Tag Archives: seeking-alpha

Vanguard’s 5 Best No-Load ETFs And Index Funds To Make Into A Portfolio

The best no-load ETFs and index funds will help you create a diversified portfolio. Vanguard Funds is the place to start when it comes to finding the best no-load ETFs and index funds. When you are replicating an index, cost and portfolio drift are two of the main issues. Vanguard Funds started the first index fund back in the 1970s, and their ability to limit portfolio drift is well documented. How the best no-load ETFs and index funds do on cost We did some research, which you can see in this chart: (click to enlarge) Source: Morningstar Looks like Vanguard Funds are leading the way in cost no matter which type of investment you wish to purchase. In this article, we focus on the best no-load ETFs and index funds from Vanguard. Which should you buy to make your globally-balanced portfolio – the best no-load ETFs or index funds? We have done a lot of comparison shopping, and our preference is the Vanguard Admiral Shares Index Funds. However, they are not available everywhere; they have a $10,000 minimum purchase, and they do not trade during the day like an ETF. If any of these are issues for you, then we recommend you purchase the Vanguard ETF shares. Want to make a five Vanguard fund portfolio that will cover the planet? Here is what you should buy: Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: VOO ) or (MUTF: VFIAX ) – This fund buys the 500 stocks selected by S&P to represent the U.S. large cap stock universe. It has the advantage of being an index that is recognized and purchased around the world. A limited number of stocks with growing global demand and an incredibly low 0.05% expense ratio make this a good core holding for your portfolio. Vanguard Extended Markets ETF (NYSEARCA: VXF ) or (MUTF: VEXAX ) – This fund contains all of the U.S. common stocks regularly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq over-the-counter market, except those stocks included in the S&P 500 Index. This fund fills in the blanks that are missing from the S&P 500 Index. It holds a total of 3,078 US stocks, mostly mid and small caps, which gives you fantastic coverage of the U.S. stock market. Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (NYSEARCA: BND ) or (MUTF: VBTLX ) – This ETF tracks the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It covers a wide range of public, investment-grade, taxable bonds in the United States-including government, corporate, and international dollar-denominated bonds, as well as mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities-all with maturities of more than one year. The ETF invests by sampling the index and currently holds 6,166 bonds. Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (NASDAQ: VXUS ) or (MUTF: VTIAX ) – This ETF tracks the market-cap weighted FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, which covers 99% of the world’s global market capitalization outside the US. The ETF holds 5,512 stocks from 46 developed and emerging markets. Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (NASDAQ: BNDX ) or (MUTF: VTABX ) – This fund tracks the Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). The index includes government, government agency, corporate, and securitized non-U.S. investment-grade fixed income investments. They are all issued in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, with maturities of more than one year. To minimize the currency risk, the ETF will attempt to hedge its currency exposures. The ETF currently holds 2,246 bonds. With just five Vanguard ETFs or index funds you get exposure to 9,090 stocks and 8,412 bonds. This is incredible diversification! There are pros and cons to every portfolio. You may want to read “Vanguard’s Best ETF Index Funds for Building a Global Portfolio” to get a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each portfolio type. Originally published 2/6/14. Updated on 7/20/15. Share this article with a colleague

