Court Ruling On Open Internet Imminent For Comcast, Verizon, AT&T

A federal appeals court could hand down a decision any day on the Open Internet Order — also called “net neutrality” — rules opposed by Internet service providers such as AT&T ( T ), Comcast ( CMCSA ) and Verizon Communications ( VZ ). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit typically releases decisions on Tuesdays and Fridays. Telecommunications, cable and wireless industry trade groups have challenged the Federal Communications Commission’s authority to enforce rules for an open Internet . In separate cases, Verizon and Comcast have successfully challenged earlier FCC net neutrality rules. A ruling from “D.C. Circuit 3” appeals court had been expected as early as April. The three-judge panel heard oral arguments in December. Judge David Tatel, who ruled against the FCC in an earlier case, in December appeared more favorable to the FCC’s position, some analysts say. Phone and cable TV stock will likely trade up or down depending on the ruling from the appeals court’s three judge panel. The case, however, could reach the U.S. Supreme Court. “Most agree this is an issue that will likely end up before the Supreme Court, especially if the FCC wins,” said Jennifer Fritzsche, a Wells Fargo analyst, in a research report published Thursday. Jonathan Atkin, an analyst at RBC Capital, said in a recent report that the appeals court may overturn rules on net neutrality that apply to wireless networks but uphold those for wireline broadband. Another court option is to “remand” the FCC’s rule-making back to the agency for additional work The FCC in February 2015 reclassified broadband services as a public utility, in order to enforce net neutrality rules under Title II of the 1934 Communications Act . The agency also expanded net neutrality rules to wireless networks for the first time. The rules bar ISPs from throttling, blocking or prioritizing Web traffic. The FCC also created a general conduct standard that ISPs cannot harm consumers or service edge providers, such as Alphabet ‘s ( GOOGL ) Google or Netflix ( NFLX ). Some consumer groups over the past six months have objected to new, so-called “zero-rated,” services offered by Verizon, Comcast and T-Mobile US ( TMUS ) that do not count video or data usage toward monthly caps.

Tesla Production Target Said To Be Achievable, Price Target Hiked

Electric automaker Tesla ( TSLA ) got a price-target increase from Evercore ISI on Thursday, as analyst George Galliers defended the automaker’s ambitious production targets. Tesla sparked debate when it said in its Q1 earnings report last week that its was moving up its goal of manufacturing 500,000 cars a year by two years, to 2018. Galliers acknowledged that this will be a tough task, given that the company made only 51,000 vehicles last year, but he said it’s not impossible. “Tesla’s proposed production ramp is aggressive, and many have suggested that it is without precedence,” he wrote in his research note, raising Tesla’s price target to 320 from 310. “However, while we are not aware of any developed-world manufacturer who has seen such an aggressive ramp since inception, certain Chinese OEMs’ (original equipment manufacturers’) production growth is not that dissimilar to what Tesla is looking to achieve.” Galliers added that Ford ( F ) had built as many vehicles in year one of some product launches, such as the Ford Focus and the F-150. Some of the skepticism has come from Tesla’s troubled launch of the Model X SUV, but Galliers, like Tesla CEO Elon Musk, dismissed the comparison. “Building cars is not like playing tennis,” he wrote. “No OEM is only as good as its last match/product launch.” Despite this vote of confidence, Tesla stock was down a fraction in early trading on the stock market today , near 208.

What Is In Store For Buyback ETFs Ahead?

Stocks with an increased buyback are usually investors’ favorites. With a low interest environment commanding most developed economies including the U.S., buybacks should surge and the related ETFs should beat out the broader market benchmark. But this did not happen in reality. In the last one year (as of May 3, 2016), buyback ETFs underperformed the S&P 500-based ETF SPY . During this frame, SPY lost 0.08% while buyback-oriented ETFs lost in the range of 6% to 7%. Let’s find out why. Buybacks lower the outstanding share count and thus increase earnings per share. Having said this, if companies are buying back their own shares at steep prices and accessing the debt market to finance that buyback, the move is less likely to be helpful, as indicted by Market Watch . After all, S&P 500 (ex-financials) companies’ cash position remained decent, but probably not great. Cash and short-term investments balance of those companies was $1.44 trillion at the end of Q4 (ended in January 2016), down 0.5% year over year. On a quarter-over-quarter basis, the figure was flat, as per FactSet. Of the nine sectors, seven recorded a year-over-year decline in their cash balances (Utilities sector was flat year over year). Moreover, the market was guilty of overvaluation concerns, forcing companies to repurchase their shares at higher prices than what they are actually worth. Probably this is why a waning momentum was seen in the buyback activity. Dollar-value share repurchases were $568.9 billion on a trailing 12-month basis (TTM), representing a 0.5% decline year over year and flat with Q3 (August-October), as per FactSet. In Q4 (November-January), dollar-value share repurchases were $136.6 billion, up 5.2% year over year but down 13.5% from Q3. The splurge on buyback has been the main driver of the market rally lately. If this activity cools down ahead, the broader market will likely feel the pain. Moreover, the Fed entered the policy tightening era in December 2015. Though the central bank is presently staying dovish on global growth issues, sooner or later the market will see further hikes in rates. And then, financing buybacks through debt would not be an easy task. So, investors should now be cautious while playing buyback ETFs. There are a couple of ETFs that focus on this niche strategy. PowerShares Buyback Achievers Portfolio (NYSEARCA: PKW ) is the most popular fund in the space, managing an asset base of $1.64 billion and trading in good volumes of 210,000 shares a day. PKW tracks the NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, which comprises companies that have repurchased 5% or more of their common stock in the trailing 12 months. The fund holds a basket of 232 stocks and charges 64 basis points as fees (see Total Market (U.S.) ETFs here ). Another buyback ETF SPDR S&P 500 Buyback ETF (NYSEARCA: SPYB ) tracks the performance of the top 102 stocks with the highest buyback ratio in the S&P 500 over the last 12 months. The fund charges 35 bps in fees. The fund has about $9.4 million in assets. In Conclusion Having said this, we would like to note that both the ETFs outperformed SPY in the last three months (as of May 3, 2016). So, it can be said that the languishing trend has recovered to some extent. Also, both SPYB and PKW have a decent relative strength index, below 50. This indicates these funds are yet to reach the overbought levels. The products can thus be played for a few more days, though with a strong stomach for risks. Original Post