Tag Archives: energy

5 ETFs To Buy If Oil Stays At $40

Finally, oil jolted higher in the April 8 week to near $40/barrel, snapping a drawn-out downtrend. The WTI crude oil fund, the United States Oil ETF (NYSEARCA: USO ), added about 7.5% in the last five trading sessions (as of April 8, 2016), and Brent crude oil fund, the United States Brent Oil ETF (NYSEARCA: BNO ), tacked on about 8.1% gains during the same time frame. The impressive gains were prompted by the impending OPEC-Russia meeting in Doha on April 17 to talk about an output freeze and a decline in U.S. stockpiles. As per the U.S. Energy Department’s weekly inventory release, crude stockpiles reported a surprise reduction from their all-time high levels. The report released last week showed that crude inventories fell by 4.94 million barrels for the week ending April 1, 2016, beating the expectation of a rise in inventory by 2.9 million barrels . While many are not too hopeful about a game-changing outcome at the Doha meeting, the fact is that inventory levels are finally declining . U.S. energy firms used a lesser number of oil rigs for the third successive week to touch ” the lowest level since November 2009″. If this is not enough, the demand scenario should improve in the days ahead on easy money policies in most developed countries. Since the oil patch has been under pressure since mid-2014, the time of rebalancing should approach fast. Added to this, the U.S. dollar is expected to remain benign for a few more days, as the Fed is in no hurry to hike interest rates. This, in turn, should buoy most commodity prices, including oil. Given the newfound optimism in the oil patch, many investors have turned bullish on the energy sector. While playing oil ETFs is always an option, there are other corners as well that are linked to the commodity oil and are likely to bounce back along with the oil price. Below, we highlight five mixed ways which could be profitable if oil price hovers around the $40 level. Leveraged Oil – Direxion Daily Energy Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: ERX ) This fund creates a triple (3x or 300%) leveraged long position in the S&P Energy Select Sector Index while charging 95 bps in fees a year. It is a popular and liquid option in the energy leveraged space with AUM of $507.6 million and average trading volume of 6.2 million shares. The ETF gained 6.8% in the last five trading days (as of April 8, 2016) and added about 6.2% on April 8. Energy E&P – SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (NYSEARCA: XOP ) This fund holds 60 oil & gas exploration and production stocks in its portfolio. It is well-diversified across its holdings, with none of the companies accounting for more than 2.25% of total assets. The ETF has been able to manage $1.93 billion in its asset base. It charges 35 bps in annual fees and expenses. The product gained 5.2% in the last five trading days and was up 3.7% on April 8. It has a Zacks ETF Rank #5 (Strong Sell) (see all energy ETFs here ). Russia – Market Vectors Russia ETF (NYSEARCA: RSX ) The Russian economy may not be in a great shape, having shrunk 3.7 % in 2015. But an oil price recovery could bring good luck to Russia investing. Oil is seemingly the main commodity of the nation, and thus, drives the economy’s revenue to a great extent. RSX is the most popular and liquid option in the space, with an asset base of $1.90 billion and average trading volume of more than 13 million shares a day. The energy sector accounts for about 40% of RSX, which charges 61 basis points in expense fees. The Zacks ETF #3 (Hold) fund advanced about 0.9% in the last five trading days (as of April 8, 2016) and added about 2.5% on April 8. Norway – Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NYSEARCA: NORW ) Norway is among the top 10 nations among oil exporters, and the commodity forms an integral part of the country’s GDP. The most popular way to play the country is with NORW. The product charges investors 50 basis points a year in fees. Norwegian oil giant Statoil (NYSE: STO ) accounts for about 15% of the portfolio alone, suggesting a heavy concentration. NORW added 2.8% on April 8, 2016. The fund has a Zacks ETF Rank #3. Canada – iShares MSCI Canada ETF (NYSEARCA: EWC ) Canada is also among the world’s top oil producers. The best way to invest in Canada is through EWC, a product that has nearly $2.59 billion in assets. The fund holds just under 95 stocks in its basket. Energy makes up a huge chunk of its assets, accounting for one-fifth of the total. The fund was off about 0.4% in the last five trading sessions, but returned about 2.1% on April 8. It has a Zacks ETF Rank #3. Original Post

