Author Archives: Scalper1

Will Tesla Model 3 Reveal Be More Exciting Than Apple Spring Event?

Loading the player… The mass market Tesla Motors ( TSLA ) Model 3 could drive 5 times growth in the electric car maker’s annual deliveries by 2020, according to an analyst. A new Goldman Sachs report out Wednesday, one day ahead of Tesla’s long-awaited reveal of the Model 3, says the $35,000 price point “has the potential to dramatically increase the total addressable market and drive a bullish outlook for sales growth.” Aside from the company’s sales and earnings, analysts are focused on Tesla’s delivery and production figures. Though delivery growth is expected to boom in the long term, the analyst says near-term deliveries could drag down the stock. Tesla reports first-quarter deliveries in early April, and Goldman expects the luxury car maker to meet its guidance of 16,000 deliveries. Tesla Up Over 60% From Feb. Low Shares reversed lower in above average trade, losing 0.9%, but are continuing to find support around the 200-day line. Despite reaching a 2016 high earlier this month, Tesla is still in the red for the year. The stock is about 20% below its July high, reached as the stock failed to break out of a cup-with-handle base. Still, shares are up 62% from their February low. Tesla Unveiling Like Apple Event? Meanwhile, Credit Suisse says that it does not predict “much incremental information” during the Model 3 unveiling tomorrow evening — much like what happened recently with Apple ( AAPL ) during its spring product launch event. But the analyst said the real key will be seeing what the demand for the new car is like in terms of initial reservations. The Model 3 won’t start production until late 2017, a year after a rival mass market electric car from General Motors ( GM ) — the Chevy Bolt — is expected to begin production. Apple stock rose 1.5% on an upgrade from Cowen Wednesday, while GM edged up a fraction.

5 Low-Cost ETFs Poised For Long-Term Wins

The global ETF industry has been growing by leaps and bounds and has already accumulated almost $4.5 trillion in assets, as per ETFGI data. ETFs gained popularity over mutual funds because of their flexibility, liquidity and low cost among other factors. In fact, low cost has been one of the biggest drivers for the ETFs, enhancing their total returns. This is primarily because fund managers generally don’t actively manage an ETF. As these products often engage in passive index-based investing, they charge a much smaller fee. Several research reports have shown that only a handful of fund managers outperform the market over the long term. This gives a major boost to passive investing strategies. As per the 2015 SPIVA U.S. Scorecard , over the last five years, 84.2% of large-cap managers, 76.7% of mid-cap managers, and 90.1% of small-cap managers underperformed the S&P 500, the S&P MidCap 400 and the S&P SmallCap 600, respectively. The number of managers outperforming the benchmark index is equally bleak over the 10-year investment horizon. Roughly 82.14% of large-cap managers, 87.61% of mid-cap managers, and 88.42% of small-cap managers lagged their respective benchmarks. Additionally, managers across all international equity categories failed to outperform their benchmarks in the above mentioned time frame. Although there are several cost components to an ETF like trading commissions and bid/ask spreads, expense ratios are paid the foremost attention by investors. With several ETF providers including iShares, Vanguard and Charles Schwab vying with each other, ETFs have gotten cheaper every year (read: 5 Costly ETF Mistakes You Can Easily Avoid ). Knowing how important the expense ratio is, we have highlighted five of the cheapest ETFs for long-term investors (see: all the ETFs with Low Expense Ratios here ): iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA: ITOT ) – Expense ratio: 0.03% This fund provides a broad exposure to the U.S. equity market by tracking the S&P Total Market Index and is one of the low-cost choices in the equity ETF world, charging just 3 bps in annual fees. Holding 3,819 securities, the fund is widely diversified across sectors and securities. Information technology is the top sector accounting for less than 20% while Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) is the top firm taking 2.7% share of the basket. Large caps account for 74% of the assets while mid and small caps take the remainder. ITOT is a popular and liquid ETF with AUM of $3.6 billion and average daily volume of 286,000 shares. The product has delivered 70.9% returns over the last five-year period. Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHB ) – Expense ratio: 0.03% This fund also provides a broad exposure to the U.S. equity market. The fund tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index and charges just 3 bps in annual fees. Holding 2,077 securities, the fund is widely diversified across sectors and securities. Like ITOT, information technology is the top sector accounting for less than 20% while Apple is the top firm taking 3.3% share of the basket. Large caps account for 73% of the assets while mid and small caps take the remainder. SCHB is one of the popular and liquid ETFs with AUM of $5.8 billion and average daily volume of 927,000 shares. The product has delivered 70.7% returns over the last five-year period. Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHX ) – Expense ratio: 0.03% This fund targets the large-cap segment of the U.S. equity market by tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index and holds 777 securities in its basket. Here again, information technology is the top sector with just over 20% share while Apple is the top firm at 3%. With an expense ratio of 0.03%, the fund has amassed $5.3 billion in its asset base and volume is solid at over 783,000 shares. While this is a large-cap fund, mid and small caps take minor portions each in the basket. The fund has gained about 72.4% over the past five-year period. Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA: VTI ) – Expense ratio: 0.05% This ETF follows the CRSP US Total Market Index, holding a large basket of 3,712 securities. Each security holds no more than 2.5% of total assets while financials, technology, consumer services and health care make up for a nice sector mix in the portfolio. It is one of the largest and a popular fund with AUM of nearly $57.9 billion and average daily volume of nearly 3.5 million shares. It charges 5 bps in fees and expenses and has gained 70.3% over the past five years. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: VOO ) – Expense ratio: 0.05% This is another low-cost, well-diversified large-cap fund tracking the S&P 500 index. It holds 505 securities in its basket with each taking less than 3.2% share while sector-wise too, none accounts for more than 21% of assets. The fund has AUM of $43.5 billion and trades in heavy volume of 2.7 million shares per day on average. Expense ratio came in at 0.05%. The ETF returned about 74.5% in the same period. Link to the original post on Zacks.com

