Tag Archives: utility

Atmos Energy’s Outlook Contains Multiple Drivers For Earnings Growth

Summary Natural gas utility Atmos Energy has been one of the sector’s strongest performers over the last five years as the discovery of large domestic gas reserves has spurred its demand. The company also benefits from a diverse geographic footprint and the existence of multiple favorable regulatory schemes in its large service area. While a warm spring dampened its FQ3 earnings, the company continued to report customer growth and higher throughput in its pipelines segment. The company’s shares appear to be overvalued on a P/E basis but its outlook contains multiple drivers for future earnings growth, both near term and long term. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Atmos Energy (NYSE: ATO ) is one of the country’s largest natural gas utilities, handling distribution, pipeline transmission, and storage services in several U.S. states. The company has been one of the top performers over the last several years among U.S. natural gas utilities, generating a total shareholder return result that is roughly 50% higher than the average of its peers. More recently, its share price has begun to move higher following multiple quarters of underperformance compared to the S&P 500, setting a new all-time high last week before settling a bit to $59. While the recent performance of the company’s share price has been the result of the Federal Reserve’s delay of an expected interest rate hike, which broadly supported the utilities sector, Atmos Energy’s outlook has also improved over the last several months due to a combination of changing energy consumption habits, proposed federal regulation, and the development of a strong El Nino. This article considers the company as a potential long investment opportunity in the presence of this operating environment. Atmos Energy at a glance Atmos Energy is divided into both regulated and non-regulated segments that operate in eight different states on both sides of the Mississippi River. While its largest areas cover Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, which combined are the origin of 80% of the company’s total rate base, it also operates within Colorado, Kansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia. Its service area covers several urban centers, providing its regulated distribution segment with roughly three million customers that are supplied via 67,000 miles of distribution and transmission pipelines. This segment’s operations are complemented by the company’s regulated pipeline segment, which transmits natural gas from many Texan shale gas basins via 5,600 miles of intrastate pipelines. Finally, Atmos Energy’s non-regulated segment provides natural gas delivery, storage, and transportation services. The regulated distribution segment generated the majority of the company’s earnings at 61% of the total in recent quarters, followed by 30% from the regulated pipelines segment and 9% from the non-regulated segment. The company’s regulated segments operate within very favorable regulatory schemes, resulting in strong allowed returns on equity compared to its peers. The regulated distribution segment has a blended allowed return on equity of 10.4% while that of the regulated pipeline segment is higher still at 11.8%. The allowed returns are further aided by mechanisms that rapidly increase rates in response to higher capex: the company reports that 91% of its capex is recouped via higher rates within six months and 96% is recouped within 12 months. Indeed, 45% of the company’s FY 2015 capex from its regulated distribution and pipeline operations is completely unlagged. 97% of its rates are further covered by weather normalization mechanisms that minimize exposure of the company’s earnings to weather-induced rate volatility, although this does not extend as far as consumption volume volatility. Atmos Energy earnings are very exposed to the utility’s operations within Texas, providing it with both an advantage and a risk. 60% of consolidated margins, 70% of its asset base, and 70% of its FY 2015 capex are linked to the state, and its distribution network serves 1.8 million customers in the state, including the Dallas-Fort Worth metro area. Of the company’s total rate base, Louisiana is second at 8%, followed by Mississippi at 6%. This exposure to Texas has provided strong support for the company’s earnings growth over the last decade due to the state’s above-average economic growth and growing exploitation of its shale gas reserves. The risk is that Texas could at some point introduce an unfavorable regulatory scheme that, because of the company’s exposure to the state, would have an outsized impact on its earnings despite its diverse