Tag Archives: stocks

Staying Level-Headed In The Face Of Fed Uncertainty

By John P. Calamos, Sr. As we know, uncertainty about the Fed’s plans for raising short-term rates remains a key driver of market volatility. It’s understandable that investors are afraid to be in the markets and at the same time, afraid to be out. Whenever rates do rise (probably before the end of the year), there’s every reason to expect continued heightened equity market volatility. Even so, I view a more normal interest-rate environment as long-term positive – for the economy and for the equity market. Here are some points to keep in mind. Higher short-term rates should be viewed as an affirmation of U.S. economic health. The Fed has consistently expressed its commitment to a patient, globally-informed, data-driven approach. It will raise rates when it believes the U.S. economy is strong enough to continue growing without artificially low rates. The “path” of short-term rate increases is likely to be slow and shallow. In other words, I don’t believe we’ll see the Fed move to raise rates significantly and many times, provided that the overall economic landscape remains consistent with what we’ve seen over recent years – slow growth, low inflation. A more normal interest rate environment can support continued economic growth, particularly among smaller businesses. When interest rates are higher, lenders can earn more from borrowing activities. This should provide an increased incentive to lend to small businesses, especially against the supportive backdrop of continued economic growth. With increased access to capital, small businesses can grow and hire more people, contributing to better overall economic growth. Higher short-term rates don’t signal that we’ve entered a bear market. Earlier, I noted that markets are likely to remain volatile when rates rise, but that doesn’t mean there won’t be opportunities, especially for long-term investors who take an active approach. Historically, stocks tend to perform well during periods of economic growth (see point #1). Stocks have continued to advance after the onset of an interest rate increase, as Figure 1 shows. Moreover, as our Co-CIO David Kalis explained in his recent video interview , the prospects for U.S. growth stocks look especially attractive. (click to enlarge) Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: Cornerstone Macro. “Positioning For A Fed Tightening Cycle,” September 16, 2015. Convertible allocations may be particularly effective in this sort of environment. Because they have fixed income characteristics, convertibles may be able to mitigate the impact of short-term equity downside. And because they have equity characteristics, convertible securities generally demonstrate less vulnerability to interest rate increases than investment grade bonds. That means that when rates do rise, allocations to convertibles may prove more resilient. (Co-CIO Eli Pars outlines more of these potential benefits in this video interview .) It’s been observed time and again that markets hate uncertainty. That’s not likely to change. More importantly, what’s also not likely to change is this: volatility creates opportunity for those who can tune out the short-term noise and take a long-term view. Share this article with a colleague

COPEL Is Much More Stable Than CEMIG, But The Potential Upside Is Also Lower

Summary COPEL’s business is sound, with slow growth, low debt, a good dividend, good fundamentals and a good, stable historical performance. Due to the situation in Brazil, there is still more downside potential for the stock. CEMIG is a much more risky play, but the upside is also much higher. Introduction I recently wrote an article where I analyzed investment opportunities in Brazil that are listed on the NYSE and gave an overview of the economic situation. I found four interesting companies, of which BrasilAgro (NYSE: LND ) and Brasil Foods S.A. (NYSE: BRFS ) are good, but their P/E ratio is too high. This leaves us with two electrical companies, CEMIG (NYSE: CIG ) and Companhia Paranaense de Energia – COPEL (NYSE: ELP ). I have already written about CEMIG here and here , so in this article, I will analyze COPEL. About ELP ELP is the largest company of the State of Paraná (South Brazil), and serves electricity to 4,370,200 units. The company uses 18 hydroelectric plants that give 99.5% of its own electrical production, 1 thermal plant and 1 wind plant, with total installed capacity of 4,754 MW, a transmission system with 2,302 km of lines and 33 substations, a distribution system which consists of 192,116 km of lines and network of up to 230KV, and an optical telecommunication system. The company was founded in 1954, and has been listed on the NYSE since 1997. The State of Paraná is the major shareholder, with 58% of voting shares. There has been a lot of regulatory turbulence in the energy sector lately, especially with CIG losing 45% of its electricity generation capacity due to lost concessions. Energy prices increased and are currently under the red flag 3 regime, meaning that the electrical utilities sector is under pressure. The result of this is that ELP’s revenues increased 32% in Q2 2015, mostly due to price increases. Operating expenses increased even more, around 38% in the same period. The Business One of the main issues in the sector is that all the assets are mostly under concession from the government, but with the latest news on concessions, where the Federal Audit Court authorized the government to renew