Tag Archives: alternative

What Will Happen To Utility Stocks If The Fed Raises Rates?

Summary Relative to the yield on the 10-year Treasury, utilities actually look cheap today. Based on earnings, however, they look expensive. The decline in utility prices so far this year is likely the market preparing for a rate increase. If rates do go up, the worst of the damage has likely already been done; and there won’t be a large amount of additional downside. Utilities are often thought of as a “bond substitute”. They have fairly steady earnings and usually have regulatory support to keep them healthy. Investors often think of utility dividends as a revenue source comparable to a bond’s interest payment. Ever since 2008’s financial crisis, utility valuations have been influenced by the artificially low interest rate environment the Fed created. Since the returns available from bonds have been so terrible, investors have naturally moved to utility stocks as a way to increase their income. As the Fed discusses the possibility of higher rates, investors should think about the implications for their utility holdings. You can really see how interest rates have impacted utility stocks (as measured by the Philadelphia Utility Index (UTY) since 2014 in the following chart. Chart 1 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet In 2014, while interest rates were falling, all stocks were basically rising (as shown by the S&P 500), but the utilities seemed to be receiving an added boost. Utilities peaked early this year, and since then, as Treasury yields have risen, they have taken a fall much greater than the rest of the market. A large amount of the utility drop is likely from investors anticipating a Fed rate increase and trying to get out before a big fall. Expanding this chart to the turn of the century provides additional observations. Chart 2 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet First off, you can see that utility dividend yields were lower than the 10-year treasury essentially until late 2002. At that point Enron, the California Electricity Crisis, and unwise investments by many players in the industry, finally took its toll, and utility values crashed. The yield on the 10-year treasury was actually falling because of the recession, but utilities performed terribly even with their “safe haven” status. Then over the next few years, as 10-year Treasury rates rose, utilities actually performed well. Utility dividend yields again were below 10-year Treasury until the 2008 financial crisis. The next thing to look at is the rise in the 10-year rate in 2013. There was a sizable initial drop when interest rates bounced off their lows, but the UTY stabilized before the upward move in rates was complete. Also, UTY components Exelon (NYSE: EXC ) and FirstEnergy (NYSE: FE ) were going through dividend cuts at this time, which may have had a bigger impact on the group’s underperformance than the rise of the 10-year. The next chart shows the ratio of the UTY’s dividend yield to the 10-year Treasury. Since the turn of the century, utility yields have been about 1.2x the 10-year Treasury. Today’s ratio is about 1.9x, which is more than one standard deviation above the average over the past fifteen years. Chart 3 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet The above chart basically says that utilities are cheap today relative to the 10-year Treasury. You could also argue that the historical average ratio between utility yields and the 10-year is actually artificially high because of industry issues early in the century, making today’s ratio look even further cheaper compared to the “true” average. An alternative way to look at this data is to take the spread between utility dividend yields and the 10-year. This still basically leads to the same conclusion that utilities are cheap against Treasuries on a yield basis. Chart 4 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet So if we just limited the analysis to the impact of interest rates, utility investors wouldn’t have much to worry about. Treasury rates are still so low that there will be plenty of investors looking for a way to get higher income with relative safety. Utility yields have such a cushion that as 10-year rates increase, the spread would likely just shrink from the higher Treasuries. If utility yields were to increase, it would just keep spreads at today’s extreme levels. Of course utilities trade on more than just dividends, and another big driver for valuations is earnings. Chart 5 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet On this basis things don’t look as good for the utility group, but it isn’t a disaster waiting to happen. P/E ratios have come in a lot since they reached their peak at 18x earlier this year, but the current utility P/E of 14.8x is still above its 14.1x average over the last 15 years. If you look at the middle of the last decade, Treasury yields were 200-300bp greater than they are today, and utility P/E ratios were equal to or greater than today’s levels. So there is precedent for earnings valuations to be at today’s levels in an interest rate environment higher than today’s. This chart seems to imply that the drop in utilities this year has just been a preemptive move by the market, and if a Fed rate increase leads to higher interest rates, utilities have already made the majority of their adjustment. The post-Enron period was mentioned earlier in this article, and that is an event that could have artificially skewed the average P/E of the group below its “true” level. Of course, other unique things have happened in the past that could artificially move the average higher. For example, in the time period right before the Financial crisis, competitive power generation had a very positive outlook. It looked like these assets were only going to rise in value. Shale gas did a