Tag Archives: business

How To Find The Next Great Growth Stock

Now is the time to be paying close attention to the market to find the next group of market leading stocks. Traits that define market leading stocks never change, all past winners have the same traits in common. CAN SLIM Investing and why you need to familiarize yourself with this strategy to discover winning growth stocks. Its a great time to be refreshing your watch list and be closely monitoring the market as volatility tends to bring opportunities. An investor always wants to be in tune with the market no matter how discouraging things may seem. The stocks that hold up the best during market corrections and volatility are the stocks that should be bought when the market gets its footing back. These are the stocks that institutions are refusing to dump even in a difficult environment. These stocks typically all have something in common, they have the “it” factor. The characteristics of great growth stocks never change. The “it” factor is a combination of multiple things. They display exceptional sales and earnings growth, have a new product or service, typically have just gone public within the last eight years or sooner, and are in high demand by institutional investors and come from strong industry groups. These characteristics are the basis of CAN SLIM investing. CAN SLIM is a growth stock investment strategy introduced by William O’neil founder of Investors Business Daily newspaper. O’neil analyzed the top performing stocks dating back to the 1880’s and identified 7 characteristics they all shared. C = Current quarterly earnings and sales growth should be up at least 25% or more for the last two quarters. Accelerating earnings and sales growth for three quarters in a row and you could have a potential big winning stock. A = Annual earnings growth of at least 25% for each of the past 3-5 years. Also look for return on equity (ROE) of at least 17% N = Look for companies with new products, new services, new conditions in their industry, new management, and new price highs. S = Supply and Demand – look for big volume moves in the stock during upside trading. L = Leader – Look for the top stocks both fundamentally and technically, in the best performing sectors and industry groups. I = Institutional sponsorship – Watch what pension funds, mutual funds, banks and other institutions are buying. M = Market Direction – Three out of four stocks follow the market trend, therefore only buy growth stocks when the market is in an uptrend. This time tested and proven strategy is a blend of fundamental and technical analysis. If you can identify companies that fit the “CAN” in the acronym you have taken your first step to discovering the importance of the fundamental side of the equation. Take Palo Alto networks(NYSE: PANW ) for example in May of 2014. The company had just reported its second quarter results showing a 57% increase in Earnings per share and a 49% increase in sales. This fits the “C” part of the equation. The company showed a 84% annual increase in in EPS numbers in 2014 fitting the “A” part of the equation perfectly. At the time of the second quarter earning release the company had posted two quarters of significant earnings growth foreshadowing the strength of projected earnings for the year. Throw in the fact that the company was in a red hot cyber security sector with a new technology to help companies ward of cyber attacks and you then satisfy the “N” part of the equation. You now have the making of a big potential winning stock with strong fundamentals in a red hot industry which is acting like a market leader. The “SLIM” part of the equation covers the technical aspects of growth investing as well as the health of the market. The “S” in the strategy is a whole set of technical analysis skills that must be learned and developed to be able to identify supply and demand. The market repeats symmetrical patterns. Through the use of technical analysis and pattern recognition experience these patterns can be identified for good potential risk reward set ups. Lets go back to Palo Alto Networks( PANW ) in May of 2014. The stock was coming out of a proper technical basing pattern and offered investors a good risk reward entry after it reported earnings. The stock closed at a price of $73.17 on May 29th 2014. The stock was a market leader at the time satisfying the “L” part of the equation, showed strong interest from Institutions and mutual funds covering the “I” part of the equation, and the stock market was in an uptrend satisfying