Tag Archives: utilities

Dynegy: A Growth Story About To Begin

Dynegy has mainly expanded inorganically through acquisitions. Substantial free cash flow generation and margin improvement are preparing the way for upside. Be on the lookout for any dips on which to buy Dynegy’s shares. Small cap companies offer investors the benefit of potentially increased returns with the downside of increasing volatility and/or risk in the investor’s overall portfolio. This risk can be mitigated through the inclusion of large cap and mid cap stocks as well as diversification through the purchasing of stocks of many small cap companies. Another way to increase the stability of these small cap investments is to make these investments in industries that are more stable, such as utilities and/or industrial industries. These industries retain their stability through inelastic consumer and/or firm demands as well as diversification across multiple other industries. With the infusion of small cap status into a firm in these industries, investors can benefit from the growth of the small cap in addition to the stability that comes with being in steady industry. Small cap utilities companies are one such combination of capital appreciation and capital preservation. Dynegy Inc. (NYSE: DYN ) is one such company that possesses these two characteristics, and based on investor sentiment, the shares are essentially up for grabs. The company owns a series of power generating facilities across the Midwest, Northeast, and West coast regions on the United States, so the company is mostly specialized in terms of customer concentration. The company diversifies its energy facilities across multiple utilities submarkets, including coal and gas; this adds the benefit of indirect additional diversification to investors in that investors who purchase the company’s shares get that indirect diversification. Some of the company’s major business segments include its Homefield Energy segment and its Dynegy Energy Services business. From looking at the company’ stock chart, investors can see that the company’s shares have gone on a bit of a roller coaster over the past few years. Capital invested at the beginning of calendar year 2013 would have generated essentially a zero percent return on investment throughout 2015. The shares have gone from a low of about $17 all the way to a high of about $36, and the shares have fallen all the way down again, so the shares are a bit volatile. In technical terms, the 50-day moving average has danced around the 200-day moving average, with the former going above and below the latter multiple times throughout the course of the past three years. Most recently, the 50-day moving average has once again dipped below the 200-day moving average, which could indicate near-term downside, as the spread between the two indicators seems to be widening. (click to enlarge) Source: Stockcharts.com From a fundamental perspective, the company is in a solid financial position: liquidity ratios indicate that the company’s financial health is in good order. The current ratio, quick ratio, financial leverage ratio all have hit all-time highs. However, it also appears that the debt to equity ratio has also hit an all-time high as well, with the ratio at about 2.5. The reason for this is because of the way the company grows. The company has expanded mainly through inorganic growth, and it has accomplished this by using a substantial amount of debt to fund its acquisitions. Some of its more recent acquisitions include the acquisition of Duke Midwest for $2.8B , which is extremely large for a company with a market cap of just under $3B. Although this particular method of growth has worked for the company, the fact of the matter is that the company’s capital structure has changed to include about 75% debt, which is certainly a lot. Thus, as the number of financial covenants begins to mount up, the company will become limited in the activities it can conduct, including further acquisitions. The company will have to be careful to ensure that the amount of debt that it takes off will not cripple its operations. Positive aspects of the company is that it has been generating large amounts of free cash flow recently, which the company can either use to reinvest back into the company or distribute it to shareholders in the form of share buybacks or dividends. In fact, the company began a share buyback program for $250M, which the company has already completed half of, so it appears that the company is committed to keeping shareholders happy. The amount of free cash flow that the company has historically generated has been negative, so this is definitely a positive trend for the company. Furthermore, cost reductions have resulted in margins that are beginning to stabilize, which could also boost free cash flow in the mid-term. All-in-all, it appears that the company has an uncertain future. However, the shares have dipped all the way back to their original price in 2013, so now could be a good time to buy. The fact that the company’s margins are getting better and that the company is beginning to generate substantial free cash flow is always a good sign. Be on the lookout for any further share dips to buy on.

