Tag Archives: transactionname

U.S. Mutual Fund Investors Shy Away From Domestic Equity Funds

“}); $$(‘#article_top_info .info_content div’)[0].insert({bottom: $(‘mover’)}); } $(‘article_top_info’).addClassName(test_version); } SeekingAlpha.Initializer.onDOMLoad(function(){ setEvents();}); By Patrick Keon Since the global financial crisis of 2008, U.S. domestic equity funds have suffered net outflows in each year except one (2013). Conversely, U.S. nondomestic equity funds have experienced net inflows in every year except two (2008 and 2012). Per Lipper’s methodology, the difference between U.S. domestic and nondomestic equity funds is that, while both types of funds are domiciled in the U.S., domestic equity funds have greater than 75% of their assets invested in U.S. stocks and nondomestic equity funds have less than 75% invested in that asset type. Despite the trend evident since the financial crisis, domestic equity funds-with $5.7 trillion in assets under management-remain significantly larger than nondomestic equity funds-with $2.0 trillion in assets. Domestic equity funds had negative net flows of over $100 billion each for 2008 and 2012, and they are on pace to approach that number again this year; they have seen approximately $30 billion leave their coffers for the year to date. The largest contributors to this year’s outflows have been funds in Lipper’s Large-Cap Core Funds (-$18.0 billion) and Large-Cap Growth Funds (-$14.0 billion) classifications. Within the Large-Cap Core classification the Virtus Equity Trend Fund (MUTF: VAPAX ) (-$3.0 billion), the Davis New York Venture Fund (MUTF: NYVTX ) (-$2.3 billion), and the AMG Yacktman Focused Fund ( YAFFX) (-$2.0 billion) have had the largest net outflows. The funds in the Large-Cap Growth group that have seen the most significant amounts of money leave are the Fidelity Contrafund (MUTF: FCNTX ) (-$3.1 billion), the American Funds Growth Fund of America (MUTF: AGTHX ) (-$3.0 billion), and the MainStay Large Cap Growth Fund (MUTF: MLINX ) (-$1.8 billion). (click to enlarge) Share this article with a colleague

