Tag Archives: finance

Investing In The Russian Market: Oil ETFs Are Better Than Russia-Focused ETFs

The Russian Central Bank surprisingly cuts the key rate to 15%. The implementation of the anti-crisis plan meets first obstacles. ETFs that focus on Russia are unlikely to rise at the same pace as oil ETFs in case of an oil price upside. Russian market has recently been under serious pressure due to sanctions, falling oil prices, devaluation of the ruble and weakening economy. A number of investors believe that the Russian market is cheap right now and await an oil price upside, hoping that it will provide significant upside to ETFs that focus on Russia, like the Market Vectors Russia ETF (NYSEARCA: RSX ), iShares MSCI Russia Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: ERUS ) and SPDR S&P Russia ETF (NYSEARCA: RBL ). However, I would like to argue that investors will be better off investing in oil ETFs, like The United States Oil ETF (NYSEARCA: USO ) or The United States Brent Oil ETF (NYSEARCA: BNO ), if they believe in a bright future for oil prices. Currently, energy accounts for 43.04% of RSX holdings , 49.63% of RBL holdings and 51.97% of ERUS holdings . This means that approximately one half of holdings of these ETFs is not directly related to oil prices. One could argue that oil prices are the single-most important factor for the Russian economy. When oil prices rise, the economy and all its sectors feel better. While this is partly true, I think that there are negative factors that will pressure RSX, ERUS and RBL. The first factor is the continuing devaluation of the ruble. In my view, rising oil prices will not provide a corresponding upside for the currency. This point was recently highlighted by the surprise cut of the key interest rate by the Russian Central Bank on January 30. While Brent oil prices have enjoyed a significant upside since then, the ruble remained roughly unchanged. When the Central Bank was raising its key rate to 17% in December, it stated that these measures were necessary because of ruble depreciation risks and inflation risks. While commenting on the reduction of the key rate from 17% to 15%, the Central Bank stated that it saw a stabilization of inflation and depreciation expectations. In my view, this is a rather strange conclusion. The Central Bank stated that annual consumer price growth rate was 13.1% as of January 26. In comparison, 2014 inflation totaled 11.4%. These numbers show that inflation is increasing rather than stabilizing. The Russian ruble started this year at 59.18 to the dollar. It is trading at 68.92 to the dollar as I’m writing this article. In my view, a 16% devaluation of the ruble cannot be called a “stabilization of depreciation expectations”. Meanwhile, a 15% key rate is still prohibitive for most businesses, and the recent interest rate cut might signal a shift in the Central Bank’s policy. Further rate cuts will lead to more downside for the ruble, pushing RSX, ERUS and RBL lower. The second thing that I’d like to mention is the government’s anti-crisis plan . While the government is sure that it has enough reserves to ensure the implementation of this plan, the process is not going smoothly. The Russian Ministry of Finance stated (please note that the link is in Russian) ( Google translate link ) that it would not be able to allocate enough funds for several anti-crisis measures. While the Ministry of Economic Development proposed to spend 40 billion rubles ($580 million) on credits for Russian regions in the first quarter of 2015, the Ministry of Economic Development is ready to allocate just 10 billion rubles ($145 million) for these measures. In my view, it will take time before the Russian government is able to develop a unified position on the implementation of the anti-crisis plan. Meanwhile, the economy is suffering, and Morgan Stanley is predicting that Russia’s GDP will drop by 5.6% in 2015. In my view, the lack of coordination within the government supports my previous thesis that the situation in the Russian economy will get worse before it gets better. I believe that the fate of the Russian economy remains in the hands of oil prices. I remain skeptical on the current anti-crisis measures. What’s more, I think that ETFs that focus on Russia won’t be able to outperform oil ETFs in the near term. I think that further depreciation of the ruble and problems with the implementation of the anti-crisis plan will hit the non-energy part of RSX, ERUS and RBL portfolios. In my opinion, if an investor is bullish on oil, they should buy oil ETFs rather than ETFs that focus on Russia. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Unitil’s (UTL) CEO Bob Schoenberger on Q4 2014 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Unitil Corporation (NYSE: UTL ) Q4 2014 Earnings Conference Call January 28, 2015 14:00 ET Executives David Chong – Director, Finance and Assistance Treasurer Bob Schoenberger – Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Mark Collin – Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Tom Meissner – Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Larry Brock – Chief Accounting Officer and Controller Analysts Shelby Tucker – RBC Capital Markets Dave Parker – Robert W. Baird & Company Operator Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Fourth Quarter 2014 Unitil Earnings Conference Call. My name is Tony and I will be your moderator for today. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. David Chong, Director of Finance. Please proceed. David Chong Good afternoon and thank you for joining us to discuss Unitil Corporation’s fourth quarter 2014 financial results. With me today are Bob Schoenberger, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Mark Collin, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; Tom Meissner, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and Larry Brock, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller. We will discuss financial and other information about our fourth quarter on this call. As we mentioned in the press release announcing the call, we have posted that information, including a presentation to the Investor section of our website at www.unitil.com. We will refer to that information during this call. Before we start, please note that comments made on this conference call may contain statements that are commonly referred to as forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding the company’s financial condition, results of operations, capital expenditures and other expenses, regulatory environment and strategy, market opportunities and other plans and objectives. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as may, will, should, estimate, expect or believe, the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve risks and uncertainties, and the company’s actual results could differ materially. Those risks and uncertainties include those listed or referred to on Slide 1 of the presentation and those detailed in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. The company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. With that said, I will now turn the call over to Bob. Bob Schoenberger Thanks, David. I would also like to thank everyone for joining us today. I will give a summary of our year end financial performance. If you turn to Slide 4 of our presentation, today we announced 2014 net income of $24.7 million or $1.79 per share, an increase of $3.1 million or $0.22 per share compared to 2013. This 14% increase in earnings in 2014 over prior year was driven by higher natural gas and electric sales margins partially offset by higher net operating expenses. Turning to Slide 5, the graph shows that our financial results have increased sharply over the past few years. The continued growth of our natural gas business along with recently completed gas and electric rate cases helped the company to achieve strong financial results in 2014. As we look forward to 2015, the continued expansion of our natural gas utility business and investments in the company’s gas and electric distribution infrastructure will provide a strong foundation for sustained future growth. On Slide 6, we are benefiting from improved economic activity underlying our service areas. Currently, average unemployment is just above 5% in the three states served by Unitil and signs of an improving economy are everywhere. We estimate that there is approximately $0.5 billion of new commercial construction underway in two of the largest cities we serve, Portland, Maine and Portsmouth, New Hampshire. We are benefiting from this economic growth and our focus on converting more and more of our customers to natural gas. Since 2010, our weather normalized gas unit sales have grown annually at 4.7%. And in 2014, our gas customer count grew 2.6%. Slide 7 highlights our historic annual return on equity. Strong customer growth paired with successful base rate cases continues to drive the company’s return on equity. In 2014, we earned a 9.2% return on equity, which is in line with the ROEs allowed by our regulators. As Mark will discuss later, we have long-term capital cost trackers in place to recover a significant portion of current and future capital spending, which we expect will help to maintain the level of earnings across our subsidiaries. Finally, on Slide 8, as you may have already seen, we recently announced an increase to our quarterly dividend from $0.345 to $0.35 a share. This equates to an annual increase in the dividend of $0.02 per share. We recognized the importance of the dividend to our shareholders. This increase reflects the confidence we have in our business. Going forward, we will continue to assess our dividend level to provide this continuing source of value to our shareholders. So, I will turn the call over to Tom Meissner, our Chief Operating Officer, to discuss details of our capital budget for 2015 and other operational highlights. Tom