for another 30 years the concessions for electricity distributors whose contracts expire between 2015 and 2017, the situation is more stable now as compared to that a month ago. This is good news for ELP, as in the Q2 earnings conference call, the company did not know if its distribution concessions would be prolonged. As for electricity production, the situation with ELP is much more stable than it is with CIG, because ELP has only 5% of electricity production in doubt for 2015, whereas CIG had 45% of production in doubt, and eventually lost it. According to ELP’s CEO , the company will bid to renew the concessions and are pretty sure it will happen. The two plants in question are the Parigot de Souza and Mourão plants. ELP is also developing new projects, building 2,000 km of new distribution lines and developing new wind farms, with three new farms expected to start up in upcoming weeks. Fundamental Analysis The current P/E ratio is 7.91, and the price-to-book value is 0.6. In Table 1, you can see the main fundamental indicators for ELP and their stability in the Brazilian currency. Table 1: ELP Fundamentals 2010-2015 (Source: Morningstar ) In the Brazilian currency, ELP is able to transfer the increase in prices to its customers, which shows it to be a great hedge against inflation. The net income is pretty stable for a regulated electrical company, and it can be assumed with a high degree of certainty that ELP will continue to operate less or more positively in the future. The dividend is also stable, and the company has a policy of paying at least 25% of its net profits in dividends. This means that with the trailing earnings, an investor can expect minimally US$0.25 per share at the current exchange rate. This would give a 3% dividend yield at current prices and exchange rates. The gross margin is slowly deteriorating, but we can expect it to improve as soon as the extraordinary circumstances in the Brazilian energy market pass. Technical Analysis The main issue here is not ELP’s business or its fundamentals, but the volatility of the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Brazilian real. In Figure 1, you can see that an end to the depreciation of the real is nowhere to be seen. Figure 1: Brazilian real per US$1 from 2005 to 2015 (Source: XE.com ) I cannot predict what will happen here in the next few years. Currently, the situation in Brazil is far from stable, but in the period from 2009 to 2011, the real appreciated against the US dollar by 60%. We could say that there is blood on the Brazilian financial markets now, and usually, these are the best times to buy. But the main question is: How low can the real go? On the other hand, if we see an improvement in the political and economic situation in Brazil, the exchange rate trend would quickly switch and create a point of stability at a certain level. This trend reversal could give a 25% currency gain and add an extra 25% to the dollar EPS of ELP. This is a scenario that would easily create a 50% return for international investors. But we would need a crystal ball to know when the bottom will be reached in Brazil. Conclusion If ELP were a European or US company, I would probably buy it at these ratios, expecting a healthy 13% yearly return and a 3-4% dividend that would allow me to repurchase shares. With the uncertain situation in Brazil and the real depreciating at a 10% monthly rate (August and September 2015), I want a much wider margin of safety. The margin of safety that I would look for to feel comfortable investing in ELP would be one that gives me a 15% return even if the real depreciates by another 50%. This means that for US$1, we would get R$6. In such a scenario, ELP’s EPS would be US$0.66, and to get a 15% return, the P/E ratio should be 6.66 – meaning that a safe entry-level stock price for ELP is US$4.4. We are still far from that, but everything is possible considering the current situation. ELP is very stable, and Brazil is very unstable for sure in the short term, but potentially stable in the long term. Such a situation makes me believe that there might be a chance of the stock falling a little bit more, and thus, increasing the safety margin for investors. My advice would be put this company on a watch list, estimate your required rate of return for such an investment, adding to that the potential further depreciation of the real, and thus get to a safe entry price for yourself. Comparison with CIG ELP’s price-to-book ratio is 0.6, and CIG’s is currently at the same level. The P/E ratio is 8 with ELP and 3 for CIG, but with the unclear future earnings stream for CIG due to the loss of the concessions on 40% of its energy production, the difference is justified. I do not see potential spectacular earnings growth with ELP, because it is a stable company that aims for sustainable growth, whereas with CIG, everything is possible due to the management’s more risky approach to business. CIG has the potential to bring EPS to $US1.5 per share that would give a P/E ratio of 1.13 at current prices and a dividend yield of around 40%. The risk-reward ratio is 50% downside and 50% upside with ELP, while with CIG, it is 50-100% downside and 600% upside. I will continue to follow the two companies, and if the divergence between the perception the investor community has about Brazil and the businesses’ results continues to grow, thus lowering the potential downside, I will start buying. So, for now, I will put both companies on a watch list and let you know more in the future.

