Tag Archives: author

Investors Have Been Selling But Haven’t Yet Decided What To Buy

“The stock market is almost magical because it always leads the economy. It goes down long before the economy drops and then heads higher long before the economy rebounds. It always has.” -Kenneth L. Fisher If you look at the details of fund flows during the last several months, then you will discover that there have been net outflows from many funds of U.S. risk assets. This includes most U.S. equity and U.S. bond funds. As more and more time passes from the all-time peaks for many U.S. equity indices, investors are progressively realizing that the likelihood for additional gains is less than the probability that we have begun what could eventually become a full-fledged bear market. The S&P 500 reached its highest point of 2134.72 on May 20, 2015, which was more than five months ago. Investors hate to tamper with the status quo if they are comfortable with it, so very few people sold near the spring highs. In recent weeks, there have been notable outflows especially on days when U.S. equities have been declining. The more that time passes and additional lower highs are registered for the S&P 500, the Nasdaq, the Russell 2000, and similar indices, the more that people will realize that their portfolios are losing money rather than making money. Since the losses have been modest overall, these outflows haven’t nearly approached the record withdrawals which were made during the first quarter of 2009. However, there has been a notable total decline in the money committed to U.S. risk assets, while the amount of money in safe deposits including money market funds has surged in recent months. One interesting observation is that, prior to the recent climb in the popularity of safe time deposits, these had reached all-time low levels relative to the amount of money invested in riskier assets. It is likely that, obtaining only around one percent interest or less on their bank accounts and near zero in their money market funds, many investors were encouraged to shift into far more speculative alternatives. They convinced themselves, with the able assistance of financial advisors, that they were nearly as safe in high-dividend blue chip U.S. stocks or high-yield corporate bonds as they were in the bank. In reality, they have been taking enormously greater risk, because most of these assets lost more than half their value during their respective bear markets of 2007-2009. However, most advisors politely didn’t bring up this inconvenient fact, and most people would rather not think about what is possible while focusing instead on what is ideal. Now that reality has slowly begun to reassert itself, investors have been moving back into time deposits-but haven’t yet taken more than a tiny percentage of this money and invested it in other assets. Historically, whenever there is a recent surge in safe time deposits, most of the money ends up being reallocated into securities which are perceived to contain greater upside potential. The only exception tends to be near the very end of a bear market, when risk assets are plummeting and investors are frightened into safety at any cost. Since we are far from such a situation today, asset reallocation usually means chasing after whatever has recently been climbing the most in percentage terms. If 2015 ends with a net loss for most U.S. equity and bond funds, then those funds which have enjoyed net gains will stand out noticeably among a sea of red. Other investors look for whatever has rebounded the most from its recent bottom, or for various kinds of moving average crosses and other signals. Therefore, whichever assets outperform from now through the end of 2015 are likely to be especially visible and to receive increasingly positive media, analyst, and advisor coverage. The persistence of such upbeat discussion will be accompanied by strong inflows. So far, there haven’t been any sectors which have featured many such standout assets. However, this could change soon, because there is such a huge disparity between the world’s most overpriced assets and the most undervalued ones. The list of overvalued securities includes many U.S. stocks and bonds and global real estate. The most compelling bargains can generally be found among commodity-related and emerging-market assets which in many cases have been trading at lower prices than during their worst levels of 2008-2009. Because they are so inexpensive, they can gain enormously in percentage terms and yet remain far below their respective peaks from the first half of 2008 or in many cases from April 2011. If this happens, then they will be able to continue to gain dramatically until the final months of 2016 or the early months of 2017. It is too early to say whether this kind of activity will occur or not, although historically most U.S. bull markets end with a period of rising inflationary expectations. It is rare for the economy to go into a recession without