Tag Archives: alternative

EWI: 3 Coins In The Fountain

A long established fund, with consistent dividend returns. The fund is well off its highs attained before the financial crises of 2008. Italy, as part of the larger EU, offers investors the opportunity to grow with a recovering EU economy. Among the available legions of ETFs there are only two mostly Italian weighted at better than 94% and they are closely related funds. First, is the plain vanilla iShares MSCI Italy Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: EWI ) and the currency hedged version, the iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Italy ETF (NYSEARCA: HEWI ). The currency hedged fund HEWI, as its ticker symbol suggests, is identically the EWI fund with the addition of a U.S. Dollar vs Euro currency hedge. It should be noted that a currency hedge does its best to mitigate fluctuation in currency exchange. Just briefly, when the U.S. Dollar strengthens against the Euro, Euro denominated profits will seem to shrink when translated into U.S. Dollars even if Euro denominated profits remain unchanged. Conversely, when the Dollar weakens vs the Euro, Euro denominated profits will seem to grow, even if Euro denominated profits remain unchanged. A currency hedge is designed to ‘smooth out’ these fluctuations. However, there are costs associated with currency hedge, so an investor would a long term horizon may or may not fully benefit from a currency hedge. Hence, the choice of the hedged [HEWI] or unhedged [EWI] version is left to the discretion of the investor. The benchmark index is Morgan Stanley Capital International [MSCI] Italy 25/50 Index (NYSEARCA: USD ): The MSCI Italy 25/50 Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid-cap segments of the Italian market. It applies certain investment limits that are imposed on regulated investment companies, or RICs, under the current U.S. Internal Revenue Code. With 26 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Italy. The fund’s cap refers to U.S. IRS tax code in that: …at the end of each quarter of its tax year no more than 25% of the value of the RIC’s assets may be invested in a single issuer and the sum of the weights of all issuers representing more than 5% of the fund should not exceed 50% of the fund’s total assets… Lastly, the MSCI cap methodology is designed to minimize turnover. (click to enlarge) ( Data From MSCI and BlackRock) The three heaviest weighted sectors are a little different. The fund weights the Energy Sector energy about 10.8% more than does the index; Financials about 4.41% lighter than the index and Utilities almost 13% heavier than the index. So the fund leans a little more defensively than does the index. In spite of the difference, the iShares Italy capped fund EWI seems to emulate the MSCI index rather well. iShares EWI vs the MSCI Index 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year Inception MSCI Italy 25/50 Index -7.09% 7.97% -0.58% -2.83% 4.07% iShares Italy Capped EWI -7.23% 8.21% -0.59% -2.83% 4.16% (Data From BlackRock) As far as individual holdings, MSCI only list the top ten heaviest weighted holdings. A quick comparison reveals a slight difference from the fund. First, the top ten Index holdings represents 65.42% of the entire index, whereas the top ten holdings of EWI represents 68.74% of the fund’s holdings. As far as individual top ten holdings, the iShares fund carries three identical financials and Telecom Italia (NYSE: TI ) 3.6132% of the fund’s total holdings. On the other hand, the MSCI Index carries a fourth financial, Banca Monte Dei Paschi di Siena ( OTCPK:BMDPY ) 5.25%, of the index. The fund carries the bank also, but it accounts for only 2.096% of the total fund. Top ten comparison of MSCI Index vs iShares EWI Sector MSCI EWI Sector Consumer Discretionary LUXOTTICA GROUP (NYSE: LUX ): 4.66% LUXOTTICA GROUP: 4.58% Consumer Discretionary Consumer Discretionary FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES NV (NYSE: FCAU ): 4.00% FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES NV: 4.11% Consumer Discretionary Energy ENI (NYSE: ENI ): 11.00% ENI: 11.96% Energy Financials INTESA SANPAOLO ( OTCPK:ISNPY ): 12.13% INTESA SANPAOLO: 13.48% Financials Financials UNICREDIT ( OTC:UNCFY ): 7.57 UNICREDIT: 8.72% Financials Financials BANCA MONTE DEI PASCHI DI SIENA SP: 5.25% ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI: 4.53% Financials Financials ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI ( OTCPK:ARZGY ): 4.48% ATLANTIA: 4.56% Industrials Industrials ATLANTIA ( OTCPK:ATASY ): 4.43% TELECOM ITALIA: 3.61% Telecommunications Utilities ENEL ( OTCPK:ENLAY ): 7.73% ENEL: 8.93% Utilities Utilities SNAM ( OTCPK:SNMRY ): 4.00% SNAM: 4.26% Utilities Represents 65.42% of the Index Represents 68.74% of the Fund (Data from BlackRock and MSCI) It’s worth making note of the difference between those two top holdings. Banca Monte Dei Paschi di Siena provides corporate and consumer banking services, asset management, life insurance, pension funds and investment trust. The bank has a market cap of $5.3876 billion, has a negative EPS at -5.97 and does not pay a dividend. Lastly, the shares are rather volatile with a beta of 1.73 times the market. Telecom Italia’s primary businesses are landline and mobile telephone service, internet and internet protocol TV as well as the office product and IT provider, Olivetti , as a wholly owned subsidiary. Telecom Italia company is the leading company in its sector, with international operations in Brazil and Argentina in addition to domestic operations. Telecom Italia has a market cap of $19.87 billion, a P/E of 25.65 and a beta of 1.43 times the market, however, no dividend yield. (click to enlarge) Lastly, a few words about the Italian economy: Italy seems to have two economies: the northern, industrial economy as well as a lagging southern economy. The difference is notable. The entire economy grew at about 0.3% in 2015-Q1 with full year expectations of about 0.7%. The Eurozone economy, (EU19) as a whole, grew at 0.4% in Q1. The results were similar in Q2, with Italy growing at 0.2%, while the entire EU19 grew at 0.3%. However, according to the Economist , ” A Tale of Two Economies” , North and Central Italy grew at 2%, well ahead of the Eurozone as well as the entire EU, (EU28). To put it perspective: … Of the 943,000 Italians who became unemployed between 2007 and 2014, 70% were southerners… … Italy’s aggregate workforce contracted by 4% over that time; the south’s, by 10.7%… …Employment in the south is lower than in any country in the European Union, at 40%; in the north, it is 64%… In the North, per Capita GDP is about $35,500; in the south about $19,250. Unemployment in the North is 9.5%; in the south 20.7%. Public debt is approximately 133% of GDP. The economic obstacles in the south go beyond direct economic regions, including changing demographics. About 700,000 Italians migrated to the northern part of the country and skilled labor is in short supply in the south. Lastly, the southern region contains the islands Sardinia and Sicily where growth and recovery have been slower. Until recently, both islands have been weighed down by higher utility and transportation costs to and from the mainland. Their economies rely heavily on the Hospitality Industry. However, recent reforms and infrastructure upgrades have had very positive results. To put progressive reforms in perspective, Sicily now ranks as the 8th and Sardinia 13th of the fastest growing of the 20 regions in Italy. Sardinia is currently seeking tax haven status, and is currently free from custom duties; Sicily is developing Etna Valley, attracting electronics firms such as STMicroelectronics (NYSE: STM ) and Numonyx, a wholly owned subsidiary of Micron Technologies (NASDAQ: MU ). Key Facts Summary Net Assets Outstanding Shares Holdings x-cash or derivatives 20 Day Average Volume Expense Ratio (Industry Average 0.44%) Price/ Earnings Price/ Book Beta Annualized Yield iShares EWI Italy 25/50 Capped $1.1504 billion USD 79.5 million 26 494,696 0.48% 22.39 1.10 0.85 3.69% and 2.52% TTM (Data from BlackRock and MSCI) At first glance, an investor might shy away based on the Italian economy and to be sure, there is a risk. However, Italy is a key component state of the larger European Union. In other words, the Italian economy is not entirely left to its own devices and is subject to the rules and regulations governing its membership in the EU. True the EU has had some difficult years, but amazingly, has not only come out intact, but has even added a new member. Right now, Italy’s economy as an EU member will feel the effects of a global economic contraction. However, for those investors with patience, the potential for the Italy economy as a member of a fully recovered EU economy, may prove profitable in the long run.

