Tag Archives: stocks

New Hope Looks Good, But Is Free Cash Flow Negative

Summary New Hope is one of Australia’s companies focused on coal. It says it wants to acquire new projects with its A$1B working capital position, but it’s spending cash like there’s no tomorrow. The dividend is 7 times higher than the free cash flow is. If New Hope is serious about its expansion plans, it should reduce its dividend payments right now. Introduction After identifying Whitehaven Coal ( OTCPK:WHITF ) as a great coal company, I continued to look for other companies and was waiting for New Hope’s ( OTCPK:NHPEF ) financial results to see whether or not this is another coal company I should add to my list. Source: company presentation New Hope has a more liquid listing at the Australian Stock Exchange where it’s listed with NHC as its ticker symbol. The current market capitalization is approximately US$1.05B, so this isn’t your average micro-cap company. The company is still flowing cash Everybody knows the entire coal sector is suffering due to low prices, but fortunately the Australian producers have one advantage; the extremely weak Australian Dollar. As the Australian currency has lost in excess of 30% of its value in just one year time, the Australian companies are doing much better than their competition as even though they are still selling the coal in USD, the local expenses are a few dozen percents cheaper than one year ago, protecting the margins. (click to enlarge) Source: financial statements And yes, this seems to be proven in the company’s financial statements as even though the revenue decreased by 11%, the cost of sales fell by 17% and this would have resulted in a pre-tax profit of A$73M ($52M), if New Hope would have been able to avoid an A$97M impairment charge. This pushed the pre-tax profit in the red and even after a small tax benefit the bottom line was still showing a net loss of almost A$22M ($16M). Fortunately an impairment charge never has any influence on a company’s ability to generate cash flows, so I would think the cash flows of New Hope would remain pretty decent but the only way to find out is by checking the cash flow statements. That’s why I waited for New Hope to publish its annual report, as (unlike the quarterly reports), the company has to provide a cash flow overview as well. (click to enlarge) Source: financial statements The operating cash flow was A$88.5M ($63M) (after taxes), and whilst that’s still pretty good, considering the worsening circumstances on the coal market, you shouldn’t forget the total capital expenditures were A$115M ($82M), so New Hope was free cash flow negative. Again, that’s nothing to worry about because a) the negative cash flow is still limited and b) New Hope has a substantial amount of cash on its balance sheet. The negative free cash flow was A$26.5M ($18M), but in the next part of this article I’ll explain why I’m not really worried about this cash shortfall. But is spending more than it receives, and I don’t like that Indeed, that’s New Hope’s strength. It has a working capital position of in excess of A$1B ($700M) and a current ratio of in excess of 11 and that’s extremely high. This strong working capital position will also allow New Hope to indeed pursue the acquisitions it has been eying as this must be the only coal company in the world with such a financial flexibility. (click to enlarge) Source: financial statements The majority of its cash is being held in term deposits, and this resulted in a total interest income of A$38M in FY 2015. This was sufficient to cover the shortfall of the operating cash flow to fund the capital expenditures, but despite the free cash flow increasing to A$11.5M, it’s quite annoying to see the company has spent A$79M on paying dividends. And it won’t stop there. Together with the presentation with the company has announced a final dividend of A$0.025 and a special dividend of A$0.035 to bring the total dividend for the financial year at A$0.10 ($0.07). Using the current amount of 831M outstanding shares, this means New Hope will be paying A$83M in dividends based on its FY 2015 results. And that’s a pity. The adjusted free cash flow was a positive A$11.5M, but paying A$83M in dividends is definitely weakening the company’s financial situation. Of course, it still has in excess of one billion of Australian Dollars in working capital, but I have a firm opinion the company should NOT pay out more cash than it’s taking in from its operations. Investment thesis The shareholders will be happy with a 6% dividend yield, but I believe not a single company should pay out more cash than it’s generating. New Hope has publicly declared it wants to acquire more projects, to paying out almost A$100M ($71M) in dividends probably is one of the most stupid things the company could do. I like coal, and I like New Hope’s strong and solid financial status, but it’s not helping the company at all to spend cash on dividends instead of keeping the cash in its treasury. The working capital decreased from almost A$1.2B to A$1.1B in the past year, and that seems to be a bit contradictory to the company’s public claims it’s looking for acquisition targets. If New Hope is really serious about becoming a major player in the coal space, it should cut the dividend and cash up. Now. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

Tech Stocks On Move Start With CyberArk In Security

Tech security is worth watching going into Thursday’s stock market trading, with CyberArk (CYBR) and Imperva (IMPV) each jumping 5% Wednesday as the broader market slipped, with the S&P 500 Index down 0.2%. Both stocks have seen analyst upgrades this month amid rising demand for cybersecurity software. And unconfirmed rumors are circulating this week that CyberArk could be an IBM (IBM) acquisition target. IBD Leaderboard security stock Palo Alto

