Tag Archives: first-look

ETFs To Move On Yuan Devaluation

China has been hitting headlines this year for one reason or the other. While the economy has been reeling under pressure for long given the protracted slowdown in the domestic manufacturing sector, credit crunch concerns and a property market slowdown, its stock market has been through a wild ride on overvaluation concerns. Meanwhile, the economy’s exports plunged 8.3% year over year in July, massively falling short of analysts’ expectation of a 1.5% decline as well as the 2.8% drop-off recorded in June. Though a 1.3% fall in exports to the U.S. was not that alarming, exports plummeted 12.3% and 13% in the EU and Japan, respectively. These two regions are presently under QE policy and thus see relatively weak currencies against the greenback. This gave the Chinese policymakers a wake-up call that it is high time to devalue its currency, yuan, to maintain the export competitiveness. As a result, China undervalued its currency yen against the U.S. dollar by a historic amount, i.e., 100 bps on August 11. Yuan has now plunged to the 2012 levels. Per Reuters , China’s central bank fixed the midpoint for its currency at 6.2298 per dollar, down from 6.1162 seen on August 10. The bank also indicated that it was eyeing a currency devaluation of 2%. As per Barrons.com , the Chinese government viewed yuan as an extremely strong currency. Given the looming Fed policy normalization and its depreciating impact on a basket of currencies, any shift in yuan ‘from market expectations’ seems unreasonable. However, such an epic move in the Chinese currency market will definitely leave an impact across the globe. Below we highlight a few asset classes and their ETFs, which may be among the biggest movers. Currency Needless to say, the move will lead the Chinese currency ETF, the WisdomTree Chinese Yuan ETF (NYSEARCA: CYB ), to losses while the dollar ETF, the PowerShares DB USD Bull ETF (NYSEARCA: UUP ), will gain strength. The Aussie dollar lost about 1% following the announcement, putting Australia ETF, the CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: FXA ), at risk. Per Reuters, the Australian dollar is often regarded as a liquid proxy for the Chinese currency. China is a major trading partner of Australia and thus the currencies of the duo share a high correlation. Currencies like the Singapore dollar, South Korean won and Taiwan dollar will be stressed as these countries are manufacturing destinations and thus act as competitors to China on the export front. Market experts apprehend a currency war among these Asian tigers in the near future. Gold How much more pain will gold have to bear? The yellow metal already crossed its five-year low level on its way down hit by the dollar strength thanks to the impending Fed rate hike, a deflationary environment prevailing in most part of the developed world and reduced demand from the key consuming nation China because of its waning economy. Now, currency devaluation will likely curb the import demand of gold from China as a feebler currency will turn imports pricier. The SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) tracking the gold bullion will bear the brunt the most, while the impact will not be unnoticed by the gold mining ETF, the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: GDX ). Apart from gold, several industrial metals will likely see a negative pricing trend in the near term as the Chinese economy accounts for about half of the global consumption of the industrial commodities and is the second-biggest purchaser of oil. The iPath Dow Jones-UBS Nickel Total Return Sub-Index ETN (NYSEARCA: JJN ), the UBS E TRACS CMCI Industrial Metals Total Return ETN (NYSEARCA: UBM ), the ELEMENTS Rogers International Commodity Metal ETN (NYSEARCA: RJZ ) and the United States Copper Index ETF (NYSEARCA: CPER ) are some of the ETFs which might succumb to a slowdown. Equities As we already know that the South Korean and Taiwanese economies thrive on exports, these nations will now be losing on currency competitiveness to China. There are several South Korean companies, namely Samsung Electronics ( OTC:SSNLF ), Hyundai Motor ( OTC:HYMLF ) ( OTC:HYMTF ), LG Corp. and Daewoo, which have big export markets and Taiwan houses one of the largest semiconductor companies in the world – Taiwan Semiconductor. In short, these two countries’ stock markets will be hit by the yuan devaluation in a passive way. This puts the iShares MSCI South Korea Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: EWY ), the Horizons Korea KOSPI 200 ETF (NYSEARCA: HKOR ) as well as the iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (NYSEARCA: EWT ) and the First Trust Taiwan AlphaDEX ETF (NASDAQ: FTW ) in focus. While this move might help some Chinese sectors and equities, investors should note that most of the Chinese equities ETFs are not hedged to the greenback and thus may see some downward pressure on U.S. exchanges. Some Chinese equities ETFs to watch in the coming days are the Market Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (NYSEARCA: CNXT ), the Market Vectors ChinaAMC A-Share ETF (NYSEARCA: PEK ), the iShares China Large-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: FXI ) and the iShares MSCI China ETF (NYSEARCA: MCHI ). Original Post

