Tag Archives: industry

6 Reasons Why JETS ETF Could Fly Higher

Gone are the days when aviation companies were ill-famed for their bankruptcy protection status. During 2005 and 2008 , over half of the U.S. carriers functioned under Chapter 11 of bankruptcy protection. But things have changed in the last seven years. Since last year, the U.S. aviation industry has been soaring with oil price going into a tailspin. Moreover, a pickup in the domestic economy, rising cargo demand and a boost to tourism bode well for the sector and the pure play airline ETF U.S. Global Jets ETF (NYSEARCA: JETS ) . The fund was up 6.5% in the last one month though it lost slightly in the first quarter, resulting in a muted year-to-date return of 2.3% (as of August 19, 2015). Since the fund is new in the industry and debuted on April 30, 2015, let’s take a look at the drivers that can take the fund higher in the coming days. To analyze this, we have considered the details provided by U.S. Global Investors in its JETS presentation. Higher Margin & Lower Debt: The U.S. airline industry saw the 10-year best margin performance in 2014. Not only this, U.S. airlines are projected to see huge free cash flows (in the range of $15,000 to $20,000 million) in the coming three years including 2015. These figures represent a remarkable jump from less than $5,000 million of FCF earned in 2014. The debt-ridden airlines are also paying down borrowings over the years. Total debt in proportion of operating revenues came down to 41.4% at the end of 2014 from around 65% at the end of 2010. Surge in Ancillary Revenues: Apart from the key business, supplementary revenues including hotel accommodation, car rentals, onboard food, and travel insurance are all performing well. Restructuring: Modifications in operations and carrier structure are on in full swing. While slimmer seats and the addition of more rows resulted in about a 16 percentage point increase in passenger load factor in 10 years (till Q2 of 2014), fuel-efficient aircraft contributed to energy savings. Limited Capacity Growth: Most airlines recently acknowledged plans of adding lesser fleet in the coming days. While several factors are responsible for this decision, a shortage of pilots is the primary reason. As per U.S. Global Investors’ report, as much as 34% of present pilots will retire by 2021. Solid Earnings: The positive factors led to an immense improvement in the companies’ earnings. The airline stocks gained altitude post Q2. In any case, cheap fuel has been a windfall and will likely remain so in the quarters to come. The mounting middle-income population in emerging markets is benefitting worldwide customer growth. Strong Zacks Metrics: At the time of writing, the sector resides in the top 16% of the Zacks Industry Rank. Most of the industry players have a top Zacks Style Score of ‘A’ for their Growth and Value metrics, suggesting a bullish outlook for the space. By now, one must have realized that the underlying trend is solid in the airlines industry. So, investors might play it via the basket approach to tap the entire potential of the space. And to do so, what could be the best option other than the JETS ETF? The fund holds 33 stocks in its portfolio and is concentrated on a few individual securities, as it allocates about 70% to the top 10 holdings. Southwest (NYSE: LUV ) (12.75%), Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL ) (12.49%), United Continental (NYSE: UAL ) (11.9%) and American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL ) (11.34%) are the top four elements in the basket, with a combined share of about 45%. Other firms mentioned above also get places in the top 10 chart, each with over 4% weight. The product charges 60 bps in fees. Original Post

Long-Term Potential Not Enough To Change Hold Rating On Southern Company, For Now

