Tag Archives: utilities

VUIAX: This Utility Mutual Fund Is Keeping The Lights On

Summary VUIAX has a respectably low correlation to SPY, but the correlation and relative volatility have changed materially over time. The expense ratio is great for an investor wanting some cheap diversification throughout the utility sector. I expect the Federal Reserve to push hard for raising rates in December, but I don’t think rate increases can be sustained. Utilities are sensitive to interest rates, so an increase in rates would trigger lower prices and a buying opportunity. In my past analysis on other utility mutual funds and ETFs I have found they can offer some nice benefits to the portfolio from lower levels of volatility and lower levels of correlation to the S&P 500. However, finding a good utility mutual fund can be a problem because a high expense ratio can destroy a fund that would otherwise be very attractive. Since the Vanguard Utilities Index Fund (MUTF: VUIAX ) has an expense ratio of only .12%, I’m feeling pretty optimistic going into this one. Does VUIAX provide diversification benefits to a portfolio? Each investor may hold a different portfolio, but I use the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) as the basis for my analysis. When I ran a regression on SPY and VUIAX, I found a correlation of 78%. That isn’t very low, but it is not high enough to be problematic. I found the annualized volatility for VUIAX was 18% since February of 2004, which was slightly lower than the overall market at 19.4% during that time span. However, if an investor focuses only on the last couple of years the resulting volatility levels are significantly less favorable for VUIAX. Over the last 24 months the annualized volatility on VUIAX was 14.8% and it was only 13.1% on SPY. On the other hand, during those 24 months the correlation was only around 53% rather than the longer term average of 78%. Expense Ratio The mutual fund is posting .12% for an expense ratio. What else is there to say? That is a solid expense ratio. Largest Holdings The diversification within the mutual fund is pretty weak. For a very long term holder it might make sense to replicate the mutual fund by just buying the underlying securities and taking higher trading costs to eliminate the expense ratio. However, an expense ratio of only .12% would be difficult to beat without a fairly long time horizon or a large volume of commission free trades in the account. (click to enlarge) The major holdings here are the same ones I would expect to see. Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE: DUK ) is a fairly huge utility company and frequently at the top of the list for utility mutual funds. All around this appears to be a reasonable portfolio for an investor that wants to get more utility companies into their portfolio without having to buy the companies individually. Why Utilities Investors may be wondering why they should look to raise the utility allocation when the Federal Reserve is talking about raising rates. Since utilities tend to have some material correlation to corporate bond funds, it would seem like an allocation to utilities would be dangerous. When it comes to the Federal Reserve, my stance is that they can’t raise rates as rapidly as they would like to raise them. Because I expect them to substantially underperform their projected trajectory, I see the December meeting as potentially providing a great entry point for equity REITs, utilities, and bonds. I see the potential for weaker prices as being indicative of solid entry points, it simply requires having the conviction to pull the trigger right when everyone else is bracing for higher rates. Conclusion Utility companies can act as a form of income investment because of their strong dividend yields. Unlike buying into a bond portfolio investors can expect that the level of dividends will be increasing over time which makes up for the portfolio having more risk than a simple bond portfolio. When it comes down to designing an ideal portfolio, I think there is a viable argument for running a higher allocation to the utility sector as a way to improve diversification throughout the portfolio. The biggest weakness for using utility companies as a way to diversify the portfolio is that the diversification benefits of the utility allocation are not as strong as the benefits from simply using a diversified bond portfolio since bonds have historically shown materially lower correlations with the S&P 500. If an investor already has a large allocation to bonds, the benefits of adding VUIAX will not be as strong. On the other hand, if an investor places a high value on getting qualified dividends as a source of income, it would materially increase the relative attractiveness of VUIAX. In those cases, it would make sense to use a stronger allocation to VUIAX to reduce portfolio risk.