geographic footprint. That said, the risk of this happening is much lower than that faced by utilities in states such as California or New York, for example. Atmos Energy has achieved 12 straight years of diluted EPS growth and 31 straight years of dividend increases. The most recent dividend hike came in the form of a 5.4% increase in the current fiscal year. Its forward yield is a relatively modest 2.6% at present, although this is more of a function of the fact that the share price has nearly tripled over the last three years than of a low dividend payout ratio. FQ3 earnings report Atmos Energy reported its earnings in August for the quarter ending June 30 that slightly exceeded the consensus analyst estimate despite the presence of warm spring temperatures. Consolidated revenue came in at $686.4 million (see table), down 27% YoY from $942.7 million. The decline from the previous year was primarily due to a 37% fall in the price of natural gas over the same period and reduced demand due to warmer than normal temperatures, although these impacts were partially offset by a customer increase of 4.6%. Atmos Energy financials (non-adjusted) FQ3 2015 FQ2 2015 FQ1 2015 FQ4 2014 FQ3 2014 Revenue ($MM) 686.4 1,540.1 1,258.8 778.7 942.7 Gross income ($MM) 381.7 520.7 423.3 337.7 359.5 Net income ($MM) 56.3 137.7 97.6 23.7 45.7 Diluted EPS ($) 0.55 1.35 0.96 0.23 0.45 EBITDA ($MM) 187.0 317.0 253.9 151.3 170.4 Source: Morningstar (2015). The company reported gross profit of $381.7 million, up from $359.5 million YoY. All three of its company’s segments reported increases over the same period, led by an increase to that of the regulated distribution segment from $257.7 million to $267 million as higher rates were only partially offset by an increase to revenue-related taxes and a decrease to demand resulting from the warm spring. The regulated pipelines segment reported a similar increase to $97 million from $87.2 million YoY as its capex spending quickly generated higher rates. Finally, the non-regulated segment’s gross profit increased from $14.8 million to $17.8 million YoY as falling natural gas prices pushed its margins higher. Adjusted net income rose to $55.1 million, or $0.54 diluted EPS, from $46.1 million, or $0.43 diluted EPS, beating the consensus EPS estimate by $0.03. The adjustment excluded an unrealized gain of $1.2 million, or $0.01 of diluted EPS. The YoY increase to net income would have been higher still but for an increase to O&M costs over the same period from $125.6 million to $132.4 million resulting from higher maintenance capex. Outlook Based on its earnings through the first three quarters of the 2015 fiscal year, Atmos Energy’s management announced during the FQ3 earnings call that it was both tightening and increasing its annual diluted EPS forecast to $3-$3.10. This would ultimately be below the company’s target annual growth of 6-8% through FY 2018, although such a relative slowdown isn’t surprising given its 12% YoY increase in FY 2014. Management expects to support its long-term EPS growth target by maintaining its current high levels of capex, reaching around $1 billion annually through FY 2018 and resulting in a rate base CAGR of 9-10% over the same period. Most of this capex will consist of reliability spending by its regulated distribution segment; only 12% will go towards customer expansion. Atmos Energy’s outlook through FY 2018 will be most impacted by three factors: weather, interest rates, and natural gas demand. Barring an interest rate increase before the end of the year, weather will be the first factor to make its presence felt. Meteorologists now attribute a high degree of certainty to the arrival of a strong El Nino this year, with the only questions remaining relating to its ultimate strength. Previous such events have been characterized by substantially colder than normal temperatures across Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi between January and May. Virginia and Kentucky have also experienced slightly colder temperatures during previous El Nino events, although Colorado and Kansas have experienced warmer temperatures. Given the strong influence of natural gas demand in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi on Atmos Energy’s consolidated earnings, however, the net impact of El Nino should be higher natural gas demand. While weather-normalization mechanisms in its service area will insulate the company from higher rates resulting from strong demand, it will benefit from higher volumes resulting from people running their heaters more than normal. Interest rates will also impact Atmos Energy’s earnings in FY 2016 and beyond. The company ended FQ3 with only $43 million on hand, making it likely that it will turn to the debt markets to