert the banks insisted the equity goes in first. Rupert Merer Right, so sounds like your approach going well, so given where you are now and what you’ve learned over the last few quarters, what keeps you up at [night] today with those projects if anything and already you see [indiscernible] risky or you’re scheduled on budget today? John Brace That’s pretty wide reaching question. I think from my perspective, we are confident that all of the projects which are under-construction will meet their schedules and budgets. What we have to do as the owners, is make sure in the case of Gemini and Nordsee, whether actually large teams of people that are the owners side of the table over in Europe watching that the contractors do what they’re supposed to do with a right degree of quality and the right rate level of health and safety and environmental protection and cost control that the projects unfold. So from Northland’s point of view our role to a large degree is ensuring that our two teams of 40 odd people in Europe perform and watch the contractor the way they are supposed to do. In the case of North America here for Grand Bend’s we have a classical balance plan contract with [indiscernible] and we are — our role is much closer to the home in terms of watching them and making sure they do what they are supposed to do. And off course in the [indiscernible] we are in slightly different relationship now with [indiscernible] than we were with White, so we are paying close attention to scheduling cost on those projects. So the shorter form version of it is, I wouldn’t say, it keeps me up at night in a frightened state by any means but as owners, we have to make sure that we absorb these projects and influence these projects to best we can to make sure they stay on schedule and on budget. And off course overwriting everything is the need and the absolute necessity of clean health and safety records and environmental records on those projects. Rupert Merer Yes, great, thanks, just a quick follow up on Nelson’s question, in early classification of Nordsee and Grand Bend, from development of TPNA, will you see a decline in your development cost for the rest of the year? John Brace I think, remember our business is one big pipeline. Absolutely after continue to develop, but we do it prudently, right now we don’t have any projects in the stage of where Nordsee was six months ago, so we’ll continue on the origination side and continue developing deals and really it’s the Nordsee shows the most promise over the short term. So our development budget is what it is and as I said it’s a touch lower than it was the previous year. Operator Our next question comes from the line of Sean Steuart with TD Securities. Please proceed with your question. Sean Steuart Couple of questions, with respect to Phase III of the Solar, I think the wording in the MD&A was you’re not in a position to determine expected final returns but you do expect it to reach minimum hurdles. I guess just with products underway here and it seems like a fair degree certainty on CapEx. I’m surprised you aren’t able to nail that in, is it just with respect to the ongoing legal proceedings with the former contractor? John Brace Yes, that’s a main part Sean, as in our view we’re very convinced of the legitimacy of our position as I mentioned earlier on, it’s how much money that White ends up pawning up to the table and [that is, we’ll be able] to fight to get there, so that’s a fairly uncertain number at this stage. Paul Bradley And that’s why we put the outside barrier number in there Sean, just to let people get a sense of where we believe the worst outcome comes and then Sean, we believe we’ll do better than that, but we feel it’s responsible for the outside number. Sean Steuart Okay, understood. And then on Kirkland Lake, can you give us any context on the economics for the TPA for the 30 megawatt peaker? John Brace With rather which we get the whole package done because we’re in the middle of a very commercial sensitive negotiations, so let us defer that if you don’t mind Sean? Operator [Operator instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Akman with Scotiabank. Please proceed with your question. Matthew Akman Good morning. Paul I wonder if you could just recap the [thorough] refinance terms versus prior any advantages in the refinance terms relative to what it was in place? Paul Bradley Yes, so basically a largely awash, we didn’t over finance it, [indiscernible] plenty of money out and if you realize the interest rate had been swapped out there really was no gain on the underline and [indiscernible] was done at a time when spreads were at historical low so the spreads were ted higher than that we had before but we are also able to pick that up in better amortization of the final debt so from a free cash flow perspective the financing kind of kept us about the same maybe as snick below where you were but nothing was mentioning. Matthew Akman Good was the amortization disclose? Paul Bradley Well. Typically we do disclose it I don’t believe we’ve come out with an area since we’ve done that as typically we will put it there but it’s basically closer at the end of the life with the PPA along with CAF I think if you go back if you want to get the exact one you can pull out what the institutional change was amendment [Indiscernible] Matthew Akman Okay. Thank you. In terms of the FX hedges and the projects finance on North Sea can you make any comments about where you hedged out versus your expectations for returns and your project analysis going in. Paul Bradley While we hedge we typically look at our projects pre-hedged only to keep the discipline of trying to make the hedging decision as a corporate decision not a project decision because it’s really the corporate investors that are enjoying those cash flows not the project per say. What I can tell you is that the euro cad forward swap rates tend to still be very favorable versus just a plain forward spot rates so in other words we will have picked up a fair bit of return over the course of time if you kind of take the swap and marry it up with the actual project cash flows but again I would like to reiterate that we keep the corporate hedging transactions we try to keep that little bit separate from the actual project transactions. Matthew Akman Okay, thanks for that. And finally is it too early to talk about contingencies on Gemini and North Sea and whether you have started to chug and to those at all at a normal pace or do you waits for another 3 months to 6 months to start hearing about that? John Brace By thinking the case with North Sea it’s too early for sure in the case with Gemini and we’ve been under way for a year now there has been a small use of contingency but nothing significant at this point in time. Operator Our next question comes from the line of Steven Paget with FirstEnergy. Please proceed with your question. Steven Paget Thank you and good morning. Gentlemen off shore wind went from a technology or skill set that was expensive to something that was economic and could be brought in on time on budget and that’s when Gemini and North Sea team in the picture am I correct. Unidentified Company Representative Yes. Unidentified Analyst So what three technologies are coming in that you will be looking at as in that off shore wind renewable or power generation technologies that are just becoming economic and you saw. Paul Bradley I’ll start and then John can jump in. I think the Steven we are sort of 15 years into the commercial application of off shore wind so it’s still a very young industry and I think there is incredible potential still in the off shore wind space be it in the North Sea another parts of the world so our concentrated development efforts have been continue to look at that technology the company was started on the basis of thermal technologies and we still see plenty of opportunities there as well and off course with solar we’ve got our first solar plant in Latin American countries, solar is becoming closer to grid parity and a lot of opportunity there as well, so leading edge technologies I don’t know I could let John answer it but from my perspective and a development perspective I think we got lots of opportunity in those three technological fields. Unidentified Company Representative Well just before [Indiscernible] oracle of the future I just like to remind everybody that we are kind of an infrastructure company so we aren’t even looking to necessarily be cutting edge on new technologies we to your point Steven we did enter an off shore wind when it was at the point that we felt the maturity was sufficient and probably the rest of the world thinks it’s a bit early and there end lies the superior returns that you can get at a certain technology but as when it comes to things like wave technology or some of the storage ideas are out there I think you would certainly wait for them to mature that before you saw a stuff filing in those areas and now John Brace. John Brace I think maybe on the one thing to add to elaborate a bid on something Paul just mentioned storage as a lot of stuff going on and storage with all search of different technologies but I would just like to remind everyone it doesn’t need to be new technology to solve the misuse of the day and those are of project which is from storage are very old technology or very proven technology and wonderful project so you don’t really need new technologies to move the ball down the court on the developments and improvement of the electricity generating system. Operator Mr. Brace there are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back to you. John Brace Thank you very much operator and everyone for joining us today. We will hold our next call following the release of our second quarter results in August and we look forward to talking to you then. Thank you. Operator Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation and have a pleasant day. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!