Category Archives: stocks

Should You Hedge Your Foreign Currency Exposure?

Click to enlarge By Remy Briand, Head of Research, MSCI The volatility of currency has increased in recent years as a combination of quantitative easing and currency wars fuel swings in the foreign-exchange market. CURRENCY RISK TO EQUITY PORTFOLIOS HAS TICKED UP SINCE THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS The chart above shows that the risk to a U.S. dollar-based investor from currencies in international equity exposure has increased significantly since the global financial crisis, according to the latest Barra global equity model . By contrast, the exposure to foreign currencies reduced total risk for a portfolio of developed market equities at times prior to 2004. Many money managers disregard the volatility and leave their exposure to foreign currency unhedged. Or they apply full hedge strategies that can prove costly over time. A more dynamic hedging approach demands a framework to decide which currency to hedge, a mechanism to monitor the indicators and an ability to vary automatically the portion of each currency weight to hedge in a given period (a proportion referred to as a hedge ratio). Which indicators to consider when selecting a hedge ratio There is a long history of research by academics and practitioners who have studied currency hedging strategies. As part of MSCI’s research into risk factors, we have reviewed and modeled those indicators that have proved to be effective in the literature and over time. Our indicators come from four categories: value, momentum, carry, and volatility. The value indicator measures the relative purchasing power of each currency in a pair. Momentum examines currency returns for the previous six months. Carry measures the difference between two-year sovereign yields for both the foreign and home currency. Volatility compares average monthly volatility with the six-month historical average. The ability to hedge foreign exchange risk systematically for any pair of currencies by reference to the four indicators form the foundation of the approach to adaptive hedging that MSCI introduced recently. Though you can view each indicator individually, together they indicate whether or not to hedge and by how much. If the signal points to a possible depreciation of the foreign currency against the home currency, then a hedge may make sense. The chart below illustrates the calculation of the hedge ratio for the Japanese yen from the perspective of a U.S.-dollar based investor. The solid bands of color show periods when an investor should have hedged yen exposure for the respective indicators. INDICATOR SWITCHES AND THE ADAPTIVE HEDGE RATION SINCE MARCH 2012 FOR THE JAPANESE YEN (U.S. DOLLAR-BASED INVESTOR) Click to enlarge Taking the pain out of hedging decisions If you consider each currency represented in the MSCI ACWI Index, calculate the hedge ratios and average them in proportion to the weight of the currency in the index, you get the global average hedge ratio for home-based investors. According to the formula, a U.S.-based institutional investor would need to hedge its global equity allocation by 65% on average, as of March 31. Based on the adaptive hedging methodology, a U.S.-based institutional investor would hedge 75% of their Swiss franc exposure, 50% of their yen exposure, 75% of their euro exposure and 75% of their sterling exposure. Similarly, an investor based in the eurozone would hedge 75% of their Swiss franc exposure, 50% of their yen exposure, 75% of their sterling exposure, and 50% of their U.S.-dollar exposure. HEDGING RATIO FOR KEY CURRENCIES (AS OF MARCH 31) Because the targeted hedging ratios change through time, currency hedges require active monitoring and regular adjustment in portfolios. While long-term investors may decide to leave their allocations to global equities unhedged, investors more sensitive to short-term volatility may prefer a more rules-based form of currency hedging. The adaptive hedging methodology illustrates one approach based on four factors affecting currency behavior. Further reading: The MSCI Adaptive Hedge Indexes: Flexible hedging using a combination of currency indicators Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

After 16 Quarters Of Revenue Declines, When Will IBM Bounce Back?

The IBM ( IBM ) revenue numbers stand out like a broken arm. Deep into a major transition that has shed multibillion-dollar businesses, IBM has reported 16 straight quarters of year-over-year revenue declines. And it’s not done yet. Another three quarters of declines are expected by analysts polled by Thomson Reuters. In the past several years, Big Blue has shed computer hardware units, reshuffled its software businesses and realigned its workforce to reduce costs as it focuses on growth areas such as cloud computing, Big Data analytics, security and mobile computing — areas that it calls strategic imperatives. Since 2010, IBM has invested about $30 billion in these areas. They include the creation of a new business unit, Cognitive Business Solutions, with its backbone being IBM’s advanced Watson computer. Watson is being used in health care, the Internet of Things, analytics and other fields. IBM says Watson can address a total market opportunity near $2 trillion. “We continue to make significant progress in our transformation to higher value,” IBM CEO Virginia Rometty said in the company’s first-quarter earnings release last Monday. “We strengthened our existing portfolio while investing aggressively in new opportunities like Watson Health, Watson Internet of Things and hybrid cloud.” The IBM transformation is showing progress. IBM revenue from strategic imperatives rose 26% in 2015 in constant currency to $29 billion, compared with a 12% decline in overall revenue to $81.7 billion. Strategic imperatives now comprise 35% of total revenue, up from 22% two years ago. IBM has targeted strategic imperative revenue to reach $40 billion and at least 40% of revenue by 2018. But when will the revenue slide reverse?  UBS analyst Steven Milunovich, in a research report, says that 2017 is likely the turning point. “IBM is trying hard to transform its business and also to change the narrative from legacy loser to cloud and cognitive winner,” Milunovich wrote. He added, “Just because strategic imperatives gains the upper hand does not mean IBM’s top line is off to the races, but it could mean the worst would be over.” As to whether Watson and its Cognitive Business can save IBM, Milunovich says that it’s too soon to know, as IBM does not disclose the Watson-driven revenue just yet. “Old IBM is in secular decline, but we believe cognitive eventually could create a material new revenue stream drawing from outside existing IT budgets. We don’t expect revenue to be material for another three years, but the narrative is important now, and eventually Watson could be a $10 billion business,” he wrote. Milunovich has a neutral rating on IBM and price target of 150. IBM stock was flat, near 148, in afternoon trading in the stock market today . IBM stock hit its all-time high of 215.90 in March 2013. It hit a six-year low in February but is up 27% since then. IBM Turnaround Remains ‘Painful’ Credit Suisse analyst Kulbinder Gracha has a more negative view on IBM and says that revenue won’t stabilize until 2018. “We see a painful multiyear turnaround from here, which drives underperformance,” Garcha wrote in a research note. “We believe that large parts of IBM’s business (hardware, operating systems, services) are being impacted by the cloud.” As to Watson, he said, “While we do believe the opportunity here is significant, it is also very early, with the commercial impact of such initiatives that may take several years, if not decades.” Garcha has an underperform rating on IBM stock and a price target of just 110. Other giants in the information technology field are also going through transitions and struggling to accelerate revenue growth. They include Hewlett Packard Enterprise ( HPE ), Oracle ( ORCL ), EMC ( EMC ) and Cisco Systems ( CSCO ). “We believe the competitive challenges are emerging from companies seeking to build a business model similar to IBM’s, notably Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Oracle, EMC and Dell,”  wrote RBC Capital Markets analyst Amit Daryanani in a research note. Of these competitors, he says, HPE is closest to IBM’s model, with Cisco another. Dell is acquiring EMC. Daryanani has a sector perform rating on IBM stock and a price target of 155.