Tag Archives: ideas

Spinoffs: Looking For Value

Investing in and around spinoffs has been an extremely lucrative endeavor over the past decade, according to the Nov. 30 issue of Value Investor Insight. Indeed, since the end of 2002, Bloomberg has maintained a U.S. Spin-Off Index, which tracks the share prices of newly spun-off companies with market capitalizations of more than $1 billion for three years after they begin trading. Over the near 13-year period tracked, Bloomberg’s U.S. Spin-Off Index has risen 557%, compared to a return of 137% for the S&P 500. Moreover, spinoff activity is close to an all-time high as companies, spurred on by activists, try to unlock value for shareholders by splitting up their businesses. This year’s total number of spinoffs is expected to be 49, the fourth-highest level on record. However, more often than not, due to a number of factors, spinoffs are mispriced by the market, which can lead to some very attractive opportunities for value investors. In this month’s issue of Value Investor Insight , four spinoff experts – Murray Stahl of Horizon Kinetics, Joe Cornell of Spin-Off Advisors, The London Company’s Jeff Markunas and Jim Roumell of Roumell Asset Management – discuss the key factors that lead to spinoff mispricing and where they’re looking for opportunity today. (click to enlarge) Spinoffs: Four key factors There are four key structural factors that can lead to spinoffs being mispriced : Limited information – The documentation filed with the SEC when companies split can be quite complex, and the pro-forma financials can be difficult to analyze. Moreover, analyst coverage tends to be limited, and investors, rather than do the legwork themselves, would rather look elsewhere. Forced selling – A spinoff may see a parent company force a SpinCo onto a shareholder that doesn’t want, or legally can’t hold the shares, which will lead to selling. An S&P 500 Index fund can’t own a spinoff company outside the index, for example. Sandbagging – SpinCo managements usually receive significant financial incentives to underperform and over-deliver. Top managers’ incentive stock plans are typically based on average share prices of the spinoff company for the first 20 or so days of trading after the spinoff, which can lead to sandbagging of the highest order before those prices are locked in. ” Capitalism works ” – According to Value Investors Insight , when a SpinCo leaves its parent, “pent-up entrepreneurial forces are unleashed” as “the combination of accountability, responsibility, and more direct incentives take their natural course.” In other words, without the parent, the newly independent company can take advantage of capitalist forces to improve performance. Spinoffs: Looking for value So what do the experts look for in a good spinoff? According to Murray Stahl of Horizon Kinetics, there are four key characteristics to look for when a company spins off an unwanted subsidiary or division. First, a higher-margin business is spinning off a lower-margin business. Second, CEO movements. If the CEO of the larger company decides the best place to be is with the spinoff it’s, “a message to heed.” There’s also the capital structure of the SpinCo to consider. Too much debt dumped on the SpinCo from the parent can be a burden that haunts the company and strangles growth. That said, if figures show that the debt can be paid down over time, this creates an opportunity, like a publicly-traded leveraged buyout, according to Murray Stahl. And the last spinoff situation that creates an opportunity for profit is the very small spinoff that those engaged in industrial-scale money management are unable or unwilling to own (market cap

Stay Out Of The Junkyard: Low-Priced Stocks Are Hazardous To Your (Financial) Health