Meissner Thanks, Bob and good afternoon. As Bob mentioned, we have seen significant growth in our gas distribution business both in terms of the number of customers served in sales growth as well as the increased level of investment we are making to modernize and expand the reach of our system. Over the next few slides, I will go through our 2015 capital budget highlighting our growth spending, infrastructure replacement programs and our electric substation construction plans. If you turn to Slide 9, we have provided a more detailed look at our 2015 capital budget and our historical growth in rate base. We plan to spend about $58 million on gas projects, $31 million on electric projects, and $9 million on business systems and supporting technology for a total of $98 million of spending in 2015. Spending on new customer additions will be a significant component of this budget. In 2015, we plan to spend about $35 million or 36% of our total capital budget on expansion of our gas and electric distribution systems to achieve new customer growth. Of this, $21 million will be spent on expansion of our natural gas delivery system targeting new customers and increased sales, while on the electric side we plan to spend about $14 million on growth in expansion. Our capital spending plan continues to drive growth in our gas and electric rate base, which has resulted in annual growth rates of 10% and 3% respectively since 2009. We expect our gas rate base to continue to grow on the order of 10% in the future given our system expansion initiatives and infrastructure replacement programs. Now, turning to Slide 10, this slide highlights our infrastructure replacement programs, which consists primarily of cast iron and bare steel placement. We plan to spend about $22 million on infrastructure replacement programs in 2015 and we will be replacing about 14 miles of cast iron and bare steel gas mains annually through 2017. After 2017, our New Hampshire pipe replacement program will be finished and we expect to level out at about 9 miles per year thereafter. As a result of our infrastructure replacement programs, our customers currently enjoy a modern system with over 90% of our gas mains consisting of plastic or protected steel. Lastly, as a reminder, the majority of our infrastructure replacement projects are recovered under a capital cost recovery tracking mechanism, which provides for annual recovery of capital spending. Slide 11 provides an overview of our current electric distribution substation projects in New Hampshire. Construction began in 2014 on two new substations that will be completed over the next three years. These electric substations will be completed at an estimated cost of $12 million and $11 million respectively and will provide the capacity needed for continued load growth on our New Hampshire systems while addressing constraints at existing substations and improving reliability. Now, I will turn the call over to Mark Collin who will discus our financial results for the quarter and year end. Mark Collin Thanks, Tom. Good afternoon. As Bob stated earlier, net income increased by $3.1 million or 14% to $24.7 million for this past year ended December 31, 2014. Results were positively affected by higher natural gas and electric sales margins partially offset by higher net operating expenses. For the quarter, net income was $9.4 million or $0.69 per share compared to net income of $10.3 million or $0.75 per share for the same period in 2013. Earnings in the fourth quarter reflect warmer weather than the fourth quarter of the prior year as well as lower gas margins due to an increase in the amount of margin recovered through fixed charges, which results in less seasonality in our gas margins. That is more of our gas margin is now recovered during the non-heating period of the year. Turning to Slide 12, natural gas sales margins were $97.4 million in 2014, an increase of $12.2 million or 14.3% compared to 2013. Natural gas sales margin in 2014 were positively affected by higher therm unit sales, a growing customer base and recently approved distribution rates. Therm sales of natural gas were up 7.7% in 2014 driven by colder winter weather in the first quarter of 2014 and new customer additions in 2014 compared to 2013. There were 5.9% more heating degree days in 2014 compared to the prior year, which we estimate positively impacted earnings by about $0.06 per share. Excluding the effect of weather on sales, weather normalized gas therm sales in 2014 are estimated to be up a very healthy 5.2% compared to the prior year. Slide 13 highlights our electric business sales and margin. Electric sales margins were $80.8 million in 2014, an increase of $4.6 million or 6% compared to 2013. These increases reflect recently approved electric distribution rates and higher electric kilowatt hour sales and billing demands. Total electric kilowatt hour sales increased 0.6% in 2014 compared to the prior year. Commercial and industrial customer kilowatt hour sales were up 1.4% and billing demands were also up slightly for this customer group year-over-year. Turning to Slide 14, operation and maintenance expenses increased $4.4 million in 2014 compared to 2013. The change in O&M expenses reflects higher compensation and benefit cost of $2.8 million and higher utility operating cost of $1.6 million. The increase in utility operating costs included $0.7 million in higher electric and natural gas maintenance cost, $0.6 million in higher bad debt expense, and higher all other utility operating costs net of $0.3 million. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $3.6 million in 2014 compared to the prior year reflecting higher depreciation of $2.2 million on higher utility plant assets in service, higher amortization of major storm restoration costs of $1.3 million, and an increase in all other amortization of $0.1 million. The increase to major storm restoration cost amortization is currently recovered in electric rates. Taxes other than income taxes increased $2.2 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily reflecting higher local property taxes on higher levels of utility plant in service. Net interest expense increased $2.1 million in 2014 compared to the prior year reflecting lower interest income on regulatory assets and higher interest on long-term debt related to the issuance of $50 million of new long-term debt in October 2014. We also announced in December 2014 that Standard & Poor’s assigned a BBB+ issuer rating to Unitil Corporation and its utility subsidiaries. Now, turning to Slide 15, we have provided an update on our financial results at the utility operating company level. The chart shows the trailing 12 months actual earned return on equity in each of our regulatory jurisdictions. Unitil Corporation on a consolidated basis earned a total return on equity of 9.2% in 2014. Also as we discussed in the past and as shown on the table on the right, we have constructive regulatory rate plans and long-term capital cost trackers in place to recover a significant portion of current and future capital spending, which we expect will help to maintain the level of earnings across our subsidiaries. Now, this concludes our summary of our financial performance for the period. I will turn the call over to the operator who will coordinate questions. Thank you. Question-and-Answer Session Operator [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Shelby Tucker of RBC Capital Markets. Please proceed. Shelby Tucker Good afternoon guys. I have a question on the dividend and first of all, congratulations on increasing the dividend. Bob, could you maybe go through your policy on the dividend or how you are thinking about the dividend as you continue to grow your gas business? Bob Schoenberger Yes, first, how you are doing, Shelby? Shelby Tucker Good, thank you. Bob Schoenberger Yes, I mean, over the last couple of years, we have been telling our shareholders that as we began to realize the earnings power of the assets that we operate that it was our intent to return to a dividend policy where we would target a payout ratio of 70% to 75%. And once we have achieved that, it was our intent and desire to begin to implement a dividend policy with regular annual dividend increases. So, this $0.02 increase is really kind of a signal that we have full confidence in our business plan. And as we achieve that payout ratio over the next couple of years, our intent is to again begin to implement regular annual dividend increases and the Board will consider that each year based on our forecast. Shelby Tucker So, one of the things about this 2014 was you had the benefit of the first quarter weather. If that does not repeat in fact if weather does not go in your favor in ‘15, does that change how you look at the dividend or are you looking at a consistent level year-in, year-out irrespective of weather? Bob Schoenberger Yes. Again, I think we feel very good about 2015 again the year from a weather point of view, January has been cold. As you may have seen the forecast for the end of January and the beginning of February is very cold that may not rise to the level of last year, but we expect that, that’s going to have a positive impact. We will be bringing on a number of large customers that we connected to our system late last year, which we will begin to see the revenues from that. So, again, we feel good about 2015 and obviously, the Board will consider on a going forward basis how the company is doing compared to its forecast, but again our goal is to get back to a policy of regular dividend increases. And again, I think we can grow our EPS 6% to 8% a year for the next 3 to 5 years and the policy on our dividends will reflect that. Shelby Tucker Great. And then on the – just an update on the storm we just went through, anything should be aware of on your system? Bob Schoenberger Yes, lots of snow up to 3 feet at my house, but zero outages. We