Tag Archives: ideas

Top-Ranked ETFs To Tap India’s Growth Story

Finally, a slew of economic reforms including four rate cuts this year have started to pay off and stimulate growth in Asia’s third-largest economy. This is especially true as India picked up momentum with 7.4% growth in the second quarter (ending September). While this is far below the year-ago growth of 8.9%, it is up from 7% recorded in the first quarter and the market expectation of 7.3%, as per Reuters. Bright Spots A major boost to the economy came from solid progress in the manufacturing, mining and service sectors. Agriculture, industrial, automobiles and consumer durables are witnessing strong growth while investments are also showing signs of recovery. Additionally, current account deficit has narrowed and the currency has moved up significantly. Further, lower oil prices and rising consumer spending have added to economic strength. In particular, the current account deficit has narrowed sharply to around 1.3% of GDP in fiscal 2014-2015, below 1.7% in fiscal 2013-2014. Trade deficit in the first seven months of the current fiscal (April-October) contracted to $77.76 billion from $86.26 billion. Though inflation rose to 5% in October from 4.41% in September, it is expected to decline once the festival season ends. The central bank expects inflation to reach 6% by January 2016 and then moderate to 5% by March 2017. Given the positive developments, India has now become the world’s fastest-growing economy, outpacing China, and remains a bright spot given that most emerging economies are struggling to revamp growth. The Reserve Bank of India expects the country’s economy to grow 7.4% annually for fiscal 2015-2016 and the World Bank projects economic growth of 7.5% for the current fiscal year, followed by further acceleration to 7.8% in 2016-17 and 7.9% in 2017-18. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) also sees robust growth prospects in India compared to the other emerging markets. It expects GDP growth to remain above 7% in the coming years fueled by more structural reforms. India ETFs to Buy Based on a speedy recovery and bright outlook, we recommend investors to buy India ETFs at least for the short term. For interested investors, we have found a number of top-ranked ETFs in the broad emerging Asia-Pacific space targeting India that have a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 or ‘Buy’ rating and are thus expected to outperform in the upcoming months. Among these, the following five funds could be good choices to play in the coming months and have potentially superior weighting methodologies which could allow them to continue leading the emerging Asia-Pacific space in the months ahead. iShares MSCI India ETF (BATS: INDA ) This ETF follows the MSCI India Total Return Index and charges 68 bps in fees per year from investors. Holding 72 stocks in its basket, the fund is highly concentrated on the top two firms – Infosys (NYSE: INFY ) and Housing Development Finance Corp. ( OTC:HSDGY ) – that together make up for 20.2% of total assets. Other firms hold no more than 6.63% share. Further, the product is slightly tilted toward the information technology sector at 21.7% while financials, consumer staples, health care, and consumer discretionary round off the top five. INDA is the largest and popular ETF in this space with AUM of over $3.5 billion and average trading volume of more than 2 million shares a day. The fund is down 7.9% in the year-to-date time frame. WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (NYSEARCA: EPI ) This product tracks the WisdomTree India Earnings Index, holding 238 profitable companies using an earnings-weighted methodology. Reliance Industries and Infosys occupy the top two positions with a combined 17.9% of assets while other firms hold less than 5.8% share. The fund is heavy on financials with one-fourth share, while energy and information technology also get double-digit allocation in the basket. The fund has amassed nearly $1.7 billion and trades in volume of more than 4.8 million shares a day. Expense ratio came in at 0.83%. The fund has lost about 9% over the trailing one year. iShares India 50 ETF (NASDAQ: INDY ) This ETF provides exposure to the largest 53 Indian stocks by tracking the CNX Nifty Index. It is pretty well spread out across components with none of the securities holding more than 7.73% of assets. With respect to sector holdings, financials takes the top spot at 26%, closely followed by information technology (16%), consumer discretionary (11%) and energy (10%). The product has managed assets worth $814.9 million and trades in good volume of nearly 320,000 million shares a day. It is the high cost choice in the space, charging 93 bps. The product shed 8.4% in the trailing one-year period. PowerShares India Portfolio (NYSEARCA: PIN ) This fund offers exposure to the basket of 50 stocks selected from the universe of the largest companies listed on two major Indian exchanges by tracking Indus India. The top two firms – Infosys and Reliance Industries – take double-digit exposure each while the other firms hold no more than 5.6% share. From a sector look, the fund is tilted toward energy and information technology, each accounting for over 20% share, followed by financials (12.1%) and health care (10.8%). The fund has amassed $431.7 million in its asset base and trades in solid volume of around 1.3 million shares a day on average. It charges a higher expense ratio of 85 bps and has lost 7.7% in the year-to-date timeframe. Market Vectors India Small-Cap Fund (NYSEARCA: SCIF ) This fund targets the small cap segment and tracks the Market Vectors India Small-Cap Index. In total, it holds 135 securities in its basket with none making up for more than 3.21% of assets. Here again, financials occupies the top position from a sector look at 28.3% while industrials, consumer discretionary, and information technology round off the next three spots. The fund has so far amassed $203.5 million in its asset base while charging 89 bps in annual fees. Volume is good, exchanging around 105,000 shares in hand a day. Bottom Line Given the current trends and favorable dynamics, India will likely get a solid boost. So a solid play on the country might be a good idea. This is especially true if investors take a closer look at the top-ranked ETFs in the space for excellent exposure and some outperformance in the coming months. Original Post

