Tag Archives: seeking-alpha

Ignore Buffett: Refiners Are A Low-Quality Industry About To Plunge

Refining companies have been all the rage in 2015. After a brief lull, Buffett reignited passion for the sector buying a stake in Phillips 66. Ignore the hype, refiners are at the top of a cyclical boom. Aggressive investors should consider shorting the sector during this period of high volatility. So refiners are back in the news. They’ve been the toast of the town for much of 2015 as strong margins have driven rocketing share prices. Refining margins started plunging recently, and the stock market dumped; the one-two punch knocked the refining space down pretty hard. Predictably, lots of folks are running around calling it a big buy the dip opportunity. These calls are getting louder now that Warren Buffett has announced owning a large stake in Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX ). He bought a stake worth roughly $4.5 billion, not chump change, even to a company as large as Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A ) (NYSE: BRK.B ). Buffett’s track record with energy is mixed. PetroChina (NYSE: PTR ) was a huge win for him, Chevron (NYSE: CVX ) and his dive into Energy Futures bonds were large mistakes that caused big losses for his company. His recent buy on Exxon (NYSE: XOM ) was extremely poorly timed, but he had the good sense to sell before it turned into another large loss. While I think buying refiners now is a terrible idea, I’ll give Buffett and his Phillips 66 a pass. Phillips is rapidly moving into other segments that are less vulnerable to the feast and famine dynamics of the refining industry. This is good because the refining industry stands like a shaky rig staring down a class four hurricane just miles away. Refiners have had a big boom since 2010, largely driven by expanding margins. Alas, these refining booms never last, this industry is a cyclical money pit that ends up having the same sort of returns that only fare well compared to, say, airlines or asteroid mining schemes. Just to be clear, this industry is about as far as you can get from anything suitable for buy and hold investors. It’s very much a trader’s paradise, buy when these companies are on the brink of bankruptcy, sell when people get euphoric again. Take the long-term 35-year chart for Tesoro (NYSE: TSO ), one of the more competent and (occasionally) beloved pure-play refiners. (click to enlarge) In 1980, yes, back when disco was still a respectable trend, Tesoro shares traded as high as $16. They then did nothing for the next 12 years, falling as low as $1.37 in 1992. Refining entered one of its periodic booms, sending shares up 8x to $10 in 1998 – still well short of where it was back in 1980. Then disaster hit on the next cyclical collapse, sending shares as low as 62 cents in 2002. That’s a miserable return on investment since 1980, a 96% capital loss over 22 years! And to be clear refining is a capital intensive industry, these guys only pay acceptable dividends (for short periods of time) during sector peaks, followed by long periods of abolishing the dividend all together while they’re in “avoid bankruptcy” mode. You’re not getting paid to wait owning these guys while their stocks go sideways decades at a time. After 2002, fortunes turned brighter with a big increase in gasoline demand as the SUV craze hit. As gasoline usage surged, refiners suddenly (finally) found themselves with excess demand for their industry, and margins soared. Tesoro shares would go on a monster run, clocking out a 100x return for anyone that bought near the low. Shares peaked in the 60s in 2007 and then started to dive. In 2008, as the economy started to sink and rising oil prices killed consumer demand for gasoline and other refined products, the refineries started another classic bust. Shares, which started the year at $45 in 2008 fell as low as $6 by that winter, a stunning 85% one-year collapse – a dive so steep, it put most of the banks to shame. Remember, if you paid $16 a share in 1980, at this point, you’re still sitting on a 60% loss, 28 years later – and Tesoro is a refining industry leader. Just think of how the lower-quality refiners did over that three decade span! In 2010, refiners started to recover, aided at first by some timely hurricane activity and then by the rise of US oil production. The glut of US oil produced by the domestic energy boom caused a massive oversupply of oil locally compared to the world market. This resulted in boom times for the US refineries, which suddenly got to enjoy cheap input fuels while the value of their refined products including gasoline, heating oil, and jet fuel remained robust. The recovering economy also helped on this count. Alas, the refining boom of 2010-2015 has died. They’re engraving its tombstone as we speak: “He had a great run, but in the end the oil bust and Chinese commodity collapse was too much for his aging heart to bear.” The refining boom was fueled up primarily by three factors. The glut of US oil, the improving US economy, and the lack of new refineries. All three of those factors are played out. As you know, oil prices have collapsed this past year. This is placing intense strain on US-based marginal oil producers. There’s a ton of data that disputes exactly where the break-even for a US shale project is, but it’s clearly north of $45 where we are today. There’s talk that US production isn’t falling yet, contrary to expectations, since capital-constrained players have to keep producing. Yeah, I acknowledge we may not see US