number on that prediction, but you could argue that the unique situation inflated the historical group average. (And maybe utilities with competitive assets are entering another period with increasing values. See here for more on that possibility.) Since there are reasons to adjust the average utility P/E up or down to get a “true” number, this article just uses the 14.1x based on the historic values. Another thing to note from chart 5 is that during the rising rate period of 2003-2004, when utilities made a substantial upward run, P/E ratios started much lower than today’s levels. This should wipe out any hope that a rise in rates today would come with an increase in utility stocks similar to 2003-2004. That was really a unique situation that doesn’t currently apply. This year’s move from an 18x P/E to a 14.8x P/E means about an 18% drop in utility stocks. If the P/E were to fall to the 14.1x historic average, this would require a further drop of 4.7%. If the group were to really get hit hard, and P/E ratios went to 13x, then the group would have to drop 12% from today’s level. If utility P/E ratios started going much lower, you would expect value investors to start moving into the space and prevent a freefall. Of course, when thinking of P/E ratios we also need to think about how the group compares to the market in general. The following chart shows the P/E of utilities compared to the P/E of the S&P 500 over time. Chart 6 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet Based on this chart we again have a situation where utilities are trading a little rich compared to historical averages, but not outrageously so. Treasury yields have been more than 200bp higher than today’s level with utility P/E ratios compared to the S&P even higher than today. There could be some downward pressure on utilities based on this metric, especially if P/E ratios in the S&P 500 contract, but there is no reason to think things will go back to the way they were at the turn of the century. One last area that will be mentioned in this note is the impact of higher rates on utility earnings. Regulators set utility rates based on an allowed return on equity. As interest rates have been falling, these allowed ROEs have been falling as well. Chart 7 (click to enlarge) Source: SNL A Fed increase in rates should slow down this drop in utility ROEs, and help support utility earnings in the future. So a rate increase is not all bad news for utility investors. Conclusion While a rise in interest rates is not a good thing for owners of utility stocks, a tightening by the Fed in the near future should not lead to a disaster in these names. Right now it seems that low interest rates have increased demand for utilities by attracting investors looking for yield. As these investors have come into the space they have driven up P/E ratios in the sector, and investors focused on this valuation metric have likely stayed away. As rates rise, the balance between these two forces should gradually shift. But rates are starting at such a low level that utility yields will still be attractive to people looking to juice up the income in their portfolio, so there shouldn’t be a mad rush out from dividend-focused investors. The Philadelphia Utility Index has already fallen almost 18% off of its peak earlier this year. Utility P/E valuations were extremely high at that time, and it is likely the drop was in anticipation of interest rates falling later this year. Utilities would have to fall about 5% to bring their P/E back to this century’s average of about 14.1x, and they would only have to fall 12% to get down to 13x. If valuations start reaching these lower levels, then value investors would likely start moving back into utilities. The other thing to remember is that a rate increase is not all bad news for utilities. Higher rates should be beneficial in utility rate cases, allowing them to earn higher returns. So, even with a Fed increase, interest rates are likely to remain low and income investors will still want to own utilities for the added income. If too many income-driven investors leave and utilities go down by more than 12%, earnings valuations should start to look cheap, and it would put a floor under these names. Also, higher rates should help utilities in their rate cases, benefiting future earnings. So while you should expect a decline from the utility group if rates go up, it shouldn’t be a giant one. Housekeeping Items I am making the assumption that an increase in rates by the Fed will lead to a general increase in all Treasury rates. In theory, there are scenarios where you could say a rate increase at the Fed might lead to lower rates elsewhere in the financial world. (Maybe the Fed’s increase signals increased confidence in America’s economy, and money floods into US Treasuries lowering rates.) I’m not going to get in any type of complicated repercussions from a Fed increase. This analysis makes the simple assumption that if the Fed increases rates, Treasury rates will also increase. Historic utility performance was based on the Philadelphia Utility Index. The current components of the index are: AES Corp. (NYSE: AES ), Ameren (NYSE: AEE ), American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP ), CenterPoint Energy (NYSE: CNP ), Consolidated Edison (NYSE: ED ), Covanta (NYSE: CVA ), Dominion Resources (NYSE: D ), DTE Energy (NYSE: DTE ), Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ), Edison International (NYSE: EIX ), El Paso Electric (NYSE: EE ), Entergy (NYSE: ETR ), Eversource Energy (NYSE: ES ), Exelon, FirstEnergy, NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE ), PG&E (NYSE: PCG ), Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE: PEG ), Sourthern Company (NYSE: SO ), Xcel Energy (NYSE: XEL ). Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Royce Micro Cap Trust: A Tough Year, But Sticking To What It Knows