Managing ETF Liquidity

Over the years, certain ETFs have had problems with pricing in the face of extreme market events. If you use ETFs, then you should read the article to better understand the potential drawbacks to using ETFs; but there are also drawbacks to traditional funds as well as individual issues. A fundamental building block for how I view just about everything is to try to give myself as many options as possible, and it relates here. By Roger Nusbaum, AdvisorShares ETF Strategist ETF.com had a detailed post titled ” How Illiquid Are Bond ETFs, Really? ” Over the years, certain ETFs have had problems with pricing in the face of extreme market events. This first came to the fore in the fall of 2008 for fixed income funds, when the bond market didn’t function correctly for a short while (subjectively you may think a long while, as the markets for commercial paper and floating-rate preferreds were devastated). Since then, there have been a couple of other instances where ETFs “didn’t work” for a very short period. Part of the equation, as we learned in 2008, was that ETFs trade more regularly than the things they track. However, this can be true for fixed income markets, for example, but typically not for domestic equities, which is a point Dave Nadig explores in great detail in the above-linked article. If you use ETFs, then you should read the article to better understand the potential drawbacks to using ETFs; but there are also drawbacks to traditional funds as well as individual issues. One solution is to not invest at all, which I am not dismissive of, but the drawback there would be the need for a much higher savings rate. It has been three months since that 1000-point down open for the Dow, when a lot of these ETF issues popped up again in conjunction with investors and advisors getting whipsawed badly as stop order selected based on an inefficient open where funds traded at very wide discounts. As an “oh by the way,” if you missed it, the NYSE and Nasdaq will no longer accept stop orders. The idea that investment products have drawbacks is not a new one as far as this blog is concerned, but maybe it is correct to that the drawbacks are evolving, or we are learning more about them at least as far as ETFs are concerned. Where there is risk that ETFs may not price correctly or efficiently, it makes sense to position yourself where you are not subject to the risk, specifically being in the position where you must sell when one of these extreme market events is under way. This is not a comment about timing the market, but more like “Ok, the market just fell 8% in ten minutes, it’s probably not a good time to sell for the monthly withdrawal or rebalance.” (Assuming speculating on an extreme market event is not part of the investment strategy.) I also think this is an argument against an all-something (ETF, traditional fund, individual issue) portfolio, as opposed to having various types of products. It is also about cash management. Most advisors will tell you not put money into the stock market that you might or will need within five years, like a down payment for a house or college tuition, with the idea being that five years may not be enough time to recover from a large market decline. While keeping five years of cash on hand as part of an investment strategy in retirement is not ideal, it makes sense to stay ahead of the regular withdrawal need by a couple of months or so. That way, an intention to sell on the morning of August 24th can be pushed back to avoid participating in temporarily extreme trading. Emergency needs can also be mitigated. We talked about this before, but in addition to regular spending, there are one-off events that can be budgeted for very easily, and that do seem to come up semi-regularly. Examples of this includes new tires, vet bills (one of our dogs tore her cruciate in October), something with the house and so on. I am a fan of segregating several months of emergency funding, maybe assuming $1000/month, and all the better if not all of it gets spent, but it is another way of not selling today because you have today to pay for something. A fundamental building block for how I view just about everything is to try to give myself as many options as possible, and it relates here. ETFs offer access and ease of diversification, so instead of avoiding them, understand the drawbacks, insulate against those drawbacks and use different types of products. It doesn’t really matter if an ETF traded at a 20% discount to its IIV for 40 minutes on August 24th, except to the person who sold in the middle of that because he “had to.”