Gold Mining ETFs Are Crashing

Gold has been the worst hit commodity of this year after oil, plunging nearly 6% so far. This is especially true in the backdrop of the strengthening dollar and the looming interest rates hike sometime this year – two conditions that are tempering the safe haven appeal across the board. The decline deepened recently when the Fed stated that it is on track to increase interest rates this year as the world’s largest economy continues to gain traction. The Chinese disclosure about its gold holdings for the first time since April 2009 also added to the bearish sentiments for the yellow metal. Though Chinese gold reserves jumped 57% at the end of June from the last disclosure six years ago, the increase was only half of what the market had expected. This triggered off a number of stop losses on the gold contracts today. Apart from these, a spate of positive economic data, waning gold demand, and weak overseas trends continued to tarnish the metal badly. As fears over the Greece crisis fades, gold is losing its allure as a store of value and an alternative investment to risky assets during economic and political uncertainty. Further, the divergent monetary policies in the U.S., and the other developed and developing countries will continue to result in appreciation of the U.S. dollar against a basket of currencies. This would in turn lead to lesser demand for gold. The bullion has broken its major support level of $1100 per ounce for the first time since March 10 in the early trading session yesterday, suggesting a bleak outlook for the yellow metal. Notably, key gold products like GLD , IAU and SGOL lost 5.6% each over the past one month. While these performances have been bad, things are worse in the gold mining space. Acting as a leveraged play on underlying metal prices, metal miners tend to experience more losses than their bullion cousins in a declining metal market. Gold Mining ETFs Performance (one-month) Performance (Year-to-date) Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: SGDJ ) -20.16% -7.62% Market Vectors Gold Mining ETF (NYSEARCA: GDX ) -19.27% -16.10% Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: GDXJ ) -18.50% -11.83% iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: RING ) -18.35% -16.38% Sprott Gold Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: SGDM ) -17.63% -19.93% PowerShares Global Gold and Precious Metals Portfolio (NASDAQ: PSAU ) -17.53% -15.63% Global X Gold Explorers ETF (NYSEARCA: GLDX ) -12.73% -10.34% From the above table, it is clear that selling pressure has been intense for gold miners and that the recent trend is extremely troubling for investors given the dollar strength and bearish investors’ sentiment. Most products lost close to 20% over the trailing one-month period with GDX, RING and SGDM touching new all-time lows in Friday’s trading session. After this year’s drop, gold mining stocks have now become cheaper than gold bullion since at least the 1980s, as per the Bloomberg . Thus, many analysts view the gold miner space as an attractive entry point. In particular, Morgan Stanley upgraded the outlook for the world’s largest gold miner – Goldcorp (NYSE: GG ) – to overweight from equal weight early this month. However, some are expecting further weakness in the days ahead. Further, the gold mining industry has the worst Zacks Rank in the bottom 26% at the time of writing, suggesting some underperformance in the months to come. Hence, investors should be extremely cautious before thinking about treading into this rocky space. Still, risk-tolerant long-term investors could do some bottom fishing and might consider this slump as a buying opportunity, should they have the patience for extreme volatility. This is because much of the negative factors, such as rise in interest rates and a strong dollar, has been discounted as of now, underscoring some short covering anytime soon. Original Post

Conservative Total Return Portfolio: Sells A Winner And Welcomes Back An ‘Old Friend’