Avoiding Cigarette Butts

Too many investors hang their hat on investments that seem “cheap”. Unfortunately, too often something that looks like a bargain turns out to be a cigarette butt from which investors are hoping to take a last puff. As the old adage states, “you get what you pay for,” and that certainly applies to the world of investments. There are endless examples of cheap stocks getting cheaper, or in other words, stocks with low price/earnings ratios going lower. Stocks that appear cheap today, in many cases turn out to be expensive tomorrow because of deteriorating or collapsing profitability. For instance, take Haliburton Company (NYSE: HAL ), an energy services company. Wall Street analysts are forecasting the Houston, Texas based oil services company to achieve 2016 EPS (earnings per share) of $0.32, down -79%. The share price currently stands at $37, so this translates into an eye-popping valuation of 128x P/E ratio, based on 2016 earnings estimates. What has effectively occurred in the HAL example is earnings have declined faster than the share price, which has caused the P/E to go higher. If you were to look at the energy sector overall, the same phenomenon is occurring with the P/E ratio standing at a whopping 97x (at the end of Q1). These inflated P/E ratios are obviously not sustainable, so two scenarios are likely to occur: The price of the P/E (numerator) will decline faster than earnings (denominator) The earnings of the P/E (denominator) will rise faster than the price (numerator) Under either scenario, the current nose-bleed P/E ratio should moderate. Energy companies are doing their best to preserve profitability by cutting expenses as fast as possible, but when the product you are selling plummets about -70% in 18 months (from $100 per barrel to $30), producing profits can be challenging. The Importance of Price (or Lack Thereof) Similarly to the variables an investor would consider in purchasing an apartment building, “price” is supreme. With that said, “price” is not the only important variable. As famed investor Warren Buffett shrewdly notes, the quality of a company can be even more important than the price paid, especially if you are a long-term investor. “It’s far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.” The advantage of identifying and owning a “wonderful company” is the long-term stream of growing earnings. The trajectory of future earnings growth, more than current price, is the key driver of long-term stock performance. Growth investor extraordinaire Peter Lynch summed it up well when he stated, ” People Concentrate too much on the P, but the E really makes the difference.” Albert Einstein identified the power of “compounding” as the 8th Wonder of the World, which when applied to earnings growth of a stock can create phenomenal outperformance – if held long enough. Warren Buffett emphasized the point here: “If you aren’t willing to own a stock for ten years, don’t even think about owning it for ten minutes. Put together a portfolio of companies whose aggregate earnings march upward over the years, and so also will the portfolio’s market value.” Throw Away Cigarette Butts I have acknowledged the importance of aforementioned price, but your investment portfolio will perform much better, if you throw away the cigarette butts and focus on identifying market leading franchise that can sustain earnings growth. The lower the growth potential, the more important price becomes in the investment question. (see also Magic Quadrant ) Here are the key factors in identifying wining stocks: Market Share Leaders : If you pay peanuts, you usually get monkeys. Paying a premium for the #1 or #2 player in an industry is usually the way to go. Certainly, there is plenty of money to be made by smaller innovative companies that disrupt an industry, so for these exceptions, focus should be placed on share gains – not absolute market share numbers. Proven Management Team : It’s nice to own a great horse (i.e., company), but you need a good jockey as well. There have been plenty of great companies that have been run into the ground by inept managers. Evaluating management’s financial track record along with a history of their strategic decisions will give you an idea what you’re working with. Performance doesn’t happen in a vacuum, so results should be judged relative to the industry and their competitors. There are plenty of incredible managers in the energy sector, even if the falling tide is sinking all ships. Large and/or Growing Markets : Spotting great companies in niche markets may be a fun hobby, but with limited potential for growth, playing in small market sandboxes can be hazardous for your investment health. On the other hand, priority #1, #2, and #3 should be finding market leaders in growth markets or locating disruptive share gainers in large markets. Finding fertile ground on long runways of growth is how investors benefit from the power of compound earnings. Capital Allocation Prowess: Learning the capital allocation skillset can be demanding for executives who climb the corporate ladder from areas like marketing, operations, or engineering. Regrettably, these experiences don’t prepare them for the ultimate responsibility of distributing millions/billions of dollars. In the current low/negative interest rate environment, allocating capital to the highest return areas is more imperative than ever. Cash sitting on the balance sheet earning 0% and losing value to inflation is pure financial destruction. Conservatism is prudent, however, excessive piles of cash and overpaying for acquisitions are big red flags. Managers with a track record of organically investing in their businesses by creating moats for long-term competitive advantage are the leaders we invest in. Many so-called “value” investors solely use price as a crutch. Anyone can print out a list of cheap stocks based on Price-to-Earnings, Enterprise Value/EBITDA, or Price/Cash Flow, but much of the heavy lifting occurs in determining the future trajectory of earnings and cash flows. Taking that last puff from that cheap, value stock cigarette butt may seem temporarily satisfying, but investing into too many value traps may lead you gasping for air and force you to change your stock analysis habits. DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in HAL or any security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.

