Tag Archives: seeking-alpha

Ford Vs. Tesla

Summary I am not particularly bullish – slightly bearish, in fact – on the auto industry, but I see a relative value play between Ford and Tesla. Ford had a very solid 2014 and should build on that in 2015, barring a macro economic downturn. Tesla ended 2014 on a low note and will continue to bleed money into 2015 and beyond. A pair trade could be a low-risk way to play F and TSLA and largely mitigate the risk of economic distress. Earlier this month, I began a new mock portfolio here on Seeking Alpha: the Pairs Trade Portfolio; today I continue it with trades on Ford (NYSE: F ) and Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA ). A pair trade is a market-neutral hedge in which an investor essentially pits one company against another. Getting a return on a pair trade is not dependent upon a particular stock rising or falling necessarily, but dependent upon the relative price moves between two stocks (or other financial instruments). I won’t go into details about the hows and whys of pair trading here, as I have already described the theory in detail in a previous article. Please take a look at the link for more information on why pair trades might be a good investment. Previous articles with pair trades for the portfolio: The Auto Industry The industry is extremely sensitive to the global economy as a whole. By and large, people don’t have a pressing need to buy a car and the purchase can normally be put off for months and even years and therefore in tough economic times car sales plummet. I think that notion of “purchase delay” has never been more true than now due to the fact that automobiles are more reliable now than ever. Because of the auto industry’s reliance on a good economy, I’m actually somewhat bearish to neutral on auto companies right now. I predict the global economy will underperform expectations over the next couple of years (at least) with an excellent chance of stock market crashes and recessions. I wrote a piece about the top 7 economies – that account for 74% of world GDP – in an article titled ” The Ingredients For An Imminent Bear Market Are In Place ” in which I noted why I felt that US equities, in particular, were due for a fall. So, why am I buying Ford and shorting Tesla for my Pairs Trade Portfolio? Well, because the whole point of a pair trade is to make an investment that takes out the uncertainty of outside events. By buying Ford and selling Tesla, I am making a bet on Ford vs. Tesla and that is all. If Ford stock drops to $8 per share and Tesla drops to $50, I’ve made money. If I am completely daft about the state of the economy and Ford moves to $30 while Tesla moves to $300, then I’ve still made money, though obviously not as much as I would have being solely long. The phrase “market-neutral hedge” is critical when talking about a pair trade. Again, if the reader has lingering questions about it, please click on the link near the top of this article for more information. And now onward to discussion of the two companies. Ford’s Prospects I consider Ford to be the best risk/reward choice of the automakers for a number of reasons, but three big ones come to mind immediately: Lower gas prices means more large vehicle sales and the higher profits that go with them. Ford rules in the pickup arena and 2015 could be a banner year for F-150 sales given low gas prices along with a redesign of the truck. Asia/Pacific sales. Cheap valuation. As for pickup sales, Ford is still the king and will likely stay that way throughout 2015. In January 2015 , Ford sold over 54,000 F-Series trucks compared to 36,000 Chevy Silverado sales. It appears that the public is responding well to the revamped F-150 and I expect it to be the best selling vehicle in the US for the 34th year in a row in 2015. I want to go into the Asia/Pac region in a bit more detail as I consider that region to be extremely important in the long run. I wrote about it in a previous article on Ford, saying that: Ford is executing well in Asia Pacific, which is the region with the most growth potential for the next decade (at least). However, keep in mind that Asia Pacific is not currently a large component of Ford’s business. Units sold in the Asia Pacific region represented about 21% of the total units sold for the company in Q1 2014. However, the revenues by region are as follows: Asia Pacific: 7.8% of the company total; North America: 60.4% of the company total; Europe: 22.9% of the company total. Those numbers were from Q1 2014. Today I am looking at Ford’s most recent investor presentation and I see many highlights pertaining to the region including: Asia/Pac employment increased 25% from 2013 to 2014; China market share increased from 4.1% to 4.5% (Y/Y); Record profit in Asia/Pac in 2014; Revealed new global Explorer and the all-new Everest for Asia/Pac; Over 1 million units sold in Asia/Pac in 2014. Clearly, Ford’s strategy in Asia is working well and the company is picking up profits in the region at a record pace. The growth prospects are enormous in that region and it is one that I will continue to keep my eye on. Finally, the valuation of Ford is cheap based on analyst expectations . The stock’s forward P/E for 2015 and 2016 is at 10.0 and 8.7, respectively. I’ve already noted that I am still not fully bullish on Ford because I think those estimates don’t take into account the risk of a serious miss. But it is worth noting the price of the shares based on those analyst expectations. There is solid upside to the stock based on earnings alone if macro events don’t derail it. Tesla Prospects I’ll stick with the Asia theme to start off and note that in January 2015, Tesla sold about 120 cars in China. That linked article also notes that “Musk has previously said he expected China sales could rival those in the United States