first experiencing an inflationary binge. During the most recent bear market of 2007-2009, we had a sharp and unexpected inflationary climb for roughly one year from the summer of 2007 through the summer of 2008. Since literally a hundred central banks worldwide including the U.S. Federal Reserve are eager for higher inflation, we are likely to get exactly what they want. Wage inflation has been moderately accelerating in the U.S., while prices have been generally slower to follow suit. Most investors are continuing to moderately sell their previous favorites, while sitting on the fence in indecision about what to do with the money. If you follow the fund flows during the next few months, you are likely to learn a lot about what will happen for another year or more. There are supporting clues from the media, which have become less enthusiastic about U.S. assets but continue to generally favor them because they appear to many to be the only game in town. Most news articles regarding commodities or emerging markets are gloomy, especially when there have been recent price declines for anything in these sectors. It appears that precious metals and the shares of their producers may already have bottomed, while energy producers are possibly following suit while emerging markets are mostly bringing up the rear. If all of these are able to outperform, then especially with the best-known U.S. benchmark indices continuing to struggle, investors will begin to take notice of the top-performing securities and will become increasingly eager to own them. The financial markets have always been a paradox, in which more people are eager to buy something after it has doubled than before it has done so. It is surely the same this time, so most people won’t actually participate until it is too late to enjoy the lion’s share of the potential percentage gains. If an asset goes from 10 to 50, then buying it at 20 might seem to surrender only one fourth of the profit since 20 is one fourth of the way from 10 to 50. However, the gain from 10 to 50 is 400% while the increase from 20 to 50 is 150%, so you actually give up 5/8 of the total profit instead of just 1/4. The financial markets are inherently geometric rather than arithmetic, which is why it works out this way. The key is that those who buy before a rally end up gaining far more than those who wait until a rebound has been “confirmed”. Also, there is really no such thing as confirmation; whenever something has allegedly established a new uptrend, it often first suffers a sharp short-term correction to punish those who were tardy in jumping aboard the bandwagon. Tax tip: If you own shares or funds which are trading near multi-year bottoms and you are a U.S. resident, you can take advantage of their currently depressed prices if these assets are in your 401(k), 403(b), SEP-IRA, Keogh, traditional IRA, or other non-Roth retirement account. You can convert these shares from your account to a Roth IRA and pay taxes based upon their present low valuations. As these eventually rebound, all future gains will be completely tax free. In the event that these shares don’t recover but end up retreating further in price, you can choose to undo your conversion, which is known as a recharacterization. You can then wait at least 30 days, or until the following calendar year-whichever is later-and then convert them again. There is no limit to how many times you can repeat this process and there are no income or other restrictions in making such conversions and recharacterizations, as long as each recharacterization is done on or before October 15 of the year following the date when the conversion had been done. It’s like being able to go back in time and “unbuy” something which doesn’t go up in price. It’s heads you win, and tails you also win. Unfortunately, I do not know of an equivalent strategy which is permitted in any other country besides the United States. Disclosure: In August-September 2013, and at various points during 2014-2015, I have been buying the shares of emerging-market country funds whenever they have appeared to be most undervalued. Since June 2013, I have added periodically to funds of mining shares-and more recently energy shares-especially following their most extended pullbacks. I have also been accumulating HDGE whenever U.S. equity indices are near their peaks; HDGE is an actively-managed fund that sells short U.S. equities. I believe that U.S. assets of almost all kinds have become dangerously overvalued. From my largest to my smallest position, I currently own (NYSEARCA: GDXJ ), (NYSEARCA: KOL ), (NYSEARCA: XME ), (NYSEARCA: COPX ), (NYSEARCA: SIL ), (NYSEARCA: HDGE ), (NYSEARCA: GDX ), (NYSEARCA: REMX ), (NYSEARCA: EWZ ), (NYSEARCA: RSX ), (NYSEARCA: GLDX ), (NYSEARCA: URA ), (NYSEARCA: IDX ), (NYSEARCA: GXG ), (MUTF: VGPMX ), (NYSEARCA: ECH ), (NYSEARCA: FCG ), (NYSEARCA: VNM ), (MUTF: BGEIX ), (NYSEARCA: NGE ), (NASDAQ: PLTM ), (NYSEARCA: EPU ), (NYSEARCA: TUR ), (NYSEARCA: SILJ ), (NYSEARCA: SOIL ), (NYSEARCA: EPHE ), and (NYSEARCA: THD ). In the late spring of 2014, I sold all of my SCIF which had briefly become my fourth-largest holding, because euphoria over the Indian election was irrationally overdone and this fund had more than doubled. I have reduced my total cash position to roughly 3% of my total liquid net worth in order to increase my holdings in the above assets. I sold all of my SLX by acting whenever steel insiders were doing likewise. I also sold all of my FCG but I have been repurchasing it following its recent collapse because there has been intense buying by top corporate insiders of companies which produce natural gas. I expect the S&P 500 to eventually lose about two thirds of its recent peak value, with its next bear-market bottom occurring within several months of October 2017. The Russell 2000 Index and its funds including IWM have only modestly surpassed their highs from the first week of March 2014, while the Russell Microcap Index (NYSEARCA: IWC ) marginally surpassed its zenith from March 6, 2014. The S&P 500 Index set a new all-time high on numerous occasions during the same period, and may have completed its final top for the cycle at 2134.72 on May 20, 2015. This marks a classic negative divergence which previously occurred in years including 1928-1929, 1972-1973, and 2007. Those who have “forgotten” or never learned the lessons of previous bear markets are doomed to repeat their mistakes.

Money Markets On The Money With $10.3 Billion Gain

By Patrick Keon Lipper’s fund macro-groups (including both mutual funds and exchange-traded funds [ETFs]) had aggregate net inflows of $8.6 billion for the fund-flows week ended Wednesday, September 23. This activity marked the second consecutive week of overall positive flows; the groups took in $4.7 billion of net new money the prior week. Money market funds (+$10.3 billion) saw the largest net inflows this past week, while municipal bond funds (+$231 million) also experienced positive flows. Equity funds (-$2.0 billion) suffered the largest net outflows, while taxable bond funds had net outflows of $33 million for the week. The S&P 500 Index (-56.55 points) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-460.06 points) were down 2.83% and 2.75%, respectively, for the week. Both indices suffered the lion’s share of their losses during two trading days (Friday, September 18 and Tuesday, September 22). The major market news of the week was the Federal Reserve’s decision to leave interest rates unchanged. Despite an improving U.S. labor market, Fed Chair Janet Yellen cited the inflation rate (which is significantly below the 2.0% target) and global growth concerns (China) as the reason for keeping rates where they are. The Fed’s inaction was the main impetus for the losses incurred by the indices, as it created fear about the depth of China’s economic problems and uncertainty about when the Fed will raise rates. In an attempt to jawbone the market, Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart said he still expects the Fed to hike rates later this year because of stronger jobs data outweighing the below-target inflation rate. The statement achieved its desired result (at least temporarily), with the market posting gains on the day of the statement (Monday, September 21) before retreating again on Tuesday, September 22, on renewed concerns about the slumping global economy. The net inflows for the week into money market funds (+$10.3 billion) broke a three-week string of net outflows for the group, which saw almost $29 billion leave its coffers. Institutional money market funds accounted for the entirety of the net inflows this past week, taking in just over $13.0 billion of new money. Equity ETFs were responsible for all of the net outflows (-$4.9 billion) for the week, while equity mutual funds had $2.9 billion of net inflows. Non-domestic equity funds took in the majority of the net new money (+$2.2 billion), while domestic equity funds contributed $673 million to the total. The SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF ( SPY , -$8.3 billion) was responsible for all of the net outflows on the ETF side. In a reverse of the equity fund activity, taxable bond mutual funds (-$1.4 billion net) had money leave, while ETF products had $1.3 billion of net inflows. Lipper’s Core Bond Funds classification (-$2.3 billion net) was by far the largest contributor to the outflows on the mutual fund side, while for ETFs the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF ( TLT , +$414 million) and the iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF ( HYG , +$212 million) had the two largest net inflows. Municipal bond mutual funds took in $322 million of net new money, breaking a streak of four straight weeks of net outflows. Funds in Lipper’s national municipal bond fund group contributed $338 million of net inflows to the total, while single-state municipal bond funds saw $16 million leave.

