Tag Archives: lists

Dallas Fed Fisher’s Prescience And GLD

Recent third quarter GDP growth of 5% at 11 years high brings credibility to Fisher’s bullish dissent which is unforeseen by the FOMC. This brings greater possibility of an earlier rate hike forward to the March or April 2015 meeting especially if it is reflected in the upcoming labor figure. GLD paused its decline in this quiet festive market. This is the time to go short GLD before the market resumes fully in the second week of 2015. Voting against the action were Richard W. Fisher, who believed that, while the Committee should be patient in beginning to normalize monetary policy, improvement in the U.S. economic performance since October has moved forward, further than the majority of the Committee envisions, the date when it will likely be appropriate to increase the federal funds rate.” The quote is extracted from the statement of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) released on 17 December 2014 . Dallas Federal Reserve President Richard Fisher took on a more bullish stance than the rest of the committee. During the meeting, the FOMC took reference from the October 2014 economic data and came to a bullish stance where you can read on my previous article ‘ Dissents At The December 2014 FOMC Meeting Hints At Earlier Rate Hikes ‘. At that point, I was not very convinced about Fisher’s outlook as I believe were the case of the rest of the FOMC. The US were showing some strong number such as the November 2014 non farm payroll of 321,000 which is better than the previous reading of 243,000 and expectations of 231,000 and average hourly earnings increase of 0.4% over 0.1% in October and 0.2% of market expectations. However there were misses as well such as the 0.3% contraction of the consumer price index in November after no change in October. Flash manufacturing purchasing manager index came in lower at 53.7 in November compared to a 54.8 reading in October and market expectations of 56.1. However with the 23 December 2014 revision of the third quarter 2014 from 3.9% to 5.0% which is not seen in 11 years since the third quarter of 2003, I am beginning to think that Fisher might be prescient in his observation. The FOMC will meet again next month from 27 to 28 January 2015. They will observe that GDP grew by 5.0% in the third quarter of 2014, at a 11 year high and agree with Fisher’s observation. During Chair Janet Yellen’s latest press conference , she had the following projection about GDP growth: The central tendency of the projections for real GDP growth is 2.3 to 2.4 percent for 2014, up a bit from the September projections.” The fact that GDP grew at such a rapid rate should persuade the Fed to raise rates at an earlier date perhaps in the March or April meetings instead of the June meeting as widely expected in the market. This would be so especially if there is continued improvement in the labor market. Hence we should keep a lookout for 09 January 2015 figures for the non-farm payroll and unemployment rate data. During the same press conference, Yellen set an unemployment target of 5.2% to 5.3% in the quote below: The central tendency of the unemployment rate projections is slightly lower than in the September projections and now stands at 5.2 to 5.3 percent at the end of next year, in line with its estimated longer-run normal level.” However I don’t think that the FOMC would start rising rates when unemployment rate is at 5.2% -5.3%. Instead I am of the opinion that they would start to rise rates as unemployment start to move towards their target as GDP grows. This would obviously be bullish on the United States Dollars (USD) after the market returns from the holiday season on the second week of 2015. Then I turned my thoughts to gold. You might have heard of this argument in one form or another before but it is worth repeating. As the US rises interest rates, it will be more expensive to hold onto gold as it gives no return and in fact cost you in terms of insurance and storage if you were to hold physical gold. Of course, there is the theory that holding gold is an insurance against the economic collapse but this is getting less and less traction especially with GDP growth of 5%. Then there is the argument that gold is a hedge against inflation but inflation is low and even the Fed foresees 1.0% to 1.6% inflation for 2015 if you refer to Yellen’s press conference. However, today I am going to offer a slight twist to it. The USD has not responded much to the record 11 year high GDP reading. You can read about it in my article ‘ USD Asleep As Q3 2014 GDP Hits 11 Years High ‘. In normal trading day, we would have seen USD raise by at least 100 pips but today if you are reading it before the market returns from the holiday, you might be in a position to short gold at a good price as gold gains partial strength by default after sustained selling in the past week with a lesser possibility of being hit by a retracement. Even if you miss the chance to sell gold by the time you read it, you can also sell it but with a wider stop loss. You can take the daily volatility as a guide. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) The 2 charts above shows the weekly and daily chart of XAU/USD. XAU is the symbol for gold while USD represents United States Dollar which we are all familiar with. The weekly chart shows that this pair is under constant pressure even if there are periodic upticks. The current weekly chart looks like it is on the downtrend after completing its recent bounce to a high of $1238 two weeks back. The daily chart shows us that the XAU/USD is having one of its uptick but this is likely to be temporary. This is a function of the thin trading market during the festive season and traders can take this opportunity to sell and set their stop loss at $1230. Of course, there is no sure thing in trading and one should set the position size accordingly. For those who want to avoid the leverage inherent in forex, they should use the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) instead. GLD is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and highly liquid with $26.90 billion of market capitalization and transaction volume of 1.5 million shares. (click to enlarge) The chart above shows the weakness of the GLD after the peak 2 weeks back which is an interim retracement. Now is the time to go short the GLD as it pauses before its downtrend and catch the trend before it slowly resumes again next week.

