The WisdomTree Europe Dividend Growth ETF: Timing Is Everything
The fund is heavily weighted with best in class European companies. The fund is dividend weighted with a defensive bias. The poor performance seems to be a result of coming to market at the wrong time. Europe seems to have a split personality, at times somewhat fractious and recalcitrant and at other times cooperative and harmonious. The moribund Medieval Period was followed by a lively Renaissance. Centuries of religious wars were followed by an enlightened scientific revolution. In the 20th century, Europe engaged in decades of warfare not witnessed in all of human history. In the wake of that 20th century dark age, Europe determinedly embarked towards a second enlightenment. The basis for this hopeful new age is founded on equality, solidarity and prosperity, achieved through a unified economy. Europe has created an equitable, cooperative capitalism: carefully regulated and open. This new age has led to the creation of a sizable economy of well founded, well established global companies. An opportunity to participate in the potential growth of these companies may be had through the WisdomTree Europe Dividend Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: EUDG ). According to WisdomTree : … WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund seeks to track the investment results of dividend-paying companies with growth characteristics in the European equity market … The tracking index is WisdomTree’s own proprietary index [DEFA]: … The Index is comprised of 300 companies from the eligible universe based on their combined ranking of growth and quality factors. The growth factor ranking is based on long-term earnings growth expectations, while the quality factor ranking is based on three year historical averages for return on equity and return on assets. Companies are weighted in the Index based on annual cash dividends paid. .. It seems that WisdomTree’s approach to dividend weighting results in a more conservative passive methodology than weighting by market price. An interesting description written by Mr. Jeremy D. Schwartz, titled “Dividends of a Dividend Approach ” , details the reasoning of the approach and the results. For example, it specifically takes into account, the importance of dividends in determining a stock’s price; the fact that dividends historically have provided the majority of the stock markets real return; dividends are an objective measure; dividends reflect management’s shareholder interest and lastly, the demand for income among baby boomers in retirement. The fund itself is a relative newcomer to the industry, incepted in May of 2014. If the fund is weighted by dividends and the quality of earnings, the top weightings should give a good indication of the risk to the investor. (click to enlarge) First it should be noted that the fund has about 200 holdings as of mid-October, however, just over 50% of the funds weighting is concentrated in its top holdings. There is something to point out in those top holdings. There seems to be a repetition of companies held. For example Roche Holdings ADRs on the OTC are assigned the symbol OTCQX:RHHBY . On the “Swiss-6” exchange, it’s ROG.VTX and on another Swiss exchange it’s Ro.SW. They all represent the same company and the same class of stock, hence Roche Holdings has a combined 8.31% weighting in the fund’s holdings. Similarly, Unilever is listed as UL on the NYSE, on the London exchange UNA, on the Amsterdam exchange as UNC as well as others. The point being that in the fund’s top holdings, Unilever holds a combined 3.98877% weighting and Roche 8.31% in the top fund’s holdings. By combining those ,means that the top 50% is really contained in the top 19 holdings, i.e., 9.5% of the fund. The top 50% of the fund is more heavily weighted in Consumer Staples, Health Care and Telecom Service than the entire fund. On the other hand, the top 50% is ‘lighter’ in Consumer Discretionary, Industrials, IT. Lastly the top half contains neither a Financial nor Material Sector allocation. It then appears