GreenHunter Resources (GRH) on Q3 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

GreenHunter Resources, Inc. (NYSEMKT: GRH ) Q3 2015 Earnings Conference Call November 16, 2015, 10:00 AM ET Executives Serene Prat – Head of IR Kirk Trosclair – Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Ronald McClung – Chief Financial Officer Operator Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Latisha and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the GreenHunter Resources Third Quarter 2015 Financial and Operating Results Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Kirk Trosclair. You may begin sir. Kirk Trosclair Thank you, operator. Good morning everyone and thanks for joining our third quarter call today, Monday, November 16. And before we get started with the operational results and the financial results, I’d like to have Serene Prat read the Safe Harbor statement. Serene Prat Good morning. Thank you, Kirk. Before we begin with the content of today’s call, I’d like to advice you that today’s call may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The following discussion provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that may include statements regarding our expectation, beliefs and intentions, or strategies regarding the future. Actual events or results may differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. This discussion should be understood in conjunction with the financial statements accompanying notes and risk factors included in our SEC filings. The discussion should not be construed to imply that results contained herein will necessarily continue into the future or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be indicative of actual operating results in the future. Such discussion represents only the best present assessment by our management. Actual events or results may differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. This disclaimer is an effect for the duration of this conference call. Thank you. Kirk Trosclair Thank you, Serene. We’ll go ahead and get started this morning and basically just give you some highlights of the third quarter, look at the three months and the nine months ended September 30. But before we go into that, let’s just grab the overall picture. From last year at this time, WTI prices are now over 52% or so down year-on-year and the rig count itself is down over 50% as well. So you basically understand what that translates to as far as production and drilling in completion fluids is in the work space, on the environmental services side and the shale water outlook side. We’ve had some continuous growth over the last few quarters, continuing from the first quarter when we were averaging somewhere around 250,000 barrels a month or so of injection, and in the second quarter that went up to 275,000 on average, and in the third quarter we’ve averaged around 360,000 barrels per month. So the biggest thing there was, if you guys remember, right at the end of the second quarter and going into the third quarter, we added two additional wells down at our Mills Hunter facility, and results of those wells were really good for us and that helped translate that to a good third quarter on volumes. Even though we turned the wells on the first week of August, we didn’t get the ramp up until we finally got most of the injection volumes two or three weeks later. So we finally saw that going into August and September. So that’s the disposal volume side, on how it’s going so far this year. The trucking side has basically done a little bit less exciting than the disposal side. We started seeing price pressure on transportation in the middle of second quarter and that’s continued into the third quarter. We had, from the first quarter, we had 8,000 hours or so of trucking; second quarter, we averaged 6,500 hours or so per month; and in the third quarter now, we’re around 5,000 hours or so per month. We’re staying diligent in adding new customers out there in the Marcellus and the Utica area that should help to increase some of our volumes. But it’s – like you guys can imagine, it’s mostly production volumes at this point. Every once in a while we’ll have a flow back coming in from someone that maybe fracing a well, but there’s not that many completions going on. So our report, I think, the completions behind the pipe now are up over 5,000 wells and that’s just unheard of today. So I’ll jump into the press release portion and hit some of the operational highlights before I turn it over to Ron McClung on the financial side. Obviously, first of all, we did have positive adjusted EBITDA of $482,000 for the third quarter. The injection volumes, as I just mentioned to you, basically only about a 10% decrease respectively year-on-year and being the majority of that is production volumes, that’s pretty steady and it’s – what we can look forward to, I think, as the new norm right now until things turn around. We’ve already talked about the wells, but the two wells that we turned on at the Mills Hunter facility basically were 6,000 to 8,000 barrels per day each well. And that effectively raised our total disposal capacity by 50%, which now takes us to about 21,000 barrels per day of injection capacity currently at this time. We have a couple of other wells getting ready to go. We’ve got one in Ritchie County, West Virginia that we should add and turn on here in the next week or so, couple of weeks. So you’ll see that one come on in the fourth quarter of 2015, and then we’ll add one of the additional wells at Mills will come on as well in the fourth quarter. The last well at Mills, we’re looking at now probably in the first quarter of next year before we turn that on. In the last Q, we had just ordered those trucks. We have received the eight new Peterbilt trucks, 407s, and out of the trucking transportation side, the pricing pressure has not hit the 407 trucks compared to the straight water trucks, so that’s a good sign and we continue to put those on the road every day. Also, we looked at our revenues, and based on our injection volumes, we looked at our current portfolio and how it lays out between our number of customers that we have in the Appalachia Basin and no one customer is more than 21% of our total revenue up there. So one other thing we’ve done is pulled back on the G&A; we went from $2.1 million in the third quarter last year to $1.5 million third quarter this year. So that’s another decrease of 29%, and we’ve pulled on the belt just about as tight as we could possible pull on and cutting cost everywhere we can, but still trying to keep our customers happy and work in a safe and prudent manner. So with that, those are most of the highlights from the third quarter, I’ll let Ron take over and go through the financial results and we’ll follow that up. Ronald McClung Thank you, Kirk. I’m not going to rehash the bullet points that are in the press release related to EPS. I will get right into some of the financial results. Revenues for the third quarter in total were $4.5 million for the 2015 third quarter compared