Tag Archives: president

U.S. Stocks In 2016? Keep An Eye On The Global Economy

You may not want to risk capital in overseas stocks until foreign countries and regions begin to respond to stimulus via economic expansion. Right now, most are mired in stagnation, recession or depression. Absent a desirable revival abroad, 2016 could be tough sledding for the U.S. economy and the heralded S&P 500. During the previous bull market (10/02-10/07), financial media fawned over the critical importance of diversifying one’s equity exposure across the globe. And why not? Performance for foreign exchange-traded trackers like iShares MSCI EAFE (NYSEARCA: EFA ) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (NYSEARCA: EEM ) far surpassed anything the S&P 500 could muster up; developed international markets doubled U.S. capital appreciation while emerging economies catapulted 350%! Indeed, when I spoke at conferences 10 years ago, attendees rarely inquired about companies listed on the NASDAQ or the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). They wanted to know if they should add a materials exporting giant like iShares South Africa (NYSEARCA: EZA ) to their portfolios or whether or not iShares Small Cap Brazil (NYSEARCA: BRF ) would be a sensible way to tap consumer purchasing power in Latin America. Accessing overseas markets dominated speaker presentations as well as listener curiosity. In 2000, the financial planning community typically rallied around a 20% equity allocation to foreign stock. By 2007, the 20% recommendation jumped to 50%. The reason? Well-diversified investors were supposed to account for the world’s market capitalization, where one-half of the world’s market cap belonged to non-U.S. securities. So what happened to the notion of a globally diversified portfolio? Worldly investor perspectives? Could it be that, since the eurozone crisis in 2011, U.S. stocks have crushed foreign equities? Maybe it is easier for CNBC and Bloomberg to praise U.S. stock price gains while ignoring bearish price depreciation in foreign equity holdings — significant positions in the static allocation of the buy-n-hold viewership. Mainstream financial commentators may choose to focus on the progress of the S&P 500 alone. They may choose to ignore c orrective activity in small caps via the Russell 2000, high yield bonds via SPDR S&P High Yield Corporate (NYSEARCA: JNK ) and transporters via the Dow Jones Transportation Average. Yet ignoring bearishness in asset prices around the world is particularly near-sighted, if for no other reason that global economic weakness is the biggest threat to the worldwide profits and the worldwide revenue of large U.S.-based corporations. The FTSE All-World Index may be particularly relevant. This benchmark covers the overwhelming majority of the world’s investable market capitalization. Its global perspective is heavily weighted toward developed regions, including the United States (52.5%), Europe with the United Kingdom (19.5%) and Japan (8.5%). Nine of the top 10 corporate constituents are U.S. companies. Some trends are easier to spot than others. For example, the FTSE All-World Index has not appreciated in price for nearly two years. Its 200-day long-term trendline currently slopes downward. And the benchmark is roughly 9% below its summertime peak. The good news? Prices are well above their October lows. It follows that the global benchmark may or may not have completed a 16%-17% correction several months earlier. Make no mistake about it, though. Large-cap U.S. companies like Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, General Electric and Wells Fargo are responsible for the “resilience” of the FTSE All-World Index. Either key economies around the world – Europe, the United Kingdom, China, Japan – pull out of their collective funk in 2016, or U.S. large-cap stocks will eventually buckle. Top-line revenue has already declined in every quarter of 2015; non-dollar denominate profits have also taken a toll on multi-national players. Equally worrisome, foreign demand has been noticeably weak in the export data. In sum, you may not want to risk capital in overseas stocks until foreign countries and regions begin to respond to stimulus via economic expansion. Right now, most are mired in stagnation, recession or depression. Absent a desirable revival abroad, 2016 could be tough sledding for the U.S. economy and the heralded S&P 500. Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

Has The ‘Smart Money’ Or The ‘Dumb Money’ Been Reducing Risk?

Riskier assets have been buckling clear across the asset board. Comfort seeking in treasury bonds over low-level investment grade bonds and higher-yielding junk bonds? A preference for recession-proof staples over the wider large-cap asset class? These are signs that momentum currently favors less risky alternatives. History has rarely been kind to those who ignore common sense warning signs. Is it the “smart money” or the “dumb money” that has been seeking safer portfolio pastures throughout 2015? Time itself will tell. That said, riskier assets have been buckling clear across the asset board. Consider the iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: IEF ): iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: HYG ) price ratio. A rising IEF:HYG price ratio signals an increasing desire for the perceived safety of U.S. treasuries over the higher yield-producing income of comparable corporates. The ratio has not been this high since mid-2014. Another relationship that typically offers insight into investor risk preferences is the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLP ):SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) price ratio. When there is skittishness about the economy, cigarette makers, soda pop providers and toothpaste purveyors tend to outperform the broader large-cap market of U.S. stocks. As it stands, momentum for XLP relative to SPY is near 52-week highs. Comfort seeking in treasury bonds over low-level investment grade bonds and higher-yielding junk bonds? A preference for recession-proof staples over the wider large-cap asset class? These are signs that momentum currently favors less risky alternatives. Indeed, there are plenty of additional examples where the less risky asset is outperforming the riskier selection. Compare the perceived safer world of large-company stocks versus the perceived riskiness of owning small-company stocks via the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: IVV ):iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSEARCA: IWM ). Like most price ratio comparisons today, the lower risk option is experiencing far greater demand than the higher risk option. There are exceptions to the rule. For example, in foreign markets, large caps are underperforming small caps. This can be seen in the Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (NYSEARCA: VEU ): Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: VSS ) price ratio. One possible reason for the trend toward the perceived riskier asset? Large foreign corporations are exceptionally dependent on international trade; lackluster world demand has put enormous pressure on exporters. In contrast, smaller companies around the globe are more dependent on their local economies as opposed to global trade. Another possible explanation? International small-caps have been beaten down so far that some may perceive them as more attractive from a valuation standpoint. However, relative strength in small-cap international stocks relative to larger-company brethren is not an indication of greater demand for riskier international holdings. In fact, like the overwhelming majority of “risk-on” asset classes, small-cap international stocks via VSS have been faltering since May. In particular, VSS is more than 10% below its 52-week high and remains well below its long-term 200-day moving average. With the U.S. economy showing signs of deceleration and U.S. stocks exhibiting unrestrained overvaluation , few should be caught off guard by waning enthusiasm for risk taking. One fact that looms particularly large? Year-to-date, more stocks in the U.S. have been declining than advancing for the first time since 2009. In sum, history has rarely been kind to those who ignore common sense warning signs. If you have long-term winners in your portfolio, restore those assets or asset classifications back to your original allocation. The cash that you raise from “pruning” will help you buy desirable assets at bargain prices in the future. If you have been holding onto losing vehicles, consider taking a small loss on each. The dollars that you raise from “cutting bait” will help you buy the best fish in the sea when those fish are attractively priced. For Gary’s latest podcast, click here . Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

