Tag Archives: seeking-alpha

Consider Adding Some CRAK To Your Portfolio.

Summary The Market Vectors Oil Refiners ETF launched this week is a compelling play in the energy sector. I conduct a review of the ETF itself and the opportunities & risks associated with the ETF. I believe CRAK is worth considering because of its strong performance in comparison to other energy segments. In this article, I will be reviewing the new Market Vectors Oil Refiners ETF (Pending: CRAK ), which launched yesterday. I believe investors should consider adding some CRAK to their portfolio because the refiners have been the lone bright spot over the last year when oil prices have collapsed. The following chart from the CRAK fund profile page shows that refining and marketing stocks are the only sub-segment of the energy sector (NYSEARCA: XLE ), which has posted a positive return over the last year. Crack Spread One of the most important things to consider when looking at refining stocks is to look at the crack spread. The crack spread is the difference between the cost purchasing the crude oil and the price of the products that the crude oil is refined or “cracked” into. I created the following chart using the ThinkorSwim platform that has the crack spread plotted over the last two years, as well as the performance of Valero (NYSE: VLO ), which is one of the largest holdings in CRAK. The chart shows that over the last two years Valero’s performance [Blue Line] has been highly correlated to the crack spread. (click to enlarge) [Chart from ThinkorSwim Platform] Opportunity The opportunity for refining stocks is promising because crack spreads are higher than a year ago, which will show up in the form of year/year earnings growth. In a troubled energy environment where oil companies/drillers etc cannot earnings, the refiners stand out above other energy segments. Using Valero as an example, you can see in the chart below for the last four quarters, EPS has been trending upward, even as oil prices had fallen to near $40, went back to $60 and are now back at $40. As long as the crack spread remains somewhat stable at these elevated levels, the refiners will continue to outperform the rest of the energy sector. (click to enlarge) Risks The primary risk of CRAK is that it is highly concentrated within its top 10 holdings. The top 10 holdings account for nearly 65% of the portfolio, therefore when considering CRAK investors should be comfortable with this fact and the underlying companies that are in the top 10 holdings. Second, another item to watch for is currency risk. As the following chart from the portfolio analytics section of the CRAK fund page shows, CRAK has a large international currency exposure. With nearly 50% of CRAK priced in foreign currencies investors who are also, bullish on the dollar could potentially pair a purchase of CRAK with the small-hedged position in the PowerShares DB USD Bull ETF (NYSEARCA: UUP ) or the WisdomTree Bloomberg U.S. Dollar Bullish ETF (NYSEARCA: USDU ) to mitigate the foreign currency risk. Closing Thoughts In closing, because CRAK just launched this week and I believe it should be added to investors watch lists for a period to make sure there is interest in the product. If there is adequate volume and CRAK attracts assets the refiners are a compelling choice when considering investing in energy because they have performed very well during this tough energy environment in comparison to other energy sector segments. Disclaimer: See here . Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Share this article with a colleague

A Dim Light Shines Out Of The Deep Value Investing Cave

One tea leaf indicator that is used to get a sense of the future direction of the overall stock market is the number of stocks moving down in price. More stocks are now trading below their 200-day moving average than above it. Some investors might view this negatively, but an increasing number of stocks falling in price is a telling sign that brighter days lie ahead for deep value investors. Falling stock prices are a necessary but insufficient condition for deep value stocks to bubble up to the surface. This may seem counter-intuitive to investors who desire an ever-rising stock market, but for value investors, the opportunity to find true bargains increases following a significant market decline. One of Benjamin Graham’s more aggressive value investing strategies was to purchase stocks trading below their net current asset value . If a stock was beaten down in price so far to where it traded below what a private owner would value it upon liquidation, investors could take advantage of the anomaly and scoop up the bargain. Holding a deep value stock until the market price exceeds its net current asset value has historically produced excellent returns over the long term. An ever greater number of stocks trending below their long-term moving average is consistent with a future environment conducive to deep value investing. Some percentage of stocks trading below their moving average will eventually reach a valuation level consistent with Graham’s original concept of a true bargain. The chart below shows the percentage of net current asset value stocks that experienced a significant price decline before making their way into a deep value portfolio. (click to enlarge) Source: V. Wendl, The Net Current Asset Value Approach To Stock Investing , (2013): p. 184 . As indicated in the chart, nearly 80% of all stocks lost money over the previous five-year period before entering the net current asset value portfolio. This holds true in both bull and bear market years over the 50-year-plus study period. As more stocks join the growing herd trading below their 200-day moving average, a certain percentage of them will fall to such an irrationally low price point that deep value investors might take an interest in them. Waiting for stocks to reach a true bargain basement price level requires patience. It is a process that unfolds gradually over time. If most stocks are in a general decline , as they are currently, the evidence shows that some will continue to fall in price to a price point below net current asset value. The chart below shows the performance of a typical net current asset value stock over the five -year period of 1955-2008 before it entered the deep value portfolio. The chart is restricted to rolling five-year time periods when the overall stock market was in decline. There existed 10 overlapping five-year periods over the past 50-plus years when the stock market dropped in value. (click to enlarge) As indicated in the chart, more than half of the stocks declined in price by more than 60% before entering the net current asset value portfolio. Over a typical five-year losing period in stocks, the ones trading below liquidation value experience close to seven times the price drop in comparison with the overall market. This unfolds over years, not months. Mr. Market is at times tenacious, forcing deep value investors to wait a long time before labeling certain stocks a true bargain. Remaining on the lookout for a crack of light peering through the financial engineering monstrosity blocking our view of true bargains is the hallmark of a true disciple of Graham’s teachings. Share this article with a colleague

