Tag Archives: utility

Utilities Sector and Stocks Analysis from Seeking Alpha

Utilities Sector and Stocks Analysis from Seeking Alpha © seekingalpha.com. Use of this feed is limited to personal, non-commercial use and is governed by Seeking Alpha’s Terms of Use (http://seekingalpha.com/page/terms-of-use). Publishing this feed for public or commercial use and/or misrepresentation by a third party is prohibited. SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.com NRG Energy Is Ready For A Turnaround http://seekingalpha.com/article/3288025-nrg-energy-is-ready-for-a-turnaround?source=feed_sector_utilities 3288025 Sun, 28 Jun 2015 02:25:13 -0400 SCTY VSLR NRG Simple Investment Ideas PNM Resources: Potential Headwinds Diminish A Compelling Value Argument http://seekingalpha.com/article/3285845-pnm-resources-potential-headwinds-diminish-a-compelling-value-argument?source=feed_sector_utilities 3285845 Sat, 27 Jun 2015 08:45:43 -0400 PNM Tristan R. Brown Duke Energy: Dividend Increase Coming – What Investors Should Expect http://seekingalpha.com/article/3287375-duke-energy-dividend-increase-coming-what-investors-should-expect?source=feed_sector_utilities 3287375 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:40:14 -0400 DUK Bob Ciura Pepco-Exelon Merger: OPC-DC’s Position Raises Questions As To Agency’s Effectiveness, Relevancy http://seekingalpha.com/article/3287225-pepco-exelon-merger-opc-dcs-position-raises-questions-as-to-agencys-effectiveness-relevancy?source=feed_sector_utilities 3287225 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:51:06 -0400 EXC POM Transcend Event Driven Research PPL Remains On Track Despite Spin-Off http://seekingalpha.com/article/3287185-ppl-remains-on-track-despite-spin-off?source=feed_sector_utilities 3287185 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:35:55 -0400 TLN PPL Valuentum AES Corporation – A Long-Term Bet http://seekingalpha.com/article/3287175-aes-corporation-a-long-term-bet?source=feed_sector_utilities 3287175 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:34:41 -0400 AES Himanshu Gupta Xcel Energy Is Entering A Bear Cycle http://seekingalpha.com/article/3287135-xcel-energy-is-entering-a-bear-cycle?source=feed_sector_utilities 3287135 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:05:09 -0400 XEL Calder H. Lamb NiSource Is Overvalued And Speculative http://seekingalpha.com/article/3286025-nisource-is-overvalued-and-speculative?source=feed_sector_utilities 3286025 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:24:36 -0400 NI Benjamin Clark DTE Energy: Bearish Sentiment And Solid Earnings Potential Make This Utility Look Undervalued http://seekingalpha.com/article/3283005-dte-energy-bearish-sentiment-and-solid-earnings-potential-make-this-utility-look-undervalued?source=feed_sector_utilities 3283005 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:04:21 -0400 DTE Tristan R. Brown What’s The Matter With Utilities Stocks? http://seekingalpha.com/article/3284665-whats-the-matter-with-utilities-stocks?source=feed_sector_utilities 3284665 Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:18:21 -0400 XLU Adam Freedman Duke Energy – Repositioning Business http://seekingalpha.com/article/3284365-duke-energy-repositioning-business?source=feed_sector_utilities 3284365 Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:57:01 -0400 DUK Equity Watch Ameren Corporation: Creating Stable Income Streams At Less Risk Than The Market http://seekingalpha.com/article/3284145-ameren-corporation-creating-stable-income-streams-at-less-risk-than-the-market?source=feed_sector_utilities 3284145 Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:33:48 -0400 AEE Calder H. Lamb Southern Co. And Exelon – ‘Why Don’t You Try Me’ http://seekingalpha.com/article/3283915-southern-co-and-exelon-why-dont-you-try-me?source=feed_sector_utilities 3283915 Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:35:02 -0400 EXC SO George Fisher German Government Provides Relief For RWE- But That Won’t Turn The Share Price http://seekingalpha.com/article/3283305-german-government-provides-relief-for-rwe-but-that-wont-turn-the-share-price?source=feed_sector_utilities 3283305 Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:37:42 -0400 EONGY RWEOY Catharina Hillenbrand-Saponar Brookfield Infrastructure Partners: World Class Infrastructure Assets And Undervalued With Solid Growth Prospects http://seekingalpha.com/article/3283105-brookfield-infrastructure-partners-world-class-infrastructure-assets-and-undervalued-with-solid-growth-prospects?source=feed_sector_utilities 3283105 Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:35:20 -0400 BAM BIP Caiman Valores Warm Weather In Q1 Didn’t Diminish Portland General Electric’s Long-Term Outlook http://seekingalpha.com/article/3278635-warm-weather-in-q1-didnt-diminish-portland-general-electrics-long-term-outlook?source=feed_sector_utilities 3278635 Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:39:04 -0400 POR Tristan R. Brown NRG Could Be The Green Victim Of Green Energy