the “M” part of the equation. Palo Alto Networks( PANW ) currently trades at the time this article was written around $180 per share. Well you may be asking yourself is it really that easy to bag a big winner? With the market pulling back twice in the second half of 2014 it wasn’t easy to hold on to growth stocks. The risks of the strategy are that growth stocks typically correct two and a half times the market averages and they can be difficult to hold. The strategy also suggest taking profits at 15% to 20% and using a stop loss of 7% to 8% from your purchase price so bagging a 150% gain requires strong conviction, discipline and patience. There are advantages and drawback within any methodology but this is certainly one that can get you in the best performing stocks when the market is good and protect you from a correction when things turn ugly. My own personal use of this strategy has protected my clients from the market crash of 2008 with a +2% return and also had me outperform the market in 2013 with a +59% return. It has most recently gotten me in such big winners as Gopro(NASDAQ: GPRO ) in 2014, Shake Shack(NYSE: SHAK ) earlier this year and big winners such as Facebook(NASDAQ: FB ) in 2013 before they all made their major price advance. In summary this is a recipe to identify huge potential winning stocks and when to buy them, and can also protect your portfolio from major damage from extreme bear markets. It is a vital tool for any growth investor to have in his or her toolbox. The next big winner is currently out their and is waiting for you to identify it! Get to know CAN SLIM! Current stocks that act well technically and fit the CAN SLIM criteria at the time this article was written: Fitbit(NYSE: FIT ),Amazon.com(NASDAQ: AMZN ), Facebook( FB ), Tableau Software(NYSE: DATA ) to name a few. These stocks merely fit the criteria and as always please do your own diligence and consult your financial professional to help you make decisions on buying or selling stocks that are suitable for your own personal risk profile. To get more information on the strategy please visit the education tab on my website at skoufiscapital.com . Investors Business daily offers great resources and learning tools at Investors.com with actionable ideas. Investors.com also offers educational courses for any level of investor. For the advanced investor who is familiar with technical analysis, visit marketsmith.com for great charting software as wells as screening tools to help identify potential leading growth stocks. Marketsmith also offers a tool to identify technical patterns and offers multiple pre built stock data bases to help you identify stocks that fit the CAN SLIM criteria. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

The Good Business Portfolio: All 24 Positions

Summary The portfolio of good company businesses is doing 3.62% better than the DOW average year to date (YTD) of -0.41%. The 24 businesses comprise 99% of the portfolio with the other 1% cash and the average total return over the DOW average for the 30 month test period is 32.52%. Create a portfolio that is balanced, not income, not dividend growth, not bottom fishing, not value, but balanced among all styles. Of the 24 companies in the portfolio 19 beat the DOW average for total return and 5 missed the total return over the test period of 30 months. This article gives my 10 guidelines for company investment selection for the complete Good Business Portfolio. The intent in these guidelines is to create a portfolio that is a large cap balanced portfolio between the different styles of investing. Income investors take too much risk to get their high yields. Bottom fishing investors get catfish. Value investors have to have a foresight to see the future. You see from the guidelines below that I want a portfolio that is defensive, provides income and does not take high risks. I limit the portfolio to 25 companies; more than this is almost impossible to keep track of. At present I have 24 companies and have open slots awaiting General Electric (NYSE: GE ) and Hewlett Packard (NYSE: HPQ ) spin-offs. Guidelines (Company selection) 1. NEVER buy any company or security that has more than three letters in the symbol. I know this eliminates just about all mutual funds, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ), Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ), Intel (NASDAQ: INTC ) and a lot of other large cap good companies, but it also eliminates the small cap startups and many others that are not good investments for a retirement portfolio. The only exception to this guideline is the purchase of a high grade corporate investment grade bond fund. 2. Capitalization should be at least $7 Billion (share price times number of shares outstanding) 3. Company should have a dividend of at least 1.0% on a yearly basis and the dividend should have been increased in 7 of the last 10 years. 