had no outages anywhere in our system. So, we came to the storm with flying colors and again, largely because it was light fluffy snow, but we did have good wins that were forecasted, but again, I think part of what we are seeing is not only the fact that the snow was light and fluffy, but also I think we are beginning to see the benefit of the enhanced tree trimming program that we have been implementing over the last 3 or 4 years. Shelby Tucker Great. Congratulations guys. Bob Schoenberger Thank you. Mark Collin Thank you, Shelby. Operator Your next question comes from the line of Dave Parker of Robert W. Baird & Company. Please proceed. Dave Parker Good afternoon. I will echo Shelby’s comments. Congratulations on a good year, good couple of years. Bob Schoenberger Thank you, Dave. Mark Collin Thanks, Dave. Dave Parker A couple of questions just on the presentation, thanks for dialing up for us what the continued opportunity is here to grow earnings. If we look past ‘15, I hate to put words in your mouth, but with the pipe replacement program and some of the upgrades you have got going on the electric system that this kind of CapEx rate of close to $100 million is probably sustainable for the next couple of years? Is that a fair observation or fair assessment? Bob Schoenberger Yes. I think obviously you are right about the amount of spending in 2015. In that amount, there is probably $15 million, $20 million of one-time items to two electric substations Tom referred to before and the change out of our customer information system. So, on a going forward basis beyond 2015, I’d say probably our core and correct me if I am wrong, Mark – our core capital spend is probably going to be more on the order of $80 million, $85 million little higher. Tom Meissner Yes, I am not sure it’s going to drop significantly over the next couple of years until we get through 2017. Bob Schoenberger So, same level of spending over the next couple of years. Dave Parker Okay, alright. Alright, good. And then I assume if economic activity continues to expand obviously post ‘17, I know it’s kind of up for grabs, but if your crystal ball is better than mine, then please if you can share with me? But it sounds good enough for me. Another with weather being pretty favorable and obviously you had some benefit for earned ROEs and your trend kind of being for what you earned last year on a combined basis close to the bottom end of the authorized range, do we expect a downdraft do you think in ‘15 from an earned ROE basis or now that you have got rate relief, is it actually – may we see better earned ROEs in the future? Mark Collin Yes, I think there is a couple of aspects to that. One is as we talked about before, the Fitchburg rate cases were completed on the electric side was completed for rates effective June 1, 2014. So, we only got a partial year of that rate case. And that was an important one for us to get the Fitchburg operating subsidiary back up to a more reasonable rate of return. So, we will get a full year of that in ‘15. We will also have some additional cost trackers as part of our rate plans in northern utilities. And we also have a scheduled filing for our Granite pipeline. So, I think when you bring all that together, our goal is to continue to achieve at or about what our authorized rate of return is. And I think we are in that range. I don’t think you are going to see any deterioration of that in the near-term. I think if anything we will be trying to improve upon that. Dave Parker Alright, great. Thanks. Good answer. And on a Granite State, absent that rate filing, any other anticipated regulatory filings in the next couple of years? Mark Collin Well, in addition as I said, we do have the trackers, particularly on the infrastructure replacement. In northern utilities, there is a new tracker that we filed for our gas division in Massachusetts under new legislation there for infrastructure replacement that we expect to be a rate filing that will have regular increases for infrastructure replacement in Massachusetts. And then our rate plan for the electric division in New Hampshire is essentially coming to an end and we would expect to be looking at going back in ‘16 relative to our New Hampshire operations to reestablish a longer term rate plan there, because that’s worked very well for us. And I think it will be good to kind of renew that effort and get on a longer term plan for that. Dave Parker Great, thanks for the update and again congratulations. Mark Collin Thank you. Bob Schoenberger Thank you too. Operator [Operator Instructions] There are no further questions in the queue at the moment. Bob Schoenberger Thank you for joining us for the fourth quarter conference call. We look forward to talking to you next quarter. Thank you and goodbye. Operator Ladies and gentlemen, thank you. That concludes today’s presentation. You may now disconnect and everyone have a great day. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!

3 Bond ETFs To Generate Income For Your Portfolio

Though investors have been continuously shifting their exposure to the equity world in the second half of the year thanks to a steadily improving U.S. economy, the fixed income world is also in great shape as a result of global market turmoil. The Eurozone is at a risk of facing deflationary woes after escaping recession almost a year ago. The economies of China and Japan have also dealt a blow to the global investing market and kept the risk quotient on even after the U.S. economy’s tantalizing Q2 growth of 4.6% and Q3 growth of 3.9%. All these issues have kept interest rates low this year despite the QE wrap-up in October. The yields on 10-Year U.S. Treasury note have fallen 25 bps to 2.24% (as of November 26, 2014) since the start of the year. Though short-term interest rates are likely to rise next year, long-term yields are subdued at the current level and are expected to remain so. An increased economic stimulus in Japan, the surprising rate cut in China and the potential announcement of the QE measure in the Eurozone with interest rates at rock-bottom levels will inject cheap money in the global economy and suppress long-to-medium-term interest rates. On the other hand, volatility levels might pick up in the days ahead as the S&P appears overvalued, having hit all-time highs more than 45 times this year and global growth remaining weak. Commodity markets continued their sluggish trend causing some to shift to low risk securities like bonds. This is especially true with the latest U.S. spending data coming in a little soft. The business spending plans indicator declined for two months in a row in October. Consumer spending nudged up just 0.2% in October despite multi-year low gasoline prices. Poor wages seemed to be the victim of such subdued numbers, per Reuters . With falling Treasury bond yields, relatively high-yield products look more attractive in the near term, at least to investors who are hungry for income. And should this broad market trend continue, moderately higher yield bonds and the related ETFs could put up a strong show and help investors to protect their portfolio as well as earn higher levels of income. Below we have analyzed three ETFs that investors could consider in this mixed kind of an environment where equities are witnessing a bull run. However, there is an associated risk of an imminent correction, or at least high levels of volatility. This urges investors to save a portion of their portfolios for fixed income. After all, even if markets end up in the red to close the year, a solid yield of about 4% should definitely help to withstand volatility. First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (NASDAQ: HYLS ) The fund seeks to provide current income by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of below investment-grade or unrated high-yield debt securities . Though capital appreciation is its secondary motive, it has added a bit this year, gaining 3.7% YTD.. The product thrives on long-short strategies. Net weighted average effective duration (considering the short positions) is 2.96 years indicating low interest rate risks. The fund is meant for an intermediate term as evident from 6.42 years of weighted average maturity. The product is expensive with an expense ratio of 1.28% per annum. Volume is light, trading in less than 35,000 shares per day that ensures extra cost for the product in the form of a wide bid/ask spread. The fund yields 4.93%. SPDR Barclays Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: LWC ) With an asset base of over $305 million and an average trading volume of roughly 100,000 shares, LWC is among one of the less popular funds in the corporate bond space. The fund tracks the Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index to provide exposure to long-term corporate bonds. As such, the fund has a weighted average maturity of 23.89 years and an average duration of 13.85 years. The fund currently holds a well-diversified basket of 1,180 investment grade securities. Sector-wise, Industrials dominate the fund with a little over three-fourths of fund assets, followed by Finance and Utility with 19.6% and 13.04% allocations, respectively. The fund is a low-cost choice with 15 basis points as fees and has a 30-Day SEC yield of 4.26%. LWC is up 15% this year. PowerShares Fundamental Emerging Markets Local Debt Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: PFEM ) This emerging market fund seeks to provide exposure to high-yield bonds of various investment grades. Per the S&P, A and BBB-rated bonds take 30% of the portfolio each followed by AA rated bonds (21%) and BB rated bonds (13%). The fund presently holds 40 securities, targeting the intermediate part of the yield curve. The ETF has an average maturity of 7.18 years and an effective duration of 5.11 years. Country-wise, Brazil, Indonesia, Russia, Mexico and South Korea each occupy assets in the range of 7.5% to 9.7%. The fund charges 50 basis points as fees and has a 30-Day SEC Yield of 5.20%. The yield to worst came in at 5.74%. The fund manages a small asset base of $4.1 million and is relatively illiquid with average trading volume of roughly 1,000 shares a day.