to $6.3 million for the third quarter of 2014, or an overall decline of 28%. However, our operating losses declined to $649,000 in 2015 for this quarter versus $1.2 million in the same quarter in 2014. As we expected and had disclosed previously, we did not move some of our debt covenants for the third quarter of 2015. These covenants had previously been waived by our lender for this quarter. Notably, as we previously also announced, we did not pay dividends for any of the months in the third quarter of 2015. Our amended agreement with our lender does not allow us to pay dividends until we’ve been in compliance with our covenants for two consecutive quarters. With the current state of the oil and gas economy, we do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future barring a significant change in the business environment, and we’re not able to predict when such a change will occur. For the first nine months of 2015, our revenues were $14.3 million versus $21.6 million for the same period in 2014. A key factor in managing our business relates to direct margins, which we define as revenue less direct cost of goods and services provided, and then what percent that direct margin is when compared to our revenue. Even with this 34% drop in revenue, our direct margin actually increased to 40% in the first nine months of 2015 compared to 33% in the first nine months of 2014. This improved margins in spite of the current business environment is a positive reflection on our management’s ability to cut costs. Looking a little closer at the current quarter results, our disposal revenue was about $3 million this quarter compared to about $3.4 million in the same quarter in 2014, or a decline of about 13%. This decline was partially the result of a 5% decline in this quarter last year in the number of barrels we disposed. And as Kirk said, this was mainly due to a dramatic drop in flow back order from last year and also due to some wells in our service area that are being shut in due to low commodity prices. We’ve offset [indiscernible] as Kirk also mentioned, what could have even been a greater decline in revenue by adding some new customers in the third quarter of 2015. With revenue being down 13%, volumes are only being down 5%, the remaining 8% of the decline was due to a decline in our average revenue per barrel of about $0.29 when compared to last year due to the downward pressure in processing we’ve experienced while trying to maintain and even grow our market share in this difficult environment. Internal trucking revenue was about $1 million this quarter compared to $1.2 million in the previous year due to market conditions that have led to a decline in trucking hours and again a downward pressure on processing. Skim oil revenue was down to $87,000 this quarter compared to $198,000 last year, mainly due to lower commodity prices. Now, some comments on the cost side of our business for this quarter. Our disposal cost in the current quarter, in spite of only seeing a 5% drop in volumes, we were able to decrease costs by about 16% from last year due to operational cost cutting measures. Our trucking costs declined about 20% from the same period last year and we were able to maintain our direct margins at about 43% for both this quarter and the third quarter of 2014, in spite of an overall 28% decline in revenue from last year due to these cost cutting efforts. As one might expect and as Kirk has already noted, we’re leaving no stone unturned in looking for ways to lower our costs in this environment. We were able to cut general and administrative costs by about 46% when comparing the current quarter to the same quarter in 2014, while a little more than half of this savings was due to a decline in non-cash stock compensation. The company also had substantial declines in payroll related costs and smaller costs in G&A, again, mainly due to our austerity efforts. The company continued to cut costs in the third quarter of 2015 and some of these more recent costs particularly in operating payroll were late in the quarter and thus not much of a benefit to the current quarter. We should see more favorable results from these latest cuts in the fourth quarter of 2015. And finally, as I’ve already noted, we did not see current market conditions allowing us to meet our debt covenants in the near future. This outlook has caused us place on applicable accounting rules to classify all of our new $13 million debt as a current liability at September 30, 2015. That in turn has resulted in adding language to our 10-Q [indiscernible] as to our ability to continue as a growing concern. Kirk? Kirk Trosclair Thank you, Ron. Before we go to questions, let’s just – I guess, I want to go through the third quarter one more time and highlight the additional wells that we turned on at the beginning of the quarter and that took us from 15,000 or so a day over 21,000 barrels of day of injection capacity. And if you look back a year ago, prior, if we’d had the wells owned at that specific time, we would have been at 100% utilization on all of these wells, the new wells that we’ve turned on. But as you noticed in the past, what we’ve reported, we’ve always stayed pretty true to it that we had about 75% of our volumes were production volumes, the other 25% or so was completions volumes. And completions market has just dried up, so basically seeing all the injection volumes that we have and then what we reported in the quarter, the majority of that is production volumes. So a good part is if you can find any silver lining in the commodity price market is out there that production volume is pretty stable and we’ve seen it week over week and continuing through the fourth quarter, I don’t see much change outside from the volumes and trucking hours, things have stayed pretty flat. Outside of that, operator, I think we’re ready to go take a couple of questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of [Tony Kaylin]. Unidentified Analyst Can you tell me how – you mentioned your debt covenants not being in compliance, can you talk about what you’re going to try to do to amend those or get in compliance? And in conjunction with that, your $2 million requirement to fund additional equity and I guess [indiscernible] you have a line with him, is that still available? Kirk Trosclair Yes, the line is still available, and we have to – the current amended waiver allows us to raise that capital that equity by December 31, 2015. We are already in talks and negotiations with our current senior lender to modify those agreements at this time. So we’re working on those as we speak. Unidentified Analyst Can you go so far as to characterize, do you believe you will be successful in modifying those or –? Kirk Trosclair We’re working with the lender, that’s pretty much all I can say at this point. Operator Your next question comes from the line of [Bryan Butler]. Unidentified Analyst On the disposal volumes, so assuming that 75% is from production, 75% was in the past from production, does that mean that 21,000 barrels a day capacity