Scalper1 News
Summary According to famous value investor Murray Stahl, beta is out of favor. The contrarian play is to seek out beta. The Powershares S&P Intl Dev Hi Beta ETF is one way to go long beta outside the U.S. Examination of its valuation and contents show how contrarian this bet really is and whether there is value. In his latest investment commentary , famous investor Murray Stahl says investors are now en masse shunning beta in favor of stability. This influx of funds into ETFs with stable prices further helps this category to stabilize. This powers a virtuous cycle that has led to large inflows to so-called low-volatility products or low-beta products. The contrarian thing to do is to go high beta. I don’t think it is a coincidence I’m finding lots of bargains among companies with highly volatile earnings patterns. The contrarian idea can be played through ETFs very easily and one option is the PowerShares S&P Intl Dev Hi Beta ETF (NYSEARCA: IDHB ). IDHB data by YCharts What is beta? Beta shows you the level of volatility in asset prices compared to a benchmark. The baseline volatility is that of the benchmark and it is equal to 1. Assets exhibiting more volatile prices have a beta above 1 and assets with more stable pricing profiles have betas below 1. It is all about movement and it doesn’t matter in which direction it goes. Portfolio Holding high-beta stocks isn’t easy. At times it requires nerves of steel. Often they are highly levered, as leverage amplifies underlying developments for better or for worse. This particular ETF is focused on developed markets ex-U.S. and ex-South Korea and within those markets targets specifically the 200 stocks with the highest beta over the past 12 months. Generally stocks with float under $100 million or less than $50 million of annual trading volume are excluded. So how does such a portfolio look in practice? Well, its top 10 holdings are: Penn West Petroleum (NYSE: PWE ), Alibaba Health Information Technology ( OTC:ALBHF ), Canadian Oil Sands ( OTCQX:COSWF ), Meg Energy Corp. ( OTCPK:MEGEF ), Det Norske Oljeselskap ASA ( OTCPK:DETNF ), Tullow Oil PLC ( OTCPK:TUWOY ) ( OTCPK:TUWLF ), Nokian Tyres PLC ( OTCPK:NKRKY ) ( OTC:NKRKF ), Raiffeisen Bank International AG ( OTC:RAIFF ) ( OTCPK:RAIFY ), Hargreaves Lansdown PLC ( OTCPK:HRGLF ) ( OTCPK:HRGLY ) and DNO ASA ( OTCPK:DTNOF ) ( OTCPK:DTNOF ). Most of the portfolio companies have large or medium market caps. Together these categories make up 68% of the portfolio. On average, the companies have one-third the market cap of the benchmark constituents, so on this front there is a clear discrepancy between the two. It makes sense that prices of small caps are somewhat more volatile, as their earnings are more profoundly impacted by a subset of real-world events. Financial services is the largest sector taking up 24% of the portfolio. This is 9% below the benchmark weighting. The ETF allocated 21.55% of its funds to the energy space, which is double that of its benchmark. A recovery in oil would definitely not hurt this ETF’s performance. One last important sector is basic materials at 14.39%. Another sizeable bet that is different from the benchmark. From a geographic diversification perspective, the ETF disappoints because 83% of the money is bet on companies in continental Europe and another 16% on companies in the U.K. In summary, this ETF is a short cut to bet on Europe / Energy and Leverage. Sounds good, doesn’t it? Valuation The concept of overweighing Europe / Energy and Leverage does not really excite me either, but looking at the ETF from a valuation perspective, it starts to look quite a bit more attractive. It doesn’t score well on forward earnings, but beats the benchmark easily on a present price/cash flow basis. It is also much more attractive on a price/sales basis and offers a slightly higher dividend yield. PowerShares S&P Intl Dev HI Beta ETF MSCI ACWI Ex USA Value NR USD Price/Forward Earnings 14.03 12.56 Price/Book 0.86 1.13 Price/Sales 0.56 0.82 Price/Cash Flow 3.49 4.02 Dividend Yield % 4.9 4.45 Data: morningstar Expenses The ETF’s expense ratio is about 0.35%, but Invesco agreed to waive 0.10% of fees until 2016. Probably in an attempt to increase the assets under management. The expenses are modest, especially considering it invests in mostly foreign issues. Bottom line Even if the contrarian play of going long beta but the idea of going long this ETF does not it is still a useful starting point for further research. Beta is a decidedly backward-looking way of evaluating stocks. If you can dig up companies that experienced high volatility in the past twelve months but where it’s smooth sailing from here on out and buy them at low price/cash flow multiples, you are doing great even if beta stays out of favor. For the brave and lazy, this ETF can serve as an all-in buffet. Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Scalper1 News
Scalper1 News