Tag Archives: utilities

Why American Electric Power’s Recent Rally Will Continue, In 4 Charts

Summary Oversupply in the natural gas market will keep prices under pressure, and this will act as a catalyst for AEP since it is increasingly using the fuel for power generation. The company’s increasing usage of natural gas and other renewable sources will help it reduce costs by 13% this year and 28% next year as compared to 2014 levels. American Electric will benefit from an increase in retail electricity prices and an increase in electricity consumption going forward, which will allow it to arrest the decline in its top line. AEP’s valuation indicates bottom-line growth going forward while its payout ratio of 59% and aggressive cost reductions will allow it to sustain its dividend. Utility company American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP ) has gained some momentum in the past one month after releasing its second-quarter results at the end of July, with the stock gaining almost 3%. This is despite the fact that American Electric had posted mixed results , as its top line declined year over year and missed the consensus estimate by a wide margin. However, the company’s bottom-line performance was stronger than expected, which can be attributed to costs of electricity generation. Looking ahead, I believe that the company will be able to sustain its recent momentum going into the remainder of the year. Let’s see why. Lower natural gas prices will lead to better margins On account of massive oversupply in the U.S. natural gas market, the price of the fuel is not expected to rise anytime soon. There is news that the U.S. is considering increasing the exports of LNG, which could lead to higher prices. But, in the short run, the oversupply in the market will keep prices down. For example, on July 31, natural gas inventory stood at 2,912 Bcf, which is 23% higher than the prior-year period. The EIA believes that this level of inventory will go up to 3,867 Bcf at the end of October, up 1.8% as compared to the five-year average. Thus, higher inventory will keep natural gas prices, which are already down 11% in 2015, under more pressure. This will help American Electric to improve its margins going forward, as natural gas has turned into the largest source of electricity generation in the U.S. Given the dynamics in the natural gas market, it is not surprising to see why American Electric will increase the use of the fuel in electricity generation. As shown in the following chart, apart from natural gas, American Electric will use more renewable resources to eliminate extra costs associated with coal. (click to enlarge) Source: Investor relations As a result, by reducing its dependence on coal and using more of natural gas along with other energy sources, American Electric’s costs are expected to decline 13% this year and 28% next year as compared to 2014 levels, as shown below. Source: American Electric Higher electricity retail prices and demand will aid revenue growth The EIA expects the retail price of electricity in the U.S. for the residential sector to average 12.8 cents per kilowatt hour in fiscal 2015. This is approximately 2.5% higher than the average price in fiscal 2014. Also, it is expected that the retail price for commercial as well as industrial sectors will grow by 2% and 0.4%, respectively, in fiscal 2015. More importantly, the trend is expected to continue going into 2016 as well, with prices in all three sectors expected to rise. This is shown in the following chart: Source: EIA Along with the improvement in electricity rates, consumption is also slated to increase this year. For instance, residential consumption is expected to average 1,044 killowatthours per month during June, July, and August. This is about 3.7% higher than the consumption level last year. The increase in the consumption level will be driven by an expected 14% increase in summer cooling degree days in 2015. All in all, retail sales of electricity to the residential sector during 2015 are expected to grow by 0.4% from 2014 levels. In addition, American Electric expects reasonable sales growth for its commercial as well as industrial retail classes. The following illustrates its sales estimates for the fiscal-year 2015: (click to enlarge) Source: Investor presentation Hence, American Electric is well positioned to benefit from both an increase in electricity consumption and higher pricing. This will allow the company to improve its financial performance going forward. Valuation and takeaway Apart from strong end-market prospects, American Electric also has an impressive valuation that indicates earnings growth in the future. Its forward P/E of 15.4 is lower than the trailing P/E of 16.1, indicating positive bottom-line growth going forward. Additionally, the company carries a strong dividend yield of 3.60% at a payout ratio of 59%. Now, American Electric Power is reducing its costs by using natural gas while it will also benefit from better demand and pricing conditions. As a result, the company should be able to sustain its dividend in the future. Thus, according to me, investors should continue holding American Electric Power as the stock’s recent run will continue going forward. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