domestic production fall straight off a cliff, but let’s be straight here, there’s no reason to expect US oil production to remain at these elevated levels. Capitalism stops unprofitable activity from continuing sooner than later. Lower prices will cause lower levels of production sooner or later, basic economics assures us of that. And US suppliers, as some of the higher marginal cost producers, will be among the first to shut up shop. When they do, the disparity of prices in between WTI and Brent crude, and particularly in discounted Midwestern crude that companies like Western Refining (NYSE: WNR ) have used to great advantage will fade. The refining boom was largely built on getting access to below normal market priced crude and letting all that extra margin soak through to the bottom line rather than going to consumers. That’s why you’ll not be seeing gas nearly as cheap as you expected at the pump with oil plunging. Another cause of higher margins has been that the US refining industry was capacity restrained. No new refineries had been built in 30 years, and many of the country’s refineries were shut in the 1980s when there was excessive capacity. The sudden appearance of the shale boom suddenly caused the nation’s refining stock to be insufficient to process all the country’s oil output. However, for the first time in ages, new refineries are being built in the US, which will add supply to the industry, putting pressure on margins. Additionally, there were an unusual number of strikes and explosions in refineries in early 2015 that put transitory upward pressure on margins. This boost is now dissipating. And finally, the economy had been improving in the US and neighboring regions that also consume US-refined petroleum products, namely Mexico and Canada. Canada now appears to be heading into a serious recession, and Mexico, while still growing economically, is sputtering. And the US economy is definitely decelerating, with the Fed threatening to tighten monetary policy as the domestic economy struggles and emerging markets are crashing. Sure enough, the crack spread has absolutely collapsed, falling from near 30 just a couple of weeks ago to the 15s today. It plunged during the market dive, and has continued diving this week, down 15% Monday, and another 5% Tuesday. To be clear, the crack spread is what butters the bread for refineries. The crack spread is the difference between their input crude and the output products such as gasoline, and fuel oil. Sure refiners can hedge, some have more exposure to other products like asphalt or specialty products, and whatnot. But that spread in general drives the industry. Notice how quickly refining stocks surged this spring when the spread shot upward. Now with it plunging again, refining stocks are likely to resemble falling anvils in coming weeks. Given the end of the conditions that caused the refining boom in the first place, there’s no reason for these stocks to have bids anywhere near these levels. Tesoro, for example, is trading at 9x cycle peak earnings levels. Analysts estimate earnings will drop by $4/share in 2016 to less than $8/share. That alone is eye-catching, you never want to see a company shed $4 in earnings power in a single year. Consider this : in 2009, Tesoro lost 87 cents a share, it lost a penny in 2010, made $4.02 in 2011, $6.20 in 2012, and then earnings plunged by more than 50% to $2.85 of EPS in 2013. Do you think that company’s current $10+ EPS earnings power is a permanent improvement, or a passing fad caused by a now-expired domestic oil boom? If EPS goes back to $2.85, like they earned in 2013, let alone making losses as they did in 2009-10, what would the stock be worth? The current $90 share price is a more than 30x multiple on earnings from just two years ago. Unless you think the domestic refining industry has entered a period of permanent bliss, despite all signs pointing to the contrary, paying 9x the unusually high current earnings is simply myopic. That refining stocks haven’t collapsed faster is a bit surprising. Perhaps they’re benefiting from the best house standing in a bad neighborhood effect. Previously, the “smart money” was flowing to the pipeline players such as Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI ) causing them to become substantially overvalued. I pointed this out this spring, Kinder shares are down sharply since then. Now that investors are scared out of pipelines, refiners are pretty much the last energy house that hasn’t collapsed. But their industry fundamentals have turned sharply negative, and profit margins have imploded in the past month. To sum up, here are long-term charts of two more pure-play refiners, Western and Valero (NYSE: VLO ). Western, a favorite of mine at $6 in 2008, but absurdly overvalued nowadays: (click to enlarge) And here’s Valero, the industry bellwether: (click to enlarge) Note how terrible these investments are over time – it truly is a miserable industry, like airlines for long-term holders. See where we were in 2007 when the SUV-driven refining craze ended? Yeah, that’s about where the refining industry is now. Take note of what happened next. Do your own diligence before following Buffett blindly into the refining sector. Disclosure: I am/we are short TSO, WNR. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

SCHH: A Little Too Much SPG, But I’m Still Using It