as early as 2015.” The shortfall is important not just because Tesla’s market in China is non-existent, but also it shows just how incredibly off the mark Musk was in his prediction. If there is one common theme amongst the Tesla stockholders, it is the unshakable belief in the “Temple of Elon.” He is not infallible. As for China, Tesla has, to date, wasted its time and money on the country since 2013 (when orders began there) as it has basically nothing to show for its efforts. Moving on to some financial considerations, the company is spending money at an alarming rate. For example: The company spent $970 million in capital expenditures in 2014 while the 2013 capex was $264 million. A poor Q4 performance saw it post a loss of over $100 million – the loss was nearly $300 million for the full year. The company burned through a considerable amount of cash in Q4: $465 million. Long-term debt and “other long-term liabilities” increased from $881 million in 2013 to $3.069 billion in 2014. In addition to the added debt, Tesla is diluting its stock steadily in order to fund operations (the large steps upward) and pay management (the slower, grinding upward slopes): TSLA Shares Outstanding data by YCharts We can clearly expect to see more dilution and more debt in for the next several years in order to fund operations, capex, and compensation. Elon Musk predicted GAAP profitability in 2020 and I estimate that (if and only if all goes well) Tesla will show solid positive cash flow a year or two before that. Until then Tesla will need a lot of additional financing. There’s nothing wrong, per se, for a company to spend lots of money, incur debt, and even dilute its stock. However, when a company does those things and has a stock price that is (still) quite high and full of expectations, the bar is set extremely high for that company to execute. In other words, Tesla better be spending all that money wisely. Some Valuation Comparisons Ford’s market cap is about $62 billion and Tesla’s cap is about $25.5 billion and thus Ford is valued at just under 2.5 times that of Tesla. Some of the charts comparing the two companies are actually comical, but I think they illustrate my point well. First, the difference in revenue: F Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts Ford has about 45x the revenue of Tesla. Tesla is growing revenue much faster than Ford, but is so far behind its more established rival. The cash from operations: F Cash from Operations (TTM) data by YCharts Tesla has bounced up and down from negative to positive and back to negative again as the company struggles to limit the bleeding. I showed Tesla’s dilution above, now let’s see Ford’s shares outstanding: F Shares Outstanding data by YCharts There is a bit of upward creep there over the last few years, but it is minor – especially compared to Tesla. None of the above charts should be of any surprise to an investor in either company, but I think they do serve to show us the amount of faith that Tesla investors have. For the company to be valued at 40% of Ford means that an incredible amount of success is priced into the stock. In my opinion, TSLA should be no more than 10% of Ford. Conclusion At this point, a lot of things have to go right for TSLA stock to be worth the price it currently commands. The company will add more debt and it will dilute the stock further. Not only must Tesla continue to grow revenues and deliver cars at a rapid pace, but it must soon start to give us a glimpse of a profitable future. Moreover, Tesla is about to encounter ramped up competition in its EV space. General Motors (NYSE: GM ) has announced the development of a 200-mile range electric car that should directly compete with Tesla’s Model 3, set to debut in 2017. I have no doubt that many, if not all, major manufacturers will be making similar announcements of long-range EVs throughout 2015, including Ford (heck, maybe even Apple). At some point in the not-too-distant future, carmakers will have multiple EVs in the stable including luxury and sport models. How can TSLA stock stay, or indeed rise from, the level it is at when the company will no longer be unique? Ford, for its part is reasonably predictable, at least relative to Tesla. The stock does not move quite “…as peacefully and leisurely as a python digesting a Valium addict.” (Tom Robbins from Skinny Legs and All ), but it does trade, in the main, based on fundamentals instead of sentiment and hope. The company has a long history of success and should continue to grow and expand its success into new locations and with new models, including EV models. Ford (and all established car makers) has the advantage of being able to invade Tesla’s market whenever and however it chooses. Ford can and will make EVs that compete more directly with Tesla than they do now and when a big company like Ford moves into a small company’s space, there is a tendency for bad things to happen to the smaller company. The Portfolio At 8 p.m. Eastern Time on February 17 I’m buying F and shorting TSLS in my Seeking Alpha portfolio. Here is what the mock portfolio looks like so far after three pair trades (note that I plan on adjusting, adding, and updating this for years): A wee profit! Nice to see, although fairly meaningless this early in the game. Be sure to click “follow” if you would like to get real-time alerts on my future articles. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Beyond India: Look At These Overlooked Broad Emerging Market ETFs