finance its planned capex through FY 2018. Higher interest rates resulting from bullish Federal Reserve action will increase the company’s interest costs moving forward compared to in the past. That said, a couple of factors will limit this impact. First, 71% of its long-term debt matures after FY 2024, leaving it with breathing space. Second, its most expensive debt matures over the next few years. Finally, the favorable regulatory environment that the company operates in minimizes regulatory lag, preventing it from finding itself in the unenviable position of many of its peers when higher interest costs are not offset on the earnings statement by higher rates. The company’s longer-term earnings will likely be positively impacted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s [EPA] recent unveiling of its Clean Power Plan, which requires individual states to achieve reductions to the average carbon intensities (pounds of CO2 per MWh of electricity generated) of their power plants between 2022 and 2030. Each state’s required reduction operates as a function of its current average intensity, with those states having the highest intensities being required to achieve the largest reductions, although not necessarily the lowest ending intensities. Texas must achieve a 24% reduction by 2022, increasing to a 33% reduction by 2030, although its ending intensity can ultimately be met by employing natural gas complemented by wind. Arkansas must achieve an even larger reduction. The Clean Power Plan will ultimately drive demand for natural gas in power plant applications, both in Texas and the broader U.S., creating an additional source of demand for Texan shale gas. Atmos Energy’s regulated pipeline segment only operates at 51% of its peak capacity, leaving it with the slack to take on additional volumes at a very attractive allowed ROE. Finally, it is unlikely that the company will need to wait for the Clean Power Plan to go into effect before realizing additional natural gas demand in both its distribution and pipelines segments. The price of natural gas has fallen sharply over the past 12 months as commodity prices have broadly moved lower. This has caused natural gas consumption to move higher even as the number of heating degree-days in the U.S. has decreased, with the replacement of coal by natural gas at power plants providing a major impetus for this trend. Following the recent decline to the price of natural gas, the U.S. Energy Information Administration [EIA] is now forecasting total natural gas consumption to increase by 7% between 2013 and 2016 even as cooling degree-days decline. Texas, with its ample reserves of shale gas, can be expected to meet much of this demand, and Atmos Energy’s pipelines are available to connect the state’s gas fields with the rest of the country’s pipeline network. Valuation The consensus analyst estimates for Atmos Energy’s diluted EPS results in FY 2015 and FY 2016 have moved slightly higher over the last 90 days, the former in response to its FQ3 earnings beat and the latter in response to expectations of a cold winter in the company’s service area and the resumption of the natural gas price’s earlier trend lower. The FY 2015 estimate has increased from $3.04 to $3.07 while the FY 2016 estimate has increased from $3.23 to $3.25. Based on a share price at the time of writing of $59, the company’s shares are trading at a trailing P/E ratio of 19.1x and forward ratios of 18.3x and 17.5x for FY 2015 and FY 2016, respectively. All three of these are notably higher than their long-term historical averages of 14-15x. Conclusion Natural gas utility Atmos Energy has been a top performer from a shareholder return perspective compared to its peer group over the last several years, benefiting from its close proximity to inexpensive and abundant Texan shale gas and a diverse geographic and regulatory footprint. Its P/E ratios have moved higher over the last five years as both its earnings and dividends have moved steadily higher, and the company appears to be overvalued on the basis of these historical values. That said, its outlook contains a number of potential drivers to additional earnings growth, including the strong likelihood of a colder than normal winter across much of its service area resulting from this year’s El Nino event, increased demand for natural gas across the country in response to falling prices, and the implementation of a federal regulation that will spur additional demand for natural gas by electric utilities. While potential investors are unlikely to be interested in the company’s relatively low dividend yield, existing investors should remain in their positions despite the high valuation due to the number of potential positive catalysts on offer.