Summary Company’s strategy of making hefty growth investments in renewable energy generation projects means it is well placed in capital intensive U.S. utility industry. Analysts anticipating a healthy sales growth rate of 2.10%for SO, above the industry median. Strong growth prospects of the company will grow its cash flow base. I reiterate my hold rating on Southern Company (NYSE: SO ) due to the prevailing construction-related challenges at two important power projects of SO. As a matter of fact, the Kemper and Vogtle project delays have restricted its near-term growth potentials, but in the long run, these projects along with SO’s ongoing renewable energy generation related projects will support its top and bottom-line growths. Given the healthy long-term growth potentials of SO, I believe its cash flows will remain reasonably strong in the years ahead, which will help it improve stock price performance by making increasingly healthy dividend payments to shareholders; SO offers a dividend yield of 4.7%. Near Term Concerns But Healthy Long-Term Waits for SO Over the past few years, the U.S. utility industry has gone through a transformational phase due to aggressive spending by utility companies in several infrastructural growth related projects. I believe the industry transformation is not over yet, because companies like SO, American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP ), Exelon (NYSE: EXC ) and Dominion (NYSE: D ) are still making hefty investments to develop and enhance power generation units. The following map shows the capacity and location of new power projects planned for 2015. (click to enlarge) Source: Minnpost.com SO has also been making capital expenditures to strengthen its power generation assets. In fact, SO has made all-time high growth investments in two major energy generation projects named Kemper and Vogtle, but both projects have been facing construction delays, which have increased construction costs for the company. As far as the 582MW Kemper project is concerned, the project was started with the intent to boost the company’s future growth potentials, but the constant delays and cost overruns at the Kemper construction site are weighing on SO’s profits. The company took the additional charge of $14 million (after-tax) during 2Q’15 due to an increase in the construction cost of the Kemper gasification-combined cycle project. In its efforts to cover these cost overruns, SO had previously signed a case for an interim rate hike of 18% for Kemper’s gasification plants in the state; the rate increase request is recently approved by regulators, which will allow the company to partially offset the increase in construction cost. Although SO’s management expects Kemper to be operational in the first half of 2016, if the project continues to be affected by project delays and cost overruns, I believe the recent rate hike will fail to cover the cost overruns in the longer run, thereby disrupting the company’s profitable margins. Moreover, SO’s plan to build two Vogtle nuclear power plants in Georgia is facing similar delays. Although the management has predicted a three-year delay in the Vogtle project, as per the government’s review, the project will be delayed longer than three-years, costing the company around $8.2 billion . Although issues related to Kemper and Vogtle are both key concerns for the company’s profits, with the commencement of their operations, both projects will act as vital sources of generating strong revenues, earnings and cash flows in the years ahead. Moreover, SO is working hard to grow its renewable energy generation portfolio to hedge against fossil fuel risk and to supply low-cost power to customers. In fact, there are many ongoing and upcoming solar energy generation projects by the company, which contain a strong upside for its future earnings and cash flows. As part of its plan to establish a strong renewable energy generation asset base, SO had acquired the Blackwell Solar facility. Although the acquired facility is currently under construction phase, with the completion of construction, the acquired facility will help the company serve around 11,000 homes. In addition, SO’s plan to construct a new 46MW solar energy generation facility at Marine Corps Logistic Base-Albany has been approved by regulators, which is expected to commence operations by the end of 2016. With this approval, the company’s subsidiary Georgia Power has attained 166MW of solar generation capacity on Georgian military bases. Given the fact that all of the abovementioned power generation projects of SO will improve its production capacity and optimize its power generation portfolio, I expect to witness strong revenues, stable cash flows and healthy earnings growth in the longer run. Analysts are also expecting that SO’s earnings will grow at a decent pace in the years ahead, as shown in the chart below. (click to enlarge) Source: Nasdaq.com Furthermore, SO’s management is also working to convert existing coal-based power generation plants to gas plants. The company has announced in a press release that its 120MW Gadsden plant in Alabama will be switched from a combination of natural gas and coal to entirely natural gas. Given the fact that SO has incurred around $3 billion over the last decade to meet regulatory standards regarding limitation of carbon dioxide emission from coal base plants, I believe the conversion of Gadsden plant on natural gas is a good step by the company, as this allows it to comply with regulations and will portend well for its profit margins in the long term. Investors Remain Rewarded at SO The company has been making healthy cash returns to its shareholders through dividends. Year-to-date in 2015, SO has returned around $34 million in the form of dividends to its shareholders. These healthy dividend payments have earned it an attractive dividend yield of 4.70% . Given the strong growth potentials of the company’s growth investments, I believe SO will have strong cash flows to carry on its policy of making hefty dividend payments in the years ahead. Analysts have also projected growth in the company’s book value per share and cash flow per share, as shown in the chart below. (click to enlarge) Source: 4-traders.com Risks Continuous increases in construction costs at Kemper and Vogtle plants will remain an overhang for the company’s profits in future. In addition, any laxness exhibited by the management during the operational stage of ongoing renewable energy generation projects will result in SO’s failure to report financial numbers as per the management’s plans. Furthermore, harsh weather conditions, unforeseen negative economic changes, strict government regulations and taxes to limit carbon dioxide emissions from nuclear units are key risks that might hamper the company’s future stock price performance. Conclusion Despite the current cost overruns and project delays at SO, the company’s strategy of making hefty growth investments in renewable energy generation projects makes me believe that it is well placed in the capital intensive U.S. utility industry. Analysts also view the company’s long-term growth prospects positively, as indicated by their anticipated healthy sales growth rate of 2.10% , which is well above the industry median of 1.80%. Moreover, the strong growth prospects of the company will grow its cash flow base, meaning more upside for its future dividends. Also, analysts have projected a decent next five-years growth rate of 3.55% for SO. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Today’s Strongly Competitive Wealth-Builder Sector ETF Investment