Historical Rates Impact Common Stocks

Summary We think there is a recency bias surrounding interest rates. Historical rates are in the band between 3% and 6%. We believe rates will rise when there is a demand for credit, which can be a good thing for common stock owners. Time and coincidence often cloud our own perception. Consider interest rates. Baby Boomers and Generation Xers became adults (25 or older) between 1965 and 2005. During that period, these adults witnessed an aberration in the history of interest rates. They saw moments of monumental highs (20%) and levels consistently above historical norms. The chart below shows that long- and short-term interest rates in the United States have spent most of the last 400 years in a range between 3% and 6%. We contend that this deviation clouds the judgment and expectations of many of today’s investors. There are numerous implications for long-duration common stock owners arising from the examination of historical interest rates. Intrinsic Value Computations The father of value investing, Ben Graham, concluded through his years of research that 10-year corporate bonds averaged 4.4%. Therefore, in his revised intrinsic value equation, he used 4.4% as the numerator for adjusting intrinsic value based on interest rate fluctuations. This long-term interest rate chart supports the validity of his choice, and is right in the middle of the 3-6% historical range. One could argue that long-duration equity investors have been using discount rates in their intrinsic value calculations much higher than historical interest rates justify. This is likely due to the unusually high rates of the period between 1965 and 2005, a recency bias. Commitment of Capital to Bond Investments In 1980, the prime interest rate at the major banks was 20%. Long-term Treasuries peaked at 15% in early 1981. Inflation topped out in 1981 at 11%. Thirty-year fixed mortgages were issued as high as 17%. What people didn’t realize at the time was that they were living through a five-standard deviation event, according to history. Even if inflation had stayed at 11%, those interest rates offered investors very high inflation-adjusted returns. As the famous bond investor Bill Gross has argued, this laid the groundwork for more than 30 years of declining interest rates and a normalization back into the band between 3% and 6%. This has rewarded bond investors and got them addicted to an asset-allocation commitment based on lookback returns which are statistically unlikely. Interest rates are currently below the historical 3-6% range, and will likely rebound over the next 10 years into the historically normal band. We believe common stock buyers should include that likelihood in their stock selection methodology, whether in their intrinsic value calculations or in the effect that higher rates in the U.S. have on the U.S. dollar and overall economic growth in the country. We contend that the surprise in the U.S. will be how much stronger economic growth will be than what is expected. How else can rates go up, unless someone demands the capital via borrowing? Need for Solid Returns for Investors Owners of wealth in the form of liquid assets have an economic need in both low and high interest rate time periods. They need to earn a return above inflation to defend the purchasing power of their liquid asset pool. Ownership of long-duration common stocks has proven to be superior to that of other liquid assets over long time periods, except for the 10-year stretch from 1999 to 2008. As 10-year Treasuries fell to 1.6% in 2008 and stocks were liquidated in the financial crisis, two five-standard deviation events conspired to elevate bond investments in popularity and thrust bond portfolio managers into god-like status. We think a good rule of thumb is to avoid portfolio success stories created by five-standard deviation events. These only happen 2.5% of the time. Rather than being preoccupied with the consensus of investors, we believe building our portfolio around high-probability events is much more valuable to the long-term investor. Industries Benefited By Higher Rates in the 3-6% Range We have argued ad nauseam that common stock investors have two possibilities in front of them as it pertains to interest rates. If interest rates were to rise back into the 3-6% historically normal band, there must be forces which demand the money and industries which benefit from the forces that cause the rise in rates. If rates stay below the historical band, intrinsic value calculations using discount rates above the historical average will undervalue common stocks. Certain industries would welcome higher interest rates. Insurers must earn interest on collected premiums, banks would like to charge more for loans, and homebuilders would like to have so many customers for new homes that the resulting demand for money drives up interest rates. Consumer discretionary companies would love to see a level of prosperity which would drive retail sales and liberal advertising budgets. Drug and biotech companies would like everyone to be able to afford the fantastic new medicines they will introduce in the next 10 years. In summary, above-average returns don’t come along without taking risk. Investors have become very comfortable with today’s historically low interest rates, and fear continued poor economic growth rates. Equity portfolio managers use discount rates higher than today’s actual rates because of the abnormally high rates of the last 40 years. Lastly, the contrary long-duration common stock investor should be attracted to industries which benefit from the gravitation back into the historically normal returns from the bond market. The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Bill Smead, CIO and CEO, wrote this article. It should not be assumed that investing in any securities mentioned above will or will not be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management within the past 12-month period is available upon request.