Solid Income Company With A Dividend Increase Coming Soon: American Electric Power

Summary American Electric Power has an excellent total return over the last 33-month test period. American Electric Power’s dividend is 3.9% and has been increased nine of the last ten years. American Electric Power can continue its steady upward trend of approximately 4% as it focuses on its $12.2 billion plan for regulated transmission and distribution assets. This article is about American electric Power (NYSE: AEP ) and why it’s an income company that’s being looked at in The Good Business Portfolio. American Electric Power Company is a utility holding company. The Good Business Portfolio Guidelines, total return, earnings and company business will be looked at. Good Business Portfolio Guidelines. American electric Power passes 10 of 10 Good Business Portfolio Guidelines. These guidelines are only used to filter companies to be considered in the portfolio. There are many good business companies that don’t break many of these guidelines but will still not be considered for the portfolio at this time. For a complete set of the guidelines, please see my article ” The Good Business Portfolio: All 24 Positions .” These guidelines provide me with a balanced portfolio of income, defensive and growing companies that keeps me ahead of the Dow average. American Electric Power is a large-cap company with a capitalization of $26.4 billion. AEP provides electric utility services to about 5.348 million customers in 11 states over a total area of 197,500 square miles. The company derived 25% of its consolidated system retail revenues in 2014 from its utilities in Ohio, 14% from Texas, 13% from Virginia, 11% from West Virginia, 11% from Oklahoma, 10% from Indiana, 5% from Louisiana, 5% from Kentucky and the remainder from other states. American Electric Power has a dividend yield of 3.9% and its dividend has been increased for nine of the last ten years. The payout ratio is moderate at 60%. American Electric Power therefore is not a growth story at this time but may be as the steady growth of the company continues. The dividend is expected to be increased at the end of October and is estimated to be increased $0.02/quarter or a 4% increase. American Electric Power income is good at $3.54/share which leaves AEP plenty of cash flow, allowing it to pay its high dividend and have a enough left over for its capital campaign I also require the CAGR going forward to be able to cover my yearly expenses. My dividends provide 2.8% of the portfolio as income and I need 2.2% more for a yearly distribution of 5%. American Electric Power has a three-year CAGR of 5% just meeting my requirement. Looking back five years $10,000 invested five years ago would now be worth over $18,255 today (from S&P IQ). This makes AEP a good investment for the income investor with its steady 4% dividend and earnings growth. American Electric Power’s S&P Capital IQ has a three-star rating or Hold with a price target of $55.0. This makes AEP fairly priced at present and a good choice for the income investor. Total Return and Yearly Dividend The Good Business Portfolio Guidelines are just a screen to start with and not absolute rules. When I look at a company, the total return is a key parameter to see if it fits the objective of the Good Business Portfolio. American Electric Power did better than the Dow baseline in my 33.0 month test compared to the Dow average. I chose the 33.0 month test period (starting January 1, 2013) because it includes the great year of 2013, the moderate year of 2014 and the losing year of 2015 YTD. I have had comments about why I do not compare the total return to the S&P 500 average. I use the Dow average because the Good Business Portfolio has six Dow companies in it and is weighted more to the Dow average than the S&P 500. Modeling the Dow average is not an objective of the portfolio but just happened by using the 10 guidelines as a filter for company selection. The total return makes American Electric Power appropriate for the growth investor with the 4% dividend good for the income investor. The dividend is lower than average and covered and has been paid and increased each year for eight years of the last ten years. DOW’s 32.5-month total return baseline is 25.71% Company Name 33.0 Month total return Difference from DOW baseline Yearly Dividend percentage American Electric Power 42.15% 16.44% 3.9% Last Quarter’s Earnings For the last quarter (July 2015) American Electric Power reported earnings that beat expected at $0.88 compared to last year at $0.80 and expected at $0.80 and revenue missed by $180 million. This was a good