Tag Archives: ideas

4 Solid ETF Deals For China Singles Day

‘Singles Day’ in China has gained immense popularity in recent years, with e-commerce players making quick bucks on the back of heavy discounts and promotions to lure solitary souls. Also known as anti-Valentine’s Day, the date 11.11 depicts those who are single. The young Chinese binge on this popular occasion making it the world’s busiest online shopping day. In fact, Singles Day is now much bigger than Cyber Monday and Black Friday, with 80% more online sales in 2014. This year too, Singles Day is set to be bigger than ever, surpassing stellar sales records of last year, as per KPMG . Clothing and accessories, cosmetics and personal care, household products, home electrical appliances as well as food and beverages are the most popular categories that generally enjoy higher sales in this online shopping festival. Singles Day: A Revenue Booster Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group (NYSE: BABA ) turned into the biggest 24-hour cyber spending blitz worldwide six years ago. Alibaba hit a record $9.3 billion in sales last year versus $5.8 billion in 2013 and $3.1 billion in 2012. One analyst, SunTrust, expects Alibaba’s sales to reach $12 billion this year. This year, the company has 50% more participating vendors from around the world and 30,000 brands offering more than six million products through its various online shopping platforms, including Tmall, Taobao Marketplace, group-buying site Juhuasan and the AliExpress global retail site. JD.com (NASDAQ: JD ) is bolstering its sales and promotion on the day to give stiff competition to Alibaba. It is expecting sales to double from the last year. Other e-commerce firms like Baidu (NASDAQ: BIDU ), Jumei International (NYSE: JMEI ) and Vipshop Holdings (NYSE: VIPS ) will also offer huge discounts and expect a high sales volume on the day. Courier services are also expected to rise with the surge in e-commerce business. So logistics giants such as SF Express, STO, and YTO should also be on the list of gainers. How to Play E-commerce players have a tradition of enjoying a huge rally on the Singles Day shopping fervor. Investors seeking to tap “Single Day” benefits in a diversified way should focus on the following four ETFs that provide substantial exposure to the Chinese e-commerce or retail segment. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (NASDAQ: KWEB ) This product provides concentrated exposure to the Chinese Internet market by tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index. In total, the fund holds 58 securities in its basket with heavy concentration on the top four firms – Tencent Holdings ( OTCPK:TCEHY ), Ctrip.com (NASDAQ: CTRP ), Alibaba and BIDU – which combine to make for 37.4% share. The ETF has amassed $169.9 million in AUM and charges 71 bps in annual fees from investors. Volume is good as it exchanges 156,000 shares in hand per day. The fund surged 16% in the trailing one-month period. Guggenheim China Technology ETF (NYSEARCA: CQQQ ) This fund targets the overall technology sector in China and follows the AlphaShares China Technology Index, holding 76 stocks in its basket. Alibaba dominates the fund’s return with 21.7% share while other firms hold no more than 9.5% of assets. In terms of industrial exposure, about 65% of the portfolio is allotted to Internet mobile applications while electronic components and semiconductors round off to the next two spots. The product manages an asset base of $56.7 million while trades in a small volume of around 40,000 shares a day. Expense ratio came in at 0.71%. CQQQ added 8.5% over the past one month. Global X China Technology ETF (NASDAQ: QQQC ) This ETF also targets the broad technology sector and tracks the NASDAQ OMX China Technology Index. It is unpopular and illiquid with AUM of just $15.9 million and average daily volume of around 9,000 shares. It charges 65 bps in annual fees and holds 38 stocks in its basket with none holding more than 9.05% of assets. About half of the portfolio is allotted to Internet mobile applications while communication equipment makes up for 12% share. QQQC was up 8.2% over the past one month. Global X China Consumer ETF (NYSEARCA: CHIQ ) This product offers exposure to the consumer sector in China by tracking the Solactive China Consumer Index. Holding 41 securities in its basket, it is pretty spread out across each component as none of these holds more than 5.68% share. The ETF is also well diversified across industries with automobile manufacturing, Internet retail, packaged food products, and apparel & luxury goods occupying double-digit exposure each. The fund has a lower level of $95.7 million in AUM and about 53,000 shares in average daily volume. It charges 65 bps in annual fees and expenses and added 4.6% over the past one month. Original Post