ALLETE: Not A Compelling Buy For Dividend Investors

Summary Reliance on aging coal-fired power generation is a risk. Capital expenditures and dividend payments exceed operational cash flow. Dividend yield is solid but has not grown and is unlikely to grow meaningfully in the future. ALLETE, Inc. (NYSE: ALE ) primarily operates as a regulated utility, providing services for customers in Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, and Illinois. By comparison to some utilities, ALLETE’s largest customers are primarily industrial in nature, with these large customers (mining and paper industries primarily) drawing 54% of KWH generated. Because of this, ALLETE profit is tied directly to the health of these industries. Luckily, Minnesota mining production has continued at full-speed even in the face of a global rout in commodities that have deeply impacted the iron and steel industries. Investors who own ALLETE should focus more of their attention on the health of ALLETE industrial customers rather than traditional utility research, such as demographic trends and unemployment growth in the service areas that primarily affect residential consumers. Aging Infrastructure And Management’s Plan The vast majority of energy production for ALLETE comes from coal-fired power generation. At the end of 2014, 64% (1,277 MW) of energy production was coal-fired. The majority of these coal-fired plants are getting quite old — while units 3 and 4 at the Cohasset, MN facility are the newest (producing 75% of generation at this massive facility), these were still originally constructed in 1973 and 1980. Like a large swath of US coal-fired plants, obsolesce may soon be around the corner. The average lifespan of a coal-fired plant is forty years, according the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners . While the Cohasset facility has seen many updates over the years, facts remain that the bones of the facility have aged. Those that follow my work on utilities know that I’m a big fan of natural gas and other renewable power regeneration. This isn’t driven by my own personal feelings on the environmental impact. Regardless of your thoughts on environmental regulation, investors should nonetheless be aware of the fact that the Environmental Protection Agency has begun taking a harder stance on coal and that course is unlikely to change. Regulations on pollutant emission will likely only continue to strengthen and so will the cost burden on utilities to maintain necessary updates on these aging coal-fired plants. As a recent example of the cost impact, ALLETE is nearing completion of an environmental upgrade at one of its plants; total cost will run $260M to bring the plant into compliance with the Mercury Emissions Reduction Act. While this is cost recovery eligible through rate increases on the retail customer and if approved these customers will have no alternative but to bear the cost, industrial customers (which if we remember constitute the majority of revenue) do have the option to pursue other providers with approval from the state or can generate their own electricity on-site. This is why it is imperative that investors who remain long on ALLETE as a company pay close attention to the strides the company is making in renewables and natural gas. The company is targeting a production goal of thirds — one-third of energy production with coal, one-third with renewables, and one-third with natural gas. This was most likely driven in part by the Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act of 2007, which requires 25% of retail energy sales to be from renewables by 2025, with hurdles of 17% in 2016 and 20% in 2020. These hurdles are around the corner, but luckily ALLETE does have a foundation to work off of. There is some minimal existing hydroelectric production (105 MW) spread throughout Minnesota, but the likely new crown jewel for ALLETE is its Bison Wind Energy Center in North Dakota, which produced 497 MW of energy at the end of 2014. Further bolstering renewables production is the agreement reached to purchase hundreds of megawatts of production from AES Corporation (NYSE: AES ) early on in 2015. I’m long AES Corporation, and I see this as a win/win for both companies. AES has spread itself way too thin around the globe and these asset sales make sense to let the company gain focus on more core facilities. ALLETE in return gains solid wind production facilities that will likely be immediately accretive to earnings per share. As another related victory for ALLETE in the renewables space, the deal for ALLETE to construct a wind farm for Montana-Dakota Utilities, a division of MDU Resources Group (NYSE: MDU ) shows that the company has an industry reputation for knowing what it is doing when it comes to wind construction. Operating Results (click