Tag Archives: alternative

Nothing New About Gold

By Roger Nusbaum, AdvisorShares ETF Strategist A big part of successfully engaging in markets (success defined as not doing yourself in with poor decision making and having enough money when you need it) is revisiting certain principles that although crucial can be forgotten when they are most important. A great example of this is holding onto a small allocation to gold for its low to negative correlation to equities. I’ve written about this regularly for more than ten years with the main points being that gold continues to not look like the stock market. That was true ten years ago when equities were flattish and gold went up, it was true during the worst of the financial crisis when stocks went down a lot and gold was kind of flattish, it was true in the most recent bull market when equities rocketed and gold sunk. It is playing out as true now as equities have rolled over for the last six months while gold and mining stocks too for that matter have gone up. Play around with some ticker symbols on Google Finance and you’ll see that the S&P 500 is down high single digits for the last six months while ETFs tracking gold are up about 10% and ETFs tracking miners are up in the neighborhood of 30%. While I don’t think too many investors will want to take on the volatility that goes with the miners, the point is still the same. I continue to believe that if gold is the top performing holding you have then chances are things are going so well in the world and that seems to fit right now. Questioning gold’s role as a portfolio holding gained momentum in the media and blogs as equities continued to rally which is in part about impatience which to the intro of this post is one behavior that does investors in. This ties into a slightly bigger concept or investing belief about defense being more important than offense or as I’ve described it; smoothing out the ride. Using gold to help with that objective can be done without having to be very tactical with it; you own it and without having to figure out when equities might turn down, you have the position in place for whenever they do. Clearly this does not resonate with everyone; if it does not resonate with you then you probably don’t own any gold and if it does resonate with you, then you do have some gold but the time to make this decision is not now when volatility is sky high and emotions/indecision might also be elevated. Bigger picture still, is the importance of remembering why you chose whatever you chose for your approach to investing and knowing what type of market environments play to your approach’s strengths and weaknesses. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: To the extent that this content includes references to securities, those references do not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold such security. AdvisorShares is a sponsor of actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and holds positions in all of its ETFs. This document should not be considered investment advice and the information contain within should not be relied upon in assessing whether or not to invest in any products mentioned. Investment in securities carries a high degree of risk which may result in investors losing all of their invested capital. Please keep in mind that a company’s past financial performance, including the performance of its share price, does not guarantee future results. To learn more about the risks with actively managed ETFs visit our website AdvisorShares.com .

