Tag Archives: gift

On The Statistical Significance Of The Knowledge Factor

Over the last week or so we’ve been highlighting how factor investing is not as cut and dry as advertised . The traditional simple factors (value, size, momentum, quality, low volatility) sometimes work and sometimes don’t so investors are left to make educated guesses about which factors will work in any given year. Here we’re defining “work” as these factors’ outperformance, or not, of the broad equity market. But the Knowledge Factor (the Gavekal Knowledge Leaders Developed World Index) doesn’t appear to have this same limitation. As we’ve shown already two times in the last five days, the Knowledge Factor – the tenancy of highly innovative companies to realize excess stock market performance – is the only factor that delivers consistent outperformance vs the global stock market. In the first chart below we show the yearly binary relative out/under performance of each MSCI Factor index relative to the MSCI World Index itself. A blue line and a +1 represents a year of outperformance for that factor and a red line and a -1 represents a year of underperformance. The results speak for themselves as it’s clear that there is no discernible trend in the out or underperformance of the five MSCI simple factors on a yearly basis. Said differently, sometimes the factor exposures outperform and sometimes they don’t. The top line that shows the Knowledge Factor’s relative performance is as stable as it gets, returning less than the MSCI World Index only twice in 16 years. Click to enlarge This next chart shows the cumulative performance since 2000 for each of the MSCI simple factors and the Knowledge Factor (the bars) and the yearly hit rate of outperformance relative to the MSCI World Index (the stars). Over time, the stable outperformance of the Knowledge Factor has resulted in by far the highest total return of any factor over the last two full market cycles. Click to enlarge Having laid out the above, we then analyzed the performance of the Knowledge Factor to see if there were certain market environments which were not supportive of the Factor’s outperformance. We looked at bull markets and bear markets, periods of rising and falling interest rates, periods of rising and falling commodity prices, and periods of rising and falling inflation trends. We observed no market environment in which the Knowledge Factor did not outperform the MSCI World Index, leading us to conclude that the Knowledge Factor is the gift that keeps on giving . Statistical Analysis: Today we want to take a slightly different tack to try to understand the sources of performance of the Knowledge Factor (the Gavekal Knowledge Leaders Developed World Index). We’re going to decompose the return of the Knowledge Factor to see if underlying simple factor tilts are the sole reason for this factor’s outperformance. If the Knowledge Factor is just an intelligent combination of the simple factors, then the return stream could be easily replicated and the relative performance of the Knowledge Factor described above would lose significance. To test the hypothesis that the Knowledge Factor adds value (aka Alpha) even after taking into account of any underlying factor exposure, we show a multiple regression of the since 2000 return stream of the Knowledge Factor (dependent variable) vs the all the MSCI simple factors (the independent variables). Given the below ANOVA table we observe the following: This factor exposure model does a good job explaining the return stream of the Knowledge Factor (the Gavekal Knowledge Leaders Developed World Index) because the adjusted r-square is .95, meaning that 95% of the Knowledge Leaders Index return stream is explained by this model. All of the beta coefficients except the Size Factor coefficient are in the single digits and none of the individual beta coefficients are statistically significant. In other words, there are no large factor tilts in the Knowledge Leaders Index returns and any factor tilts observed in the model cannot be statistically relied upon given the low t-stats and high p-values. Said even differently, none of the MSCI simple factors, in isolation or combined, can explain the returns of the Knowledge Factor. Even after taking into account the incredibly small and insignificant factor exposures, the Knowledge Factor has a highly statistically significant unexplained annualized alpha of 3.18%. We know the 3.18% alpha is statistically significant because the t-stat is greater than 2 and the p-value is close to zero. These results indicate that the Knowledge Factor is not simply an aggregation of the simple factors. The returns of the Knowledge Factor are all-together different than the return streams of the simple factors. This goes a long way in explaining why the Knowledge Factor consistently outperforms global stocks on a yearly basis and outperforms in all the market environments studied. There are no underlying factor tilts dictating the performance of Knowledge Leaders except the Knowledge Factor itself, which is the systematic mispricing of highly innovative companies. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Alternatives For The Future