to enlarge) Total revenue has grown at a 5.81% over the past five-year period and this trend is set to continue with revenue projected at 1.2B for 2015. Fuel expenses have fallen as coal prices have taken a nosedive, a benefit that many utilities have enjoyed in recent years. This input cost windfall has resulted in expanding operating margins. Net income growth would have been stronger if not for a burgeoning debt load; total debt now stands at nearly $1.4B, almost double the $773M the company held in 2014. This is due to the fact that capital expenditures have massively outstripped operational cash flow over the past five years. Operational cash flow totaled $1.2B in the 2010-2014 period; capital expenditures totaled $1.8B. This out-of-balance is before factoring in dividends, which totaled another $350M. This is not what you want to see from a utility. By comparison, Calpine Corporation (NYSE: CPN ), which I own, has seen nearly $3.8B in operational cash flow versus $2.8B in capital expenditures over the same timeframe. This falls back to the cost of running and maintaining coal-fired plants. Calpine primarily operates extremely new, high-technology natural gas plants, the direct opposite of ALLETE’s current portfolio. Management is guiding these costs to fall over the next five years, capital expenditures are guided to average $250M/year versus the prior five-year average of $360M. Even with those decreases, ALLETE may continue to run into a situation where they must raise more debt to fund all their obligations. Conclusion While investors might be tempted by the 4% dividend yield, investors should keep in mind the five-year average dividend growth rate has only been 2.2% and this is unlikely to change. No large catalysts exist for substantial earnings per share and dividend expansion in my opinion. Total shareholder returns are likely to lag a broader utility index and investors would likely be better off in other names with more opportunity. Larger peers like American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP ) or prior-mentioned name AES Corporation present more compelling stories for stable dividend growth. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

I Own Southern Company And AGL Resources – Now What Do I Do?

Summary The utility stocks Southern Company and AGL Resources are low growth, high yield investments. Southern Company is buying AGL Resources – I own both. What does the transaction mean to shareholders of both companies? This article reviews the transaction as it relates to shareholders going forward. Introduction Utility stocks are generally low-growth high-yield investments. As I will soon illustrate, both Southern Company (NYSE: SO ) and AGL Resources Inc. (NYSE: GAS ) neatly fall into that category. These low growth and above average dividend yield characteristics have led me to only invest in utility stocks when two important conditions are met. First and foremost, when considering utility stocks, I am even more of a stickler for fair valuation. My logic is simple; since long-term historic and future prospects for growth are low, I consider it imperative to only invest when utility stocks can be bought at fair value or below. There is typically not enough growth available to produce an attractive enough total return if you overpay even slightly. With most utilities, the dividends are consistent, but also grow at low rates in conjunction with the utility’s earnings growth. Second, I like to utilize utility stocks when current and dependable income is my primary investment objective. Although many utility stocks can be classified as dividend growth stocks, I tend to like them more for current income than total return. However, when purchased at or below sound valuation, investments in utility stocks can produce acceptable levels of long-term total return. On the other hand, when investing at sound valuations, utility stocks do tend to produce significantly more cumulative dividend income than the average company. As the following two announcements and reports indicate, Southern Company will become the second-largest utility company in the U.S. by customer base after buying AGL Resources. Importantly, Southern Company’s management expects the transaction to accelerate earnings growth in the first full year from its traditional 2% to 3% rate to a higher but still moderate 4% to 5% earnings growth rate. “Southern Co. to buy AGL Resources in $12B deal Aug 24 2015, 07:49 ET | By: Carl Surran , SA News Editor Southern Company (SO) agrees to acquire AGL Resources (GAS) for $66/share in cash, a 38% premium over Friday’s closing price, in a deal with an enterprise value of ~$12B including debt. SO says the deal will create the second-largest utility company in the U.S. by customer base, with 11 regulated electric and natural gas distribution companies providing service to ~9M customers with a projected regulated rate base of ~$50B. SO expects the deal to increase EPS in the first full year after the close and drive long-term EPS growth to 4%-5%” ” MARKET PULSE