that you exited third quarter at, is that basically at 75% utilization, is that the way to think about that? Kirk Trosclair No, that’s our available injection capacity currently today. We’re not operating at 100% utilization on that 21,000 per day. In the third quarter, we had a couple of really good weeks where we averaged over 15,500 or so a day for several weeks, but it’s fluctuating up and down anywhere from the 12,000 to 15,000 per day on average right now. Unidentified Analyst And that’s all produce volume? Kirk Trosclair Pretty much all produced water, that’s correct. We have maybe – a couple of the companies out there had a couple of flow backs, but I can only remember one or two in the third quarter. We do have some anticipated flow backs coming in the fourth quarter that we’ve identified, our customers have reached out to us and told us to expect some heavy volumes towards the middle to late December where they have a couple of wells they are trying to get online before year end. Unidentified Analyst So produce volumes is running in that – I think you’ve just said that 12,000 to 15,000 per day and then the new capacity that you’re adding in the fourth quarter and the first quarter of 2016, I mean, it’s just capacity that’s going to be… Kirk Trosclair This capacity is waiting for the uptick. Unidentified Analyst So, it is not going to be adding anything. On the new trucks that you added, did they contribute at all in the third quarter or is that all talking about fourth quarter and 2016? Kirk Trosclair Only two of the trucks contributed to the third quarter numbers. The rest of them will be contributed in the fourth quarter. Unidentified Analyst What kind of contribution can we expect in the fourth quarter in the current environment? Kirk Trosclair On the 407 side, I think we’ll see steady runs with the 407s. That market has not really declined, but the older straight trucks and just plain water trucks, the pricing pressure that we’ve seen, it will definitely be down again in the fourth quarter. Unidentified Analyst So even though you have new trucks coming on, the pricing pressure you’re seeing is going to be offsetting any benefit that you’re getting from the new 407s? Kirk Trosclair That’s correct. That’s a safe way to look at it. Unidentified Analyst Can you talk about the competitive environment? I know you talked a lot about the market being very difficult and pricing being there, but are we seeing any competitors exiting the market here? I mean, is there some silver lining of – as competitors exit, there is additional volumes to be picked up? Kirk Trosclair We have not seen that, Bryan, at this point additional competitors closing the door or leaving the market, not at all. We haven’t seen it at all. Unidentified Analyst Because there is an expectation across all the providers, that there is going to be some kind of a recovery or is everyone just else — have a balance sheet that can support this? Kirk Trosclair There’s only two other public companies out there and they just published their results last week. I mean, everybody – the other shops out there are basically private shops, so we don’t really know what’s going on in there. But they’re experiencing the same pressures that we are, I’m pretty sure of that. Unidentified Analyst Last one just on the covenants, can you just outline what the covenants are that – current, I know you are renegotiating potentially, but what they are now, where you stood on those covenants at the end of the third quarter? Ronald McClung The biggest challenge in our covenants is there is a covenant that we have to have enough EBITDA to cover our debt source [ph], and that’s about – we now are paying principal payments to our new amortizing loan of $13 million. So that’s roughly $1.5 million a quarter and we did not obviously have that much EBITDA. And so until we’re able to cover that, we’re not going to pass that covenant. Unidentified Analyst So that’s principal and interest on that $1.5 million, what we’re talking about, it’s not just the interest? Ronald McClung Yes. Operator Your next question comes from the line of [Jim Collins]. Unidentified Analyst Question on one of your customers, you probably guess which one, Magnum Hunter, they had some language in their 10-Q that they are having some difficulties with [indiscernible] infrastructure and I just want to know if there’s been – as of this point, any disruption in your business with Magnum, obviously that would be production water at this point, not flow back. And how you look at that going forward for the rest of the fourth quarter? Kirk Trosclair Jim, we have not experienced any delays or anything different on the Triad Hunter side, we’re still taking in their production volumes currently today, but overall, the percentage of revenue and percentage of volumes that have come in from Triad versus the rest of our customers has dropped significantly over the last couple of years. But outside of that, it’s still status quo. Unidentified Analyst You mentioned that one of your customers is 21% of your volumes, I mean based on what you just said, can we assume that that’s not Triad, that’s a different customer that’s 21%? Kirk Trosclair We’ve got several that are floating right around the 18%, 19%, 21%, but it’s not Triad’s percentage. Unidentified Analyst And on pricing, we’ve used $3 a barrel as a benchmark. Given the slowdown and the low rig count in Appalachia, is that still – are you guys able to hold $3 basically? Kirk Trosclair On a blended average, it’s still right around $3, actually in some cases it’s a little over $3, Jim. But yes, you’re correct, since the market has come down, commodity prices have dropped – we’ve seen a turn on pricing pressure getting closer to that $3 range. Operator [Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of [David Rothschild]. Unidentified Analyst Most of my questions have been answered. I guess the one I did have, I assume in the condition you’re in right now, any further capital expenditures at this point are pretty much put on hold, is that correct? Ronald McClung For the foreseeable future, that’s correct. I mean, and that’s why we’ve delayed some of the wells over at Mills Hunter, we just really – we have one of them ready to go, but we just have slowed that down because our capacities are – the injection volumes are not meeting our current capacity at today’s levels. So no need to rush into another well. Unidentified Analyst Have you had to lower your prices quite a bit to keep the business that’s been coming in? Ronald McClung We’ve had to remain competitive and get aggressive with some of the newer pricings and some of the newer contracts. But for the most part, as we just mentioned, the blended rate is still north of $3. Operator And there are no more questions at this time. Kirk Trosclair Thank you, operator. This will conclude our third quarter conference call. Everyone have a good day. Thank you. Operator Thank you. This concludes today’s broadcast. We ask that you now disconnect. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!