The article first appeared in the December issue of REP . magazine and online at WealthManagement.com Along with other Yuletide treats, some Yanks are now anticipating the gift of a Fed rate hike. Better-than-expected employment numbers, an uptick in the manufacturing sector and pickup in wages have given the U.S. central bank the backstory for normalizing the nation’s monetary policy. The odds of a rate step-up, implied by Federal Funds futures, shot up from 7 percent to 70 percent in November. Simultaneously, expectations pushed the Treasury long bond yield up nearly a quarter of a point, effectively discounting the Fed’s anticipated action. Now that the markets have priced in the first Fed rate hike, it’s debatable whether it will be “one-and-done,” or the first step along a steady path of snugging. Either way, the die is cast: Rates are bound to rise, and sooner rather than later. With the coming of the end of the zero-rate environment, investors and advisors must rethink their portfolio strategies, most especially their alternative investment allocations. The basic question facing them now is which exposures are most likely to continue providing risk diversification in a rising rate environment. To answer that question, let’s look back at the liquid alt universe over the past five years and gauge each category’s correlation to a fixed income market proxy, the iShares Core Total U.S. Bond Market ETF (NYSEARCA: AGG ). AGG tracks an index of investment grade notes and bonds including Treasuries, agencies and corporates as well as mortgage- and asset-backed paper, all with a weighted average maturity just under 13 years. Currently, AGG offers a 2.4 percent distribution yield. Two Things An ideal diversifier should be negatively correlated to AGG. Thus, when rates rise (and AGG’s price, as a consequence, falls), the alternative investment should appreciate. There are five categories that are negatively correlated to AGG: arbitrage, hedged equity, commodities, long/short equity and market-neutral. Based on the foregoing criterion alone, the arbitrage category seems to have the best track record over the past five years. Keep in mind two things, though. First, the correlation coefficient doesn’t measure cumulative returns. It only depicts the statistical relationship between each investment’s month-to-month price movements. And second, the category performance represents the market-weighted average of several portfolios. The arbitrage category, for example, comprises five products, four mutual funds and one exchange traded fund (ETF). Market weighting gives us insight into investor behavior and allows us to more clearly see how investors are actually putting their capital to work. The stand-out arb portfolio is the relatively small Quaker Event Arbitrage Fund (MUTF: QEAAX ) with a correlation of -0.21 to AGG and an average annual return of 2.39 percent. QEAAX deals in mergers, takeovers, spin-offs and other reorganizations, hoping to capture securities mispricings. The obvious problem with QEAAX, if a problem is to be found, is its high correlation to equities. QEAAX, after all, buys and sells stocks. If the prospect of rising rates spooks the equity market, as indeed it seems to have done, the Quaker fund’s NAV will likely be pressured. Hedged equity funds are also highly correlated to the broad stock market. The “hedge” in the category’s title refers to the variety of strategies employed by constituent funds to attenuate, but not necessarily eliminate, beta. The Schooner Fund (MUTF: SCNAX ), for example, is a long-biased fund that utilizes a buy-write (covered call) strategy to boost income. That said, SCNAX, with a -0.19 correlation to AGG, benefits most from a mildly bullish equity market. SCNAX pays just 0.57 percent in dividends. Commodity funds-long-only indexed portfolios-are only modestly correlated to stocks, but are suffering from a four-year disinflationary malaise. All, save one, are negatively correlated with AGG. It’s the PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (MUTF: PCRIX ), which overlays an actively managed fixed income strategy atop the index portfolio, that earns a 0.04 correlation to AGG. It should come as no surprise that long/short equity funds are highly correlated to the broad stock market. Nearly half of the 16 funds in the category, in fact, correlate to the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) at better than 0.85. Of these, one with the most negative correlation to AGG (-0.31) is the Diamond Hill Long-Short Fund (MUTF: DIAMX ), a portfolio that commands a 22 percent