Southern Co. agrees to buy AGL Resources in $12 billion deal Published: Aug 24, 2015 7:41 a.m. ET By Ciara Linnane CORPORATE NEWS EDITOR Shares of AGL Resources Inc. GAS, +28.52% surged almost 9% in premarket trade Monday, after Southern Co. SO, -3.14% said it has agreed to buy AGL in a deal with an enterprise value of about $12 billion. Southern Co. said it expects the deal to boost earnings per share in the first full year after the close, and to drive long-term EPS growth to 4% to 5%. AGL will become a wholly owned unit of Southern Co., creating the second-biggest utility in the U.S. by customer base. AGL shareholders will receive $66 in cash for each share, a premium of 36.3% over the volume-weighted average stock price over the last 20 trading days through Aug. 21. We believe the addition of AGL Resources to our business will better position Southern Company to play offense in supporting America’s energy future through additional natural gas infrastructure,” Chief Executive Thomas Fanning said in a statement. The deal is expected to close in the second half of 2016. Southern Co. shares were up slightly in premarket trade, but are down 6.7% in the year so far, while the S&P 500 has lost 4.3%.” Here is a link to a report on Reuters that outlines the deal: The Southern Company Purchase of AGL Resources by the Numbers As a shareholder of both Southern Company and AGL Resources, I immediately wanted to know what I might expect from this transaction. In other words, does the deal make economic sense and will it benefit shareholders over the long run? Therefore, I looked at the deal through the lens of the F.A.S.T. Graphs fundamentals analyzer software tool and the FUN Graphs (fundamental underlying numbers) in order to evaluate the value to me as a Southern Company and AGL Resources shareholder. From The Perspective of an AGL Shareholder I was quite content with my position in AGL Resources as I considered the company fairly valued with a blended P/E ratio of 14.3 and I appreciated the 4.3% dividend yield. Additionally, since my cost basis was approximately 39, I was enjoying a reasonable level of capital appreciation coupled with its current above-average yield that had been growing at about 2½% to 3% per annum. The following earnings and price correlated graph illustrates my contentment. (click to enlarge) Of course, the approximate 30% premium over fair value significantly improves the total return I will receive when the transaction is complete. Therefore, from the perspective of an AGL Resources’ shareholder, I am quite pleased with the windfall. The following forecasting calculator on the day of the announcement and based on AGL Resources’ expected midterm future earnings growth illustrates the premium that Southern Company is paying. (click to enlarge) This is what the same graph looks like as of 8/24/2015, which shows the premium price that Southern Company is paying for AGL Resources. This would indicate that technically speaking AGL Resources has become overvalued as a result of the premium paid by Southern Company. (click to enlarge) On the other hand, when looked at from the perspective of expected future cash flows, the premium price that Southern Company is allegedly paying does not look so enticing. Cash flows are expected to increase significantly this fiscal year. Therefore, on the basis of price to cash flow, the apparent premium that Southern Company is paying based on earnings, looks like a bargain based on cash flows. (click to enlarge) When reviewing the cash flow per quarter growth (cflq) that AGL Resources has generated thus far in fiscal 2015, those fiscal year 2015 cash flow projections appear to be on track. So now, I am partially conflicted. I like the premium market valuation, but I’m not so sure that I’m truly receiving a premium price for my AGL shares based on potential cash flow growth. I have circled the last three quarters of cash flow highlighting the cash flow growth over the last three quarters. (click to enlarge) Furthermore, when I evaluate AGL’s historical annual dividends paid per share (dvpps) coverage based on cash flows per share (cflps) I am confident that my dividend was secure. Of course, I am even more confident considering the recent quarterly cash flow growth presented above. (click to enlarge) Furthermore, upon reviewing other valuation ratios, it appears that Southern Company instituted the transaction when AGL’s price to sales (ps) was at reasonable levels. However, the premium price they had to pay is common when a company is purchased outright. (click to enlarge) Additionally, AGL’s price-to-book value (PB) at the time the transaction was initiated was within historical norms as well (the red line). (click to enlarge) The bottom line is that as an AGL shareholder I have mixed views about the transaction. I like the premium market valuation, but I was also content to continue holding my AGL shares for the high yield they were providing. From The Perspective of a Southern Company Shareholder The following long-term earnings and price correlated