Shooting Hoops With Peter Lynch And The Gurus

Many funds focus exclusively on one particular type of stock, such as large-cap value picks. But different types of stocks come in and out of favor in the market over time. Allowing your portfolio free range to go wherever the best values are at a particular time can enhance your long-term returns. The 2015-16 NBA season is fast approaching, and many teams are getting ready to show off the off-season changes they made in hopes of shoring up their weaknesses and improving their squads. Take the Toronto Raptors. Last year, the Raptors scored the fourth most points in the NBA, but gave up the 18th most points. Advanced metrics showed an even wider gap, indicating that Toronto had the third most efficient offense in the league, but the eighth least efficient defense, according to ESPN. Not surprisingly, the Raptors have made several moves in the off-season to try to bolster their defense. The name of the game, of course, is balance. In basketball, just as in any other sport, you are not going to get too far if your team has several weaknesses that counterbalance its strengths. So you of course want a mix of players whose skills complement each other. Building a team of only big, strong centers or only small, lightning-quick point guards would give you certain strengths in certain situations, yes. But it would also both limit the pool of talent from which you could choose, and leave you with some major weak spots in certain aspects of the game. Unfortunately, when it comes to picking stocks, that’s just what a lot of fund managers – and the investors who buy their funds – do. Many funds will focus only on a specific “style-box” category – large-cap value stocks, for example – filling the fund primarily or entirely with just that type of stock. To be sure, style boxes serve a purpose, particularly for institutional investors, who often are required to put a certain portion of their portfolios into certain categories of stocks. But for individual investors, I think style-box investing significantly eats away at returns. Why? Because, much as with basketball players, good stocks come in all different styles and sizes; focusing on one style and size simply limits your opportunities to find winners. Sometimes, for example, the small-cap growth area of the market may be offering the most attractive values; other times, mid-cap value plays may feature the best opportunities. Why not allow yourself to go where the best opportunities are, regardless of size and growth/value distinctions? In addition, much like basketball players, the size and style of a stock often means that it will perform better in certain situations than others. Sometimes, for example, large-cap value stocks will go out of favor, and a portfolio that is focused only on them will get hit hard. A portfolio that includes stocks of various sizes and styles, however, has some natural hedges built in that should smooth out returns – making it more likely you’ll stick with it over the long haul. This “free-range” approach is what I do with my Validea Hot List portfolio, which looks for consensus from all of my Guru Strategies (each of which is based on the approach of a different investing great) when choosing stocks. At any given time, the portfolio could be tilted towards smaller stocks or larger stocks, growth-oriented picks or value plays. The strategy has paid off, with a 10-stock version of the Hot List more than doubling the S&P 500 since its July 15, 2003 inception, and a 20-stock version nearly doubling the index. What sort of stocks is this approach on right now? Here’s a look at a handful of picks that are in my 10- and/or 20-stock portfolios. The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TRV ) : Minnesota-based Travelers ($31 billion market cap) provides property casualty insurance for auto, home, and business. The 162-year-old company does business in the US, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Brazil. Travelers’ mix of solid growth and reasonable value helps it earn strong interest from my Peter Lynch-based strategy. Its 17% long-term earnings per share growth rate (I use an average of the three-, four-, and five-year EPS figures) and high sales ($27 billion over the past year) make it a “stalwart” according to the Lynch approach – the kind of large, steady firm that Lynch found offered protection during downturns or recessions. To find growth stocks selling on the cheap, Lynch famously used the P/E-to-Growth ratio, adjusting the “growth” portion of the equation to include dividend yield for stalwarts, since they often pay solid dividends; yield-adjusted P/E/Gs below 1.0 are acceptable to my Lynch-based model, with those below 0.5 the best case. When we divide Travelers’ 9.2 P/E by the sum of its growth rate and dividend yield (2.4%), we get a yield-adjusted P/E/G of 0.43 – a sign that it’s a bargain. South State Corporation (NASDAQ: SSB ) : South State provides retail and commercial banking services, mortgage lending services, trust and investment services, and consumer finance loans. It serves customers and conducts its business from about 130 financial centers in South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia. South State ($2 billion market cap) is a smallish mid-cap growth stock that gets strong interest from my Martin Zweig-based model. It likes the firm’s long-term EPS growth (17%) and long-term sales growth (22%). It also likes that recent EPS growth has been even better, coming in at 38% in the most recent quarter (vs. the year-ago quarter). Alaska Air Group, Inc. (NYSE: ALK ) : Actually based in Washington state, Alaska Air is the parent of Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air Industries, which with partner regional airlines serve 90 locations in the US, Canada, and Mexico. The smallish large-cap or big mid-cap, depending on how you look at it ($10 billion market cap) is a favorite of my Lynch model, in part because of its stellar 40% long-term EPS growth rate. Shares trade for 14.4 times earnings, making for a strong 0.41 PEG ratio. Alaska Air also has a very reasonable 34% debt/equity ratio. MYR Group (NASDAQ: MYRG ) : This small-cap specialty contractor ($571 million market cap) serves the electrical infrastructure market throughout the US and Canada. The Zweig strategy likes that it has grown earnings per share at a 27% pace and sales at a 24% pace over the long term, and that both EPS and sales growth accelerated last quarter. It also likes MYR’s 0% debt/equity ratio. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (NYSE: CBI ) : Based in The Netherlands, CBI is involved in engineering, procurement and construction services for customers in the energy and natural resource industries. The $4.7 billion market cap mid-cap was founded more than a century ago in Chicago as a bridge designer and builder. The model I base on the writings of hedge fund guru Joel Greenblatt is particularly high on CBI as a value play. Greenblatt’s approach is a remarkably simple one that looks at just two variables: earnings yield and return on capital. My Greenblatt-inspired model likes CBI’s 16.7% earnings yield (Greenblatt uses earnings before interest and taxes divided by enterprise value for that) and 177% ROC (EBIT/tangible capital employed), which combine to make the stock the most attractive in the entire U.S. market right now, according to this approach. CBI’s 24% long-term EPS growth rate and bargain priced 0.32 PEG ratio also help it earn strong interest from my Lynch-based model.