Summary SCHH is a great REIT ETF with a very low expense ratio. The holdings are little too heavy on SPG and the retail REIT sector in general. When considered within a portfolio the diversification benefits of SCHH are less important when the portfolio already has a large bond holding. Investors should treat SCHH as an optional replacement for a combination of equity and bonds. If I could make a modification to the SCHH portfolio, it would be to decrease retail REITs and increase residential REITs in lower income markets with higher capitalization rates. Investors should be seeking to improve their risk adjusted returns. I’m a big fan of using ETFs to achieve the risk adjusted returns relative to the portfolios that a normal investor can generate for themselves after trading costs. I’m working on building a new portfolio and I’m going to be analyzing several of the ETFs that I am considering for my personal portfolio. One of the funds that I’m considering is the Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHH ). I’ll be performing a substantial portion of my analysis along the lines of modern portfolio theory, so my goal is to find ways to minimize costs while achieving diversification to reduce my risk level. Expense Ratio SCHH has an expense ratio of .07%. The expense ratio is great for equity REIT ETF options. This is one of the holdings I’ve been adding to whenever I saw it dip. Largest Holdings I love what a REIT index does for diversifying a portfolio. However, when I look at the internal holdings of the ETF, I wish there was a little more diversification. Namely, I would like to see a cap on exposure to any individual REIT at about 5% to 6% of holdings. The holdings are shown below: (click to enlarge) Nothing against Simon Property Group, Inc. (NYSE: SPG ), I just don’t want to see 10% of my index fund invested in a single company. Types of REITs (click to enlarge) When we look at the type of REIT holdings by sector, I get the feeling that I would prefer to see retail REITs with a lower weights and residential REITs with a higher weight. I suppose that comes back to my issue with having over 10% of the portfolio in SPG. Drop that down and put the capital into a heavier weight on residential REITs and I’d be very happy with the overall portfolio composition. Building the Portfolio I put together a hypothetical portfolio using only ETFs that fall under the “free to trade” category for Charles Schwab accounts. My bias towards these ETFs is simple, I have my solo 401k there and recently moved my IRA accounts there as well. When I’m building a list of ETFs to consider I want to focus on things I can trade freely so that I can keep making small transactions to buy more when the market falls. Within the hypothetical portfolio there are no expense ratios higher than .18%. Just like trading costs, I want to be frugal with expense ratios. The portfolio is fairly aggressive. Only 30% of the total is allocated to bonds and I would consider that the weakest area in the portfolio. I’d like to see more bond options (with very low expense ratios) show up on the “One Source” list for free trading. (click to enlarge) A quick rundown of the portfolio The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHD ) is a dividend index. The Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHB ) is a broad market index. The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHX ) is focused on blended large cap exposure. The Schwab International Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHF ) is developed international equity. The Schwab Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHE ) is emerging market equity. The Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHC ) is developed small capitalization equity. is domestic equity REITs. The Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHZ ) is a remarkably complete bond fund. The SPDR Barclays Long Term Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA: TLO ) is a long term treasury ETF. The PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index ETF (NYSEARCA: ZROZ ) is an extremely long term treasury ETF. Notice that the 3 international equity ETFs have only been weighted at 5% while the broad market index has been weighted at 25%. I find heavy exposure to international equity to bring more risk than expected returns so I try to keep my international exposure low. I prefer no more than 20% in international equity. Plenty of domestic companies already have enormous international operations so the benefit of international diversification is not as strong as it would be if the markets were isolated from each other. Risk Contribution The risk contribution category demonstrates the amount of the portfolio’s volatility that can be attributed to that position. When TLO and ZROZ post negative risk contribution it is because the negative correlation to most of the equity holdings results in the long term treasury ETFs reducing the total portfolio risk. In my opinion, this is the best argument for including them in the portfolio. Correlation The chart below shows the correlation of each ETF with each other ETF in the portfolio and with the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ). Blue boxes indicate positive correlations and tan box indicate negative correlations. Generally speaking lower levels of correlation are highly desirable and high levels of correlation substantially reduce the benefits from diversification. (click to enlarge) The Role of SCHH REIT ETFs can perform a couple roles within a portfolio. One major use of REITs is to boost the income yield from the portfolio, but SCHH doesn’t pay out as high of a dividend yield as some of the other equity REIT index funds. In my book, that