http://seekingalpha.com/article/3275575-nrg-could-be-the-green-victim-of-green-energy?source=feed_sector_utilities 3275575 Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:03:51 -0400 ENB NEE NRG Dana Blankenhorn In A Rising Natural Gas Market Dynegy Is Worth Considering http://seekingalpha.com/article/3278015-in-a-rising-natural-gas-market-dynegy-is-worth-considering?source=feed_sector_utilities 3278015 Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:28:50 -0400 DYN Calder H. Lamb Growth And Upside Potential Highlight American Electric Power’s Bullish Credentials Going Forward http://seekingalpha.com/article/3277855-growth-and-upside-potential-highlight-american-electric-powers-bullish-credentials-going-forward?source=feed_sector_utilities 3277855 Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:58:36 -0400 AEP Equity Watch Wisconsin Energy’s 3.93% Yield: A 5-Year High http://seekingalpha.com/article/3273675-wisconsin-energys-3_93-percent-yield-a-5-year-high?source=feed_sector_utilities 3273675 Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:31:32 -0400 TEG WEC Dividend Sleuth

Dividend Growth And Value Investors Should Own ITC As A Core Holding

ITC Holdings’ management has earned the highest S&P Quality rating for 10-yr consistence in earnings and dividend growth. No easy feat. Substantially higher Net ROIC, higher allowed ROIC, and a growing regulated asset base are driving earnings and dividend growth higher as well. The current dip is a buying opportunity. The market has not been kind to utility stocks recently, and the current sell-off is offering a few attention-grabbing opportunities. ITC Holdings (NYSE: ITC ) is a company that offers top-ranking management with a record of accomplishment in generating industry-leading investment returns. Add projected annual dividend growth in the 10% to 13% range, along with forward PEG valuations more reminiscent of growth companies than slow growth utilities, and most investors should take notice. S&P Capital IQ offers a rating of 10-yr consistency in earnings and dividend growth known as its Quality Rating and firms are grouped from A+ to D, with B+ being considered average. Of the 500 stocks followed by S&P IQ with a Quality Rating, only 47 carry the A+ rating, and ITC is one of this elite group. ITC has an S&P Credit rating of A- while the industry average is BBB+. Keep in mind the company has been public for only 10 years and would have just qualified for inclusion into the Quality Ratings. One component of management excellence is generating shareholder returns based on total capital deployed that are both higher than its peers and are comfortably above their cost of capital. ITC has generated a 6-yr average return on invested capital ROIC of 6.4% and is higher than the industry average of between 4.5% and 5.0%. More impressive is the low cost of capital at a weighted average cost of capital WACC of just 2.2%, making Net ROIC an impressive 4.2%. While many may see this as small potatoes, investors should compare ITC’s Net ROIC with some bigger, more familiar names, such as those in the spreadsheet below for Exelon (NYSE: EXC ), Southern Company (NYSE: SO ), Consolidated Edison (NYSE: ED ), Dominion Resources (NYSE: D ), NextEra (NYSE: NEE ), American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP ), Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ), and Edison International (NYSE: EIX ): Source: Guiding Mast Investments, fastgraphs.com, thatswacc.com As shown, ITC management is under-appreciated by most investors for their ability to generate Net ROIC substantially above their peers. One of the keys to ITC’s success is the structural nature of its business focus. ITC is the largest publicly traded electric transmission company with 15,000 miles of FERC-regulated power lines. The subtle difference is the FERC and not individual state utility commissions regulate ITC’s assets, and the FERC has a higher allowed ROE than most states. The chart below from the Edison Electric Institute outlines the progression of lower state allowed ROE since 1990: As shown, the average state-allowed ROE has declined over the past 30 years, and has plateaued at around 10% since 2006. A national energy goal has been the upgrade of the electric grid and the interconnection of new solar and wind generating capacity in areas not historically power generation-oriented. Grid infrastructure investment has been encouraged through offering higher returns on investment dollars, and ITC’s focus has been on those higher return margins. The FERC allows returns in the 10.5% to 11%+ range. To encourage smaller companies, regulated returns offer an additional return incentive of about 1% if the assets are owned by independent firms like ITC. It is estimated that ITC’s long-term allowed ROE will be in the 11.5% range. There is opposition to the higher returns offered by FERC-regulated projects, and last year rates were reduced in the Northeast from as high as 13.4%. With the success of this reduction, consumer advocates are pushing for the formula to apply nationally, and this will negatively