RMT is a value-focused micro-cap CEF. A while back, I compared the fund to its open-ended sibling, RYOTX. Although it’s been a bad year for RMT, that’s not surprising and may actually open up a buying opportunity. The Royce family of open- and closed-end funds is managed with a bottom-up value approach. Historically, that’s been a great niche, but more recently, it’s been a performance drag. But if you are looking for a closed-end fund, or CEF, that has a value focus and invests in micro-cap stocks, I still think Royce Micro Cap Trust (NYSE: RMT ) should be on your short list. What does Royce do? The goal for every Royce fund is to find companies with strong balance sheets and the potential for above-average returns. Some of the attributes Royce looks at when examining a company include operating leverage, returns on capital, return on assets, operating dynamics, and the sustainability of its business model. Another key factor, however, makes it more difficult to find stocks to buy when the market has been heading higher for several years: Royce also wants market prices that are 30-50% below what it believes a company is worth. So it is, then, that RMT’s annualized trailing five-year net asset value, or NAV, return through August was roughly 12.8%, while the return of the Russell 2000 was a more robust 15.6% or so. By design, the Russell 2000 will have a blend of growth and value names. However, looking further back, the annualized trailing 15-year NAV return for RMT was 8.1% through August, compared to the Russell 2000’s gain of only 6.7%. (All number include reinvested distributions.) That should bring to mind the saying that the market is a voting machine over short periods, but a weighing machine over long periods. Which is exactly what RMT is all about, trying to find the stocks that have been voted “off the island” in the near term, but that still have long-term appeal. And sticking to that focus can lead the fund to underperform in bull markets. Did something just change? So far this year, it’s been no different. Year to date through August, RMT’s NAV is down 10.5% while the Russell 2000 is down only 3% or so. That’s not surprising, since, as noted, Royce sticks to its approach no matter what’s going on in the broader market. That’s exactly what a long-term investor in RMT and other Royce funds should want. But it can be hard to sit back and watch your fund underperform in the near term even though historical numbers suggest, though of course don’t guarantee, it will all turn out okay in the long term. Which helps explain why RMT’s market price declined around 14.5% through August, as investors got scared off by the laggard showing. In fact, the fund’s discount to its NAV currently sits around 15%, compared to a three-year average of around 12%. That’s a fairly deep discount for what is really a well-run fund, but shows pretty clearly that investors are worried about its performance numbers. And what about that market sell-off last month? It made things worse. At least on an absolute basis… which is worth looking at. RMT’s NAV fell 4.3% or so in August. But that marked a reversal from the trend, because the Russell 2000 fell 6.3% in the month. That’s only two percentage points, but it’s a big difference from what’s been happening recently. And once again, I’d attribute that to the fund’s value focus. Since it buys undervalued stocks, the steepening market downturn has had less of an impact. Indeed, the early-year performance of many of its holdings suggest that the portfolio had already felt the sting of the market shifting gears. In the final days of a bull market, investors tend to refocus around high-flyers, leaving other names behind. But eventually, those loved stocks also succumb when the market turns en masse. In fact, the most loved names on the upside often turn into the least loved on the downside. Value stocks, meanwhile, are usually always kind of unloved until their fundamentals shine through. But at the end of the day, RMT is trading at a wider discount than normal and has been doing better, at least on a relative basis, than the broader market as volatility has kicked up. Exactly what I’d expect from a value-focused micro-cap fund. Will it continue to hold up better? Hard to tell. But I know management will remain true to its investment focus. If we are entering a market downturn, that should serve investors well. The problem spots? So, stepping back from the last month or so of relative outperformance, what’s been going on at the fund? Looking back at the first six months of the year, lead manager Charles Royce noted that the fund’s consumer discretionary, healthcare and information technology holdings were laggards relative to the same sectors within its benchmark indexes. And that was pretty much all stock selection. For example, the fund has little exposure to biotechnology stocks, which have been on a tear in recent years. But, as Royce notes , “Most biotech companies, however, lack the fundamental attributes we seek in our holdings.” It’s the perfect example of the fund sticking to what it does, even if the market is favoring other investments. And while the next update won’t come out until after the end of the third quarter, I wouldn’t expect the theme here to change. In the end, it’s been a rough stretch for RMT. But if you have a long-term focus, don’t get too discouraged. Value investing goes in and out of favor over time, and the recent bull market, which has at least taken a breather if it hasn’t turned into a bear, has been tough for value investors like Royce. That doesn’t change the fact that RMT is a well-run fund. In fact, if you are in the market for a micro-cap value fund, now might even be a good time to start picking up some shares. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Is The Fed’s Policy Meeting Important For GLD?