Trying To Hedge 7-10 Bond Yields? Consider TBX

Summary TBX provides a well correlated hedge for intermediate treasury bonds. TBX is associated with significant risks and is intended for achieving short term goals. Recommended for investors who believe interest rates will rise dramatically over an intermediate time frame. Basic Information The ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA: TBX ) is a n exchange traded note (ETN). ETN’s are unsecured, unsubordinated debt securities. This type of debt security differs from other types of bonds and notes because ETN returns are based upon the performance of a market index minus applicable fees, no period coupon payments are distributed and no principal protections exist. TBX is intended to move inversely (-1x) to the 7-10 year Barclay’s Bond Index. The Barclay’s Bond Index is tied to U.S. treasury yields. TBX seeks investment results for a single day only, not for longer periods. A “single day” is measured from the time the Fund calculates its net asset value (“NAV”) to the time of the Fund’s next NAV calculation. The return of the Fund for periods longer than a single day will be the result of each day’s returns compounded over the period, which will very likely differ from the inverse (-1x) of the return of the Barclays U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index (the “Index”) for that period. For periods longer than a single day, the Fund will lose money when the level of the Index is flat, and it is possible that the Fund will lose money even if the level of the Index falls. Longer holding periods, higher index volatility, and inverse exposure each exacerbate the impact of compounding on an investor’s returns. During periods of higher Index volatility, the volatility of the Index may affect the Fund’s return as much as or more than the return of the Index. Expense Ratio: .95% + Portfolio turnover (currently 0% because cash instrument and derivative transactions are not included). How Could it be used? If you are looking for a 10-year hedge, TBX could be a very good play. It is highly correlated to the market and is a useful tool for any skilled investor. I cover a multitude of reasons in this article to illuminate the risks of investing in an ETN, but with adequate forethought TBX is not a bad strategy, especially with the threat of rising interest rates. Principal Investment Strategy All investment strategies are used in combination to achieve similar daily return characteristics as -1x of the index: Derivatives – financial instruments whose value is derived from the value of an underlying asset or assets, such as stocks, bond, funds, interest rates, or indexes. Swap agreements – Contracts entered into primarily with major global financial institutions for a specified period ranging from a day to more than one year. In a standard “swap” transaction, two parties agree to exchange the return (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on particular predetermined investments or instruments. The gross return to be exchanged or “swapped” between the parties is calculated with respect to a “notional amount,” e.g., the return on or change in value of a particular dollar amount invested in a “basket” of securities or an ETF representing a particular index. Futures Contracts – Standardized contracts traded on, or subject to the rules of, an exchange that call for the future delivery of a specified quantity and type of asset at a specified time and place or, alternatively, may call for cash settlement. Money Market Instruments U.S. Treasury Bills – that have maturities of one year or less and supported by full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Repurchase Agreements – Contracts in which a seller of securities, usually U.S. government securities or other money market instruments, agrees to buy them back at a specified time and price. Repurchase agreements are primarily used by the Fund as a short-term investment vehicle for cash positions. These are the Principal Risks associated with TBX Risks Associated with the Use of Derivatives Compounding Risk Correlation Risk Fixed Income and Market Risk Counterparty Risk Debt Instrument Risk Interest Rate Risk Intraday Price Performance Risk Inverse Correlation Risk Liquidity Risk Early Close/Late Close/Trading Halt Risk Market Price Variance Risk Valuation Risk Non-Diversification Risk Portfolio Turnover Risk Short Sale Exposure Risk As you can see below, estimated returns are volatile, and the funds actual results may be significantly better or worse than the underlying index. Bolded values, not including the x and y axis percentages, are where the fund performed worse than expected. This is meant to illuminate the possibility of under or over performance. Estimated Fund Returns Index Performance One Year Volatility Rate One Year Index Inverse (-1x) of the One Year Index 10% 25% 50% 75% 100% -60% 60% 147.50% 134.90 94.70 42.40 (8.00) -50% 50% 98.00 87.90 55.80 14.00 (26.40) -40% 40% 65.00 56.60 29.80 (5.00) (38.70) -30% 30% 41.40 34.20 11.30 (18.60) (47.40) -20% 20% 23.80 17.40 (2.60) (28.80) (54.00) -10% 10% 10.00 4.40 (13.50) (36.70) (59.10) 0% 0% (1.00) (6.10) (22.10) (43.00) (63.20) 10% -10% (10.00) (14.60) (29.20) (48.20) (66.60) 20% -20% (17.50) (21.70) (35.10) (52.50) (69.30) 30% -30% (13.80) (27.70) (10.10) (56.20) (71.70) 40% -40% (29.30) (32.90) (44.40) (59.30) (73.70) 50% -50% (34.00) (37.40) (48.10) (62.00) (75.50) 60% -60% (38.10) (41.30) (51.30) (64.40) (77.00) Correlation to 7-10 year yields I aligned TBX with its foil the iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF ( IEF). IEF seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury bonds with maturities between seven and ten years. IEF is comprised entirely of intermediate government bonds. It is essentially perfectly correlated to the Barclays U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. If IEF moving up in value it is likely overall interest rates are falling due to the nature of the bond. If IEF is moving down in value it is likely overall interest rates are rising. Due to the inverse relationship of IEF and TBX, TBX provides a hedge for 7-10 year bonds. Conclusion If you are trying to hedge your investment on intermediate treasury yields then TBX is probably an ETN you ought to consider. However, it is important for any smart investor to weigh the risks associated with any ETN before jumping into any investment long or short. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Weather Fed Rate Hike Fears With Global Low-Volatility ETFs