CenterPoint Energy: Be Sure To Understand What You Own

Summary CenterPoint currently yields nearly 5.35% and has $1.2B in cash reserves. Transmission and distribution income – nearly 50% of operating income – is geographically concentrated. It is largely considered to be a utility – however, a quarter of the income is derived from the MLP equity interest, which has been historically volatile. CenterPoint Energy (NYSE: CNP ) is a diversified pseudo-utility with a wide range of operations. The company operates a regulated natural gas utility business, a transmission and distribution arm, and retains ownership of substantial equity interest in Enable Midstream Partners (NYSE: ENBL ). CNP has been a favorite of investors chasing yield, but the shares have had trouble keeping up with the utility index over the past two years. Unfortunately for shareholders, the shares are down 20%, compared to a 20% gain for the broader utilities index. Contrary to what you might think, the dividend has actually been growing measurably the past two years, and the company now yields over 5.49%, well above historical averages. Is there an opportunity here for shareholders for both solid yield and capital appreciation? Business Operations CenterPoint’s strongest business unit in regards to operating income is its electric transmission and distribution business. This segment provides the infrastructure to connect power plants to substations which connect to the retail customer. This is a low-business risk, high-value business. Because the infrastructure is entirely pole/wire assets, there is significantly less regulatory and environmental risk compared to actual power generation. While this is a monopolistic business with very little risk, CenterPoint’s operations do have geographic risk in that the company only owns assets located in and around the House/Galveston metropolitan area. While this area has retained its strong growth even with the fallout of plummeting energy prices, there is no guarantee that this trend will continue. A reversal in the area’s fortune would result in a slowdown in demand for electricity, driving earnings down in this segment. The most stable and consistent business unit is CenterPoint’s intrastate natural gas distribution business. Compared to the transmission and distribution business that is concentrated in one area, this segment provides natural gas to more than three million customers in six states. Like other gas utilities, the company passes along the cost of the gas to customers, so there is little effect of gas price fluctuations on CenterPoint’s profitability aside from revenue numbers. Further cementing operating results, the company has weather normalization and decoupling mechanisms in place to limit the effects of seasonality and variations in customer demand in five of six states. This portion of CenterPoint is extremely well run, and earnings consistently bump up against the maximum allowed rate of return that the public utility commissions have set for the company (authorized return on equity in the 10% range). As mentioned, CenterPoint owns 55.4% of the limited partner units of Enable Midstream Partners, receiving 40% of the distribution rights. Operational control is split 50/50 between CenterPoint and OGE Energy (NYSE: OGE ). The reason for CenterPoint’s underperformance may largely lie with poor results from Enable. Enable’s first half of the year has been poor when compared to the 2014 results ($93M in operating income for Enable in 1H 2015, compared to $138M in 1H 2014). The downside action in Enable may have been overdone. Compared to many midstream companies like Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI ), the company is much less levered (2.6x net debt/EBITDA), making it better positioned to handle any long downturn in U.S. energy midstream operations. I think the weak recent share price performance is primarily related to the company’s short public history and heavy insider ownership. With very little track record and such a small percentage of the float open for trading, the shares have been volatile, scaring many retail and institutional investors away. Operating Results (click to enlarge) Revenue can vary widely year to year, especially within the natural gas distribution segment. As an example, revenue grew 40% from 2012 to 2014 ($959M), but operating income only grew 26% ($60M). This can cause operating margin decreases through no fault of the company as these operating margins decrease as the fixed cost of the natural gas being provided rises. Meanwhile, further putting pressure on operating margins has been a steady increase in operations and maintenance costs within the electric transmission and distribution segment. Between 2012 and 2014, revenue grew 12%. Regrettably, operations and maintenance costs grew 32%. While its maintenance capital expenditures will be recovered as part of capital plans eventually, these recoveries may not be as timely as investors might expect. (click to enlarge) 2014 was a concerning time for the company from a cash flow perspective. Cash from operations had fallen nearly $500M from 2012 levels, and capital expenditures were up tremendously. CenterPoint had to plug the hole with the $600M in proceeds from long-term debt it had raised late in the year prior. With $6.4B in net debt, the company is only moderately leveraged at 3.2x net debt/EBITDA. However, with CenterPoint keeping $1.2B in cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet, it is prepared to weather any mild operational issues quite well. Conclusion When investing in CenterPoint, investors need to be aware they aren’t buying a company with 100% regulated utility operations. The higher dividend yield here is likely justified, given the volatility present in the Enable ownership. On the plus side, the natural gas operations are very well run, and the electric transmission business, while experiencing headwinds currently, is also solid. In my opinion, the shares likely trade around their fair value. Investors looking for yield can likely comfortably add some exposure to the company in the $17-18/share range.