4. Cash flow should be strongly positive. This allows dividends to increase, do share buy backs, and purchase of other companies to expand the company business. You can’t make cash up by accounting tricks like World Com and Enron. 5. The company should be listed on a Major exchange (NYSE) or NASDAQ, NO over the counter and pink sheets, NO venture capital. 6. The company business should be understood. Don’t invest in business models or products you don’t understand. Would you buy the whole company if you could is the question. If yes the company can be bought (Peter Lynch). As an example I don’t understand Google (NASDAQ: GOOG ) (NASDAQ: GOOGL ). If you can actually understand how Google will continue to grow then you can buy it, except that it violates guideline number 1. 7. Never invest in the following class of companies; – Airline operations business (poor business model). They should charge a price that they can make money on. – Banking small and large (can’t tell what assets are worth). – BDCs (too much debt and bad businesses). High dividends are not worth it. It’s better to have a real company like Harley Davidson (NYSE: HOG ), that has an iconic product. 8. S&P Capital IQ rating should be at least 3 or better. Consider selling when its rating drops to 2 or 1. 9. Remember you are not buying stock; you are buying shares in a company. Consider yourself an owner; you are. This idea may seem silly but it’s one of the best in this list, very important. As an owner do your home work, read about the company every few days and check prices at least once a week. Having a list on your favorite financial site like Seeking Alpha or web home page will help. 10. Compound annual growth rate for the next three years should be projected at least 6% per year. These are guidelines and not rules. They are meant to be used as filters to get to a few companies where further analysis can be done before adding the company to the portfolio. So it’s alright to break a guideline if the other guidelines indicate a Good Company Business. I’m sure this eliminates some really good companies but it gets me a short list to work on. There are too many companies to even look at 10% of them. Portfolio Performance The performance of the portfolio created by the guidelines have year in and year out beat the DOW average for over 22 years giving me a steady retirement income and growth. The table below shows the portfolio performance for 2012, 2013, 2014, and YTD of 2015. Year DOW Gain/Loss Good Business Beat Difference Portfolio 2,012 8.70% 16.92% 8.22% 2,013 27.00% 39.70% 12.70% 2,014 6.04% 8.67% 2.63% 2015 YTD -0.41% 3.21% 3.62% In a great year like 2013 the portfolio did fantastic. In a normal year like 2014 it beat the DOW by a fair amount. So far this year the portfolio is doing good at 3.62% total return gain above the Dow average loss of -0.41%. All 24 Companies In The Portfolio The 24 companies and their percentage in the portfolio and total return over a 30 month test (starting Jan 1 2013) period is shown in the table below. I chose this time frame since it included the great year of 2013 and the moderate year of 2014 and 2015 YTD. The DOW baseline for this period is 35.54% and each of the top five easily beat that baseline. The next 19 have five companies that did not beat the DOW baseline but still are great businesses. I limit the portfolio to 25 companies and let the winners grow until they reach 8% – 9% of the portfolio and then I trim the position. BA , DIS and HD are now in trim position. I start the companies at a base percentage of the portfolio of 1% and add to the position if they perform well during the next six months. At 4% of the portfolio I stop buying and let the company percentage of the portfolio grow until it hits 8% then it’s time to trim. In the portfolio only one company is actually losing money over the 30 month test period – Freeport McMoRan Inc. (NYSE: FCX ). This is my full list of 24 Good Businesses. I hope to write individual articles on some of these businesses as time permits. DOW Baseline 35.54% Company Total Return Difference Percentage of Portfolio Cumulative Total 30 Months From Baseline Percentage of Portfolio Boeing (NYSE: BA ) 92.08% 56.53% 