WGL Holdings’ (WGL) CEO Terry McCallister on Q4 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

WGL Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: WGL ) Q4 2015 Earnings Conference Call November 16, 2015 10:30 AM ET Executives Douglas Bonawitz – Head of Investor Relations Terry McCallister – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Vincent Ammann – Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Adrian Chapman – President and Chief Operating Officer Gautam Chandra – Vice President of Business Development, Strategy and Non-Utility Operations Analysts Q – Operator Good morning and welcome to WGL Holdings, Inc., Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2015 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, I would like to inform you that this conference is being recorded and that all participants are in a listen-only mode. We will open the conference call for question-and-answers after the presentation. The call will be available for rebroadcast today at 1:00 PM Eastern Time, running through November 23, 2015. You may access the replay by dialing 1-855-859-2056 and entering the pin number of 72356565. I will now turn the conference over to Doug Bonawitz. Please go ahead. Douglas Bonawitz Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining our call. Before we begin, I would like to point out that this conference call will include forward-looking statements under the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements inherently involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those predicted in such forward-looking statements. Statements made on this conference call should be considered together with cautionary statements and other information contained in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we have filed with or furnished to the SEC. Forward-looking statements speak only as of today and we assume no duty to update them. This morning’s comments will reference a slide presentation. Our earnings release and earnings presentation are available on our website. To access these materials, please go to www.wglholdings.com, click on the Investor Relations tab and choose events and webcasts from the dropdown menu. The slide presentation highlights the results for our fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015 and the drivers of those results. On today’s call, we’ll make reference to certain non-GAAP financial measures, including operating earnings of WGL Holdings on a consolidated basis and adjusted EBIT of our operating segments. A reconciliation of these financial measures to the nearest comparable measures reported in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP is provided as an attachment to our press release and is available in the Quarterly Results section of our website. This morning, Terry McCallister, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will provide some opening comments. Following that, Vince Ammann, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer will review fiscal year 2015 results. Adrian Chapman, President and Chief Operating Officer, will discuss key issues affecting our business and the status with some of our principal initiatives. In addition, Gautam Chandra, Senior Vice President of Strategy, Business Development and Non-Utility Operations, is also with us this morning to answer questions. And with that, I would like to turn the call over to Terry McCallister. Terry McCallister Thank you Doug, and good morning to everyone. Today, we’ll briefly look back on the past fiscal year to review our full-year financial results. We will also discuss recent events affecting our business and introduce guidance for fiscal year 2016. I am happy to report to you full-year 2015 financial results that exceeded our initial earnings target for the year as well as our most recent guidance. As shown on Slide 5 of our presentation, we ended fiscal year 2015 with consolidated non-GAAP operating earnings of a $158.2 million or $3.16 per share. This compares to a $139 million in the prior fiscal year of $2.68 per share. This was record income for WGL Holdings and an 18% increase in earnings per share over the prior year. We have now realized a 9% compound annual growth rate and earnings per share since 2011. If you recall, we first established a goal for long-term earnings growth in 2012 when we communicated an expectation of 7% earnings growth over five years from 2011 base. This year we increased our goal to 7% to 10% up of 2014 base. We believe we are establishing a track record of delivering exceptional earnings growth and value for our shareholders. Performance of our utility exceeded initial earnings targets for the year, but utility earnings were slightly lower year-to-year primarily due to higher operations and maintenance expense. The utility results benefited from higher revenues from customer growth, strong asset optimization opportunities and rate recovery related to accelerated pipeline replacement programs. We added approximately 12,800 active utility customer meters in 2015, which represents an overall annual growth of 1.1%. The performance of our non-utility businesses as a whole also exceeded our initial expectations. With both Retail Energy Marketing and Commercial Energy Systems setting new highs in earnings, while the Midstream Energy Services business came in below initial expectations. Our Retail Energy Marketing business performed well with electric margins significantly higher than last year as we forecast at the end of 2014. This business is on a solid path back to long-term historical levels or profitability. In fact this year’s business exceeded those levels. Results from this segment during the fiscal year 2015 exceeded our expectations partially due to specific marketing opportunities that were higher than historical average this fiscal year. Over the long-term, we are still targeting adjusted EBIT for the Retail Marketing Energy segment in the range of $50 million to $55 million per year. The Commercial Energy Systems business delivered a 37% increase in adjusted EBIT compared to last year driven by the utility license distributed generation assets that we now have in place across the country. We now have $500 million in capital invested in this segment and invested a record amount of a $158 million in fiscal year 2015. Turning to Midstream Energy Services, this business underperformed somewhat this year primarily due to lack of optimization opportunities in the marketplace. However, from a long-term perspective, the business accomplished an incredible amount this year announcing the GAIL of transaction and opportunity to invest in a large gathering system and an investment in the Mountain Valley Pipeline. These three developments will create significant shareholder value for many years to come. Turning to fiscal year 2016, in our earnings release Friday, we introduced consolidated non-GAAP earnings guidance for fiscal year 2016 in the range of $3.00 to $3.20 per share. While the midpoint of our guidance