affect ITC’s allowed returns with an anticipated allowed ROE reduction from 12.75% to 11.5% by 2016. However, this decline in allowed returns will be offset by a larger network of regulated assets. ITC’s growing asset base and the large quantity of future project opportunities will drive earnings and dividend growth for the next several years. ITC has grown earnings by a three-year average of 12% and raised its dividend by 10%. The consensus is for earnings to continue its 10% to 12% growth rate. The payout ratio is a low 31%, offering management the option to raise dividends faster than earnings growth. Management has targeted mid- to high-30% for a comfortable payout ratio. Last year, the dividend was raised by 14%. ITC is a capital expansion story. Current assets are around $7.1 billion with annual capital expansion budgets of $800 million a year. Operating cash flow will fund a growing portion as ocf increases from $630 million this year to an estimated $770 million in 2018. More information on their cap ex expansion is available in the June 2015 Investor’s Meeting presentation pdf. ITC’s share price has been declining recently due to two factors, general weakness of the utility sector after a lengthy time of outperformance and concerns over the potential for a reduction in allowed ROE. ITC’s share price has followed its peers up and down over the past year until March. At that point, there is a divergence where ITC declined faster than the utility sector. ITC is down about 30% from its high, while the averages are down about 15% and since March, utility stocks have been declined about 5%, while ITC is down 17%. Over the past 12 months, utility stocks are about flat, while ITC is down about 12%. With a 52-wk range of $30.66 and $44.00, the current $32.65 is closer to the low. Another culprit is lower-than-expected first quarter earnings. Analysts were expecting eps of $0.50, but management disappointed by 6% at $0.47. This is a repeat of the previous quarter shortfall of 4%. Management’s guidance for EPS this year is $2.00 to $2.15, with a midpoint of $2.08. Next year’s EPS is estimated at $2.18 to $2.20. Below is the Fastgraph for ITC going back to its IPO in 2005. (click to enlarge) On a forward PEG basis, ITC is trading at a substantial discount to its peers. As described in a previous article , the average forward PEG ratio for the utility sector is 3.2, the average forward P/E is 15.7 and the average EPS growth rate is 4.8%. ITC compares with a forward 2016 PEG of 1.4 based on a 2016 P/E of 15.3 and EPS growth of 11%. While EPS growth is estimated at twice the sector’s growth, ITC’s share prices currently offer no premium valuation. However, in reviewing ITC’s P/E history, it seems it usually trades closer to a P/E of 22 than to 16. If ITC recovers its footing and resumes its premium P/E, it is conceivable share prices could climb to $42 to $48 for patient investors. While the current yield is below the sector average at 2.0%, a high dividend growth rate should overtake the sector average within a few years. The current weakness should be considered a buying opportunity for dividend growth investors and value investors alike. Management has shown its ability to deliver outstanding fundamental returns to shareholders, and the stock warrants a place as a core position in a portfolio. Use this dip to your advantage. Author’s Note: Please review disclosure in Author’s profile. Disclosure: The author is long ITC, AEP, D, EXC, SO. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

BlackRock Utility And Infrastructure Trust: An Option Player In The ETF Utility Space

I recently looked at UTG and UTF, leading readers to ask about BUI. BUI is BlackRock’s entrant into the infrastructure space. The biggest difference it offers is the use of options. I recently wrote an article reviewing two relatively long-standing infrastructure closed-end funds , or CEFs. My conclusion being that Reaves Utility Income Fund (NYSEMKT: UTG ) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund (NYSE: UTF ) are both good products, though UTF is trading at a wider discount at the moment. Readers of that article asked my take on BlackRock Utility and Infrastructure Trust (NYSE: BUI ), another option (that’s a pun, actually) in the space. What is BUI? BUI opened its doors in late 2011, meaning that it doesn’t have the longevity of UTG or UTF. In fact, it hasn’t really witnessed a major market correction yet, like the pain we all suffered at the turn of the century and more recently during the 2007 to 2009 recession. This is less of a knock than a piece of information to keep in mind. BUI isn’t doing anything outlandish, so it’s unlikely it would “blow up” in a downturn. Actually, just the opposite is likely to be the case, but that expectation is untested. That said, what does it do? As the name implies, like UTG and UTF, BUI invests in things like electric utilities, water utilities, pipelines, bridges, and other similar hard assets. These are the types of things we take for granted, but without which life simply wouldn’t