report. Earnings for the next quarter are expected to be at $0.95 compared to last year at $1.01. The steady growth in AEP should provide a company that will continue to have slightly above average total return and provide steady income for the income investor. Business Overview American Electric Power Company, Inc. is a utility holding company. It operates in five segments. The vertically integrated utilities segment generates, transmits and distributes electricity through AEP Generating Company, Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Kingsport Power Company, Kentucky Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Southwestern Electric Power Company and Wheeling Power Company. The Transmission and Distribution Utilities segment transmits and distributes electricity through Ohio Power Company, AEP Texas Central Company and AEP Texas North Company. The Generation and Marketing segment’s subsidiaries consist of non-utility generating assets, a wholesale energy trading and marketing business and a retail supply and energy management business. AEP Transmission Holdco is a holding company for AEP’s transmission joint ventures and AEP Transmission Company, LLC. The AEP River Operations segment transports liquid, coal and dry bulk commodities. With electric usage increasing in the United States the diversity of American Electric Power assets should allow the company to continue its growth and safely pay a moderately increasing dividend. Takeaways and Recent Portfolio Changes American Electric Power is a income company. Considering AEP’s steady slow growth and its total return better than the Dow average, AEP is a buy for the income investor. The only negative for AEP is when the Fed starts raising interest rates that will cause rising interest expense, giving AEP a headwind for a couple of years. AEP is not being added to The Good Business Portfolio right now since there are no open slots in the portfolio the Good business Portfolio is limited to 25 positions and AEP will be considered when there is an open slot. Of course this is not a recommendation to buy or sell and you should always do your own research and talk to your financial advisor before any purchase or sale. This is how I manage my IRA retirement account and the opinions on the companies are my own.

Portland General: Utility With Some Promise

Summary Short-term, headwinds exist related to heavy capital expenditures and poor weather forecasts. Long-term, spending should be down and income up, freeing up cash flow for shareholder returns. Two natural gas-fired plant openings, one in 2016 and one in 2020, will be key to company success. Portland General Electric Company (NYSE: POR ) is an electric utility that operates wholly within the state of Oregon, providing power to nearly 50% of Oregonians with over 3,400MW of available energy generation. Primarily serving residential customers, the company’s bottom line has been bolstered by domestic migration to the Northwest. From 2010-2014, the Portland metropolitan area added over one hundred thousand new residents – an annual growth rate of 5.2%. This strong local population growth has helped bolster earnings results and shareholder returns, with investors reaping 100% in total return over the past five years, roughly double the return of utilities indexes. Does Portland General have more room to run or has the utility run its course? Future Is Natural Gas, Profit Is With Hydro * Portland General September 2015 Investor Presentation Portland General has a diverse portfolio of power generation. Including purchased power, 36% of power was created from renewable sources and an additional 25% generated from cleaner-burning natural gas. This is going to change drastically over the next few years, however. Given Oregon’s progressive nature, it wasn’t a surprise to see Oregon residents campaign for clean power. Management quickly bowed to customer and political pressure, leading to plans for the elimination of all coal-fired generation in Oregon. Under the Boardman 2020 plan, Portland General will close its 518MW Boardman coal asset by 2020, instead building a natural gas facility on the site. This will be a costly project, but doing so will save the company $470M in required upgrades to meet emissions guidelines had the plant remained open until 2040 as previously guided. The risk here is that the new plant is delayed and is not completed by the time Boardman is scheduled to be mothballed. Portland General relies heavily on the Boardman plant to produce electricity as coal-fired generation is in many cases the cheapest and most reliable asset the company has. Coal represents 16.5% of