Summary From a population of some 350 actively-traded, substantial, and growing ETFs, this is a currently attractive addition to a portfolio whose principal objective is wealth accumulation by active investing. We daily evaluate future near-term price gain prospects for quality, market-seasoned ETFs, based on the expectations of market-makers [MMs], drawing on their insights from client order-flows. The analysis of our subject ETFs’ price prospects is reinforced by parallel MM forecasts for each of the ETF’s ten largest holdings. Qualitative appraisals of the forecasts are derived from how well the MMs have foreseen subsequent price behaviors following prior forecasts similar to today’s. Size of prospective gains, odds of winning transactions, worst-case price drawdowns, and marketability measures are all taken into account. Today’s most attractive ETF Today’s most attractive ETF is the SPDR S&P Retail ETF (NYSEARCA: XRT ). The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the retail segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Retail Select Industry Index (the “index”), the fund employs a sampling strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the retail industry group of the S&P Total Market Index (“S&P TMI”). The fund is non-diversified (Description from Yahoo Finance) Figure 1 (used with permission) The vertical lines of Figure 1 are a visual history of forward-looking expectations of coming prices for the subject ETF. They are not a backward-in-time look at actual daily price ranges, but the heavy dot in each range is the ending market quote of the day the forecast was made. What is important in the picture is the balance of upside prospects in comparison to downside concerns. That ratio is expressed in the Range Index [RI], whose number tells what percentage of the whole range lies below the then current price. Today’s Range Index is used to evaluate how well prior forecasts of similar RIs for this ETF have previously worked out. The size of that historic sample is given near the right-hand end of the data line below the picture. The current RI’s size in relation to all available RIs of the past 5 years is indicated in the small blue thumbnail distribution at the bottom of Figure 1. The first items in the data line are current information: The current high and low of the forecast range, and the percent change from the market quote to the top of the range, as a sell target. The Range Index is of the current forecast. Other items of data are all derived from the history of prior forecasts. They stem from applying a T ime- E fficient R isk M anagement D iscipline to hypothetical holdings initiated by the MM forecasts. That discipline requires a next-day closing price cost position be held no longer than 63 market days (3 months) unless first encountered by a market close equal to or above the sell target. The net payoffs are the cumulative average simple percent gains of all such forecast positions, including losses. Days held are average market rather than calendar days held in the sample positions. Drawdown exposure indicates the typical worst-case price experience during those holding periods. Win odds tells what percentage proportion of the sample recovered from the drawdowns to produce a gain. The cred(ibility) ratio compares the sell target prospect with the historic net payoff experiences. Figure 2 provides a longer-time perspective by drawing a once-a week look from the Figure 1 source forecasts, back over two years. Figure 2 (used with permission) What does this ETF hold, causing such price expectations? Figure 3 is a table of securities held by the subject ETF, indicating its concentration in the top ten largest holdings, and their percentage of the ETF’s total value. Figure 3 source: Yahoo Finance XRT apparently takes a low-concentration approach to holdings, with an average of 1¼% of its assets in each of its top ten commitments. This provides a wide dispersion of holdings among competitive investment contestants in an industry where success rewards can be huge, while failures may be complete. If the remaining 88% of assets are distributed on a comparable basis 99 separate bets may be being made, offering great diversification, as well as dilution of encountered bonanzas. Where ultimate payoffs are less dependent on initial capital commitment size, this may be an advantaged strategy. Figure 4 is a table of data lines similar to that contained in Figure 1, for each of the top ten holdings of XRT. Figure 4 (click to enlarge) In an industry as unpredictably dynamic as this, wide variations in market experience seem to be the rule. Column (5) contains the upside price change forecasts between current market prices and the upper limit of prices regarded by MMs as being worth paying for price change protection. The average of +10.2% of the top ten XRT holdings is near the population average of all 2600+ equities MM forecasts of +13.4%. It is about double the upside forecast for SPY price change prospects. The other side of the coin is column (6), which shows what actual worst-case price drawdowns have been typical in the 3 months following each time there has been a forecast like those of the present day. Those risk exposures have been about -7% in the holdings top ten, less than -9 by equities at large, and only -3.2% on the SPY ETF. But these holdings are attractive reward tradeoffs between returns and risks, with the top ten (column 14) at a ratio of 1.4, compared to equities overall at 1.6 times. The market average of SPY provides a ratio of 1.6 times risk avoidance. Another qualitative consideration is the credibility of the ten XRT big holdings after previous forecasts like today’s. The net average price change (column 13) of the ten has been only 0.5 times the size of the upside forecast average, +4.8% compared to +10.2%. The equity population’s actual price gain achievement, net of losses has been a pitiful +3.3% compared to promises of 13.4%. The ability of XRT holdings to recover from those worst-case drawdowns and achieve profits occurred in 75% of experiences. The equity population only recovered less than two thirds of the time, and while the SPY experiences were more consistent like the ten XRT holdings, the achieved gains were much smaller. SPY has had only +3.2% gains previously from like forecasts of +5.2%. The 20 top prospective equities from our overall equity population have superior credentials historically, given the past performance of present MM price range outlooks. Their reward-risk score of 1.8 is the highest of the four blue row averages. Their price recovery ability at 89% contributes mightily to their upside price forecast credibility and their % payoff achievement. Moving to targets more quickly than others has generated annual rates of gain (11) three times the XRT holdings and five times the rate of the population and market average. Conclusion XRT provides competitive forecast price gains in comparison to many other sector ETFs, supported by the outlooks for their largest holdings. Both the ETF and many of its major holdings offer strong prospects in near-term price behaviors, demonstrated by previous experiences following prior similar forecasts by market makers. In a market environment many consider to be at risk they present a reasonable defensive alternative. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.