go on as it had before. On that score, it does, indeed, deserve to be looked at with UTG and UTF. However, there’s a not too subtle difference here. UTG and UTF both make use of leverage. BUI does not. It enhances returns, specifically income, through the use of an option overlay strategy . This means two things: return of capital will always be an issue and the options it writes could provide downside protection in a bear market. One of UTG’s big bragging rights is that it has never used return of capital to support its distributions. They have always come out of income and capital gains. You can argue this doesn’t matter much so long as a fund isn’t using destructive return of capital over extended periods. For example, UTF has used return of capital in the past and in one recent year it was destructive (the net asset value went down at the same time as return of capital was being used to support the dividend). However, that was one year and UTF hasn’t used return of capital recently. But some investors are highly suspicious of return of capital distributions. And BUI has made use of return of capital every single year. Why? Because it writes options. Dividends and interest on debt fall into investment income. Capital gains fall into, well, capital gains. Option income isn’t either of those things and winds up getting shoved into return of capital. It hasn’t proven to be a bad thing at BUI, with the net asset value, or NAV, increasing from $19.10 a share at its initial public offering to $21.50 or so more recently. So, at this point, the issue of return of capital hasn’t been a big one and likely only matters if you have a personal issue with that type of distribution. Looking at options from a different angle, the premiums received can provide return during down markets. This protects an option writing fund’s returns to some extent from the full effects of a market decline. In the case of BUI, however, that’s more of an academic issue because the fund has yet to deal with a truly severe downdraft. So, in theory, BUI should hold up better than UTG or UTF in a downturn. But it’s worth noting that the use of leverage at these two funds is likely to result in notable underperformance during a bear market. Both funds, for example, lost more than 40% of their NAV value in 2008. A fact to keep in mind when you consider that options can also limit BUI’s upside because positions will get called away. So BUI should lag in good markets and shine in bad ones compared to UTG and UTF. How has it done? Looking at performance numbers, BUI has underperformed relative to UTG and UTF on an NAV total return basis over the trailing three-year period through May (BUI’s short history means that’s the furthest back this trio can be compared). Interestingly, however, over the trailing six months period, UTG is down 2.7%, UTF is up a scant 0.4%, and BUI is up roughly 1.8%. Although hardly a bear market, while UTG and UTF have struggled, BUI is beating them. BUI’s standard deviation goes right along with that. UTG and UTF have three year standard deviations, a measure of volatility, of 13.5 and 11.4, respectively. BUI’s standard deviation is a far more subdued 8.5% over that span. Looking at cost, UTG is trading at a small discount to its NAV and roughly in line with its historical price trends. UTF, meanwhile, is trading far more cheaply at an around 14% discount. BUI is trading at a discount of around 12%, nearly three percentage points more than its trailing three-year average discount. Investors looking for bargains should be interested in UTF and BUI. That said, if you are concerned about risk, BUI should have the edge (despite the fact that it hasn’t been stress tested by a deep downturn). Yield wise, BUI’s distribution is around 7.5%. That’s in the same area as UTF, but notably above UTG’s 6.3% yield. That said, it’s worth repeating that UTF and UTG use leverage to enhance yield, hopefully earning more in dividends than they pay in interest. BUI, on the other hand, generates income by selling options on its holdings, which generates return of capital, can limit upside potential, yet also helps to reduce volatility. And options are also cheaper to deal with, which is why BUI’s expense ratio is around 1.1%. Both UTG and UTF have to contend with interest costs, which push their expense ratios up to 1.7% and 2.2%, respectively. Who’s BUI for? Whether or not you want to purchase BUI really boils down to your concern about market volatility. If you think the markets are trading at premium levels and could be due for a correction, theoretically, BUI is probably the best choice out of these three funds. It also has the allure of trading at a noticeable discount, like UTF, if you prefer to buy on the cheap. And it’s the least expensive to own based on fees. All of that said, I still like UTG because of its longevity and the fact that it has never cut its distribution. But for risk-averse investors who don’t have an issue with return of capital, BUI is truly worthy of consideration. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.