8.77% 8.77% Home Depot (NYSE: HD ) 86.52% 50.98% 8.66% 17.43% Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS ) 127.27% 91.72% 8.05% 33.19% Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ ) 48.98% 13.44% 7.70% 25.14% L Brands Inc. (NYSE: LB ) 99.39% 63.85% 6.73% 39.92% Harley Davidson Inc. 20.06% -15.49% 6.24% 46.17% Cabela’s Inc. (NYSE: CAB ) 16.41% -19.13% 6.03% 52.20% Altria Group Inc. (NYSE: MO ) 72.57% 37.03% 6.16% 58.36% Philip Morris INTL INC. (NYSE: PM ) 6.63% -28.92% 5.49% 63.85% McDonald’s Corp. (NYSE: MCD ) 17.78% -17.76% 5.49% 69.34% Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (NYSE: EOS ) 53.55% 18.01% 5.49% 74.83% General Electric 34.39% -1.15% 4.83% 79.66% Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ: ADP ) 46.03% 10.49% 4.12% 83.78% Ingersoll-Rand plc (NYSE: IR ) 73.55% 38.01% 2.83% 86.61% Hewlett Packard 113.11% 77.57% 2.44% 89.05% Novartis AG (NYSE: NVS ) 71.37% 35.83% 1.65% 90.70% Omega Health Inv. (NYSE: OHI ) 64.02% 28.48% 1.53% 97.35% Mondelez (NASDAQ: MDLZ ) 60.52% 24.98% 1.48% 94.64% Texas Instrument (NASDAQ: TXN ) 54.02% 18.48% 1.30% 93.16% Amerisource Bergen (NYSE: ABC ) 155.97% 120.42% 1.17% 95.82% Freeport McMoran -43.95% -79.49% 1.16% 91.86% Kraft Heinz Corp. (NASDAQ: KHC ) 82.08% 46.54% 0.82% 98.17% Alcoa (NYSE: AA ) 18.06% -17.48% 0.68% 98.85% Hanes brands Inc (NYSE: HBI ) 263.04% 227.50% 0.18% 99.03% Average 32.52% Recent (last month) Portfolio Changes and Comments Added a starter position of HBI to the portfolio. If the next earnings are good I will add to this position as the above 8% positions get trimmed to balance the portfolio. I have to see if they can continue this great performance going forward. Continued selling covered calls against part of the MCD position. I am selling out of the money calls with short duration of two weeks. MCD is a great business but is being hurt by the strong dollar and its ability to compete against new startups. I have made a little extra money while we wait for MCD to turn around. Added to EOS position now 5.5% of the portfolio. I needed some extra income so I bought a little more of EOS to increase my income. I have also started selling covered calls against FCX and CAB. I am selling out of the money calls with short duration of two weeks to three weeks. One comment: I have never bought commodity companies before and both (AA and FCX) have disappointed me. A new guideline is in the making to avoid commodity companies , it just seems too much risk and uncontrolled world events to predict what the price of a commodity will be in the future. Earnings Season Has Just Started. Alcoa had a mixed report with earnings missing the expected earnings of 0.24 compared to the actual earnings at 0.19, but the revenue beat by 110 Million. The transformation of Alcoa is starting to take effect and I will wait at least two more quarters to see if it’s a turnaround or sell. I always like earnings season since most of my Good Business companies have increasing earnings. Looking forward I expect Boeing to beat the expected earnings of $2.06 this quarter but will not trim it until it reaches 10.0% of the portfolio. Last year Boeing got above 10% and I trimmed it a little to get it below 10% of the portfolio. Conclusion The 10 guidelines in the article give me a balanced portfolio of good companies that are large cap and can grow their revenues, earnings, and dividends for years. They have the staying power to fix what ever goes wrong. In each case the company has the size and good management to fix the problem. The portfolio has growth companies, defensive companies, income companies and companies with international exposure giving it what I call balance. Of the 24 companies presently in the portfolio five are underperforming the DOW average. All five companies are being hurt by the strong dollar since they are multi-national and have a large portion of their income coming from foreign operations. it is my intention to write separate comparison articles on individual companies. If you would like me to do a review of one of my Good Business Companies please comment and I will try to do it. Of course this is not a recommendation to buy or sell and you should always do your own research and talk to your financial advisor before any purchase or sale. This is how I manage my IRA retirement account and the opinions on the companies are my own. Disclosure: I am/we are long BA, HD, DIS, JNJ, LB, HOG, CAB, MO, PM, MCD, EOS, GE, ADP, IR, HPQ, NVS, OHI, MDLZ, TXN, ABC, FCX, KHC, AA, HBI. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.