Understanding Liquid Alternatives: Ask The Right Questions

Financial advisors and other professional investors often have a lot of questions about liquid alternatives, and for good reason. The investment strategies used in alternative mutual funds and ETFs are not straight forward by any means. Many use some form of leverage. Most utilize the ability to short securities, while others use a variety of derivative instruments to efficiently gain exposure to certain assets classes or securities. But when used properly, liquid alternatives can be an effective tool to mitigate risk, increase diversification and/or enhance returns. So what questions should advisors be asking? To answer that question, Cognios Capital , managers of the Cognios Market Neutral Large Cap Fund (MUTF: COGIX ), has produced a handy guide, “FAQ: Liquid Alternatives.” The eight-page white paper answers the following frequently asked questions: What is the difference between traditional alternative investments and liquid alternatives? What is the benefit of adding alternatives to my portfolio? How many different alternative strategies do I need? From where should I fund my alternative allocation? Are there risks that are unique to alternatives? Why not just invest in a multi-strategy fund? Why is there such a large difference in returns among the different types of alternative strategies? What does it mean to be Beta Neutral? How are fees and expenses reported for alternative mutual funds? Cognios’s white paper answers each of the above queries in great detail, devoting nearly a page to each answer. What follows is an abbreviated summary of the report. Traditional vs. Liquid Alts Alternative investments include assets such as commodities, currencies, and private equity; as well as public-equity strategies such as long/short equity, market neutral, and equity arbitrage. Traditional alternatives are subject to less stringent regulation by the SEC, have less liquidity and transparency than liquid alts, and are open to wealthy individuals and institutions only. Liquid alts offer similar exposures but through SEC-regulated mutual funds and ETFs, with daily liquidity and greater transparency. Benefits of Allocating to Alts Alternatives present many potential benefits, but perhaps the most obvious is their potential to improve the risk-adjusted return of portfolios through exposure to assets and strategies with low correlation to traditional stocks and bonds. How Many Alts are Needed? According to Cognios, a 10% to 25% allocation “may be an optimal range” for individual investors. As for the optimal number of different alternative strategies, this depends on investors’ desired outcomes. Alternatives aren’t a single “asset class” – a variety of strategies pursue a variety of different outcomes. Funding an Alts Allocation Should alternatives be funded from the equity portion of a portfolio, the fixed-income sleeve, or a separate “alts” sleeve? According to Cognios, there is no one right time to add alts to a portfolio – and similarly, there is no one right way to fund them. Unique Risks Cognios cites the following as unique risks to investing in alts: Insufficient manager experience Limited track records Difficult-to-understand strategies Multi-Strategy Funds Investing in a multi-strategy fund leaves the decision of which strategies to invest in and how much to allocate to each strategy up to an outside manager. While this can be beneficial, multi-strategy funds sacrifice customization for ease. Furthermore, multi-strategy funds aren’t always fully diversified within the alts space, so certain single strategy funds may be needed to complement multi-strategy holdings. Dispersion of Returns Since alts aren’t a single “asset class,” it makes sense that there would be a wide dispersion of returns across the different alternative assets and strategies. But even within a given strategy, wide dispersion between the best and worst performers is common, since many funds operate different sub-strategies and most are unconstrained by benchmarks. Beta Neutrality A “beta” of 1.0 indicates 100% correlation with a given benchmark. Equity market neutral funds pursue “beta neutrality,” meaning a beta of as close to 0.0 as possible. This way, their returns are isolated from the fluctuations of the broad market. Liquid Alts Fees While alternative mutual funds certainly have lower fees than their hedge-fund counterparts (in most cases, at least), their fees aren’t necessarily as straightforward as those of traditional mutual funds. This is because strategies that engage in short-selling incur related costs, whereas traditional mutual funds don’t sell short, and thus don’t incur these added charges. Download the full guide for complete answers to the nine questions (linked above). Jason Seagraves contributed to this article.