available resource capacity but generated 28% of the load in 2015 and is run at capacity nearly constantly. The company’s peak power load in 2014 was 3866MW which was already above currently available company-owned power generation and the shortfall from the Boardman plant closure could force Portland General to increase purchased power during peak times. While these costs will inevitably be passed along to the consumer because of Portland General’s clauses with the Public Utility Commission of Oregon, higher prices could still cause a slack in energy demand and bad press is never good for the bottom line. The company’s Carty Generating Station, slated to be completed in 2017, will help cover future shortfalls built is imperative for investors to track how the new Boardman facility’s construction is proceeding over the coming years. This risk is noted in the company’s 10-K: “Beyond 2018, PGE may need additional resources in order to meet the 2020 and 2025 RPS requirements and to replace energy from Boardman, which is scheduled to cease coal-fired operations in 2020. Additional post-2018 actions may also be needed to offset expiring power purchase agreements and to back-up variable energy resources, such as wind generation facilities. These actions are expected to be identified in a future IRP. PGE expects to file its next IRP with the OPUC in 2016.” – Portland General, 2014 Form 10-K From a profitability standpoint, the key to the company’s energy costs however is hydroelectricity. Hydroelectric generation can be the lowest cost source of generation for Portland General if conditions are right. The state of the Deschutes and Clackamas Rivers (tributaries of the Columbia River) is key. Both of these rivers’ headwaters are fed by the Cascades, a mountain range spanning from Canada to Northern California. In general, the greater the snowfall, the better the power generation is for hydroelectric when the spring thaw comes. Unfortunately for Portland General shareholders and highlighted in a recent prior SeekingAlpha article by Tristan Brown , weather models show lower than average snowfall likely for Oregon, along with a more mild winter in regards to temperature. This presents a double whammy for Portland General in the form of higher energy costs and lower revenue in the winter months during which customers typically draw around 10-15% more electricity than in the summer months. Past Operating Results (click to enlarge) Operating results have been steady and rather uneventful over the past five years (my own estimates used for the back half of 2015). Of note however is depreciation/amortization costs have been increasing dramatically due to the large capital investments the company has been making over the past five years, developing relatively more expensive wind/solar farms and the costs associated with the Carty Generating Station. Overall, this is steady-as-she-goes results that utility investors like to see. (click to enlarge) Frequent readers of my utilities research know that I look for solid coverage of capital expenditures and dividends from operating cash flow for mature utilities. Starting in 2013, Portland General reversed course and begun stepping up the leverage as capital expenditures rose for the natural gas plants at the Carty Generation Station and the old Boardman location. To fund this, Portland General issued $865M in long-term debt in 2013/2014 and also issued $67M worth of common stock in 2013 to cover the cash flow gaps. While this picture looks currently worrisome, it should moderate over time. Capital expenditures are expected to fall from the $600-650M range in 2015 to $289M in 2019, back to levels we saw in 2011/2012 when cash flow was positive. Unfortunately, Portland General won’t see much recovery in the form of increased rates because of offsetting factors, based on the overall breakdown of the 2016 rate case filing: (click to enlarge) Conclusion Portland General saw a little bit more renewed interest after the 7% dividend increase in 2015, well in excess of 2% annual growth from 2009-2014. In regards to operating income, however, 2016 looks unclear given the poor weather outlook. Earnings per share are likely to be flat to down in 2015/2016, so I would not expect a repeat of that hefty 2014 dividend increase. Before entering a position, I would like to see the valuation come down along with more visibility on completion of the two big natural gas facilities (early 2016 should give excellent insight into schedule on Carty Generation Station). Overall, however, shares are quite fairly valued given the long-term prospects of the region. Being long won’t hurt you.