Tag Archives: vym

VYM Is Still A Good Bet In The Short Term

Summary Rates will rise, but very slowly, so dividend funds are still in favor. As rates rise, high-yielding funds should generate more attention. Ultra-cheap way to own some of the world’s best companies. The purpose of this article is to discuss the attractiveness of the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA: VYM ) as an investment option. To do so, I will look at recent fund performance, its current holdings and allocation, and trends in the market to conclude if VYM will be a profitable investment going in to 2016. First, a little about VYM. The fund is designed to track the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which measures the investment return of common stocks of companies characterized by high dividend yields. Currently, the fund is trading at $68.52/share, and its most recent quarterly dividend is $.53/share. Since VYM’s dividend payment typically fluctuates throughout the year, I used Vanguard’s website directly to estimate its annual yield going forward, rather than relying on its most recent payment. Vanguard currently has its annual yield listed at 3.14%. With the Federal Reserve set to finally raise rates this month, (according to 81% of fund managers surveyed by Bank of America Merrill Lynch), it may seem to go against conventional wisdom to initiate positions in dividend funds at this time. However, there are a few reasons why I expect VYM to still outperform in this environment, which I will outline below. One, the market has been expecting rate hikes for some time, only to be continuously surprised by the Fed delays month after month. Funds such as VYM have been dropping prior to the Fed’s meetings, only to rebound sharply once the announcement of no increase is made. For example, in mid-August VYM dropped over 10% , partly on speculation that a September rate hike was evident. Since the Fed has delayed raising rates in the following two meetings, the fund has rebounded to the pre-drop levels. While VYM has not suffered a recent steep drop, it has traded cautiously over the last month, gaining under 1%. I view the potential upside to VYM, if the Fed delays yet again in December, as greatly outweighing any downside risk. In fact, while most traders are expecting a hike, they are still not completely sold on it. According to the same Bank of America Merrill Lynch survey , the possibility of a December rate hike after the release of last month’s Fed meeting minutes went down to 68%. Therefore, VYM could be a great hedge if the rate hike is delayed yet again, because the fund should rise swiftly as investors dive back in to capture the high yield. Two, I think VYM will outperform over the next six months even if rates do rise, because the increases are likely to be slow and small, meaning investors will have to wait a long time for yields to rise high enough on short-term bonds to seriously compete with the yield offered by the fund. The annual yield of over 3% will still be seen as “high” for a while, even when the Fed finally decides to begin increasing rates. Coupled with the possibility of capital appreciation, investors would be wise to stay the course with VYM, as I do not anticipate a massive correction in the fund on the first rate hike announcement. Additionally, if the Fed does decide to raise rates, the principal reason behind that decision is because they are beginning to feel more confident about the economy’s ability to stand on its own merits. Under such a scenario, I would expect the largest American companies to do well in this growing economy, and those are exactly the companies that make up the bulk of VYM’s portfolio. Below is a listing of the main holdings of VYM as of 10/31/2015: 1 Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT ) 2 Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM ) 3 General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE ) 4 Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC ) 5 Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ ) 6 JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM ) 7 Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE: PG ) 8 Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE ) 9 AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T ) 10 Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ ) As you can see from the chart, VYM is made up of some of the biggest companies in the world, and these companies will perform strongly during periods of domestic growth. Therefore, the bulk holdings of the fund should continue to deliver returns, regardless of the Fed’s decision. Of course, investing in VYM is not without risk. While I have laid out a few reasons why I like the fund, it is certainly plausible that the Fed will raise rates more aggressively than anticipated. If rates are raised higher, or more quickly, than investors expect, the market will become more volatile and dividend funds will likely suffer as investors shift into bonds and other fixed income investments that begin to offer higher yields with less downside risks. Also, while I laid out why continued low rates will be beneficial overall for the fund, VYM does have about a 15% exposure to the financials sector. This is a sector that should actually outperform in a higher rate environment, since financial companies like banks are able to charge more for the loans they lend out, typically leading to a higher spread, and therefore profits, for the firm. If rates stay low, that sector could be a laggard, which will weigh on the overall performance of VYM. How much this will impact the fund is unclear, but it is a risk to be aware of. However, I do not expect either of these scenarios to play out. Fed chairwoman Janet Yellen has made it clear that the Fed will take a “gradual approach” to hikes to ensure the market is not disrupted. Also, I do not expect the financial sector to drag on VYM, as the sector has rallied, and all odds do point to a hike in the near future. Bottom line VYM provides investors with diversified exposure, access to some of the biggest companies in the world, all for an ultra-low fee of .10%, which, according to Vanguard’s website, is lower than that of 91% of comparable funds. With rates expected to stay at historically low levels, even after the Fed’s initial hikes, VYM’s yield of over 3% will continue to attract investor interest in 2016. The fund will also benefit from increased consumer spending, as it has a 20% weighting of direct exposure to the U.S. consumer. While recent consumer spending has not been strong , I see tremendous upside to that statistic, as hourly wages for Americans have finally started to rise . This will bode well for future consumer spending, especially going into the holiday season, and VYM will be a direct beneficiary of this trend. With a growing U.S. economy and wage growth, continued low rates, and low management fees, I would encourage investors to take a serious look at VYM.