Summary This week the highly anticipated FOMC meeting will take place. The market still places a low chance of a rate hike. But the meeting isn’t just about will they raise rates this time? Will the FOMC move the price of GLD? This week the highly anticipated FOMC meeting will take place, in which the Fed will decide whether to raise rates or not. Currently, the implied probabilities for a September rate hike are slim – the market gives this possibility a 23% chance. For investors of the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) will this rate decision move the price of GLD? How important is a rate hike at this stage for precious metals? It should matter, shouldn’t it? A rate hike should have some implications of the price of GLD: after all higher rates should translate to an increase in long term treasury yields, which should adversely impact gold prices. I talked about the relation between GLD and long term yields at great lengthen in previous posts . (click to enlarge) Source: U.S Department of Treasury and Bloomberg But as you can see, the medium term treasury yields, and the same goes for long term yields, after yields started to pick up at the beginning of the year, they have resumed their slow descent. Currently, yields aren’t far off their levels from the beginning of the year. The correlation between GLD and 5-year yields isn’t too strong at -0.24. This relation used to be much stronger in the past. It seems, for now, the relation may have weakened. Usually, the rise in the risk factor and economic uncertainty tends to pressure down long term yields and pull up GLD price. But this wasn’t the case for GLD this year. And if the FOMC raises rates, it could slightly raise interest rates, which should also lead to a modest decline in GLD. The U.S. dollar should also strengthen, a move that could also bring down GLD prices. Finally, as the Fed changes its policy, which in effect it has already heavily prepared us for, the “fear factor” of some bullion investors over a possible rate hike is likely to subside – a shift that could also reduce the demand for bullion investments including GLD. This FOMC meeting, however, isn’t likely to make long term waves. Yes, it could lead to some short term volatility, because some people still think a rate hike is still on the table. And if the Fed does push the button, it could raise market volatility in the following days. In such outcome, the price of GLD is likely to suffer even if it’s only for a few days. But for the more likely scenario – no rate hike, only a promise for hikes in the near term – the price of GLD could actually slightly rise, even if for a short term. More than just the statement This meeting also includes an update to economic data, a press conference – if we don’t get a rate hike, Chair Yellen will promise us a rate hike is right around the corner and is “data dependent” – and the dot plot. (click to enlarge) Source: FOMC As you can see, the Fed’s medium cash rate has declined over the past year, while the rates for 2016-2017 increased in the past meeting. If we don’t see a rate hike this time, the dot plot will likely show a decline in the medium rate for this year, a perhaps a rise for 2016. This shifts in the dot plots could also impact the markets as it will provide the outlook of FOMC members’ vis-à-vis the direction of the cash fund. I think, as I pointed out in the past , the current market conditions are less in favor for a rate hike at this point in time. If the Fed doesn’t raises rates, we could see a short term bounce in the price of GLD. But as long as the Fed is on course to raise rates in the coming months, GLD is still likely to suffer. For more please see: ” Gold and Inflation – Is there is relation? ” Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.