Unitil Is Becoming Overvalued On A Forward Basis

Summary Northeastern electric and gas utility Unitil Corp. reported Q3 earnings last month that beat expectations on net income despite missing on revenue. The share price declined in the wake of the earnings release, due to a combination of profit-taking and concern over the company’s outlook over the next 6 months. A strong El Nino is developing across the U.S., and such events in the past have resulted in warmer-than-average winters across the company’s service area. With natural gas demand expected to be low through April, diminished earnings expectations, and high P/E ratios, I do not recommend Unitil as a long investment at this time. Small Northeastern electric and gas utility Unitil Corp. (NYSE: UIL ) reported Q3 earnings late last month that beat slightly on net income despite missing on revenue. The company’s shares have lost almost 10% of the value since the earnings report’s release, however, suggesting that even the beat didn’t meet investors’ expectations. In a bullish article on the company written back in June, I highlighted management’s plans to increase the penetration of its natural gas services in an area that has historically been dominated by heating oil, concluding that current investors should maintain their positions. The company’s share price rose by 17% over the subsequent four months, as an expected Federal Reserve interest rate hike failed to materialize. The company’s short-term outlook has diminished somewhat since then, as an especially strong El Nino has begun to make its presence felt. This article reconsiders Unitil Corp. as a long investment opportunity. Q3 earnings report Unitil reported Q3 revenue of $74.7 million, down by 2.5% YoY (see table) and missing the consensus analyst estimate by $7.4 million. The decline and miss were attributable to the company’s electric utility segment, which reported a revenue decline of $2.8 million YoY to $51.4 million due to lower rates. An increase in kWh sales of 1.1% over the same period, split between the company’s residential, commercial, and industrial customers, was insufficient to prevent the revenue decline. The natural gas utility segment’s revenue increased slightly by $0.8 million YoY to $21.7 million despite the presence of lower rates during the quarter, with gas therm sales increasing by 4% over the same period as strong demand from commercial and industrial customers offset weakness from residential customers. The gas utility segment also reported a 1.4% increase in customers compared to the previous year, further offsetting the impact of lower rates. Finally, Unitil’s non-regulated Usource segment reported revenue of $1.6 million, virtually unchanged from the previous year’s result. Unitil Corp. Financials (non-adjusted) Q3 2015 Q2 2015 Q1 2015 Q4 2014 Q3 2014 Revenue ($MM) 74.7 77.5 172.2 119.8 76.6 Gross income ($MM) 40.0 40.1 61.6 50.7 39.3 Net income ($MM) 1.7 1.7 13.6 9.4 1.6 Diluted EPS ($) 0.12 0.12 0.98 0.68 0.11 EBITDA ($MM) 18.7 20.1 39.8 31.3 18.5 Source: Morningsta r (2015) The company’s electric sales margin came in at $22.2 million, down slightly YoY, as a large decline to the segment’s cost of revenue resulting from the presence of lower fuel prices during the quarter offset the aforementioned revenue decline. The gas segment’s margin came in at $16.7 million, up YoY by $1 million, as a similar decline to its cost of revenue complemented its revenue increase. O&M and income tax expenses both fell over the same period, although the impacts were offset by higher depreciation and interest expense costs. Unitil reported net income of $1.7 million, up by 11.1% from $1.6 million in the previous year. This generated a diluted EPS of $0.12 for the most recent quarter, up from $0.11 in the previous year, and beating the analyst consensus estimate by $0.01. EBITDA came in at $18.7 million, up slightly from $18.5 million over the same period. Including the Q3 results, the company is on pace to report a 9.7% allowed return on equity for the TTM period, an achievement that management attributes to the presence of cost trackers. Unitil also reported a number of positive developments during Q3 in addition to its earnings beat. First, it extended the duration of its credit facility by two years to 2020, while simultaneously reducing its interest rate by 0.125%. With sufficient liquidity in place following this move, management announced a 1.4% dividend increase compared to the previous year. While lower than those increases reported by many of its peers, the increase does leave it with an attractive forward yield of 4%. The company stated that the penetration of its natural gas utility segment into its service area increased to 60% during the quarter. While this is low relative to its system potential, natural gas is a relatively new arrival in the Northeast as a heating fuel, with heating oil having a lengthy history there instead. The company’s future earnings expectations are based on the assumption that natural gas will continue to make inroads. Finally, Unitil is asking Maine to approve the implementation of a rate surcharge mechanism for the natural gas segment that will enable proactive expansion and replacement of its existing distribution infrastructure, thereby minimizing regulatory lag and maximizing the company’s ability to initiate its planned capex spending. Outlook Unitil’s management expects the natural gas utility segment to be the major driver of its earnings growth moving forward, stating during the Q3 earnings call that it anticipates annual rate base growth of 10% for the gas utility, compared to only 4% for the electric segment. This expectation is, in turn, being driven by the continued presence of low natural gas prices, especially compared to those seen in previous years. While natural gas has already begun to replace heating oil in many Northeastern buildings, the percentage of residential homes using natural gas in Massachusetts, for example, is still lower at 44% than the U.S. average of 51%. Maine, which is home to most of the natural gas utility segment’s service area, has natural gas penetration of only 4% . Likewise, the percentage of homes heating with electricity in both states is also well below the national average. Inexpensive natural gas provides consumers with a major incentive to convert from heating oil, which is both relatively dirty and a fire risk, to natural gas. This incentive becomes especially pronounced when natural gas prices exhibit low volatility, as has been the case for the last two quarters. Increased adoption of natural gas by utility customers presents Unitil with a substantial future growth opportunity, primarily due to the relative lack of natural gas penetration within the gas segment’s own service areas. The company can bring in new customers without needing to build additional pipelines or move into new service areas and potentially unknown regulatory schemes; instead, it just needs to build the necessary distribution infrastructure within the existing service area. While Unitil’s long-term growth drivers remain in place, its share price is at risk of a decline in the near term due to weather-related impacts. This year’s El Nino event is now expected to be an especially strong one, and its effects have already begun to be felt across the U.S. Unitil’s service area has experienced warmer-than-average temperatures between October and April during previous El Nino events, resulting in fewer heating degree days than average. The timing of this impact could not be worse for the company’s earnings given that the large majority of its annual earnings are reported in Q4 and Q1 due to its heavy exposure to natural gas, which is primarily utilized for space heating in the service area. This impact could be partially offset by higher-than-average precipitation in the Northeast coastal states, with humidity making it feel colder than it actually is. Overall, however, I expect Unitil’s Q4 earnings in particular to come in under expectations and fall on a YoY basis. Valuation The consensus analyst estimate for Unitil’s EPS in Q4 has held steady over the last 90 days, although the FY 2016 consensus estimate has declined. The FY 2015 estimate has remained at $1.89, while the FY 2016 estimate has decreased from $1.96 to $1.91 over the same period. Based on a price of $34.79 at the time of writing, Unitil’s shares are trading at a trailing P/E ratio of 18.3x and forward ratios of 18.4x and 18.2x, respectively. All three of these ratios are above their long-term averages, with the latter, in particular, approaching a 3-year high. High ratios could be justified in the event that the company offered either an especially high forward dividend yield or strong near-term earnings growth potential. While the forward yield is relatively attractive at 4%, this is offset by a lack of near-term earnings growth potential (a mere 1% in FY 2016 if the consensus estimates are correct) and a negative short-term outlook due to El Nino. Conclusion Unitil reported Q3 earnings that beat on net income despite missing on revenue, although investors were ultimately not impressed. While some of the share price’s subsequent decline can be attributed to profit-taking in the wake of its earlier Fed-induced increase, the fact that the company’s winter outlook has been diminished at the same time due to El Nino is also likely weighing on shareholders. With minimal earnings growth expected in FY 2016, the likelihood that warm Q1 and early Q2 temperatures will have a disproportionately negative impact on Unitil’s earnings, and higher-than-average forward P/E ratios, I cannot recommend the company as an attractive long investment opportunity at this time. El Nino and a potential interest rate hike early next year provide too much potential downside risk, although they could also create a potential buying opportunity given the company’s more favorable long-term outlook. Dividend investors should wait for a falling share price to make the company’s forward yield even more attractive before placing any buy orders.