Retail ETFs In Focus This Holiday Season

As a pioneer in retail business, the U.S. provides ample growth opportunities for all types of retail companies. From growth perspective, retail ranks among the dominant U.S. industries and employs an enormous workforce. Retail sales represent approximately 30% of consumer spending, which itself accounts for more than two-thirds of the economy. The U.S. economy is on the growth path driven by lower oil prices and an improved job market that is counteracted by certain spillover effects from the global economy. However, this is not likely to come in the way of U.S. economic growth and the labor market boom. The Federal Reserve chairwoman Janet Yellen and the president of the New York Fed William Dudley recently expressed the possibilities of a U.S. rate hike in December, the first since the 2007-09 economic crisis and recession. The key basis for the hike will be a fall in unemployment rate and the return of inflation to the Central Bank’s 2% target over the medium term. From the economic standpoint, we see a gradual improvement in the labor market, as unemployment rates have declined to the lowest level since September 2008. According to the recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate for November has declined to 5%, same as in October. In November, 211,000 people were hired, reflecting improved employment prospects. Given a rebounding U.S. economy, the retail space is bubbling with optimism. A gradual recovery in the housing market and manufacturing sector, along with an improving labor market and lower gasoline prices, are favoring the economy and playing key roles in raising buyers’ confidence. We expect this positive sentiment to translate into higher consumer spending. The recent U.S. GDP data (second estimate) revealed that the economy grew at a rate of 2.1% in the third quarter, despite a strong dollar and overseas weakness, while consumer spending increased 3.2%. Though the pace of economic growth decelerated from the second quarter due to inventory correction, analysts are hopeful of a pickup in momentum in the final quarter that primarily constitutes the holiday season. The holiday season is the time when retailers are on their toes, flooding the markets with offers and promotions. Apart from price-matching policies, retailers will sweep buyers off their feet with early-hour store openings, huge discounts, promotional strategies and free shipping on online purchases. Since the season accounts for a sizeable chunk of yearly revenues and profits, retailers are gung ho to drive footfall. In this regard, retailers are efficiently allocating a major portion of their capital toward a multi-channel growth strategy focused on improving merchandise offerings, developing IT infrastructure to enhance web and mobile experiences of customers, giving their stores a facelift, developing fulfillment centers to enable speedy delivery, implementing an enterprise-wide inventory management system as well as enhancing their relationship with existing and new customers. ETFs present a low-cost and convenient way to get a diversified exposure to this sector. Below we have highlighted a few ETFs tracking the industry: SPDR S&P Retail (NYSEARCA: XRT ) Launched in June 2006, SPDR S&P Retail ( XRT ) is an ETF that seeks investment results corresponding to the S&P Retail Select Industry Index. This fund consists of 104 stocks, the top holdings being Wayfair Inc. (NYSE: W ), Pep Boys – Manny, Moe & Jack (NYSE: PBY ) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (NYSE: ANF ), representing asset allocation of 1.44%, 1.42% and 1.39%, respectively, as of December 11, 2015. The fund’s gross expense ratio is 0.35%, while its dividend yield is 1.12%. XRT has $637 million of assets under management (AUM) as of December 10, 2015. Market Vectors Retail ETF (NYSEARCA: RTH ) Initiated in December 2011, Market Vectors Retail ETF ( RTH ) tracks the performance of Market Vectors U.S. Listed Retail 25 Index. The fund comprises 26 stocks, the top holdings being Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN ), Home Depot Inc. (NYSE: HD ) and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT ), representing asset allocation of 15.25%, 8.73% and 6.39%, respectively, as of December 11, 2015. The fund’s net expense ratio is 0.35% and dividend yield is 0.37%. RTH has managed to attract $147.2 million in AUM till December 10, 2015. PowerShares Dynamic Retail (NYSEARCA: PMR ) PowerShares Dynamic Retail ( PMR ), launched in October 2005, follows the Dynamic Retail Intellidex Index and is made up of 30 stocks that are primarily engaged in operating general merchandise stores such as department stores, discount stores, warehouse clubs and superstores. The fund’s top holdings are The Kroger Co. (NYSE: KR ), Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ: COST ) and L Brands, Inc. (NYSE: LB ), reflecting asset allocation of 5.54%, 5.25% and 5.16%, respectively, as of December 11, 2015. The fund’s net expense ratio is 0.63%, while its dividend yield is 0.71%. PMR has managed to attract $22.4 million in AUM as of December 10, 2015. Original post .