ETF Update: Smart Beta Launches As Far As The Eye Can See

Welcome back to the SA ETF Update. My goal is to keep Seeking Alpha readers up to date on the ETF universe and to gain some visibility, both for the ETF community and for me as its editor (so users know who to approach with issues, article ideas, to become a contributor, etc.). Every other week (depending on the reader response and submission volumes) we will highlight fund launches and closures for the week, as well as any news items that could impact ETF investors. As you might have noticed from the title, smart beta funds were on my mind this week. This might have something to do with the last 8 launches falling into that self-proclaimed category. It might also be due to a great read from Abnormal Returns, ” Finance blogger wisdom: smart beta bubble? ” In the linked article the author presented the following question to his online peers: The ‘smart beta’ or factor-investing bubble seems to be in full bloom. Is ‘smart beta’ simply the new active investing? If so, what happens to the entire fund industry which was built on the high fees associated with active management? This is a question that many have also covered on Seeking Alpha, but the most recent example is from Benjamin Lavine, CFA , whose article was posted on Wednesday (3/30). I would highly recommend it for any readers wondering what is behind the smart beta trend and how to interpret the term when considering an investment. With that disclaimer aside, let’s jump into the most recent round of smart beta launches: Fund launches for the week of March 21st, 2016 Principal expands into smart beta (3/22): The Principal Price Setters Index ETF (NASDAQ: PSET ) and the Principal Shareholder Yield Index ETF (NASDAQ: PY ) are the first smart beta launches from Principal Funds; both target mid- and large-cap domestic firms. However, PSET “focuses on companies with sustainable pricing power, consistent sales growth, high/stable margins, quality earnings, low leverage, and high levels of profitability,” while PY is for investors more concerned with “sustainable shareholder yield, strong cash flow generation, and capacity to increase dividends and/or buybacks.” Both funds are a relatively large departure from the Principal EDGE Active Income ETF (NYSEARCA: YLD ), which was launched in July 2015. This first venture into ETFs is an active fund investing across multiple income-producing asset classes in search of high-income investments. Victory Capital Management rolls out an emerging market fund (3/23): The Victory CEMP Emerging Market Volatility Wtd Index ETF (NASDAQ: CEZ ) was the third smart beta launch of the week. The in-house CEMP Emerging Market 500 Volatility Weighted Index “combines fundamental criteria with volatility weighting to seek to improve an investor’s ability to outperform traditional indexing strategies.” It is worth noting that the top countries represented at this time are Taiwan, China, South Korea and India; all of which are still considered emerging by MSCI , but many have argued that they are quickly evolving out of the traditional definition. Fund launches for the week of March 28th, 2016 Fund closures for the weeks of March 21st and 28th, 2016 Direxion Value Line Conservative Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: VLLV ) Direxion Value Line Mid- and Large-Cap High Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: VLML ) Direxion Value Line Small- and Mid-Cap High Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: VLSM ) ALPS Sector Leaders ETF (NYSEARCA: SLDR ) ALPS Sector Low Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: SLOW ) ALPS STOXX Europe 600 ETF (NYSEARCA: STXX ) Global Commodity Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: CRBQ ) iSharesBond 2016 Corporate Term ETF (NYSEARCA: IBDA ) iSharesBond 2016 Corporate ex-Financials Term ETF (NYSEARCA: IBCB ) Have any other questions on ETFs or ETNs? Please comment below and I will try to clear things up. As an author and editor, I have found that constructive feedback is the best way to grow. What you would like to see discussed in the future? How can I improve this series to meet reader needs? Please share your thoughts on this first edition of the ETF Update series in the comments section below. Have a view on something that’s coming up or a new fund? Submit an article. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.