Piedmont Natural Gas: Steady, Reliable Income

Summary Dividend history is incredibly stable – 3 or 4% annual raises for more than a decade. Market area (Carolinas and Tennessee) is one of the bright spots in the United States. Shares won’t double overnight, but they don’t have to in order to reward shareholders well. Piedmont Natural Gas (NYSE: PNY ) is a large, pure-play natural gas distribution company with a wide berth of operations across the Southeastern United States. The utility has been growing steadily, with earnings and the dividend tracking along at nearly 5%/year for the past twenty years. Consistency has been the name of the game here. This measured growth has been attributable to the favorable rate environment along with population growth strength in the Southeast coupled with the buildout of pipelines surrounding the Marcellus/Utica shale formations in the Northeast. Natural gas development and production in the United States has been and continues to be incredibly strong, yielding abundant supply and relatively stable pricing for gas utilities like Piedmont Natural Gas, especially over the past five years. This strong, consistent operating performance has yielded shares that have been less volatile and consistently outperformed the broader utility index. Will the future be as strong as the past? Operating Results Revenue is down, as has been the case for many natural gas utilities. This is because utilities dealing with lower natural gas prices have to pass the vast majority of the associated cost benefits passed along to consumers in the form of lower utility bills. Excess consumer demand from cheap energy rarely offsets the associated drop in revenue. Further compounding top-ine issues, weather has been at best normal and at worst seasonally warm in the company’s service areas. Decoupling agreements with the utility commission and strong local population growth have done their best in managing to keep growth flat. The company’s small but highly profitable non-regulated businesses have also done well, helping to improve overall operating margins over the 2011-2015 timeframe. (click to enlarge) Piedmont continues to invest significantly in its pipeline infrastructure through capital expenditures. This has continued to result in cash flow deficits, most obviously in 2013/2014. The company notes that it is pushing for new regulatory mechanisms such as IMR tariffs and accelerated rate requests to allow quicker recovery of its cash outlays. The majority of these initiatives went into place in 2013 and the company has made significant strides in getting back to cash flow neutral between its operating and investing activities. Unfortunately the shortfalls in 2013 and 2014 almost doubled long-term debt from $675M in 2012 to nearly $1.4B today. At 3.3x net debt/EBITDA, however, the company is only moderately leveraged and will have no problem covering interest expense on this cheap fixed-rate debt (blended rate is 3.85% fixed rate). While negative consistent overspending in the cash flow statement is generally a sign of mismanagement, in this case it was simply the case of a company investing in its non-utility power generation service delivery projects. Going forward, I expect cash flow shortfalls to be small and investors need not be concerned yet. Conclusion I view Piedmont Energy as an excellent choice in its peer group compared to overvalued alternatives like Atmos Energy (NYSE: ATO ) ( analyzed here ) or lower yielding options like Southwest Gas (NYSE: SWX ) ( analyzed here ). Dividend growth has been incredibly consistent, plugging along at either 3 or 4% increases every year for more than a decade. At a 3.22% yield as of today, the income being thrown off isn’t anything to sneeze at either. Investors might find themselves falling asleep if they hold the stock in their portfolios. For income investors, that is quite often a good thing rather than a bad thing. While I wouldn’t go running to pick up shares at current levels, current shareholders are likely quite happy with the results they’ve been getting and will likely continue to get. I’m not going to disagree with that sentiment. If you’re long, keep on holding and enjoy what is likely to be one of the most stable companies investors have access to in publicly-traded markets. Share this article with a colleague