UIL’s Updated Connecticut Merger Filing

In late June the Public Utility Regulatory Authority of Connecticut issued a draft decision denying UIL’s merger with Iberdrola USA. UIL withdrew their application and filed a new application on July 31. The new application substantially addresses PURA’s concerns and increases the likelihood that this value creating merger will be approved. UIL Holdings (NYSE: UIL ) and Iberdrola USA ( IUSA ) (a subsidiary of Spanish utility Iberdrola (OTCPK: IBDSF )) are making their second attempt to get their merger through the notoriously difficult Connecticut Public Utility Regulatory Authority ( OTCPK:PURA ). As discussed in my earlier post , this is a merger that will create substantial value for the participants, so there was no way they would give up easily after PURA’s initial rejection. The new filing really lays out the benefits for the state of Connecticut, and should be enough to get the deal approved in that jurisdiction. PURA’s issues with the original application are summarized in this excerpt from the draft decision : The Applicants have not provided any measurable or quantifiable commitments that unequivocally assure the Authority that the public interest of the ratepayers will not be harmed. In response, the applicants have increased a number of the benefits Connecticut customers will receive, and presented them in a quantifiable way that easily allows PURA to see the advantages for customers. The draft decision also listed a number of items that had been included in recent Connecticut merger agreements. Many of the updates to the application are related to this list. A discussion of these items follows. Rate credit allocated to retail customer classes UIL and IUSA have increased the rate credits for customers from about $5M in the original application, to approximately $20M in the new one. The applicants have actually proposed three different methods to distribute the credit to customers. The first option would apply a $20M credit customers in the first year after the closing. Another proposal is for UIL to provide $26M of credits spread over ten years. The last option is essentially giving a $1.5M annual credit over thirty years. The present value of all three options is essentially the same, and the applicants are giving PURA a choice based on feedback they received from their earlier application. Commitment to accelerate the pole inspection cycle. This is basically a reliability commitment. For those unfamiliar with the issue, utility poles, like any other piece of the electric system, can wear out as they age. The end of a pole’s life can lead to a power outage or damage to property. Increasing the frequency of these inspections can reduce the number of surprise failures, resulting in fewer outages. Subsidiary United Illuminating (UI) is the custodian of 87,000 poles. In 2005 they pledged to improve their pole inspection process, and they have $700,000 budgeted for pole inspections in 2015. With an already strong commitment to inspecting utility poles, no further enhancements were made in this application. However, while UI will not address poles, they are making some quantifiable reliability commitments. In the first application UIL had only said there would be benefits from sharing best practices and better storm response, and that there would be no deterioration in service after the transaction. Now the applicants have pledged to increase investment in electric distribution system resiliency with a reduced recovery of the first $50M of this spending over a two year period. They are also making some reliability commitments at their Southern Connecticut Gas (SCG) subsidiary. UIL is promising to double the annual spending on the replacement of cast iron/bare steel pipe (from $11M to $22M per year) over the next three years without seeking recovery until the next SCG rate case. There are substantial reliability issues with these older pipes, and increasing the rate of replacement should have an impact on safety and dependability. UIL estimates the gas commitment will create a $1.6M benefit, and the commitment at UI will create a $5M benefit. Commitment to improve non-storm and storm related service quality performance at a minimum of the 10-year historical average UIL stated that they