makes it more useful for investors that are not concerned about distributions for decades. Since I’m holding the ETF in a tax advantaged account, I won’t have to worry about capital gains taxes either. Since SCHH is not offering a high current yield for investors, it is useful to look at the diversification benefits because SCHH runs between .70 and .60 on correlation with all of the other equity ETFs in the portfolio. The only real weakness for holding a large allocation in equity REITs is the correlation with bonds is not as favorable as it is for the other equity ETFs. If an investor wants to completely avoid using bond exposure in their portfolio, as I’ve been doing, then equity REIT indexes are absolutely critical in reducing the risk level. When the portfolio is including a substantial allocation to bonds it will reduce the optimal allocation for equity REITs. Conclusion SCHH may not offer a high dividend yield, but for long term investors looking to build an optimal portfolio it makes sense as a solid index fund with a very low expense ratio. When investors increase their allocation to equity REIT indexes it may be appropriate to fund the portfolio by selling both domestic equity and bond ETFs. If the investor sells out of their position in REITs, the most intelligent allocation strategy would be to split the proceeds between bonds and equity. With the domestic equity REIT space, SCHH is a very attractive ETF for having a very low expense ratio. The biggest thing I would like to see changed is moving some the retail REIT exposure to residential REIT exposure. If I were to get even more specific, I would love to see the residential REIT exposure focused on markets with higher capitalization rates and lower value properties that would be expected to do better in a recession. If I were adding individual equity REITs to my portfolio to compliment SCHH, I’d start with looking for ones that operated low income properties. Disclosure: I am/we are long SCHB, SCHD, SCHF, SCHH. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: Information in this article represents the opinion of the analyst. All statements are represented as opinions, rather than facts, and should not be construed as advice to buy or sell a security. Ratings of “outperform” and “underperform” reflect the analyst’s estimation of a divergence between the market value for a security and the price that would be appropriate given the potential for risks and returns relative to other securities. The analyst does not know your particular objectives for returns or constraints upon investing. All investors are encouraged to do their own research before making any investment decision. Information is regularly obtained from Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, and SEC Database. If Yahoo, Google, or the SEC database contained faulty or old information it could be incorporated into my analysis.

DoubleLine Debuts Dynamically Managed Strategic Commodity Fund

By DailyAlts Staff Led by the new “Bond King” Jeffrey Gundlach, DoubleLine Capital has been one of the hottest asset managers since its founding in December 2009. In addition to the firm’s institutional and sub-advisory businesses, DoubleLine also makes a number of its investment strategies available via its own line of mutual funds and closed end funds. On August 31, DoubleLine Funds added one more fund to its roster: the DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (MUTF: DLCMX ), a ’40 Act mutual fund managed by DoubleLine Commodity LP. Through the fund, retail investors with as little as $500 to invest via their IRAs can gain access to DoubleLine’s Strategic Commodity strategy. The new fund’s objective is to seek long-term total return. In pursuit of this goal, the fund’s portfolio manager will employ to two distinct approaches: A long-only strategic allocation to commodities and A long/short tactical allocation to individual commodities. In practice, the fund seeks returns by means of long exposures to one or more commodity indexes, and long and short exposures to individual commodities. It achieves these exposures primarily through derivatives contracts, as well as individual securities and other instruments with returns tied to commodity indexes, baskets of commodities, individual commodities, or a combination thereof. The fund’s portfolio manager is Jeffrey Sherman. Mr. Sherman is a portfolio manager for DoubleLine LP’s derivative-based and multi-asset strategies, and he’s supported in his management of the new fund by analysts and traders in DoubleLine’s Cross Asset Team. “The rationale for investing in commodities has several components,” said Mr. Sherman, in a recent statement. “A broad mix of commodities historically has shown low correlations to stocks, bonds and cash. So commodities can diversify a portfolio invested in traditional asset classes.” Mr. Sherman, who will be holding a webcast on September 29 to discuss the fund and answer questions, also noted that commodities have inflation-hedging properties, and that “incremental returns potentially can be obtained by exploiting the term structure of prices of individual commodities.” Shares of the DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund are available in I (MUTF: DBCMX ) and N ( DLCMX ) classes. I shares have a $100,000 minimum initial investment and a 1.11% net-expense ratio; N shares have a $2,000 minimum initial investment and a 1.36% net-expense ratio. For IRAs, the initial minimums are $5,000 and $500, respectively. For more information, visit the fund’s web page .