share of the category. Market-neutral funds attempt to hedge out general market exposure, i.e., aim for a beta near zero, to allow full expression of the manager’s concentrated bets. The multi-manager Deutsche Diversified Market Neutral Fund (MUTF: DDMIX ) accomplishes this with the category’s most negative correlation to AGG (-0.16). Alternative Income There’s a category we haven’t yet examined: alternative income. Three funds, in particular, have five-year track records, two mutual funds and an ETF. Collectively, these funds exhibit a modestly negative correlation (-0.06) to AGG, though you can see there’s a fair degree of “zig” to AGG’s “zag” in Chart 2. Viewed separately, these funds offer distinct value propositions: The $7.6 billion ALPS Alerian MLP ETF (NYSEARCA: AMLP ) tracks the price and yield performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, a modified capitalization-weighted and float-adjusted benchmark of two dozen U.S. energy master limited partnerships (MLPs). To allow a full allocation to MLPs, AMLP is structured as a C-corporation, which means it can’t pass through the full return of its underlying index. Payouts are distributed net of corporate tax, which translates into a daunting expense ratio of 5.4 percent. The good news is that most of these distributions come tax-deferred to investors, making its 8.4 percent distribution yield doubly attractive. Worse News There’s, of course, worse news: The energy sector’s tanked this year, taking AMLP’s share price with it. The fund lost 28 percent on the year through mid-November. The JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (MUTF: JSOAX ) is an unconstrained bond fund with an absolute return orientation. The $18.4 billion fund has the flexibility to allocate its assets across a broad range of fixed income securities and derivatives as well as strategies employing cash and short-term investments. JSOAX is not afraid to load up on high-yield securities. JSOAX tends toward a short duration and holds a heavy slug of cash, all of which reduce its interest rate risk. The fund offers a 2.6 percent distribution yield. At $698 million, the Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fund (MUTF: HFRAX ) is the category’s smallest asset collector. Still, it’s the best performer. HFRAX invests in floating rate bank loans-obligations with interest rates pegged to a spread over Libor (the London Interbank Offered Rate). This puts the fund in the catbird seat in a credit-tightening cycle. Currently, the fund offers a 5 percent distribution yield. You can see in Table 2 the countertrend nature of the HFRAX fund in its -0.22 correlation to AGG and a Sharpe ratio 40 basis points above that of the iShares product. So what have we learned from our little exercise? Simply this: When it comes to hedging interest rate risk, fund performance doesn’t draw assets. At least not yet. The Highland HFRAX fund, despite its impressive metrics, remains relatively obscure. It accounts for barely one-half of 1 percent of the alternative funds’ assets examined here. Perhaps that makes this fund-and newer funds on similar trajectories-undiscovered gems in the upcoming rate environment.

ETF Research Trading Analysis For 10-27-2015

Summary We took profit from both JNUG and JDST on Tuesday. DWTI doing well for us along with DGAZ. Reminder it is Fed week and expect some volatility – which we don’t mind. (Subscribers received early access to this article here .) INDEXES The markets opened down a bit on Monday as housing starts fell more than expected. It tried a couple of times to get going but it just couldn’t get over the hump. The ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF (NASDAQ: TQQQ ) was the only one that could move higher ending positive for the day. If the market opens higher tomorrow I would look to trade the ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (NYSEARCA: SVXY ) and the Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: FAS ). It’s Fed week and I said in Sunday’s article to subscribers I like the ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (NYSEARCA: UVXY ) during Fed week as we usually get a lot of volatility, opened at 28.50 Monday and went as high as 29.65, closing near the high of the day at 29.51. I would be a buyer over 29.65 Tuesday. If it gaps up buy the higher high. CHINA/RUSSIA/EMERGING As I wrote in my Current Thoughts on Monday referencing China, the country has some big issues ahead of it with its shadow banking that we here in the U.S. have already experienced. I have said for the longest time I like the Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: YANG ) on dips but thought we would get a reversal to play with a potential U.S. market move higher. Two days in a row of weakness and we may be done with the Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: YINN ). I am still holding out hope but the truth