reflects lower earnings than our 2015 results, we are solidly within the range of 7% to 10% earnings growth from 2014 results that we established as a goal earlier this year. I’ll now turn the call over to Vince. Vincent Ammann Thank you, Terry. Turning first to our Utility segment, adjusted EBIT for fiscal year 2015 was $235.7 million, a decrease of $9 million compared to last year. The drivers of this change are detailed on Slide 7. We continue to grow and add new meters. The addition of 12,800 average active customer meters improved adjusted EBIT by $5.3 million. Higher results from our Asset Optimization program added $12.1 million in adjusted EBIT. Revenues from new rates in Maryland added adjusted EBIT of $2.6 million as new base rates were not effective in Maryland during the first two months of fiscal year 2014. Higher revenues from our accelerated pipe replacement programs added $9.7 million in adjusted EBIT. The favorable effects of changes in natural gas consumption patterns in the District of Columbia added $5.3 million in adjusted EBIT. These items were offset by higher O&M expenses driven primarily by higher labor and outside services in large part due to the cold weather and employee incentives cost, partially mitigated by lower employee benefit costs. These impacts collectively reduced adjusted EBIT by $28.4 million. Higher appreciation expense also reduced adjusted EBIT by $6.4 million, reflecting growth in our investment and utility plan. Other miscellaneous items reduced adjusted EBIT by $8.9 million. I would also like to highlight the performance of our Asset Optimization program for the full-year. This program generated total of $38 million in adjusted EBIT for the utility this year and also delivered approximately $47 million in benefits to our customers through sharing mechanisms. Asset optimization activity this year will also deliver results in 2016 due to deferred storage earnings which I will discuss further when addressing fiscal year 2016 guidance. Turning to the Retail Energy Marketing segment adjusted EBIT for fiscal year 2015 was $68.5 million, an increase of $57.8 million compared to the same period last year. On Slide 8, you will see that the increase was driven primarily by significantly higher electric gross margins. Natural gas gross margins were also slightly higher compared to the prior year. Electric margins increased by $56.5 million, driven by lower capacity charges from the regional power grid operator PJM as well as lower ancillary cost in PJM. Electric margins in the prior year were negatively affected by adverse market dynamics created by the polar vortex weather event that led to a dramatic spike in ancillary and energy charges. Our internal data indicates an ancillary charges in PJM in January 2014. The procedural changes that PJM implemented in the wake of the polar vortex began to take effect in late fiscal year 2014 and continued into fiscal year 2015. The ancillary costs were incurred this year where generally in line with cost levels seen through the – during the three years before the spike caused by extreme weather. In the natural gas business, gross margins were $2 million higher, due to lower natural gas purchase cost and favorable gas supply and pricing opportunities. As stated throughout the year, our Retail Energy Marketing business has increased its focus on large commercial and government account relationships. As a result the overall number of electric and natural gas accounts both declined compared to the prior year. As of September 30, we have approximately $138,000 electric accounts and $144,000 natural gas accounts declined to 15% and 8% respectively. However, indicative of our revised thorough focus electric volumes increased 3% versus the prior year and natural gas volumes only decreased 1% versus the prior year. The increase in commercial loan in both electric and natural gas offset the decline in mass market customers on a biometric basis. Operating expenses for fiscal year 2015 were slightly higher than the prior year. Next, I will move to the Commercial Energy Systems segment, adjusted EBIT for fiscal year 2015 was $16.8 million compared to $12.3 million last year. The increase reflects growth in distributed generation assets in service, as well as higher income from state rebate programs for certain projects. These favorable variances were partially offset by higher operating expenses, including fixed expenses to support future growth. Our commercial distributed generation assets generated over 147,000 megawatt hours of clean electricity during the fiscal year 2015, which is sold to customers through power purchase agreements. This represents a 73% increase in megawatt hours compared to fiscal year 2014. As of September 30, the Commercial Energy Systems segment owned $369 million of operating distributed generation assets. In addition, our alternative energy investments, which include ASD, Nextility and SunEdison represent $128 million in capital investments since inception. In total, we now have approximately $500 million invested in distributed generation assets. Also note, that as of September 30, our assets in service have generated over a $122 million in investment tax credits and grants. These credits and grants are recognized as reductions in tax expense by amortizing them over the useful life for the underlying assets, which is typically 30 years. Next, I’ll move to the Midstream Energy Services segment. Results for the fiscal year 2015 reflect an adjusted EBIT loss of $3.6 million, compared to adjusted EBIT of $5.1 million last year. The decrease primarily reflects lower storage and transportation spreads in fiscal year 2015, partially offset by lower development expenses and higher income related to our pipeline investments. Results for our other non-utility activities reflecting adjusted EBIT loss of $4 million compared to a loss of $8 million for the prior year. The improvement is primarily related to lower business development and legal expenses. I’ll discuss interest expense on a consolidated basis. Interest expense increased to $50.5 million this year compared to $37.7 million in the prior year. The increase was primarily driven by interest expense on long-term debt issued by both Washington Gas and WGL. I’ll now move to our initial guidance for fiscal year 2016 earnings. We will continue to use adjusted earnings before interest and taxes or adjusted EBIT to provide guidance on the segment level. Guidance regarding non-GAAP operating earnings at the consolidated level was still be provided using an expected range of earnings per share. As Terry have stated earlier, our consolidated non-GAAP earnings guidance for fiscal year 2016 within a range of $3 to $3.20 per share. This earnings guidance includes dilution from the planned issuance of equity in fiscal year 2016. For the utility as shown on Slide 11, the favorable effect of the continued growth of new customers will improve utility results in 2016. In addition, increased revenues from accelerated investment