3 Mid Cap Growth ETFs To Buy For Q4

Increasing uncertainty pertaining to the China turmoil, global growth worries, slumping commodities and timing of the interest rates hike in the U.S. are general concerns. In this backdrop that has lasted for quite some weeks now, the broader U.S. market has trapped itself in a nasty web of trading. While the U.S. economy is on a firmer footing, calling for a rates hike sometime later in the year, the fundamentals in other developed and developing markets are deteriorating. This is especially true given the slowdown in Japan, sluggishness in Europe, technical recession in Canada and weak growth in emerging markets. Additionally, investors are wary of third-quarter earnings, which are expected to drop 5.8% on 3.9% lower revenues for the S&P 500 index, as per the Zacks Earnings Trends . Moreover, the ongoing battle over the funding for Planned Parenthood between Republicans and Congress could lead to the possible shutdown of the federal government at the end of the month. All these conditions are increasing the volatility in the market, putting the stocks’ returns at risk. However, the bullish sentiment for U.S. stocks remains intact given the substantial improvement in the economy and a healing job market. In such a scenario, investors seeking to participate in the growing economy, but are worried about uncertainty, should consider mid-cap stocks in the basket form. Why Mid Caps? While large companies are normally known for stability and smaller ones for growth, mid caps offer the best of both the worlds, allowing growth and stability in portfolios simultaneously. These middle-of-road securities are arguably safer options and have the potential to move higher in turbulent times, especially if political issues or financial instability creeps into the picture. Further, honing in on growth securities in this capitalization level allows investors to earn more returns. This is because growth stocks refer to those high quality stocks that are likely to witness revenues and earnings increase at a faster rate than the industry average. These stocks harness their momentum in earnings to create a positive bias in the market, resulting in rocketing share prices. There are currently a number of ways to tackle this overlooked part of the market segment through ETFs, giving exposure to various styles including broad, value and growth. With such a large number of choices, it may be difficult to choose the right funds. After all, many of these products target the same securities though they have different tilts, weighting schemes or focus for their portfolios. How to Pick Right ETFs? One way to narrow down the list is to utilize the Zacks ETF Rank. This system looks to find the best ETFs in a given market segment based on a number of factors such as industry outlook and expert surveys; and then apply ETF-specific factors (like expense ratios and bid/ask spreads). And given the rise of the outlook for mid caps of late, it shouldn’t be too surprising that a few have moved to the top Zacks ETF Rank of 1 (Strong Buy) from Zacks ETF Rank 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) in the latest ratings’ update. Below, we have highlighted these three surging funds in brief detail for investors seeking a way to make a great play on the overlooked mid cap growth space in basket form: Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: VOT ) This fund follows the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Holding 177 securities in its basket, it is highly diversified across each component with none holding more than 1.5% share. In terms of sector exposure, industrials occupies the top position at 19.3%, followed by consumer services (19.2%), technology (14.7%), and consumer goods (14.2%). The product has managed nearly $3.4 billion in its asset base and trades in moderate volume of around 177,000 shares. Expense ratio came in at 0.09%. VOT has lost 1.6% in the year-to-date timeframe. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: JKH ) With AUM of $217.4 million, this product tracks the Morningstar Mid Growth Index. In total, it holds 204 mid cap securities with none accounting for more than 1.53% of assets. Information technology, industrials, consumer discretionary, health care and financials are the top five sectors with double-digit exposure each. The ETF charges 30 bps in annual fees and trades in a light volume of less than 5,000 shares a day. It has shed 2.2% so far this year. Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: IVOG ) This ETF tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index, charging investors 20 bps in fees per year. It has amassed $379.3 million in its asset base while sees a light volume of less than 13,000 shares. The fund holds 229 stocks with a well-diversified portfolio as each firm holds no more than 1.4% of total assets. However, it is skewed toward financials with one-fourth share while information technology, consumer discretionary, industrials and health care round of the top five. The ETF has gained 1.6% in the year-to-date timeframe. Link to the original article on Zacks.com