Review Of NRG’s Business Update Conference Call

Summary NRG held an analyst call last Friday to provide a strategic update. NRG will create a GreenCo, including its Home Solar business. The remaining exposure to GreenCo is $125M. NRG committed to an additional $1.3B in share repurchases and debt reduction through 2016. The company also announced its performance in the latest PJM capacity auction. Last Friday, NRG Energy (NYSE: NRG ) held a conference call to present an update to its strategic direction and to present a business update. The big item in this call was the plan for simplifying NRG by creating a new “GreenCo.” The GreenCo will contain three of NRG’s current business units: NRG Home Solar, NRG EVgo, and NRG Renew. The creation of the GreenCo is expected to be complete on January 1, 2016. Part of the reason for this move is that investors have been concerned that these businesses were money pits that would just suck away the cash generated by its main wholesale power business. NRG said that these businesses are showing progress and that the time had come to increase the financial rigor and make them more self-supportive. NRG has put a limit of $125M in additional support to GreenCo from the parent. It is also pursuing potential strategic partners. NRG feels that the GreenCo business will be self-sufficient by the middle of 2016. NRG provided an update on how the Home Solar business has been doing this year, and presented the following chart: Exhibit 1 Source: NRG 9/18/15 presentation NRG felt that the solar business got off to a slow start in 2015, but that it has achieved some momentum as the year has progressed. 2015 sales are up 103% year-to-date, even after the slow start, and the 2,500 bookings in August are a monthly record for NRG. That level puts it with Sunrun (NASDAQ: RUN ) in the competition for third place in domestic market share, behind SolarCity (NASDAQ: SCTY ) and Vivint (NYSE: VSLR ). Installations and deployments are still lagging, but NRG feels this lag will be addressed by year-end. Getting the installations and deployments figured out is obviously a big thing for its solar business. It is one thing to be able to take orders, but it is another to actually deliver a product, and this is what NRG needs to prove to investors. (Reminds me of this old Seinfeld episode .) Of course, one of the advantages of solar deployment being behind schedule is that it has burned less cash in the business. At January’s investor day, NRG estimated $250M in cash being spent at Home Solar in 2015, but now its estimate is only $168M. Other reasons for the decrease are a partnership with NRG Yield (NYSE: NYLD ) and better terms from tax equity providers. It really makes sense for NRG to make the move to break out the GreenCo businesses. You can see how small these GreenCo businesses really are compared to the older NRG businesses by looking at the YTD EBITDA table: Exhibit 2 (click to enlarge) Source: NRG Q2 2015 Earnings Presentation Management is spending significant time involved with these businesses, even though there is a small effect on the bottom line. Yes, there is the potential for high growth if these work, but there are lots of risks as well, and with management spending all of their time on the small businesses, they risk missing opportunities at the big businesses that could really impact the bottom line. Management does not want to quickly sell the GreenCo business at this time. They think that as the business continues to grow and as the IPO market improves, they could extract a lot of value. One example they gave is that the Texas market has been very slow to embrace solar. They feel that if Texas takes off, the GreenCo would really be a big beneficiary, and they would like to keep exposure to this upside. NRG said it thinks it could eventually realize a significant multiple above the $125M commitment it is making today. RUN, the company with a similar-sized solar business, has an enterprise value of about $1.7B, so there may be hope that NRG can extract value from this endeavor. The call reviewed a number of other topics besides the GreenCo announcement. Over the last six months, NRG has been examining ways to optimize its generating portfolio through deactivations, fuel conversions, or other means. On Friday, NRG announced that non-strategic asset sales would also be part of its portfolio optimization. The company feels that there are a number of valuable assets that could be sold, simultaneously reducing its need for CAPEX and providing capital to be used elsewhere in the company. NRG mentioned that there is a good chance a number of these sales would be in the PJM region. If transactions do take place in PJM, it could give investors some nice data on values for similar assets that would help in estimating the value of other companies with big nearby portfolios (Dynegy (NYSE: DYN ) and Talen (NYSE: TLN ) for example). NRG also plans to reduce development, marketing, and G&A spending by $150M in 2016. It estimates that it will cost $60M to put these expense reductions in place. NRG