that the more defensive sectors comprise the heaviest dividend weights. The more cyclical sectors are less weighted and more widely distributed among the fund’s 200 holdings. Below is a summary table of the top 50%, containing 19 companies with a relevant few metrics. Company Fund Weighting Yield Cash Flow Multiple Payout Ratio ROI/ROE Price/Earnings Price/Book Sector Roche [RHHBY] 8.31031% 3.06% 18.10 73.94% 20.07/48.00 23.37 10.96 Health Care British American Tobacco ( OTCPK:BTAFF ) 4.19366% 3.98% 14.71 46.50% 22.57/70.15 17.50 11.74 Consumer Non-Cyclical Anheuser-Busch (NYSE: BUD ) 4.02124% 3.11% 26.58 29.15% 10.25/19.29 19.38 3.77 Consumer Non-Cyclical Unilever [UL] 3.98877% 3.14% 17.37 41.40% 17.63/33.21 22.16 7.00 Consumer Non-Cyclical Novo Nordisk (NYSE: NVO ) 3.16913% 1.39% 21.09 41.30% 75.61/82.48 29.94 23.78 Health Care Bayer ( OTCPK:BAYRY ) 3.09927% 1.95% 14.14 53.35% 7.40/16.71 26.38 4.13 Health Care SAP (NYSE: SAP ) 2.35035% 1.79% 17.35 42.76% 11.82/16.66 23.46 3.47 IT Daimler ( OTCPK:DDAIF ) 2.32166% 3.41% 5.63 32.51% 6.82/17.81 9.62 1.98 Consumer Cyclical Diageo (NYSE: DEO ) 2.18663% 2.99% 15.88 59.43% 13.56/32.63 19.30 5.91 Consumer Non-Cyclical Telefonktiebolasget Ercsso [ERIC] 1.95709% 3.72% 13.59 109.29% 5.73/7.55 27.43 2.07 Telecom Service Inditex ( OTCPK:IDEXY ) 1.79386% 1.67% 26.14 29.56% 26.31/29.39 35.37 9.78 Consumer Cyclical Louis Vuitton ( OTCPK:LVMUY ) 1.73739% 1.92% 15.88 46.08% 9.29/12.71 24.76 3.02 Consumer Cyclical Hennes & Mauritz ( OTCPK:HNNMY ) 1.6948% 3.14% 16.43 *51.54% 41.57/44.71 23.82 9.98 Consumer Cyclical L’Oreal ( OTCPK:LRLCY ) 1.6825% 1.65% 23.28 *37.86% 11.80/12.90 31.27 3.99 Consumer Non-Cyclical Reckitt Benckiser ( OTCPK:RBGLY ) 1.66167% 2.14% 24.96 59.49% 16.66/24.90 28.23 6.90 Consumer Non-Cyclical ABB LTD (NYSE: ABB ) 1.62665% 3.12% 11.23 72.54% 9.54/15.73 16.94 2.90 Industrials Schneider Electric ( OTCPK:SBGSY ) 1.44748% 3.61% 11.19 *40.34% 6.20/9.03 17.64 1.50 Industrials Airbus Group ( OTCPK:EADSY ) 1.4196% 2.08% 9.04 *18.83% 5.61/32.83 16.54 7.94 Industrials Syngenta (NYSE: SYT ) 1.41046% 3.57% 14.77 *52.75% 10.39/15.68 20.92 3.42 Industrials Totals/Averages 50.07% 2.707368% 16.731 49.40% *estimated % of cash flow per share 17.30/28.55 22.84 22.84 The returns are anything but stellar, however, there’s an important reason for this. Returns 1 Month 3 Months 1 Year Since 5/7/2014 Inception WTEDG Index -2.87% -6.18% -6.28 -8.76 EUDG Fund -2.49% -6.56 -5.96 -9.21 The fund is not currency hedged. A comparison with the Euro vs the U.S. Dollar tells the story. (click to enlarge) The fund came to market precisely on the same day the Euro peaked in this time interval at $1.37 per Euro. From there it steadily trended lower to its current $1.12; just over an 18% decline. The fund closed its first day of trading at about $25.25. An 18.25% decline of the shares from that point works out to $20.64, just above its September 29 low of $20.05. Hence, when translated back to USD dollars, the value of the fund ‘shrank’ even though the top line companies continued to perform well. The currency translation is a very important point for the investor to keep in mind. When the European currencies weaken vs the U.S. Dollar, the NAV will decline, even if the companies in the fund are doing well . Hence, purchasing when the U.S. Dollar is strong is like purchasing the fund at a discount. Eventually, Europe will regain its economic footing and European currencies will appreciate against the U.S. Dollar, hence the potential for capital appreciation on a ‘dollar cost averaged’ investment. The same is true of European denominated dividends and distributions. The whole point of the matter is that for investors with risk capital, and the willingness to be patient while gradually accumulating a position knowing that the top 50% of the fund has an average yield of over 2.7% and the fund is defensively allocated, then it’s reasonable to assume that over a longer time horizon the future returns will outweigh current risk. The current poor returns are a matter of having a good idea, but extraordinarily bad timing.