programs will improve utility earnings, lower operating and maintenance expense is also forecast. These improvements will be offset by lower asset optimization revenue and higher depreciation expense due to the increased plant additions. Based on deferred storage earnings from this winter and other hedging opportunities deployed $13 million of the adjusted EBIT we expect from utility asset optimization in fiscal year 2016 is already locked in. The $20 million of total asset optimization EBIT forecasted in fiscal year 2016 assumed normal weather. As shown on Slide 12, our non-utility guidance reflects an increase in electric margins, a decrease in natural gas margins and higher operating expenses at our Retail Energy Marketing business. Electric margins are forecasted to be higher due to the growth in the large commercial segment. The increase in volumes will be partially offset by higher capacity costs that negatively impact the timing of margins through the first eight months of the fiscal year. Gas margins are expected to be lower as several highly favorable items that occurred in fiscal year 2015 are not expected to recur including higher levels of retail and wholesale portfolio optimization as well as declining prices throughout the latter half of fiscal year 2015 that positively impacted natural gas margins. The forecast for fiscal year 2016 is based on historical levels of these activities and benefits. Operating expenses in this segment are expected to increase primarily driven by the increase in commercial electric volume. Higher costs related to volume include broker expense, bad debt expense and increased billing services and staffing costs. The Commercial Energy Systems segment is forecasting higher earnings in fiscal year 2016. In fiscal year 2015, our distributed generation assets produced 147,000 megawatt hours of electricity. In fiscal year 2016, we expect our distributed generation assets will produce over 230,000 megawatt hours of electricity representing a 50% increase in generation. Our Midstream Energy Services segment is forecasting higher earnings at fiscal year 2016 of the $15 million in additional EBIT expected in this segment approximately $6 million is driven by improved storage and transportation spreads, $6 million is related to higher earnings from our pipeline investments and $3 million is driven by decreased expenses primarily non-recurring transaction fees. Please note that the increase related to pipeline investments assumes that our option related to the gathering system will be exercised during the first half of fiscal year 2016. I’ll now turn the call over to Adrian for his comments. Adrian Chapman Thank you, Vince and good morning everyone. I am pleased to provide you with an update on our operations and regulatory initiatives. In the District of Columbia, the settlements have resulted in a surcharge mechanism to recover accelerated pipe replacement investments included requirement to the filings of two rate cases, one no later than August 1, 2016 and the second no later than April 30, 2020. Accordingly, we currently planned to file a rate case during the first half of fiscal year 2016. The anticipated filing will allow us to rebalance our revenues, expenses and other utility investment in the District of Columbia. One item in particular that supports the rate case is our need to recover previously deferred pension tracker costs that were not addressed in our last rate case. As a reminder, our last rate case in the district was filed in February 2012 with rates effective in June 2013. The Public Service Commission in the District of Columbia has no time limitation in which it must make decisions regarding modifications to base rates. The commission targets resolving pending rate cases within three months of the close of the record in the case. In Maryland, you may recall that we received approval in July of an amendment that expands our currently approved STRIDE plan. We received approval to spend an additional $4 million to $5 million per year on distribution and transmission replacements through 2018. However, the commission excluded from the accelerated recovery program cost related to transmission system replacements physically located outside of Maryland. This treatment was contrary to how common transmission related costs have been recovered in rate cases. Washington Gas filed an appeal with the circuit court from Montgomery County on July 30 to challenge the PSC decision to deny recovery through the surcharge mechanism of cost related to transmission system replacement projects located outside of Maryland. On August 10, the Maryland Office of People’s Counsel filed a notice with the circuit court that it intense to participate in the appeal case. Washington Gas filed an initial brief on October 23, the responsive briefs of the PSC and Office of People’s Counsel are due on November 30. In Virginia, Washington Gas entered into an agreement with Energy Corporation of America in May of this year to acquire natural gas reserves through non-operating working interest in 25 producing wells located in Pennsylvania. Virginia law now allows local distribution companies to recover a return of and return on investments in physical gas reserves that benefit customers by reducing cost, price volatility or supply risk. On May 12, Washington Gas filed an application with the SEC for approval of the gas reserves purchase agreement as part of a natural gas supply investment plan. On November 6, the SEC of Virginia issued an order denying the application by asserting that due to questions regarding issues such as the certainty of volumes delivered and the reasonableness of pricing forecast we used to establish benefits to customers the gas reserve application did not meet the public interest standard. The SEC of Virginia did not close the record in the proceeding and we are reviewing the order with our gas reserve counterparty to determine whether there is an opportunity to file an amendment to the reserve proposal within the 60-day period provided under the law. The SEC will then have 60 days to review and issue a decision on such an amendment. I would also like to update you on the WGL Holdings capital spending forecast. Our current forecast as shown on Slide 14 in the presentation cause for us to spend $835 million in 2016 and $3.3 billion cumulatively in the 2016 to 2020 timeframe. This represents an increase of $275 million for 2016 compared to our prior forecast and an increase of $520 million for the full-year period of 2016 through 2019. The primary drivers of the increase for fiscal year 2016 include $178 million increase related to our pipeline investments primarily related to the Mountain Valley pipeline and the gathering system option and $100 million increase in distributed generation projects at our Commercial Energy Systems segment. The primary drivers of the increase over the extended period are the three previously mentioned items as well as $115 million in additional spending related to our utility