Scalper1 News
Summary Cyber-security market top line growth doesn’t necessarily translate to profit growth for companies. Most companies are still spending a large portion of gross profit on R&D for new software/hardware solutions and marketing & selling to boost brand recognition and gain market shares. Until the industry consolidates and SG&A costs stabilize, it’s hard for these companies to retain profits. Recommendation: Sell Although the cybersecurity market is expected to grow at a phenomenal rate, in my opinion it doesn’t necessarily translate to profit growth for companies. Since cybersecurity is a relatively new industry, most companies are still spending a large portion of gross profit on R&D for new software/hardware solutions and marketing & selling to boost brand recognition and gain market shares, resulting in negative bottom line for most companies. Choppy as the cash flow from operation (CFO) growth is, most cybersecurity companies have positive operating cash flow and incur little CapEx. Going forward, keeping up with hacker’s technology requires constant R&D spending on upgrading and updating technology, and large marketing & selling expense to compete for market shares remains a headwind for these companies in this highly fragmented market. Until the industry consolidates and SG&A costs stabilize, it’s hard for these companies to retain profits. ETF Info Price 27.16 52 Wk H 33.91 52 Wk L 18.29 30D Avg Volume 396,270 Market Cap 1,114,917,969 Shares Out 41.05 Return YTD 3.66% Excess Return YTD -1.97% Tracking Error 1.70 Inception Date 11/12/2014 Expense Ratio 0.75% ETF Summary The PureFunds ISE Cyber Security™ ETF (NYSEARCA: HACK ) tracks the price and yield performance of the ISE Cyber Security™ Index, which includes companies or ADRs that are hardware/software developers for cyber security (“Infrastructure Providers”) or non-development service providers (“Service Providers”). The ISE Cyber Security index assigns weights to companies according to category (“Infrastructure providers”/”service providers”) and then is adjusted according to liquidity and market cap. For more information, you can refer to the PureFunds website . Companies Updates When looking at financial statements of the holding companies, other than 6 companies that had negative sales growth for the past year (~-5%), 26 companies had 10%+ sales growth with on average 70% gross margin. A large chunk of gross profit goes to R&D and Selling & Marketing expenses, resulting in negative profit margin for some of the companies. The gap between sales growth and net income growth is largely attributable to SG&A spending. Most of these companies don’t incur much CAPEX and have positive free cash flow when adding back non-cash charges (mostly stock-based compensation and debt amortization). However, the stock-based compensation is a meaningful real expense and will likely to continue due to continuous talent acquisitions. Operating cash flow growths are choppy and unpredictable. These companies have a median forward PE of 22.7x and average forward PE of 40x (vs. S&P 500 average 18.7x forward PE). Among the top 10 holdings, 5 are experiencing fast sales growth for the past several years, 4 have stagnant growth, and 1 had negative growth (shown later in this article). MIN MAX MEDIAN AVERAGE S&P 500 Sales growth (%, FY) -23.2 163.5 8.2 16.1 Net Income growth (%, FY) -2620.1 1865.2 -11.4 -70.9 EBITDA growth (%, FY) -230.5 123.6 5.2 -14.5 CFO growth (%, FY) -122.4 302.8 3.7 21.3 FY Gross margin 9% 95% 76% 67% FY EBITDA margin (adj) -89% 62% 11% 8% FY Operating margin -111% 56% 9% 4% FY Net margin -112% 44% 5% -1% FY CFO/sales -31% 59% 19% 18% FY FCF/sales -47% 56% 14% 14% FY capex -3879.7 -1.4 -14.5 -244.8 FY FCF/capex -2.9 60.7 4.4 8.0 PE(forward) 13.7 312.1 22.7 40.4 18.7 PB 0.9 38.8 5.1 7.5 2.8 *data gathered from yahoo finance and Bloomberg, compiled by author Looking at the table above, the median sales growth is 8%, meaning more than 50% of these companies are doing fine on the top-line. However, median net profit growth is negative, meaning profits for more than 50% of the companies are shrinking. Would you buy into an industry where profits for companies are stagnant or shrinking? Probably not. What worsens the situation is the assigned weights. This ETF is almost as if it’s assigning equal weight to all the companies – the largest holding is 4% and the smallest is Scalper1 News
Scalper1 News