BlackRock Cuts Fees To Offer Cheapest ETF Ever

The ETF fee race is far from over. BlackRock (NYSE: BLK ) has announced fee cuts for seven iShares exchange-traded funds in response to competition from low-cost competitors such as Vanguard Group. According to Tuesday’s announcement the new management fee for BlackRock’s iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF will be 0.03%, making it the cheapest ETF on the market, excluding those with temporary fee waivers. In plain English that means that fees amount to just $3 per year for every $10,000 invested, writes Chris Dieterich for Barrons . (click to enlarge) Via S&P CapIQ BlackRock cuts fees in response to low-cost rivals Vanguard and Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCHW ) “The entire U.S. stock market is the epitome of buy and hold, and price does matter more to those kinds of investors. It’s really importantly to have the most cost-efficient fund in that space,” said Ruth Weiss, head of the U.S. iShares team. Other ETFs in the “core” buy-and-hold friendly product suite will have their fees reduced. BlackRock also announced the iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF, a new international bond ETF for which trading will begin on Thursday. Its expense ratio of 0.15% is even less than the rival Vanguard Total International Bond ETF, which has a ratio of 0.19%. BlackRock also announced that its iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF will follow the S&P Total Market Index from next week, a move which will make it more exposed to micro- and small-cap U.S. companies. As a result it will become more similar to the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF. Rivals eating in to BlackRock ETF market share BlackRock currently holds $818 billion in ETFs, representing 38% of a total $2.1 trillion U.S. market. Although it remains the largest asset manager in the world, BlackRock has been losing market share to low-cost rivals Vanguard and Charles Schwab. At the end of 2006 BlackRock held 58% of the total ETF market. In that time Vanguard has grown from 5.2% to 22% of the total ETF market share. Until the BlackRock announcement, Charles Schwab offered the two cheapest ETFs, at 0.04%. Although Schwab only manages $37.5 billion in assets, or 1.8% of the market, the company is growing fast. In 2015 Schwab’s ETF asset growth rate is 28%, compared to 7.8% for BlackRock and 12% for Vanguard. Disclosure: None

Utility Investors: Embrace Pending Rate Hikes

Utility investors should be more afraid of declining interest rates than rising. History points to rate cycle turns in 2004-2007, 1993-2000, and 1986-1989. Overall annual total return for utility stocks during the previous three rates hike cycles was 7.5%. In July 2014, I penned an article investigating the effect of previous interest rate cycle upswings on share prices of utilities, and with the pending rate hikes anticipated to begin in just a few weeks, it may be time to revisit this topic. The premise of the previous article was to review the performance of some well known utilities stocks after the previous three turns in the rate cycle. History points to rising interest rate cycles of 2004 to 2007, 1993 to 2000, and 1986 to 1989. I will not reiterate all the finer historic points of the previous article, including the graphs of the respective yield curves, but will analyze stock performance over the time frames. As background, I suggest reviewing the previous article. Many investors believe utilities are negatively hurt by rising rates. The most common reasoning is: •Higher rates increase interest costs for utilities and the capital-intensive nature of their business makes profits more sensitive to leverage expense. In addition, weak share prices reduces the effectiveness of equity raises to fund capital expenditures, along with raising the cost of the debt portion of billions in cap ex budgets. •Higher rates cause income-oriented investors to gravitate to bonds where principal risk is perceived to be lower. •If interest rates are increasing to stem the tide of rising inflation, utility operating costs, such as coal fuel costs, will also increase along with labor cost pressures. A traditional cost-push inflation cycle could be distressing to more than just a few utilities. Yes, corporate interest costs go up as new borrowings reflect current yield conditions. However, interest expense is part of operating expenses that are incorporated in most rate decisions. While there is a delay between cash out due to greater interest costs and inclusion in rate decisions, the higher expense is usually passed on to customers. While income investors will gravitate to safer bonds as their yield rises, selectively reviewing top quality utilities with a higher spread to 10-yr Treasuries will mitigate downward pressure in stock prices. Currently, rising rates are not being caused by cost-push pressures but due to stronger economic growth. Stronger growth usually leads to higher energy demands. In addition, a large percentage of infrastructure growth and cap ex is upgrading older assets and accommodating new sources of green energy, which are not as sensitive to underlying population and economic growth. The age of sector ETFs is relatively short and most do not encompass the above listed time frames. For example, S&P Utility ETF (NYSEARCA: XLU ) started trading in Dec 1998. In order to evaluate utility stock performance during these periods, a list of some of more popular stocks was chosen. These include: Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ), NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE ), Dominion Resources (NYSE: D ), Southern Co (NYSE: SO ), American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP ), PPL Corp (NYSE: PPL ), and PCG Corp (NYSE: PCG ). Combined, these represent 45% of the current value of XLU. Below are two tables outlining each stock’s performance during the last three up cycles in rates. The first table lists the starting and closing price of each stock, the individual performance of its share price and the value of an equal weight holding for these seven firms. The Fed Fund Rate is listed as well. The second table relies on information from buyupside.com to calculate the overall total return for each stock, the number of days held, and the value of an investment of $10,000 at the start date. As most utility investors realize, returns from utility stock dividends is an important portion of total return, and an overriding reason for buying utility stocks. The table also compares these with the return of S&P 500. These tables support the strategy of buying potential weakness in utilities when investors mistakenly sell at the turn in the rate cycles. Many utility stocks have declined from their 52-week highs, with the most common reason being a fear of rate hikes. For example, Duke Energy is trading -24% below its 52-wk high and 1% over its low, NextEra Energy -12% and 8%, Dominion Resources -16% and 3%, Southern Co -15% and 10%, American Electric Power -15% and 6%, PPL Corp -11% and 17%, and PCG Corp -12% and 13%, respectively. If an investor were to buy as the total return table outlines, their investment would have been a total of $210,000 combined, $70,000 each cycle. The value of these investments at the end of the respective rate hike cycle would be $350,000, or a total annual return of 7.5% over the 8.5 year covered. Utility investors should embrace the beginning of the rate up cycle by not dumping their stock holdings. If anything, investors should be looking for bargains as others are fearfully selling. Author’s Note: Please review disclosure in Author’s profile.