Trounce The Market With Less Risk

Over a lifetime, stocks trounce bonds more than 800-fold. Contrary to conventional thinking, LESS risk taking can lead to HIGHER returns. Active investing can significantly outperform balanced, buy-and-hold strategies. Most of us tend to think of investing in terms of the experiences of our lifetime, and in fact, of that limited span during which we were vaguely aware of economic events in the world at all. (Nope, you can’t count those teenage years…) But it is important to view things in a greater historical perspective. The chart below does that. (click to enlarge) Source: Stocks, Bonds, Treasury Bills and Inflation 1926-2010 If you zoom in on the graph, you’ll quickly grasp one salient fact: over the long run, if you can stand a bit of risk, you’ll certainly be richly rewarded for that risk. From 1926 to today, an investment in the lowest risk strategy, short term government bonds, grew your money 19-fold, but barely outpaced inflation which eroded the value of the dollar 12-fold over that same period. In stark contrast, investing in small caps grew your money 16000-fold. Yes, you read that right! Put another way, a $1000 investment grew to just over $16 million. Here are a couple of other important observations: If time is on your side, you are seriously shortchanging yourself by not investing in the stock market. A small increment in your yearly return makes a huge difference over time. Look at how a 4 percent difference between large cap stocks and long term bonds increases returns by more than 40 times over that period. Thanks to the incredible magic of compounding, the earlier you start the better off you’ll be. The more you depend on your investments for income today, the less you can (safely) earn, ironically enough. (The corresponding corollary to that in the banking sector is that the more you need a loan, the less likely you will get one. Oh well…) It may take you 20 years to recover from a market break! If you invested in the market in late 1928, you were not back to square one until 1946 !!! (If you think we have that problem solved, just talk to some Japanese investors. Or view this article on my blog.) Even government treasuries can be a poor investment. See the period from 1965 to 1970, when treasuries dropped, yet inflation was raging. Faced with the complexities of investing, sticking your head in the sand and your money under your pillow just ain’t the way to go! Just look at that inflation line. It means your $1.00 invested in 1928 buys you about 8 cents in 2015 prices. So you cannot afford to be on the sidelines. In fact, if you are not investing, you have almost a complete certainty of seeing your assets shrink. So given all of these conclusions, how should you invest your hard-earned money for the best results? Or if you’re among the fortunate few born with a silver spoon in your mouth, how should you protect your leisurely-inherited millions? The short answer is: it depends… For those of you not quite happy with that decidedly hedged answer (Ever wonder what the word hedge funds really means?), please read on. I promise to give you a more concrete response. A traditional approach would be to spread your assets widely among several groups of investments. Take a look at the following graph showing how several different categories of exchange traded funds performed in the last big stock market crash in 2008. (click to enlarge) As the graph makes clear, while the stock market was plunging, other market sectors (mortgage-backed securities, short and long term treasuries, corporate bonds and government backed securities) were rising. So by mixing your asset classes, you can significantly smooth out the volatility of your portfolio. This is particularly important for retirees, since you can choose to withdraw only from areas that have risen in value, as opposed to selling at the worst possible moment, when asset values are at all time lows. A number of mutual funds and ETF’s already subscribe to this strategy. The chart below shows the performance of the Janus Balanced Fund, plotted against the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ), which is a proxy for the S&P 500 index. This has averaged a 9.85% return over 20 years, with fewer big drawdowns than the S&P itself. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) If you pay close attention to the percentage comparison, you will note that the balanced approach actually beat the S&P 500 in overall return with less volatility along the way! Some people mistakenly assume that this “spread your marbles out evenly” strategy argues against an actively managed approach. Nothing can be further from the truth. The next two graphs show an active approach that picks the best stocks in the US stocks universe (according to our proprietary formula), times the buys according to certain technical criteria related to momentum, and rebalances the portfolio on a weekly basis. Here is a relatively low-beta (low volatility) approach, that still wallops the results of the JANUS fund shown above, as well as the S&P. (click to enlarge) And for those of you willing to sit tight through a little more volatility, how does a 16 fold return on your money over a 12 year period grab you? But don’t complain about the 50% drawdown… (click to enlarge) Source: quantopian.com Strategy back-testing based on universe of 8000 plus US stocks from 1993-2015. Graphed results are NOT based on historical performance. Real results may differ significantly from back-tested results. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: The author currently holds positions using some of these strategies. We do not currently hold position in the Janus fund. The active strategies mentioned require margin accounts and the ability to short stocks at certain times.