about China is going mainstream now. I even said that would be back over 100 again and I think it will at some point. The Direxion Daily Russia Bear 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: RUSS ) has really lagged the last run up and I would be a buyer over 31 Tuesday. The Direxion Daily Russia Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: RUSL ) is still a buy over 17.24 but these two have not triggered green on the weekly yet. The Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: EDC ) opened lower and this uncertainty is causing me a little concern in that the Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: EDZ ) may now become the play. We’re only 3 points away from a run in but first need to take out 39.20. Being that it is Fed week, either one of these can offer some trades on a higher high. With the Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: BRZU ), we stopped out with some profit Friday and it did open higher at 18.69 Monday and went as high as 17.28 but then fell with the overall market. If you did get in again, it may have got you a little profit but I can’t say I like it now. Volume was pathetic Monday. INTEREST RATES As you know, I have been saying for 6 months now I like the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TLT ) on the dips but thought the ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA: TBT ) would move higher with a turn in the market. With it gapping down at the open Monday was obviously taken off the table. Interest rates on the 10-year were down 1.4% Monday and TLT is looking closer to a run once it gets over 126.61. First up, the 124.55 resistance. PLEASE NOTE: I have to keep reminding everyone that during Fed week, we get more volatility than normal. Monday was the first example with a reversal of Friday’s run up. Tuesday, we could very well get a reversal higher and it’s easy to switch sides after recognizing it. But today’s report is written mostly with the assumption that Tuesday’s micro trend is continued. In the Trading room, I call it like I see it during market hours and it was a good day for us Monday. ENERGY I said at the close on Friday I like the VelocityShares 3x Inverse Crude Oil ETN (NYSEARCA: DWTI ) at 109.80 where it ended the day. It gapped up Monday and I emphasized in the room that I still like it and gave again my target at some point of 200 again, which we played the last run up to over 200. It closed at the high and is up to 116.81 after hours. Stay long and strong now. Dips will come to try and shake you out and if you want to take profit then do so as you can always get back in. Past 124.25, which may act as resistance, I would stay in for a nice ride. For the VelocityShares 3x Inverse Natural Gas ETN (NYSEARCA: DGAZ ) I said to stay long and strong in Sunday’s report and move stops up to where you lock in profit now or 9.74 if conservative. Monday, we got the gift of a gap up to 11.05 and it never looked back. I said in the room Monday a couple of times to lock in some profit as it got to the upper $11s and again just over $12. We have had a 30% run in this and nothing goes straight up. As such, I have put the VelocityShares 3x Long Natural Gas ETN (NYSEARCA: UGAZ ) on the one to watch list. The Direxion Daily Natural Gas Related Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: GASL ) I keep saying another day another 4% lower and Sunday I wrote, “I would only run from it.” Monday for the first time in a while, I don’t have to say it lost 4%, as it lost much more down 17.84% for the day. I am now putting it on the watch list as the volume increased which is either sellers or some buyers coming in. We can get a 10% to 20% bounce in this quickly but again, keep in mind it is a lower volume play. I only want to buy it on an up day, not chase it down. The Direxion Daily Energy Bear 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: ERY ) is the one making higher highs for us. Be a buyer over 24.55 Tuesday. It is 24.43 after hours. Energy not behaving very bullish and looks like it wants to run. Some resistance around 28 and then 30. GOLD MINING RELATED ANALYSIS The Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: JDST ) gave way to the Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: JNUG ) in the trading room Monday and we scalped a little off on an intraday reversal. Then we got full on long again and I recommended holding. We have to get through 24.50 now and then 25.35 and 26.74. Past 30.58 we are off to the races. I have been waiting for a while now to get long and stay long and even though reversals come, the dollar is poised to move higher and we just need gold and silver to move lower. As you can see from the first sentence though, even though I have been waiting for a great trade in, I can still trade the other side for profit if it comes. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge)