Tag Archives: feeds

The Year In Review: Investors Pull Money Out Of Mutual Funds

By Patrick Keon For 2015 Lipper’s mutual fund macro-groups (equity, taxable bond, money market, and municipal bond) experienced overall net outflows for the first time since 2011. The mutual fund groups saw over $121.5 billion leave their coffers last year, with taxable bond funds (-$85.9 billion) and equity funds (-$60.0) accounting for all of the net outflows. Money market funds (+$16.0 billion) and municipal bond funds (+$8.4 billion) were able to take in net new money for the year. The negative flows from taxable bond funds represented their first annual decrease since 2000 and their largest net outflows since Lipper began tracking fund-flows data (1992). After a positive start to 2015 the group suffered $109.2 billion of negative flows during the last two quarters of the year, when it became apparent the Federal Reserve was looking for an opportunity to start raising interest rates before finally doing so in December. The selling was spread out across both investment-grade and below-investment-grade bond funds; funds in Lipper’s Core Plus Bond Funds (-$20.6 billion), Loan Participation Funds (-$20.0 billion), and High Yield Funds (-$14.5 billion) classifications all experienced substantial net outflows. The annual net outflows for equity funds marked their first decrease since 2012; the group had taken in over $270 billion of net new money for 2013 and 2014 combined. Equity funds did start 2015 strongly with net inflows of almost $34 billion in the first quarter, but the tide turned after that with three straight quarters of net outflows, culminating with $73.0 billion of negative flows during the last quarter of the year. Domestic equity funds (-$153.9 billion) were responsible for all the year’s net outflows, while nondomestic equity funds (+$93.9 billion) were able to post net gains for the year. The main contributors to the negative flows on the domestic equity side were funds in Lipper’s Large-Cap Core Funds (-$47.5 billion), Large-Cap Growth Funds (-$29.4 billion), and Equity Income Funds (-$21.8 billion) categories. Click to enlarge

Playing Offense With Defense Stocks

Increased government spending is boosting the prospects of aerospace, defense and related firms By Nick Kalivas After years of decline, 2015 saw a rebound in plans for government defense spending – a trend that shows no signs of abating. At the same time, valuations on aerospace and defense stocks are attractive relative to the broader market. With these trends in mind, I believe now might be a good time for investors to consider adding potential offense to their portfolios with defense stocks. Defense dominates the headlines in 2015 The following news stories were reported in November and December, illustrating global interest in boosting defense programs. “Japan to spend a record $41 billion on defense.” 1 “War on Islamic State brings $50 billion European defense boost.” 2 “The House and Senate Armed Services Committees … increased the fiscal 2016 spending caps for defense and nondefense activities by $25 billion each.” 3 “South Korea approves 3.6% increase in 2016 defense budget.” 4 “US said to move ahead with $1.83 billion arms sale to Taiwan.” 5 Defense orders pop in November These headlines indicate a shift from a four-year trend of declining defense orders, which appears to be bottoming even before newly expanded budgets can be deployed and reflected in government data. The US Commerce Department’s November durable goods report showed a 44% jump in defense orders from October. 6 Defense orders are highly volatile, but the six-month average is starting to climb after an extended period of weakness. Notice the upward trend in defense orders in the following chart. Unfulfilled defense orders have been declining since late 2012, which has hurt the defense industry’s performance. However, the defense order-to-shipment ratio is trending upward over the past year, which suggests that there could be a firming in industry order backlogs (unfilled orders). 6 A rising backlog could, in turn, boost confidence in defense company earnings and garner the attention of investors. In addition, computer and electronic equipment orders rose 0.4% from the previous month in November – building on October’s 2.1% gain. 6 This is relevant, as the defense industry has become more high-tech over time. In my view, technology companies with exposure to the defense industry are likely to benefit from higher defense spending and increased computer and electronic equipment orders. Civilian aerospace is still strong It’s also important to note that many defense contractors have exposure to commercial aerospace firms. Examples include Boeing (NYSE: BA ), United Technologies (NYSE: UTX ) and Honeywell (NYSE: HON ). 7 Cheap energy prices support airline industry profits and often lead to lower air fares, which can boost aircraft and aircraft maintenance demand. In its third quarter 2015 business outlook, Boeing projected higher air passenger traffic and meaningful replacement demand in its outlook for the commercial airline business. As indicated in the graphic below, unfilled aircraft orders reported by the US Commerce Department are at historically high levels – underscoring the continued strength of commercial aerospace. 6 Source: Bloomberg L.P. as of Dec. 23, 2015 Defense and aerospace valuations are attractive Valuations for defense and aerospace firms are also compelling. As of Dec. 23, the S&P 500 Aerospace and Defense Industry Index was trading at an 8.0% discount price-earnings (P/E) ratio to the S&P 500 Index. Relative valuations were richer in the mid 1990s and mid-2000s, but have come down since early 2014. 6 Source: Bloomberg L.P. as of Dec. 28, 2015 A potential alternative for investors interested in defense and aerospace Investors looking for access to the aerospace and defense sector might consider the PowerShares Aerospace & Defense Portfolio (NYSEARCA: PPA ). PPA holds a mixture of traditional aerospace and defense companies, as well as information technology and materials companies that are involved in the defense industry. Sources: 1 RT.com, Dec. 22, 2015 2 Bloomberg L.P., Nov. 24, 2015 3 Bloomberg L.P., Nov. 4, 2015 4 Bloomberg L.P., Dec. 3, 2015 5 Bloomberg L.P., Dec. 15, 2015 6 Bloomberg L.P., Dec. 23, 2015 7 As of Dec. 31, 2015, Boeing, UTX and Honeywell make up 6.46%, 6.40% and 6.35% of PPA’s holdings, respectively. Important information The S&P 500 Aerospace & Defense Index is a capitalization-weighted index designed to capture a composite return of the stocks in the S&P 500 Index that are operating in the aerospace and defense industry, according to the Global Industry Classification Standard. An investment cannot be made in an index. Past performance cannot guarantee future results. Price-earnings (P/E) ratio, also called multiple, measures a stock’s valuation by dividing its share price by its earnings per share. There are risks involved with investing in ETFs, including possible loss of money. Shares are not actively managed and are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, including those regarding short selling and margin maintenance requirements. Ordinary brokerage commissions apply. The Fund’s return may not match the return of the Underlying Index. The Fund is subject to certain other risks. Please see the current prospectus for more information regarding the risk associated with an investment in the Fund. Investments focused in a particular industry, such as aerospace and defense, are subject to greater risk, and are more greatly impacted by market volatility, than more diversified investments. Stocks of small and mid-sized companies tend to be more vulnerable to adverse developments, may be more volatile, and may be illiquid or restricted as to resale. The Fund is non-diversified and may experience greater volatility than a more diversified investment. Before investing, investors should carefully read the prospectus/summary prospectus and carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. For this and more complete information about the Funds call 800 983 0903 or visit invescopowershares.com for prospectus/summary prospectus. The information provided is for educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation of the suitability of any investment strategy for a particular investor. Invesco does not provide tax advice. The tax information contained herein is general and is not exhaustive by nature. Federal and state tax laws are complex and constantly changing. Investors should always consult their own legal or tax professional for information concerning their individual situation. The opinions expressed are those of the authors, are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco investment professionals. NOT FDIC INSURED MAY LOSE VALUE NO BANK GUARANTEE All data provided by Invesco unless otherwise noted. Invesco Distributors, Inc. is the US distributor for Invesco Ltd.’s retail products and collective trust funds. Invesco Advisers, Inc. and other affiliated investment advisers mentioned provide investment advisory services and do not sell securities. Invesco Unit Investment Trusts are distributed by the sponsor, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc., and broker-dealers including Invesco Distributors, Inc. PowerShares® is a registered trademark of Invesco PowerShares Capital Management LLC (Invesco PowerShares). Each entity is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd. ©2015 Invesco Ltd. All rights reserved.