Time To Go Shopping For Retail ETFs

Summary Strength in retail was a major factor in the Q3 U.S. GDP read. The sector looks very strong going into 2015. The ETFs discussed in this article provide easy and affordable access to the sector. The latest read on U.S. GDP growth surprised many. Analysts were expecting a pretty big number, but Q3 growth of 5% smashed estimates. With the energy sector, oil especially, in a steady decline, some have been left scratching their heads as to where this growth is coming from. After a sustained slump, it looks like retail is back in the game, especially going into Q4. The sector overall is looking good, as lower gas prices and higher employment leave consumers with more money to spend on discretionary items. Retail back in business According to some of the macro numbers that have been released recently, the retail sector seems to be picking up strength as we near the end of the year. November retail sales rose 0.7% year-over-year for the best performance in eight months, beating estimates for a 0.4% increase, in part due to falling oil prices and increased employment. In fact, gas prices are at their lowest point in four years, and the hiring increase has been the largest in over a decade. Higher spending is distributed quite evenly across product categories, such as electronics and furniture, although car sales seem to be doing particularly well. Sales of cars and light trucks hit an annualized rate of 17.1 million in November, up from 16.4 million in the month before. Excluding autos, retail sales rose 0.5% versus an expected 0.1%. The fact that consumers are spending their higher disposable income instead of squirreling it away is encouraging, and indicates that consumers are optimistic about the economy. Things aren’t expected to slow down in Q4 either. Growth of 5% in Q3 GDP came in well ahead of a previous estimate of 3.9%, and comes on top of a 4.6% increase last quarter after a fairly easy comp with last year’s harsh winter. There are a host of indications that the U.S. economy may be shifting gears. Personal spending jumped 0.6% together with a 0.4% rise in personal income. This strong performance is expected to carry over into Q4, with projected growth revised up to 2.8% from a previous 2.6%. Getting in For investors looking to ride the strength of the U.S. consumer, without putting in too much effort, retail ETFs look like a good bet. Let’s take a look at a few of the options in the consumer discretionary space. As usual, the obvious choice is SPDR’s offering: the S&P retail ETF (NYSEARCA: XRT ). With around $1.7 billion in AUM, it’s the largest and also the most liquid. The expense ratio is fairly low at 0.35%. A bit pricey at around 19 times trailing earnings overall, the ETF is up around 8% year-to-date. Its three biggest holdings are Whole Foods (NASDAQ: WFM ), Tractor Supply (NASDAQ: TSCO ) and L Brands (NYSE: LB ), and some 74% of its holdings are classed under consumer cyclicals, making it a slightly more volatile play than the next ETF choice. Another option, and one which has performed considerably better, is the Market Vectors Retail ETF (NYSEARCA: RTH ), which is up 17% so far this year. A more defensive option, roughly 38% of the ETFs holdings are in the consumer defensive space. Its three biggest holdings are Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT ), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ) and Home Depot (NYSE: HD ). At an expense ratio of 0.35%, it’s fairly inexpensive, and the P/E ratio of 19 times trailing earnings is also in line with SPDR’s comparable ETF. A more actively managed choice would be Powershares Dynamic Retail (NYSEARCA: PMR ). This active management results in a higher expense ratio of 0.63%, and the ETF is up around 11% so far this year. At the moment, its top holdings are Costco (NASDAQ: COST ), Kroger (NYSE: KR ) and O’Reilly Automotive (NASDAQ: ORLY ). All stocks in the basket are screened on a number of fundamental growth metrics, and are moved up or down in weight accordingly. As it has not outperformed the Market Vectors Retail ETF, and is pricier in terms of expense ratio, this one looks a bit less enticing. For me, Market Vectors’ offering looks like the best bet due to its low expense ratio, solid performance this year, and relatively defensive character. However, all three will do a good job in providing a portfolio with some exposure to strength in U.S. retail. Conclusion There are now tangible signs that the U.S. economy is picking up steam, with a huge Q3 GDP beat fueling expectations for further growth. Retail sales have been a major driver behind this increase, and the sector looks excellent going into the holiday season. The three ETFs discussed here provide affordable and efficient access to the consumer discretionary sector, and getting in before the holiday figures come in could provide some very decent returns going into 2015.