My last post generated a fair amount of negative feedback on my Yahoo Finance page and on Twitter . There’s nothing quite like waking up in the morning and being called an idiot (and worse) by all sorts of strangers on the internet. I understand that people have strong feelings about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but I have to say, the vitriol of the comments took me by surprise. Setting aside whether it was fair (or legal) for the government to change the bailout terms for Fannie and Freddie, my main point in writing about the two giant GSEs seemed rather straightforward: the low-priced stocks and preferred shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are extremely risky investments. If Washington formally nationalizes these companies (or does so informally, as it seems to be doing right now), there is a good chance that their stocks will go to zero. Sure, the big hedge funds and their armadas of lawyers might prevail in court and win the return of the companies’ dividends to shareholders. But even if that happens, it will probably take years. As I wrote in the last line of the post, “There are easier ways to make money.” The broader lesson of the GSEs for both retail and professional investors can be stated in four words: What do I mean by junk stocks? There are all sorts of ways to answer that question. Usually, junk stocks are defined as companies with shrinking revenues, outsized debt loads and negative cash flows. But there’s an easy way to spot junk stocks without digging through financial disclosures: if a stock is below five bucks, it is more than likely a troubled mess not worth investing in. As I write in my book Dead Companies Walking , the vast majority of low-single digit stocks in the market are over – not under- priced. Almost all of them have been relegated to the stock market pick-n-pull for one (or more) of three reasons: a bad business, a bad management team, or a bad balance sheet. It’s not uncommon for companies with sub-$5 stock prices to suffer from all three of these maladies. Yet, many investors cannot resist the temptation to buy these jalopies, hoping for a turnaround that almost never happens. Like vintage cars, a small percentage of cast-off stocks do defy the (very long) odds and regain their former glory. But here’s the thing pick-n-pull investors fail to understand: those stocks are even better buys at $8 or $10 than they were at $2 or $4. Why? Because improving fundamentals have taken hold by then, and the wider market has taken notice. Good news spreads quickly, and healthy, wealthy, and popular companies tend to get healthier, wealthier, and more popular as cash flows fatten and more investors pile in. Consider how brutally top-heavy the markets have been this year. At the end of July, I (lightly) cautioned investors to be wary of the high-flying FANG quartet – Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ), Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ), and Google ( GOOG , GOOGL ) – saying that any correction in the tech sector could also drag these stocks down to earth again. So much for market forecasting. Shortly after I wrote that post, the market did go through a correction. The FANGs fell along with everyone else, but they’ve all charged to new highs since then. If you add the other two largest tech companies (Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ) and Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL )) to the FANGs, these six behemoths now comprise 12 percent of the S&P 500’s $18.5 trillion total market capitalization, and have accounted for just about all of the index’s gains this year. If these half dozen names were flat, not up, the S&P would be down 1.5 percent year to date instead of up 1 percent. More importantly from an investment standpoint, the likelihood that any of them will go broke is exactly nil. They all have rapid revenue growth, strong balance sheets, capable Boards and highly educated employees. Those attributes are much harder to find at troubled companies with sub-$5 stock prices. The top-heaviness of the current market might be extreme, but it isn’t new. Historically, a minority of stocks have always outperformed the overall market over any lengthy time period. All the major indexes (minus the Dow) are market capitalization weighted. That means a few mega-cap winners, like Google or Amazon, can (and often do) offset the stock price declines at dozens, or even hundreds, of smaller companies. Though I usually don’t buy the stocks of large, widely analyzed businesses, my own returns as a fund manager bear this out. My best performance has occurred when most of my shorts are below $10 (and hopefully heading toward zero) and my longs are pricier. In years where junk outperforms value (like 2003 and 2009), I tend to underperform. A few years back, Blackstar Funds analyzed the returns of the Russell 3000 between 1983 and 2007. Even for a cynic like me, the bearish results were shocking. Of the 8000+ stocks that were either in the Russell 3000 originally or that entered it at some point during the study period (usually via an IPO), 39 percent produced a negative lifetime total return – with 19 percent losing over 75 percent. Only 1 in 5 stocks produced a 300 percent or greater return. And yet, over that same time period, the Russell 3000 gained over 1000 percent – all because a small handful of large winners crushed the median stock’s advance. In life and in the stock market, the rich tend to get richer. For everyone else, it’s a different story. Original Post

4 Sector ETFs On Sale

A string of woes have held back the U.S. market this year, with the S&P 500 adding just about 2.5% so far. Global growth issues, Fed lift-off worries and a surging greenback are coming in the way of the markets’ outperformance. While many may hope for a sharp revival in the market in 2016 following such a slow year, Goldman Sachs’ latest prediction points to the same story next year. Considering dividends, Goldman estimates stocks to return merely 3% next year. The renowned investment banker also raised overvaluation concerns over the U.S. market. This statement very well motivates investors to search for a value sector, if there is any left at all. A value play is especially required given the broad-based revenue weakness noticed in Q3, not only among multinationals but also within small-cap companies. After all, the low valuation might lead investors to some quality sector buys at best prices. No doubt, with all the major indices trading at around all-time highs, it is hard to find value plays at home. But for those investors ardently seeking undervalued sectors, there are still a few hidden treasures out there. While several indicators are used to find out any stock or sector’s valuation status, price-to-earnings ratio or P/E has been the most widespread. We have identified four sector picks having the lowest forward P/E ratio for next year’s earnings in the pack of 16 S&P sectors classified by Zacks and detail the related ETFs to play those sectors’ undervalued status. Auto – First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto ETF (NASDAQ: CARZ ) The U.S. automotive industry is on high gear. A strong labor market, persistently lower energy prices, increasing aging vehicles on road and a still-low interest rate environment made the first half of 2015 the best six months in a decade for auto sales. Though the Fed is poised to raise key interest rates in December, it will opt for a slower rate hike trajectory. So, auto loans are presently feared to get pricy. Despite strong fundamentals, the sector has a P/E ratio of 9.9 times for 2015 and 8.8 times for 2016, the lowest in the S&P universe, as per the Zacks Earnings Trend issued on November 18. Investors should note that the P/E of the auto industry trades at a 43.8% discount to the current year P/E of S&P and 45.7% discount to the next year P/E. The space is down 12.1% so far this year, implying that the auto stocks are yet to capitalize on the sector’s momentum. Investors should note that there is only one pure play CARZ in the space that provides global exposure to nearly 40 auto stocks by tracking the Nasdaq OMX Global Auto Index. CARZ has a Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy) and is up 1.4% so far this year (as of December 1, 2015). Transportation – iShares Dow Jones Transportation Average Fund (NYSEARCA: IYT ) This is yet another sector which failed to make the most of improving economic activities. The sector’s pricing is down 13.2% year to date. While a strong dollar will definitely play foul with the profits of big transporters, tailwinds including a stepped-up economy and cheap fuel are still in fine fettle. This raises optimism on the future of the transportation sector. This is especially true as total earnings of the sector were up 22.5% in Q3 while revenues declined 1.3%. This is much better than Q2 earnings growth of 9.4% and revenue decline of 1.9% for the same period. Revenues are forecast to grow from the first quarter of 2016. The current and the next year P/Es for the sector are 12.2 times each, reflecting a 30.7% and 24.7% discount to the S&P 500, respectively. One way to play this trend is with IYT, which tracks the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index that holds 20 stocks in its basket. The fund has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a High risk outlook. The fund is off 10% so far this year (as of December 1, 2015). Finance – SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (NYSEARCA: KRE ) With the looming prospect of a lift-off, all eyes will be on financial stocks and ETFs. While the operating backdrop of financial stocks has improved a lot from the recession-cursed phase, a potential rising rate environment is another positive for the financial ETFs. The space has a current-year P/E of 13.6 times, reflecting a 22.7% discount to the S&P while its next year P/E stands at 12.8 times, a 21% discount to the S&P 500’s 2016 P/E. The space has lost 1.7% so far this year (as of November 27, 2015). While there are plenty of financial ETFs, investors can take a look at Zacks #2 ETF KRE. The bank fund is up 12.4% so far this year. Utilities – PowerShares S&P SmallCap Utilities ETF (NASDAQ: PSCU ) Utilities will be hurt by the Fed lift-off as this sector underperforms in a rising rate environment. But the space is expected to score positive earnings growth from the second quarter of 2016. The space has a current-year P/E of 15.7 times, reflecting a 10.8% discount to the S&P while its next year P/E stands at 15.3 times, a 5.6% discount to the S&P 500’s 2016 P/E. The space has lost 13.4% so far this year (as of November 27, 2015). However, investors should note that utility is a risky bet at this point of time. We thus highlight the small-cap utility ETF as small-cap stocks deal more with the reasonably expanding U.S. economy and also offer less exposure to the greenback. PSCU is up 4.1% so far this year (as of December 1, 2015). Original Post