5 Best Performing High Yield Mutual Funds Of 2015

Investors were lured to invest in high yield bond mutual funds following the financial crisis. And why not, as these funds were a better investment destination since there weren’t enough opportunities elsewhere to seek high yields. These funds provided better returns than those investing in securities with higher ratings, including government and corporate bonds. Also, due to their higher yield feature, these funds were less susceptible to interest rate fluctuations. High yield bond mutual funds provide the best choice for those looking to invest in below investment-grade bonds, also known as junk bonds. Talking of junk bonds, it surged an incredible 85% in 2011 since its Great Recession low and continued its winning run. However, in 2015, U.S. junk bonds registered their worst performance since 2008. Rate hike apprehensions throughout the year and finally the lift-off in December dealt a severe blow to these funds. Meanwhile, the weak Chinese economy raised concerns about future demand for oil, eventually dragging global oil prices down. This decline in oil prices also adversely affected junk bond funds. Activist shareholder, Carl Ichan, has tweeted: “Unfortunately I believe the meltdown in High Yield is just beginning.” Under such circumstances, investors may choose to stay away from high-yield mutual funds. Granted that the outlook is bleak, but still if you are a junk bond investor, we have presented those funds that have turned out to be the best gainers in 2015 despite several bottlenecks. These funds also possess a favorable Zacks Rank that should help these funds to continue gaining in 2016 as well. What Went Wrong for High-Yield Mutual Funds? In 2015, the high yield funds category lost an average 4.1%. Anticipation of a rate hike for the first time in nearly a decade and finally the Fed hiking its benchmark interest rates in December had a negative impact on the junk bond market. The Federal Reserve’s easy monetary policy for the last several years, which kept interest rates at record low, had been a boon for the junk bond market. Investors had flocked to this market in search of bigger payoffs. Following the Fed rate hike, net outflows from high-yield bond funds were $3.8 billion in the week ending Dec 16. It marked the third largest outflow on record and the largest since 2014, according to Lipper. During December, net outflows totaled $6.29 billion, higher than November’s net outflow of $3.3 billion. With this outflow, total outflow of high yield bond funds for 2015 came to $13.88 billion, with high-yield funds posting a negative flow in 7 out of 12 months of 2015. The adverse effect could easily be spotted when New York-based Third Avenue Management blocked investors from redeeming money from the near $1 billion Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund (MUTF: TFCVX ) last December. The failure and the embargo on investors on withdrawals also highlighted the concerns related to liquidity in corporate bond markets. The continuous slide in commodity prices also affected junk bond funds. Decline in commodity prices means that energy and material companies may soon have trouble repaying their debts, as they constitute a major portion of the high-yield bond market. Fears about economic slowdown and market volatility in China were instrumental in the plunge in commodity prices. Fed Rate Hike Through 2015, Fed rate hike expectation kept high-yield funds under pressure. Ultimately, on Dec 16, the Fed raised its key interest rate for the first time in nearly a decade. The Fed increased its short-term borrowing rate to a range of 0.25% to 0.50%. Meanwhile, the Fed stressed that the pace of rate hikes will be ‘gradual’ in nature. The junk bond market had been a strong beneficiary of low interest rate and capital had flowed strongly into the debt sector. However, the lift-off spooked investors and they started exiting junk bond positions. Weak Chinese Economy and Oil Price Slump China’s economy and financial markets suffered for a large part of 2015. Economic data remained weak through the year though markets soared during the first half of 2015. Ultimately, markets crashed over a two and a half month period, erasing nearly $5 trillion in value terms. A bubble had built up steadily and valuations had hit levels which were difficult to justify. Weak Chinese economic data raised concerns about decelerating growth in the world’s second largest consumer of oil, which eventually dragged oil prices down. Additionally, persistent supply glut and a stronger dollar also adversely affected oil prices. Price of a barrel of U.S. crude was down more than 30% in 2015 from year-ago levels. Meanwhile, the U.S. economy hardly helped high yield funds in 2015. For the first three months, it expanded at an annual rate of 0.6%. The growth was mostly affected by harsh winter weather and disruptions in West Coast ports. However, the economy picked up pace in the second quarter, gaining 3.9%, but slowed down to a gain of 2% in the third quarter. Best Performing High-Yield Mutual Funds in 2015 In 2015, the junk bond market had a torrid ride due to decreasing liquidity within and rising borrowing costs. Moreover, concerns about junk-rated energy and material companies’ ability to repay debts due to fall in commodity prices continued to weigh on junk bonds. As declines outweighed gains, the funds finishing in the green could post only modest gains. Below we present the best-performing high yield mutual funds of 2015, which are under Zacks Mutual Fund coverage. We have considered those funds that have a minimum initial investment of $5000 and net assets over $50 million. From the above list, we present the top five best-performing high yield mutual funds of last year. These funds also possess a relatively low expense ratio and boast a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy). The Aquila Three Peaks High Income Y (MUTF: ATPYX ) seeks high current income. ATPYX invests a large portion of its assets in income-producing securities. Its portfolio includes high-yield/high-risk securities rated below investment grade. ATPYX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. ATPYX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 3.6% and 4.8%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 0.94% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. The Buffalo High-Yield Fund (MUTF: BUFHX ) invests a major portion of its net assets in higher yielding, higher-risk fixed income securities. BUFHX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. BUFHX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 4.1% and 5.2%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 1.02% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. The Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (MUTF: CHIAX ) seeks high current income. CHIAX invests in a diversified portfolio of high yield and high risk fixed income securities (junk bonds). CHIAX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. CHIAX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 2.3% and 4%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 0.95% is lower than the category average of 1.07%. The Wells Fargo Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund (MUTF: SSTHX ) seeks total return and invests primarily in medium and lower quality corporate debt obligations. SSTHX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. SSTHX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 1.9% and 3.1%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 0.81% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. The MassMutual Premier High Yield Fund (MUTF: MPHZX ) seeks to achieve a high level of total return and mostly invests in high yield debt and related securities. MPHZX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. MPHZX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 3.8% and 10.1%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 0.55% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. Link to the original post on Zacks.com