Is It All Downhill For SLV?

Summary The silver market cooled down in recent weeks. The rise in U.S. treasury yields and stronger U.S. dollar dragged down the price of SLV. The low price of silver didn’t raise the physical demand for silver. The silver market cooled down as the market is slowly adjusting to a possible rate hike by the FOMC in December. The price of the iShares Silver Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SLV ) dropped by more than 8% since the beginning of the month. The lower price has yet to ramp up the physical demand for silver. The upcoming minutes of the FOMC meeting could revise market expectations with respect to the Fed’s rate decision, which could impact SLV. Even though the recent NFP report was better than expected and led the market to revise up the odds of a hike – the implied probabilities for a December hike grew to 70%; it’s still not a done deal that the Fed will raise rates in December. These odds could come down if the next NFP report in early December disappoints and the growth rate in wages declines again to around 2.2%. And these chances still suggest the market isn’t fully convinced of a rate hike this year. As long as there is uncertainty, the price of SLV is likely to benefit from it. This week, the minutes of the FOMC will be published. Last time, the FOMC issued a hawkish statement, in which it mentioned December as a possible timing to raise interest rates. In recent weeks, the U.S. dollar resumed its upward trend, and medium-term and long-term U.S. treasury yields bounced back. And if the upcoming minutes of the FOMC meeting were to present a hawkish stance, after all occasionally the minutes are revised up to their release, this could further boost the U.S. dollar and treasury yields – trends that are likely to bring down SLV. Another report worth noticing is the U.S. CPI, which will be published on Tuesday. The U.S. core CPI reached 1.9% – close to the Fed’s lower bound inflation target. But the weakness in the energy market could also trickle into the core CPI, resulting in a possible decline in the coming months. If the core CPI were to fall back down to 1.8% or lower, this could reduce the odds of a rate hike and slightly reduce the downward pressure on SLV. But let’s not only dwell on the demand for silver for investment purposes. Has the low price of silver drove up the physical demand for silver? On this front, in the U.S., the leading country in importing silver, the market has also cooled down in the past several months, as indicated in the following chart: Source: Bloomberg and U.S. Mint During the past month and a half, sales of American Eagle Silver reached a monthly average of 3.9 million ounces – nearly 16% lower than in Q3 2015, but 2.3% higher year on year. The amount of silver sold doesn’t seem to be strongly correlated with the monthly changes in the price of silver – the linear correlation is only -0.17. So, even if the price of SLV is expected to come further down, it’s not likely to push the demand for silver in the U.S. much higher. The decline in the price of SLV was inevitable as the Fed moves closer towards raising rates. The recovery of the U.S. dollar and rise in long-term yields have also helped push back down the price of SLV and erased its gains from October. This week’s release of the minutes of the last FOMC meeting could raise the chances of a December rate hike, which could also result in another blow for SLV. In any case, the bearish sentiment for SLV isn’t likely to dissipate anytime soon. For more, please see: Is SLV about to change course?