Summary The CTR sold VLO after less than a month following double digit gains. While money was left on the table, the market in this name seemed a little “frothy”. After recently selling BX, the combination of a price drop and company strategic moves prompted the equity to be “welcomed back”; BX is still best-in-breed. AAPL is nearing an inflection point, while IBM may be nearing a breakout. GM is universally hated, but that has to change (or does it). I introduced the ” Conservative Total Return ” or CTR portfolio in August 2014 and try to provide monthly updates. The general philosophy of this method has allowed me to cumulatively beat, since 1999, the S&P 500 by a wide margin. As the market has “evolved”, so have the holdings. While the investments in the CTR are conservative, the portfolio is dynamic (as is the market and its “favorites”). In the June report, I noted broadening the portfolio base to add a transport (American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL )) and an energy company (Valero (NYSE: VLO )). Unfortunately for the diversification strategy (but fortunate for the portfolio), VLO appreciated significantly and I exited the position. Why did I exit below my target price? Simply put, VLO appreciated fast in a short time. In reviewing my investing mistakes, I have learned that in the past I have been reluctant to sell; waiting for the market to “get it right” and hit my target price. Often my stubbornness has been costly. In recent years (with a lot of prompting from my wife), I have been more prone to take a quick profit as I am skeptical of “one-way elevator rides”. So when VLO jumped more than 10% in less than a month, I decided not to be greedy and took profits. Subsequently, VLO has considered to appreciate. While the greedy side of my wishes I held on, the logical side of me believes the market is over-reacting to perceived good news and is happy I sold. I will continue to monitor VLO and my re-enter if 1) the core value has changed and/or 2) pricing becomes favorable. During the month, I re-entered a favorite (Blackstone- (NYSE: BX )) that I had previously sold for reasons similar to VLO. In that case, BX had become “everyone’s favorite stock”, which always makes me nervous. I sold my position at $42.80 and re-entered at $39.45. While I was absent from the stock, BX made some moves I “approved of”, including accelerating the sale of US single family homes. The worsening energy market also makes it more likely BX will be able to deploy recently raised funds productively (previously I was concerned too much money was chasing too few deals and the funds could underperform). Even while selling (and subsequently adding KKR & Co. (NYSE: KKR )), I maintained BX was “best of breed”. I am happy to once again be holding this winner. An error I made was not being focused enough on the markets during the short-lived Greece/China crisis. I have been looking to increase exposure to financials, but at more attractive prices. Frankly, I wanted to buy Citigroup (NYSE: C ) and missed out. I may still enter C, or another financial, but the post-Q2 earnings response to the group was a little too optimistic for my tastes; there may be another opportunity during the next mini-crises or when enthusiasm pulls back. I am OK with missing an opportunity, if it means not overpaying and having my risk/reward skew too heavily toward risk. The Conservative Total Return Philosophy The essence of the CTR method is to combine a strong value bias with flexibility, opportunism and an ability to assimilate and respond to new information. The core philosophy will always be the same; however, as the economic cycle grows older, identifying the appropriate time to “harvest” becomes increasingly important. In assessing the prospects for all of the portfolio members, I feel good that the risk-reward dynamic is positive and, on a risk-adjusted basis, market beating (taking into account the strong value provided by dividends). Feedback from readers has been a partial motivator in my broadening my market segment exposure. The Individual Stocks The core stocks in the portfolio are (alphabetically): AAL, Apple (OTC: APPL ), Blackstone Discover Financial Services (NYSE: DFS ), Ford, (NYSE: F ), GE, General Motors (NYSE: GM ), Harley Davidson (NYSE: HOG ), International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM ), JPM, KKR and Siemens (OTCPK: SIEGY ). (click to enlarge) As the above chart confirms, my positions will generally have a strong bias toward dividends, reasonable valuation and a moderate (in most cases) PEG. Below are comments summarizing my interest in the equity. The chart also contains the appropriate metrics (valuation, fair value, potential gain). Holdings Apple – APPL has a bit of room to run, whether upward valuation is based on more than iPhone sales will be clarified following Q2 earnings. I believe the watch is a non-event (a disappointment for some bulls) and payments have potential. By the end of the year, AAPL has to demonstrate the catalyst for further appreciation or risk being “dead money” (or worse). I am not a “perma-bull” on APPL (though I use the Company’s products). Blackstone – As noted above, BX was re-introduced at a price reflecting a sold risk/reward opportunity. Still the best of breed, well-funded and poised to profit from market distress and volatility (especially in energy). The harvest of US residential is viewed by the author as a positive. Discover Financial – DFS should be worth more. The stock is trading below levels of Q1, when it announced some bad news. I continue to believe the US economy is very strong, and DFS will benefit (and reflect the growth in higher EPS and stock price). Ford – F has underperformed due to the (predictable) ramp-up of the F150. The industry in general is out of favor, with investors using the excuse de jure to send stock prices lower. Yes China is slowing, but Europe is recovering and the US economy continues to do well. While not quite as cheap as General Motors , F offers nice appreciation potential and is a good “partner” to GM in the portfolio. General Electric (NYSE: GE )- I am thrilled about GE’s medium-term future. The near-term makes me a little nervous as the stock is near fully valued and there is uncertainty with respect to the Alstom and Electrolux transactions. Higher post-GE Capital tax rates also make stock appreciation more challenging. General Motors – Even more than F, GM is the stock everyone loves to hate. Looking at the numbers, it is hard to see much downside (or at least the risk/reward looks very favorable). As with F, China is concerning, but solid progress in Europe and the US should continue. Low gas prices for the foreseeable future put a backstop on highly profitable truck and SUV sales. I believe analysts are too concerned with unit sales and not focused enough on product mix. Harley Davidson – I may have bought HOG too early. However, HOG is an iconic brand and will, over time, garner the premium multiple it deserves (and has held historically). At the current 12.2x forward earnings, it is hard to see much downside (and a lot of upside). Housing prices in the US are rising; historically, HOG sales increases have been incredibly strongly correlated to appreciating housing prices (wealth effect x more retiring baby boomers). International Business Machines – IBM has been a disappointing investment. However, the Company has repositioned and is making solid progress. Improving Europe and progress in “Cloud” should drive a break-out sometime in the next 3 (or at the most three) quarters. Trading at less than 11x forward, there is little downside and much (potential) upside; a 3% dividend provides a bit of a reward for waiting. JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM )- JPM has performed very well, as have the financials. The stock has grown into its valuation and I am confident in twelve months the stock should perform well. As I have mentioned, I would like to add more in the sector, but recently investors have been a bit too eager. Siemens – Continues to be a play on recovering Europe and a weak US dollar. After GE and Honeywell (NYSE: HON ) have performed and appreciated, SIEGY remains a “show me” laggard. It may take a while, but SIEGY should deliver appropriate total returns through the investment period. Position Summary In my opinion, the positions continue to provide a nice balance of innate conservatism, multiple and earnings driven appreciation potential and exposure to a more mature stock market. Please keep in mind that my portfolio also consists of actively managed real estate, index funds (international, emerging markets and domestic) and bond proxies. I this in response to readers who thought the noted stocks were 100% of my investments and lacked diversity (if that were the case, I would agree). The CTR is a portfolio of stocks that in my opinion are conservative (strong reward vs. risk bias) and well positioned to outperform with below-average risk. I own all of the stocks in the CTR (I also own other positions which I consider speculative or otherwise inappropriate to recommend). I appreciate any feedback on individual securities and recommendations on equities to add to the CTR. This article reflects the personal opinions of the author and should not be relied upon or used as a basis in making an investment decision. Investors should always do their own due diligence prior to making an investment decision. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Disclosure: I am/we are long AAL, AAPL, BX, DFS, F, GE, GM, HOG, IBM, JPM, KKR, SIEGY. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.