For the past one year, India has been dominating the broad emerging markets, thanks to the enormous ascent of its stock market on pro-growth political hopes, declining inflation – which was once a botheration for the economy – and the latest interest rate cut to spur growth. While its supremacy is still prevalent in the emerging market space, one might be concerned about the overvaluation issues associated with the Indian stocks and the related ETFs. Presently, the biggest and broader emerging market ETF – the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEARCA: VWO ) and the broader U.S. market SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) sport a P/E (TTM) of 12 and 17 times, respectively, while iShares MSCI India Index ETF (BATS: INDA ) has a P/E (TTM) of 19 times. Secondly, a drastic slump in oil price played its role in facilitating the India ETFs’ upward journey. This was because the country imports more than 75% of its oil requirements. With global oil prices falling about 50% in the last six months, Indian foreign reserves found real reasons to cheer about. However, it remains to be seen how the Indian economy handles the situation when the oil price bottoms and reverses the trend. Also, some analysts believe that the not-so-enthusiastic December 2014 corporate results, a later-than-expected rebound in the investment cycle and overvaluation with respect to the future profit growth potential might stress out the Indian market. Given this situation, some cautious investors might begin to reconsider their emerging market investments and look for broader exposure, rather than sticking to any particular nation. After all, the emerging market space should continue to enjoy cheap money inflows, thanks to QE starting in the eurozone and the easy money policy in most developed nations, despite the likely beginning of policy tightening in the U.S. this year. In light of this, we have highlighted four overlooked ETFs that are tracking emerging markets from around the world (See all emerging market equities ETFs here ). Market Vectors MSCI Emerging Markets Quality ETF (NYSEARCA: QEM ) This fund has attracted $5.3 million in AUM. It charges a 50 bps fee per year, and trades in a paltry volume of around 1,500 shares a day, ensuring additional cost in the form of a wide bid/ask spread. The product tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Index, and holds 201 stocks in its basket (Read: QEM: A Higher Quality Emerging Market ETF? ). The ETF is slightly tilted toward the top four firms – China Mobile, Tencent Holdings, Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung Electronics – that collectively make up for more than 20% of total assets. Other firms hold not more than 3.01% share, suggesting modest diversification across each security. The holding pattern reflects the fund’s focus on Asian countries like China (20.7%), India (13%), Taiwan (13.0%), South Korea (12%) and South Africa (11.1%), which take the top five country spots. In terms of sector holdings, Information Technology dominates the portfolio at 34%, followed by Consumer Staples (16.8%), Telecommunication Services (12.6%) and Financials (11.5%). The fund has gained 6.2% since the start of the year (as of February 13, 2015) and more than 8.5% in the last two weeks. The fund yields 2% annually (as of the same date). Behind its decent performance is quality exposure across a number of deserving sectors in the emerging markets and a focus on high-quality criteria like high return on equity, stable year-over-year earnings growth and low financial leverage. The fund trades at a P/E (TTM) of 15 times. iShares MSCI Emerging Markets EMEA Index ETF (NASDAQ: EEME ) This fund has amassed about $8.8 million in assets so far, and trades in volumes of 2,000 shares a day, resulting in additional cost in the form of a wide bid/ask spread over and above the expense ratio of 49 bps a year. The fund is tilted toward South Africa (46.2%), Russia (20.9%), while the third country, Turkey, gets a meager allocation of 9.64%. As far as sectoral diversification is concerned, Financials gets about 34% of the basket, followed by Energy (16.6%) and Consumer Discretionary (14.8%). The latest cease-fire between Ukraine and Russia and the record rally in the South African stocks led the fund way higher. The fund has gained 4.2% so far this year (as of February 13, 2015) and about 6.6% in the last two weeks. The fund yields 3.1% annually (as of February 13, 2015). It trades at a P/E (TTM) of 10 times. ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (NYSEARCA: EDOG ) The product tracks the S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, which gives exposure to a basket of large-cap and high-yield stocks domiciled in the emerging markets. The index takes up an equal-weighted approach to assign weights to securities (Read: ALPS Debuts Dividend ETF in Emerging Market Space ). The index applies the “Dogs of the Dow” theory in the stock selection process. The product looks to hold about 50 stocks with this approach. The ETF offers a solid level of diversification, as both sector and country exposure is limited to five securities. Russia (11.2%), South Africa (10.4%), Brazil (10.3%), China (10%) and Thailand (9.65%) are some of the nations that the fund puts heavy weight on. EDOG has generated about $11.3 million in assets, and trades in 10,000 shares a day. It charges 60 bps in fees. The fund is up 6% in the YTD frame (as of February 13, 2015), while it yields 3.2%. The need for higher yield should be the key to the fund’s future success. EGShares Emerging Markets Domestic Demand ETF (NYSEARCA: EMDD ) EMDD seeks to tap the exponentially rising domestic demand of the emerging market space. The fund puts heavy weight on South Africa (20.2%), China (19.2%), Mexico (16%) and India (11.1%). It has an asset base of $35 million, and trades in volumes of more than 5,000 shares a day. The fund charges 85 bps in fees. Holding about 50 stocks in its portfolio, the fund does not put more than 5.37% assets in one stock. EMDD was up 5% so far this year, and has added about 3.5% in the last two weeks. The P/E (TTM) of the fund stands at 17 times.