Telecom ETFs To Watch After Lukewarm Earnings

This year has been rather mediocre for the telecom industry, with lukewarm results coming up amid turbulent economic conditions. The industry has emerged as an intensely contested space, where success depends largely on technical superiority, quality of services and scalability. Cut-throat pricing competition has put pressure on margins this earnings season. However, mixed results and global market concerns notwithstanding, the overall sentiment for the U.S. telecommunications industry in 2016 is positive. Telecommunications is one of the few industries to have managed to undergo rapid technological improvement even during depression. In this era of digitization and technology, the ever-growing demand for technologically superior products should see the sector through. Quite expectedly, investors will keep an eye on telecom earnings for the rest of this season to assess industry dynamics and future growth prospects, with several big names like T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS ), Dish Network Corp. (NASDAQ: DISH ) and Cincinnati Bell Inc. (NYSE: CBB ) yet to report. Telecom Earnings in Details U.S. telecom behemoth Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ ) reported impressive results, beating on both the top and the bottom line. Adjusted earnings per share of 89 cents beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by a penny and year-ago earnings of 71 cents. Quarterly total revenue increased 3.2% year over year to $34,254 million, outpacing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $34,132 million. Apart from earnings, the company was also in the news because of other developments. According to a recent Bloomberg report , Verizon has assigned its chief executive officer of its AOL unit, Tim Armstrong, a key role, exploring options to bid for the core assets of tech giant Yahoo Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO ). However, neither company has confirmed the news as yet. Verizon has gained 11.2% since reporting earnings (as of February 11, 2016). In contrast U.S. telecom giant AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T ) reported weak financial results, wherein both the top and bottom line lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate. AT&T’s adjusted earnings per share moved up 14.5% year over year to 63 cents, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by a penny. Quarterly revenue increased 22.3% year over year to $42,119 million, but missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $42,781 million. AT&T’s weaker-than-expected earnings were primarily attributable to disappointing postpaid wireless subscriber addition of 526,000, down a significant 38.4% year over year. The stock has gained 2.3% since reporting earnings (as of February 11, 2016). CenturyLink Inc. ‘s (NYSE: CTL ) solid quarterly performance was buoyed by increased revenues from the acceptance and recognition of Connect America Fund (CAF) phase II funds, along with strength in high-bandwidth data services and consumer strategic revenues. The telecom company’s fourth-quarter 2015 adjusted earnings per share of 80 cents surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 65 cents and were up 33.3% year over year. Quarterly total revenue of $4,476 million rose 0.9% from the prior-year quarter and surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4,427 million. The stock climbed 11% since reporting earnings (as of February 11, 2016). ETFs in Focus Thanks to mixed results, telecom ETFs with considerable exposure to the three stocks above were all in the red in the last 10 trading sessions (as of February 11, 2016). Below, we discuss four of these that are in focus in the coming days (see all Telecommunication ETFs here ). iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (NYSEARCA: IYZ ) IYZ tracks investment results before fees and expenses corresponding to the price and yield performance of the Dow Jones US Select Telecommunications Index. The fund manages assets worth nearly $416.6 million and has an average trading volume of roughly 438,000 shares a day. It charges an expense ratio of 43 basis points a year. IYZ holds 25 stocks and has a concentrated approach in the top 10 holdings, with almost 63% of the asset base invested in them. Among individual holdings, top stocks in the ETF include AT&T, Verizon and CenturyLink, with asset allocation of 13.3%, 13.1% and 6.03%, respectively. The four major sectors of this ETF include Integrated Telecom, Wireless Telecom, Alternative Carriers and Communications Equipment, with asset holdings of 56.1%, 23.3%, 18.1% and 2.5%, respectively. The product lost 2.1% in the past 10 days and currently has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a Medium risk outlook. Fidelity MSCI Telecommunications Services Index ETF (NYSEARCA: FCOM ) This ETF tracks investment results before fees and expenses corresponding to the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. The fund manages assets worth nearly $89 million and has an average trading volume of roughly 56,000 shares a day. It charges an expense ratio of 12 basis points a year. FCOM holds 33 stocks and has a concentrated approach in the top 10 holdings, with 73.5% of the asset base invested in them. Among individual holdings, AT&T, Verizon and CenturyLink number among the top five, with asset allocation of 25.8%, 25.4% and 4.1%, respectively. Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services are the two major sectors of this ETF, with asset holdings of 88.2% and 11.8%, respectively. The product lost 0.5% in the past 10 days and currently has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 with a Medium risk outlook. iShares Global Telecom ETF (NYSEARCA: IXP ) This ETF tracks investment results before fees and expenses corresponding to the price and yield performance of the S&P Global 1200 Telecommunications Sector Index. The fund has nearly $356.7 million of assets under management and an average trading volume of roughly 41,000 shares a day. The fund charges an expense ratio of 47 basis points a year. IXP holds 31 stocks in its portfolio and has a concentrated approach in the top 10 holdings, with approximately 74% of the asset base invested in them. Among individual holdings, top stocks in the ETF include AT&T and Verizon, with asset allocation of 18.9% and 17.3%, respectively. Integrated Telecommunication Services, Wireless Telecommunication Services and Alternative Carriers are the three major sectors, with asset holdings of 77.5%, 21.2% and 1.2% respectively. It fell almost 0.6% in the last 10 days and currently has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a Medium risk outlook. Vanguard Telecom Services ETF (NYSEARCA: VOX ) This ETF seeks to track the performance corresponding to the benchmark MSCI US Investable Market Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. It has assets under management of nearly $1 billion and an average trading volume of roughly 96,000 shares a day. The fund charges an expense ratio of 10 basis points a year. VOX holds 31 stocks in its portfolio and has a concentrated approach in the top 10 holdings, with 71.1% of the asset base invested in them. Among individual holdings, top stocks in the ETF are AT&T and Verizon, with a combined share of almost 50%. Integrated Telecommunication Services, Alternative Carriers and Wireless Telecommunication Services are the three major sectors, with asset holdings of 63.1%, 20.8% and 16.1%, respectively. The fund lost 0.7% in the last 10 days and currently has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a Medium risk outlook. Original Post