would improve a number of different service metrics by 5% by the end of the third year after the closing of the deal. These metrics were: average answering times, % abandoned calls, % appointments met. UIL also promised to maintain the high level of reliability at UI as measured by SAIDI and SAIFI. (SAIDI is the System Average Interruption Duration Index, essentially the average number of minutes a customer is out during a year; and SAIFI is the System Average Interruption Frequency Index, essentially the average number of times a customer has an outage in a year.) You can see how well they have been doing on these metrics by looking at this information from UIL’s 2015 Reliability Report . SAIFI SAIDI 2010 0.65 85 2011 0.81 102 2012 0.60 58 2013 0.58 51 Four-Year Average (’10 – ’13) 0.66 74 2014 0.56 53 2014’s SAIFI number was actually the company’s best in the past eighteen years. The 2014 SAIDI number was better than all but two of the previous eighteen years. Also, UI’s SAIDI and SAIFI numbers are better than neighboring utility CL&P. In 2014 CL&P’s SAIDI was 88.9 minutes, and their SAIFI was 0.77. It seems that UI maintaining current reliability numbers should be acceptable to PURA. Commitment to open space land UIL has not specifically addressed open space land, but they appear to be working on an issue that is related in spirit. This is regarding English Station, a retired power plant on a nine acre site that UIL sold over fifteen years ago. This property has substantial environmental issues, and there is a big dispute over who should pay the cleanup costs. The applicants have stated that if the merger is approved they will end the legal wrangling, and agree to pay for the cleanup of the site. This cost is currently estimated at $30M. (More information on the English Station dispute can be found here .) Seven year commitment to not move headquarters out of Connecticut The applicants have proposed to create a new management position entitled the President of Connecticut Operations. The President of Connecticut Operations will be headquartered in Connecticut, and the applicants state that the headquarters will remain in Connecticut for at least seven years. (I’m pretty sure we know where they came up with that length of time.) One issue that was not in PURA’s bullet list, because this is the first time it has come up in a Connecticut utility merger case, is ring-fencing. UIL has dramatically increased the robustness of their proposed ring-fencing provisions. The applicants have proposed creating a special purpose entity (SPE) adding another layer of separation between UIL and IUSA. 100% of UIL will be owned by the SPE, and IUSA will own the SPE. The SPE will have at least one independent director, and a “Golden Share” provision. This Golden Share has a non-economic interest in the SPE and will be owned by an administration company in the business of protecting special purpose entities. The Golden Share has the right to vote on certain matters, primarily with respect to the filing of bankruptcy. (More information can be found in Attachment 2 of the merger application.) UIL and IUSA have made a dramatic improvement in their merger application. The benefits Connecticut customers will receive have been increased and quantified, so it is easier to see the advantages of the deal for the state’s citizens. The applicants have specifically addressed many of the items PURA brought up in their earlier draft decision. In particular they have substantially beefed up the ring-fencing provisions, so a problem elsewhere in Iberdrola’s operations does not hurt any of UIL’s subsidiaries. Based on these changes it seems like the merger should have a very good chance of getting PURA approval. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Vanguard 500 Index Fund: A Mutual Fund Anyone Can Appreciate In Their 401k

Summary VFIAX is a mutual fund designed to track the S&P 500 with a lower expense ratio than SPY. The mutual fund is a great holding for investors wanting to replicate the performance of “the market” without getting devoured by fees. This is a solid option for the retirement account. The Vanguard 500 Index Fund Admiral Shares (MUTF: VFIAX ) offer investors an excellent way to handle their investments. While I’m a huge fan of using ETFs in the construction of a portfolio, Vanguard is offering some mutual funds with very compelling expense ratios. The nice thing about these mutual funds is that investors are able to buy fractional shares which are excellent for dollar cost averaging. Volatility The standard deviation of returns (monthly) shows very similar levels of volatility to the S&P 500 index as tracked by (NYSEARCA: SPY ). Correlation is also running around 99.9%. The holdings are very similar, but these shares are offering a lower expense