Forget Dividend Growth Investing: I Want My Dividends And I Want Them Now

Summary In a previous article, I featured the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, and my reasons for including it in my personal portfolio. In this article, I feature a different ETF, one that you may select if you wish to receive a higher level of current income. In the course of this article, I will also examine the question: “Should I perhaps hold both in my portfolio?” Towards the end, I also offer a link that will give you a peek into my own portfolio. This article is designed to be read in conjunction with the most popular article I have managed to write to-date for Seeking Alpha, with over 7,750 web and mobile views and counting. In that article, I featured the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEARCA: VIG ). I explained why, after considering attempting to build a little 10-stock “mini ETF” of my own, I decided instead to add to my weighting in that particular ETF. While noting that VIG carried a rather modest SEC yield of 2.19%, I featured the structural reasons that one could expect this dividend to grow over time. But what if you are an investor who says: “Forget dividend growth! I want my dividends and I want them now!” As it happens, I have just the ETF for you. This article will discuss another Vanguard ETF that forms a piece of the “bedrock” of dividend income that supports my portfolio; namely the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA: VYM ). When I say “read in conjunction with,” what I mean is that I will attempt not to bore the reader by repeating the information and concepts developed in that previous article, but rather expand on them, clarify similarities and differences between the two ETFs, and ultimately attempt to address the question: “Why might I want to have both ETFs in my portfolio?” Expense Ratio and Composition While, at times, other ETF providers make a wonderful marketing splash by being able, for example, to at least temporarily tout that they offer the world’s cheapest ETF , one of the things I admire about Vanguard is that it offers a wide variety of ETFs – including some that are specialized – at extremely low expense ratios. VYM is no exception. Like its stablemate VIG, its expense ratio is a mere .10%. In this case, what do you get for your .10%? Here’s a quick overview from VYM’s fact sheet on the Vanguard website: Right off the bat, then, we see that VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index and does so in passive fashion, using a full-replication approach. As it turns out, this index represents the U.S.-only component of the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index . From the linked fact sheet, we find that: This index comprises stocks that are characterized by higher-than-average dividend yields. REITs are removed from this index, because they do not generally benefit from currently favorable tax rates on qualified dividends. Additionally, stocks forecast to pay a zero dividend over the next 12 months are also removed. Finally, the remaining stocks are ranked by annual dividend yield and included in the index until the cumulative market cap reaches 50% of the total market cap of the universe of stocks under consideration. The index is reviewed semi-annually, in March and September. Finally, the associated Vanguard Advisor’s page reveals that “buffer zones” are utilized during the annual rebalancing exercise, to reduce portfolio turnover. This index is a little broader than the one utilized for VIG. Currently, VIG contains 179 stocks, and VYM contains 435. The fund currently has $15.6 billion in Assets Under Management (AUM), with daily average trading of $43.41 million. It has an average trading spread of 0.02%. Finally, the fund’s current SEC yield is 3.14%. Comparing VYM With VIG. Should You Hold One? Both? In this section, I will expose the differences and similarities between VYM and VIG. Ultimately, it is my hope that it helps you to decide whether you would like to add one or the other to your portfolio or, like I do, maintain a target weighting in both. To help you conceptualize the differences, I first used the charting capabilities of Excel to visually display the differences in their sector breakdowns, with all percentages being taken directly from the Vanguard fact sheets. From that graphic, you likely noticed that VIG is much more heavily weighted in: Consumer Goods Consumer Services Industrials In contrast, VYM tends to feature: Financials Oil & Gas Telecommunications Utilities When it comes to Basic Materials, Healthcare, and Technology, the weightings are very similar. Next, have a look at the comparative Top-10 holdings of the two ETFs, to see how these themes play out in their largest holdings: There are perhaps two intuitive takeaways from this: VYM tends to feature what might be described as slightly “stodgier” companies. These are certainly not rapid growers. Rather they are established companies in low-growth businesses which deliver a large part of their earnings to shareholders in the form of dividends. VIG tends to feature companies with lower current payouts, but slightly faster growth. If you decide to include both in your portfolio, there is some overlap (3 similarly-weighted sectors, 3 stocks in the Top-10 holdings of both). However, it could be argued that there is a greater level of variance (3-4 sectors with very different exposure, 7 stocks which are not found in both Top-10 holdings). Let’s next turn to relative performance. In reviewing the comments from other Seeking Alpha articles, I have noticed some skepticism regarding dividend-paying stocks, and therefore related ETFs, on two fronts: In good times, they tend to underperform the S&P 500. Conversely, they often don’t hold up so well when the market experiences a sharp downturn. In that vein, you may find the following charts helpful to review. First, I started by laying both VIG and VYM against the S&P 500 index over the past 5 years. VYM data by YCharts Interestingly, I actually find VYM’s performance to be rather stunning. Though it has trailed the S&P 500 by roughly 6% over that time frame, as the next chart shows it has also consistently delivered a dividend in the range of 2.75-3.25%. In contrast, on both counts, VIG’s comparative performance over this period appears slightly underwhelming. VYM Dividend Yield (TTM) data by YCharts Next, though, let’s have a look at the last extended major downturn, covering the period between 10/1/2007 and the bottom on 3/9/2009: VYM data by YCharts In this drastic negative environment, VIG emerged as the clear winner, besting the S&P 500 by a full 8.5% and VYM by over 10%. However, again using the S&P 500 as our benchmark, VYM also held up comparatively well. Summary and Conclusion I am of the belief that dividends are an invaluable component of a solid, well-balanced portfolio. In my case, I have elected to maintain modest holdings in both AT&T (NYSE: T ) and Verizon (NYSE: VZ ) in my personal portfolio for the express purpose of having a solid foundation of dividends. The linked article also explains my rationale for not automatically reinvesting my dividends, and what I do instead. That is why VYM forms an integral part of my portfolio as well. Currently, it stands at 5.18%, augmenting my 7.22% weighting in VIG, for a total of 12.40% between the two ETFs. Should you hold both VYM and VIG in your portfolio? If you are interested in a steady stream of dividends while at the same time benefiting from both great diversification and a low expense ratio, I believe the above evidence suggests that you should. VYM offers a higher current dividend yield while VIG may offer both a little more growth as well as better protection in the event of a market downturn. As always, whatever your personal choices, I wish you. Happy investing!

The Global X SuperDividend ETF Illustrates The Risks That Come With Yield Chasing

Summary The SuperDividend U.S. ETF has underperformed considerably this year posting a loss this year of 6.5% compared to a gain 0.6% for the S&P 500. The fund’s yield of over 7% may have been tempting for investors but the fund’s composition showed it took positions in riskier investments to achieve that yield. The fund increased its position in MLPs to around 15% of fund assets at the end of Q2 right around the time when losses in MLPs were accelerating. A heavier allocation to underperforming utility stocks also contributed to the fund’s poor performance. As Treasury yields remain near all time lows and bank products struggling to yield as much as 1%, investors often look to riskier products in search of higher yields. Corporate bonds sport modestly higher yields. That leaves a lot of people turning to much riskier equities for income. The SuperDividend family of ETFs from Global X was created to appeal to investors looking for a high yield product. The Global X SuperDividend ETF (NYSEARCA: DIV ) has been around since the beginning of 2014 tempting investors with yields as high as 6% and currently has a 30 day yield of over 7%. The fund has drawn nearly $300 million in total assets since its inception but some investors are now finding out the hard way that those high yields come with risks. High dividend equity ETFs like the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA: VYM ) and the iShares Core High Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: HDV ) have performed roughly on par with the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) year-to-date but DIV has lagged considerably. DIV Total Return Price data by YCharts A big chunk of the blame could come from the composition of the fund itself. The Vanguard and iShares ETFs are well diversified broadly among the major sectors. DIV is much more concentrated. As of 10/23/15, utilities and real estate count for nearly half of the portfolio. Real estate has performed in line with the S&P 500 but utilities have lagged the index by about four percent. DIV Total Return Price data by YCharts The biggest offender however could be MLPs. MLPs have gotten hammered this year as the Alerian MLP Index is down 30% year-to-date. The index’s losses accelerated just as DIV begin piling in. DIV Total Return Price data by YCharts Consider some of the fund’s most recent quarterly fact sheets. The holdings as of the end of the first quarter indicate that about 8% of assets were committed to MLPs At the end of the second quarter, MLPs accounted for over 15% of fund assets. It’s right around this time that you can see losses in the ETF began to accelerate. Even now, taking a look at the fund’s current assets shows that about 12% of the fund is still in MLPs. The Alerian MLP Index’s total return is still sitting over 40% below its high reached in 2014 thanks to the fall in oil and other energy prices. The MLP Index rallied over 20% between the end of September and the middle of October but a chunk of that gain has been given back demonstrating again that some of these high yielding investments aren’t necessarily conservative. Conclusion The moral of the story here is pretty simple. Higher yields usually mean higher risk. As we’ve seen this year, risk isn’t always rewarded as there’s been a pretty sizeable shift out of riskier assets into more conservative investments. But maybe another reason is that the ETF has just plain old performed lousy. The relatively high exposure to MLPs at a time when their value was tanking doesn’t help the fact that year-to-date the ETF has lagged almost every sector that it has a reasonable exposure to. It’s understandable that income seeking investors are looking for ways to improve on the low yields that they’re seeing in just about every other corner of the market. But one of the primary principles of investing is that the chance at higher returns usually only comes when taking on additional risk. Sometimes that risk doesn’t pay off and some investors may be learning that rule the hard way.