accelerated recovery program. For our utility the 2016 to 2020 period includes approximately $650 million of plant expenditures to meet the requirements of the accelerated pipe replacement programs in place in all three of our jurisdictions. Finally, a quick update on the development related to our utility operations. Some of you may recall Washington Gas outsourced many of its customer service, information technology and other functions in 2007 through a multi-year business process outsourcing agreement with Accenture. We’ve recently signed a new agreement with Faneuil, a call center services company that specializes in customer care for the Utility industry. Through this agreement, more than 200 new jobs will be established in Virginia as Washington Gas transitions from offshore customer service operations to two call centers in Hampton and Martinsville, Virginia by the end of next year. Faneuil has a well-established track record of success in the utility sector and I am confident that we have selected our partner that will help us achieve the new heights in customer satisfaction. I would like to now turn the call back to Terry for his closing comments. Terry McCallister Thank, Adrian. I would like to now highlight a few recent developments and provide an update over the status of our midstream and distributed generation investments. First, an update on our investments in the Constitution Pipeline project. We continue to wait with our partners for a permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. As of September 30, WGL Midstream has invested approximately $29 million in the Constitution Pipeline project based on updated cost estimate, WGL Midstream now expects to invest $83 million in total for its 10% share in the project. Regarding our investment in the Central Penn line, the Central Penn line is a Greenfield pipeline segment of Transco’s Atlantic Sunrise Project. The project is on track and the development activities are proceeding as expected. The Central Penn line has a projected in service date in the second half of calendar year 2017. WGL Midstream will invest approximately $412 million in the project as of September 30, our subsidiaries have invested approximately $31 million. Next I’ll provide an update on our investment in the Mountain Valley pipeline project. Mountain Valley pipeline is a 300 mile pipeline in West Virginia and Virginia that will help to meet increasing demand for natural gas in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast markets. This project is on track and development activities are proceeding as expected. On October 23, Mountain Valley pipeline formally applies to the FERC for authorization to build the pipeline. Pending regulatory approval, construction has anticipated to begin at late 2016 with full and service targeted for the fourth quarter of calendar year 2018. Also please note that on October 1, RGC Midstream acquired a 1% interest in Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC and Roanoke Gas Company will become a Shipper on the pipeline. WGL Midstream will invest between $210 million and $245 million in the Mountain Valley Pipeline project. As of September 30, WGL Midstream has invested approximately $10 million. Finally, an update on an additional opportunity to invest in infrastructure that we first announced last December. As we have discussed previously, we have an option for 30% interest and a $400 million plus gas gathering system in West Virginia, but gathering system will help move gas out of the production fields of West Virginia to an interstate pipeline system for transportation to the Mid-Atlantic region. Construction is nearly complete substantially within our original cost projection. Therefore, our guidance assumption includes the exercise of this option during fiscal year 2016. Turning to our Commercial Energy Systems business, our portfolio of distributed generation assets continue to grow in fiscal year 2015. As of September 30, we have 130 megawatts of capacity in service with an additional 40 megawatts contracted are under construction. We invested $158 million in capital this year which is a 46% increase over last year. And as Adrian mentioned, we plan to invest an additional $200 million in fiscal year 2016. We see a strong pipeline of potential business across the country. And we’ll continue to invest in utility-like distributed generation assets that will generate long-term shareholder value. Our recent agreement with the Architect of the Capitol demonstrates the strong competitive position of diversified energy solutions portfolio and well established position in the government and commercial segment. The Architect of the Capitol is responsible for the maintenance operation and new development of over 17 million square feet of federal buildings. The Architect of the Capitol has selected WGL Energy Systems to develop 7.5 megawatt natural gas co-generation systems for its electricity and heating and cooling requirements. This innovative solution will deliver significant energy efficiency benefits and will help support the federal government’s sustainability goals while reducing its carbon footprint. Regarding sustainability goals, I’d like to provide a quick update on WGL’s accomplishments. We continue to make excellent progress in achieving the aggressive sustainability goals that we set for ourselves four years ago. We are on track to achieve an 18% reduction in Greenhouse gas emissions for every unit of natural gas delivered by our 2020 target base. I am also very pleased to report that given progress to date we expect to achieve the 70% reduction in Greenhouse gas emissions from our fleet facilities earlier than our 2020 target date, reducing our carbon footprint and simplifies the fact that we are using energy efficiently while also improving safety and reliability. As we closed the 2015 fiscal year and looked to 2016, I am proud of our progress and excited about the future. We delivered exceptional financial performance this year delivering earnings per share of $0.36 higher than our initial guidance. Our guidance for 2016 reflects higher utility revenues driven by strong customer growth and accelerated replacement programs. Our guidance for 2016 also reflects the growth potential we see in our non-utility businesses as both energy systems and midstream will began to generate a larger share of total non-utility earnings creating a balanced non-utility portfolio. While we already have a very active capital spending plan in place over the next few years, we continue to look for opportunities to invest in businesses and projects that are in line with our strategic vision and that will add shareholder value with consistent long-term earnings. We are well-positioned to deliver on the 7% to 10% earnings growth target introduced earlier this year and we look forward to providing additional details during our analyst meeting scheduled for March 2016 in New York. This concludes our prepared remarks and we’ll now be happy to answer your questions.