ratio and the ability to use dollar cost averaging very effectively. Expense Ratio The mutual fund is posting .05% for an expense ratio. There is really nothing to complain about here. It beats SPY and it beats most mutual funds and ETFs in existence. Largest Holdings The diversification within the fund is good. There are not as many holdings as the whole market index funds that I often prefer, but all around this is a very solid fund. (click to enlarge) Risk Factors The biggest issue for VFIAX is the risk that the S&P 500 is getting fairly expensive on many fundamental levels. For instance, the P/E ratio on the index is fairly high (running over 20). The high P/E ratio comes at a time when corporate profits after taxes are also very high relative to GDP. My concern is about the valuation level of the market. When it comes to ways to buy the market, VFIAX is one of the best funds to use for the task. When it comes to risk assessment, I’m not sure I’d go with Vanguard’s scale, shown below: Vanguard has a tendency to mark any primarily equity investment as being fairly high risk. Relative to other equity investments, the risk level here is very reasonable. The fund still scores high on risk for Vanguard’s scale because they are comparing it to other funds stuffed with lower risk securities than equity. Compared to a very short term high credit quality bond fund, I have to agree that VFIAX has substantially more risk. Compared to the broad universe of equity investments, VFIAX is doing a solid job of holding a diversified portfolio of large capitalization companies with solid histories. Other Things to Know Minimum investments for opening a position were $10,000 according to the Vanguard website. After that additional purchases could be in increments as small as $1. This is a solid fund for dollar cost averaging. Based on my macroeconomic views, I would want to use a fund like VFIAX for equity exposure but I also believing hold some cash on hand is wise given the potential for a reduction in equity prices. When it comes to using mutual funds, I think the best way to deal with them is to dollar cost average in. I like using ETFs to adjust my portfolio exposure but the mutual funds can be set as a “set it and forget it” investment vehicle. When making a meaningful contribution to a fund month after month without checking up on it, it would be wise to make sure the fund is reasonably diversified and that the expense ratios are low. The Vanguard 500 Index Fund Admiral Shares easily sail through both of those tests. Conclusion While I am concerned that market valuations are a little on the high side, I’m still investing each month. I choose to hold more in cash than I would if the market looked cheaper, but I still see dollar cost averaging into the right funds as a viable long term strategy. The biggest challenge for investors is to resist the urge to pull back when the market falls. We should all expect that the stock market will fall within the next 30 years. When those drops happen, investors need to be able to stomach stepping into the market to buy. Since those times are often very scary, one solution is to set up automatic purchases for a fund like VFIAX. To avoid overthinking things, I keep automatic contributions running as a baseline for investing. I use my other accounts to make additional purchases. If your employer sponsored plan offers VFIAX, it is a mutual fund worthy of consideration. Figure out your own risk tolerance and determine if the equity exposure is right for you. The biggest potential mistake an investor could make with buying VFIAX would be to put 75%+ of their portfolio in the fund when they are only a couple years from retirement and will be required to sell off shares to take distributions. So long as the total level of risk is appropriate for the investors, this is a great fund to use as the core of a passive retirement portfolio. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: Information in this article represents the opinion of the analyst. All statements are represented as opinions, rather than facts, and should not be construed as advice to buy or sell a security. Ratings of “outperform” and “underperform” reflect the analyst’s estimation of a divergence between the market value for a security and the price that would be appropriate given the potential for risks and returns relative to other securities. The analyst does not know your particular objectives for returns or constraints upon investing. All investors are encouraged to do their own research before making any investment decision. Information is regularly obtained from Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, and SEC Database. If Yahoo, Google, or the SEC database contained faulty or old information it could be incorporated into my analysis.