Up 20% In 3 Months Since My Recommendation, Sell EUO Stakes Now

The ProShares UltraShort Euro (EUO) ETF is up 20% over the three months since I recommended it, but I’m suggesting investors close their stakes here. The factors that came against the euro are about to reverse, and I see the euro gaining strength against the dollar near-term. A favorable Greece resolution is imminent in my opinion, and the European economy is steadying. The dollar is overextended versus the euro and against other currencies and should give way now, and thus the EUO ETF’s success should end here. In mid-November, I suggested investors buy the ProShares UltraShort Euro (NYSE: EUO ). Today I’m suggesting investors close the position and take the 20% profit earned over the 3 month period. I see the factors that have worked against the euro about to reverse, so sell the EUO ETF and take your gain. Holding Period Chart of EUO +20% at Seeking Alpha If you agreed with my investment thesis on the EUO ETF shared on November 19, 2014 when I suggested investors buy the ProShares UltraShort Euro , well then you have generated a 20% paper profit in the three month holding period through the February 13 close. It’s now time to close the stake, as I am anticipating the euro will strengthen against the dollar from here. My main thesis in the aforementioned report was keyed on a potential Russian rebuttal to Europe’s hand in sanctions against it. However, the curiously timed and perhaps not coincidental drop in oil prices that occurred this winter handcuffed Russia, in my opinion. It seems to have effectively kept the cash-strapped, energy based Russian Federation from acting in the manner I anticipated it might. I speculated Russia could cut off the flow of energy into Europe in the middle of winter and harm the euro’s value against the dollar. While this is still possible, the also curiously timed recently stepped up effort by European leaders to drive a peace initiative between Ukraine and the Russian backed rebels in the East of the country is serving the same purpose, again keeping Russia from acting against Europe. Importantly, in my November report, I also said that a weakening European economy and the potential for European Central Bank (ECB) extraordinary action had been serving the dollar versus the euro and should continue to add support to the dollar. This proved to be a continuing driver against the euro, assisted by the critical political developments in Greece that later followed. In essence, the Greek issue took the place of my Russian factor and drove the euro down versus the dollar, and led the ProShares UltraShort Euro up 20% over the three month period. Intensifying fear of a Greek exit from the euro-zone has been the booster of the dollar against the euro year-to-date, and affected a great deal more than just the currencies in my opinion. In the uncertainty, demand for U.S. treasuries drove U.S. interest rates down, and thus major U.S. financial sector issues in Bank of America (NYSE: BAC ), J.P. Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM ) and others. The stronger dollar has played an important role in the fall of oil prices along with supply issues in my view. And the uncertainty around Europe and how it might affect the United States economy worked against U.S. equities this year in my view. But all this is about to change. I anticipate a favorable resolution between Greece and its European partners is imminent. The removal of the palpable fear that has gathered around this issue should serve a U.S. market rally in my opinion. Improving expectations have already begun to drive U.S. interest rates higher, and the dollar recently gave way a bit to the euro. European economic expectations are also improving in my opinion and Japan just exited recession . As the euro gains its strength back against the overextended dollar, the EUO ETF, which is a bet against the euro, should give way. Thus, while still ahead of the announcement of a Greek deal, you have time momentarily to close the investment I suggested in November. If you need a place to invest your gains from the EUO play, on the same thesis, I have recently suggested investors look to: the UDN ETF contra-dollar investment; or a short of the UUP ETF ; and a short of the iPath S&P VIX (NYSE: VXX ); or long investments in financial sector beneficiary Bank of America , which should rise on higher U.S. interest rates. Also, I’ve suggested Greek issues including the National Bank of Greece (NYSE: NBG ) and the Global X FTSE Greece 20 ETF (NYSE: GREK ). Readers may review my column for more. Disclosure: The author is long GREK, NBG, BAC. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: I’m short VXX and UUP.