The Fed rate hike possibility probably never appeared as strong as it seems now. A better-than-expected job data recently along with strong manufacturing, construction spending and automobile sales confirmed the passage of winter blues and solid recovery in the U.S. economy. This has bolstered market sentiments that the Fed will normalize its interest rate policy this September or October. The market has already started to position itself for a September lift-off timeline as bond yields took an upturn. Higher interest rates might derail the stock market rally as many investors will now throng to the fixed-income world in search of high current income. Not only this, the ripples of the Fed tightening will spread into several corners of the investing universe. Most importantly, emerging economies which enjoyed prolonged easy money inflows will now be spots of vulnerability. The International Monetary Fund’s deputy managing director recently cautioned of “considerable” downside risks associated with the rippling effect of looming Fed rate hike, per Reuters. Several markets and asset classes will likely see disruptions once the decision is taken. To add to this, the rest of the developed world is yet to gain ground and the Greek debt concern seems a constant worry in the Euro zone. In such a baffling backdrop, seeking refuge in low volatility products rather than sticking to highly risky options and enduring the Fed-infused storm can help investors. Since the effect of the Fed rate hike will not be limited to the U.S. market, investors can choose from across the global options. These global low-volatility products could be intriguing choices for those who want to stay invested in equities, but like the idea of focusing on minimum volatility. Low-volatility ETFs generally tend to offer positive risk-adjusted gains, though not enormous. iShares MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: EFAV ) EFAV looks to replicate the performance of international equity securities that have lower absolute volatility. This equal-weighted ETF invests about $2.5 billion in 205 holdings. No single stock makes up more than 1.53% of the portfolio. Country wise, the fund appears more focused on Japan and United Kingdom equities, with the duo having a little less than 50% allocation in the fund. EFAV charges about 20 bps in fees. So far this year (as of June 8, 2015), the fund is up 8%. It currently carries a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a Low risk outlook. iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: AXJV ) This fund, just a year old, follows the MSCI AC Asia ex-Japan Minimum Volatility (USD) Index and intends to offer better risk-adjusted returns to investors. The $5.4 million-product is heavy on nations like China, Taiwan and South Korea while sectors like financials, technology and industrials take up big chunks. AXJV has about 184 securities in total in its basket and charges 35 bps in fees for its service. Individual holdings wise, the fund is quite diversified considering that no stock accounts for more than 1.95% of the basket. The top three holdings – Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, BOC Hong Kong Holdings and AIA Group combine to take up roughly 5.2% of assets. The Zacks Rank #3 ETF is up 7.9% in the year-to-date frame. iShares MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: EUMV ) This fund has accumulated $9.8 million within one year of operation. It tracks the MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility Index giving exposure to 126 European stocks having lower volatility characteristics relative to the broader European developed equity markets. The product charges a bit cheaper fee of 25 bps a year while average daily volume is paltry at about 6,000 shares causing relatively high trading costs. Like many other funds in the space, the ETF provides higher diversification benefits with none of the securities making up for more than 1.59% of assets. In term of country exposure, United Kingdom takes the largest share at 35.61%, followed by Switzerland (17.96%), Germany (10.3%) and France (10.2%). The fund is up 6.4% so far this year (as of June 8, 2015) and has a Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy). VelocityShares Equal Risk Weighted Large Cap ETF (NASDAQ: ERW ) ERW tracks the VelocityShares Equal Risk Weighted Large Cap Index. This index uses a methodology to measure a stock’s risk and then distributes the risk in each of its stock equally by weighing their risk exposure individually. The index comprises most of the S&P 500 Index stocks, but individual exposure depends on their expected risk. The stocks with lower expected risk will account for a percentage of the index that is larger than in the S&P 500. This overlooked fund has managed to amass an asset base of nearly $2.6 million. The fund charges a fee of 65 basis points annually and has returned 4.5% so far this year (as of June 8, 2015) while SPY has added about 1.4% during the same time frame. ERW has a Zacks ETF Rank #3. Original Post