graph on Southern Company supports my contentment as a shareholder. Although my cost basis in Southern Company was approximately at the same level that the company was trading at prior to the announcement, I was quite happy with my 4.7% dividend yield and believed that the company was fairly valued. Consequently, I was committed to continuing to own this high-quality utility company for many years to come. Moreover, even the approximate 5% price drop as a result of the transaction did not concern me very much because I felt the dividend was secure, above average, and had the potential for a modest amount of future growth. However, I was now faced with the issue of whether my Southern Company investment would continue to make sense after they purchased AGL. (click to enlarge) At this point, I decided that I would give credit to management’s assertion that the transaction would in fact accelerate Southern Company’s future earnings, and therefore, along with it – future dividend growth. Therefore, I reviewed the Forecasting Calculator based on consensus estimates from S&P Capital IQ prior to the AGL transaction. Here I discovered that consensus expected Southern Company’s earnings to grow at a very modest rate of 2.7%. Based on those consensus estimates and assuming that Southern Company would trade at a reasonable P/E ratio of 15 out to fiscal year-end 2018, I came up with a total annual rate of return expectation of 5.22%. Of course, that is nothing to write home about as it only represented capital appreciation of $.85. On the other hand, the $7.70 of projected dividend income was very attractive considering today’s low level of interest rates. Clearly, this is purely an income play and I had no delusions of anything different. (click to enlarge) This is what the expected returns look like after Southern Company’s price drop as a result of the announcement. The announcement brought Southern Company’s stock price into better alignment with fair value. (click to enlarge) For additional insight, I felt the forecasts prior to the transaction announcement were reasonably reliable considering the historical record of analysts forecasting Southern Company’s earnings. As the following analyst scorecard indicates, when making 1-year forward and 2-year forward estimates since calendar year 2000, the record of analysts following Southern Company has been consistently accurate at over 93%. (click to enlarge) Then I ran a similar calculation using the custom Forecasting Calculator based on management’s expectation of earnings growth accelerating to between 4% and 5% as a result of the transaction. I split the difference and ran a calculation based on Southern Company’s 5% drop in price and a forecast 4.5% growth rate. Based on those calculations, I was pleased that my Southern Company investment offered the potential for significantly more capital appreciation of approximately $11.11 versus the $.85 based on growth prior to the transaction. However, I was even more pleased to discover that my dividend income of $13.19 would be close to double what I expected prior to the transaction. Note: all these calculations are made and based on purchasing one share of the stock. The bottom line is that I have concluded that my Southern Company investment holds the potential to be much more attractive after the AGL transaction than it was prior to it. (click to enlarge) As a bonus , I have prepared a free analyze-out-loud video on my website MisterValuation which provides a more in-depth and detailed look at the Southern Company and AGL Resources transaction. Summary and Conclusions From the perspective of a Southern Company shareholder based solely on the numbers, I am enthusiastic and pleased with the AGL transaction. From the perspective of an AGL shareholder, I am disappointed that I will lose the company as a separate holding, but pleased that I will still benefit from its potential as a Southern Company shareholder. Of course, the premium over current market price is also a plus. However, I am now also faced with the challenge of what I will do with the proceeds received from the AGL shares. At this point, I am not yet certain whether I would reinvest the proceeds into Southern Company, or look for another opportunity. However, I have time to assess the situation. Disclosure: Long GAS, SO at the time of writing. Disclaimer: The opinions in this document are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the stocks mentioned or to solicit transactions or clients. Past performance of the companies discussed may not continue and the companies may not achieve the earnings growth as predicted. The information in this document is believed to be accurate, but under no circumstances should a person act upon the information contained within. We do not recommend that anyone act upon any investment information without first consulting an investment advisor as to the suitability of such investments for his specific situation. Disclosure: I am/we are long GAS,SO. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.