expects that over the next six to nine months, cost reductions, CAPEX reductions, non-recourse financings, and asset dispositions will free up $1B in capital. By the Q3 conference call, NRG will announce the details of where the first 50% of this $1B will come from. The final 50% will most likely take place through asset dispositions, which it expects to happen in 2016. This $1B will be used for stock repurchases and debt reduction. NRG also committed to an additional $300M of stock repurchases and debt repayments from cash flow it expects to receive this year. All of these balance sheet reductions are on top of the remaining $251M of stock buybacks that NRG has already committed to for 2015. Also, don’t forget that in 2016, NRG’s operations will produce additional cash flow that could be used for further reductions to the balance sheet and dividends to shareholders beyond this current plan. NRG also mentioned that maintenance and environmental CAPEX is expected to go from about $725M in 2016 to $400M in 2017, which will continue to help its cash flow over the long run. The call also provided updates regarding NRG Yield. The big item was that an agreement has been reached to move the Edison Mission Wind portfolio to NRG Yield. This is going to bring $210M of cash to NRG, and the entire deal was completed at an implied enterprise value of $452M. The implied EV/EBITDA of the deal was approximately 11x. It was also announced the NRG Yield would not be looking to raise any equity until the markets for Yieldcos improved. This could impact its ability to obtain more assets, but stated that NYLD can still grow its dividend at a 15% CAGR without any further asset dropdowns from NRG. Exhibit 3 (click to enlarge) Source: NRG September 18 presentation The big update about NRG’s traditional generation business was the review of last month’s PJM capacity auction. (My Seeking Alpha article discussing the auction can be found here .) Exhibit 4 (click to enlarge) Source: NRG 9/18/15 presentation The company’s 2018/19 results give about $225M of extra revenue compared to the results of the original 2017/18 auction. If you assume a 40% tax rate, and then take NRG’s 331M shares, you get an almost 41¢/share impact to earnings. NRG did not break out the specific units that cleared the auction, but it did show some data by zone. I have totaled the cleared capacity data NRG gave in Exhibit 4 above, and compared it to the available capacity in the different regions. Exhibit 5 (click to enlarge) Source: NRG and Garnet Research estimates It should be noted that NRG’s numbers include imports, which explains why the total of NRG generation that cleared in the RTO is above the amount located in that zone. If all of NRG’s assets in PJM (not including imports) had cleared at the CP price, it would have received about $1.1B in revenue, instead of the $950M level it achieved. According to page 16 of PJM’s report on the auction results, the COMED zone (the area around Chicago) had 23,320 MW of capacity clear the auction. This means that NRG had about 18% of the cleared capacity. PJM’s report also shows that 26,275 MW were offered in the auction for that zone. Exelon (NYSE: EXC ) has already stated that its 1,800 MW Quad Cities nuclear plant did not clear in COMED, and it now appears, assuming NRG offered all of its capacity, that the remaining capacity that didn’t clear was entirely owned by NRG. This should be a sign that if things continue to tighten around Chicago, NRG has a good chance of benefiting. With the new auction results, expect an update of this slide from the Q2 results presentation when NRG presents Q3 results. Exhibit 6 (click to enlarge) Source: NRG Q2 2015 Earnings Presentation NRG now has about $950M from the latest auction that will be split between 2018 and 2019 in the above chart. The recent PJM transitional capacity auctions for the 2016/17 and 2017/18 planning years will add $125M to be split between 2017 and 2018, and an additional $105M to be split between 2016 and 2017. Friday’s announcements should be pretty positive for NRG, but the initial reaction has not been that enthusiastic. Exhibit 7 (click to enlarge) Source: SNL NRG did take a big hit on Friday after the conference call. But most of this was giving back that gains from earlier in the week that came when it announced it would hold the call. The market also had a down day on Friday, so NRG was likely carried along with everyone else, further worsening performance. So far this week, the stock has continued down, even with Friday’s positive news. Most of the other independent power producers were down significantly as well, so NRG’s fall has not been isolated. Conclusion This was a positive call for NRG. It is simplifying its business and will be returning significant capital to investors. The stock market has driven NRG’s shares down further since the announcement, on top of an already tough year. If NRG can execute this plan, it should at least stop the relentless decline it has been experiencing. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.