Considering SCHF For Foreign Exposure? Modern Portfolio Theory Can Use It

Summary I’m taking a look at SCHF as a candidate for inclusion in my ETF portfolio. The risk level is relatively high for just holding SCHF, but the correlation to the S&P 500 fixes that. The ETF has a solid dividend yield and diversified holdings. I’m not assessing any tax impacts. Investors should check their own situation for tax exposure. Investors should be seeking to improve their risk adjusted returns. I’m a big fan of using ETFs to achieve the risk adjusted returns relative to the portfolios that a normal investor can generate for themselves after trading costs. I’m working on building a new portfolio and I’m going to be analyzing several of the ETFs that I am considering for my personal portfolio. One of the funds that I’m considering is the Schwab International Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHF ). I’ll be performing a substantial portion of my analysis along the lines of modern portfolio theory, so my goal is to find ways to minimize costs while achieving diversification to reduce my risk level. What does SCHF do? SCHF attempts to track the total return of FTSE developed ex-US Index. The ETF falls under the category of “Foreign Large Blend.” Funds within this category generally invest most of their assets in developed markets. Some will include a small exposure to emerging markets, but different investment managers have different definitions of which markets are “emerging” and which ones are “developed.” Does SCHF provide diversification benefits to a portfolio? Each investor may hold a different portfolio, but I use (NYSEARCA: SPY ) as the basis for my analysis. I believe SPY, or another large cap U.S. fund with similar properties, represents the reasonable first step for many investors designing an ETF portfolio. Therefore, I start my diversification analysis by seeing how it works with SPY. I start with an ANOVA table: (click to enlarge) The correlation is about 76%, which is low enough that I’m expecting to see significant diversification benefits. Standard deviation of daily returns (dividend adjusted, measured since January 2012) The standard deviation isn’t going to make a strong case for investing in SCHF. For the period I’ve chosen, the standard deviation of daily returns was 0.8955%. For SPY, it was 0.7300% over the same period. Clearly, SPY appears to be the safer of the two investments. Mixing it with SPY I also run comparisons on the standard deviation of daily returns for the portfolio assuming that the portfolio is combined with the S&P 500. For research, I assume daily rebalancing because it dramatically simplifies the math. With a 50/50 weighting in a portfolio holding only SPY and SCHF, the standard deviation of daily returns across the entire portfolio is 0.7865%. The risk level on the portfolio drops relative to only holding SPY because of the diversification benefits that come from the 76% correlation. If the position in SPY is raised to 80% while SCHF is used at 20%, the standard deviation of daily returns drops down to 0.7453%. In practice, I think the best way to use SCHF will be a position smaller than 20% and used in a more diversified portfolio. The low correlation makes a very strong case for using SCHF in a small position to enhance diversification. Currently, I’m thinking my exposure to developed markets should be around 5%. At 5%, the standard deviation of the portfolio would be 0.7329%. This is hardly higher than simply holding SPY and indicates that most of the additional risk from the higher standard deviation has been effectively diversified away. Why I use standard deviation of daily returns I don’t believe historical returns have predictive power for future returns, but I do believe historical values for standard deviations of returns relative to other ETFs have some predictive power on future risks and correlations. Yield and Taxes The distribution yield is 2.26%. The SEC 30-day yield is 2.49%. Those yields aren’t bad and make this ETF look attractive as part of a dividend portfolio. However, the ETF invests in foreign securities and I’m not a CPA or CFP. Investors concerned about tax consequences should seek advice from someone knowledgeable about their tax situation. Expense Ratio The ETF is posting .08% for an expense ratio, which is very low. Market to NAV The ETF is trading at a .45% premium to NAV currently. In my opinion, a .45% premium to NAV is a problem for new investors. I think the ETF is significantly less attractive when it trades above NAV. A .10% premium isn’t too bad in my opinion, but .45% bothers me. It’s not terrible, but I’d be cautious about that. Largest Holdings The diversification within the ETF is excellent, as shown by the following chart: (click to enlarge) I don’t love having my portfolio invested in U.S. Dollars (my checking account gives me that exposure), but I can understand the ETF needing to have some cash. With no company over 1.5%, that diversification is great. I have not performed individual research on the holdings, but with no exposure over 1.5%, I don’t think there is a viable case for returns on time in researching the individual holdings. Investing in the ETF is largely relying on modern portfolio theory. The argument for the investment is the respectably low correlation of the portfolio to the major U.S. index funds. Making an investment requires a belief that markets are at least somewhat efficient so that the companies within the portfolio will be reasonably priced. Conclusion I’m currently screening a large volume of ETFs for my own portfolio. I’ll do a little more digging on SCHF later and post what I find. The portfolio I’m building is through Schwab, so I’m able to trade SCHF with no commissions. I have a strong preference for researching ETFs that are free to trade in my account. I think SCHF will merit a fairly small position within that ETF portfolio. The low correlation and the low expense ratio are the driving factors for me. Additional disclosure: Information in this article represents the opinion of the analyst. All statements are represented as opinions, rather than facts, and should not be construed as advice to buy or sell a security. Ratings of “outperform” and “underperform” reflect the analyst’s estimation of a divergence between the market value for a security and the price that would be appropriate given the potential for risks and returns relative to other securities. The analyst does not know your particular objectives for returns or constraints upon investing. All investors are encouraged to do their own research before making any investment decision. Information is regularly obtained from Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, and SEC Database. If Yahoo, Google, or the SEC database contained faulty or old information it could be incorporated into my analysis. The analyst holds a diversified portfolio including mutual funds or index funds which may include a small long exposure to the stock.