Market Lab Report – Our VVM is up +44.1% year-to-date: How to safely ride and profit from tidal waves via our timing strategies

2016 has been fraught with volatility. As we stated in a report sent out on January 3, we anticipate 2016 to be a year of elevated volatility which is a great benefit to the VIX Volatility Model (VVM). Indeed, its quick +15% or better gains in typically two days or less has been the motivation behind adding on a rule which automatically cashes in on such quick profits. With this rule in place, and with no operator override as I discussed here:  https://www.virtueofselfishinvesting.com/r/market-lab-report-how-experience-can-work-against-you  the VVM is up +44.1% so far in 2016. Of course, its current signal being up almost +20% helps. But then that’s the rhythm of the model- a few large gains swallow up the many tiny losses, and explains how the model has in backtests managed to well outperform the major averages in every single year.  Tidal Waves, Tsunamis, and Shock Waves Market volatility and instability since October 2014 have been prevalent. The trendless yet choppy 2015 was by some media accounts the most challenging market year in 78 years. Looking back over the last couple of years, it is evident that sharp drops in the stock market are due to fears of a slowing global economy. These fears come by way of recessionary reports out of economic juggernauts such as the US, China, and Germany. Indeed, Oct ’14, Dec ’14, Aug ’15, Sep ’15, Jan ’16, and Feb ’16 all had short-lived but sharp corrections. The markets then quickly found their floors and bounced just as sharply as various central banks pledged to keep rates low. In the case of the US Federal Reserve, they reduced the number of anticipated hikes in 2016. In the case of the ECB and Bank of Japan, they both pushed rates negative. And Fed Chair Yellen has not ruled out the possibility of negative rates. As more central banks jump on the negative interest rate bandwagon, the GDP of respective countries will have to increase. This is a Catch-22 since negative rates have not, in theory or in reality, ever been shown to boost economic growth but rather can have crippling effects on banks, pensions, insurance companies, and savers. So should global growth fail to occur as the months wear on, central banks will be unable to reflate/normalize rates. Meanwhile, QE-generated capital has to go somewhere, and that somewhere tends to be into stock markets and hard assets such as real estate which keeps the top 1% safe who tend to be invested heavily in such areas. But this may come at too high a price should the respective middle classes, a measure of health and stability in any economy, continue to erode adding to the growing social unrest seen around the planet. 70% of Americans live one month away from financial disaster, and one in five American families is food-challenged. And this is happening under the hood of the world’s largest economy which begs the question of how less advantaged economies are faring.  The prevailing issue is global GDP. Should it fail to rise, the sagging global economy will start to win the tug-o-war against the easy money policies of central banks. This may at first lead to accelerating prices in stocks and hard assets as QE becomes an inevitability, but the final outcome of such practices is never pretty. Current global debt-to-GDP stands at around 3:1. History has shown that when debt reaches these extremes, governments mired in such deep levels of debt have never been able to pay back this debt. This is an important tipping point as regimes may start to topple taking down their respective fiat currencies. Indeed, fiat has a long-term historical lifetime average of just 27 years, so the day of reckoning could be upon us within the next couple of years or less.  But the end of an era makes way for a new dawn. And while the end may not be pretty, enhanced volatility will offer ample opportunities to profit. So while the VIX Volatility Model has performed handsomely in every year in the backtests, it achieved stellar performance during the years of elevated volatility which include 2000-2002, 2008, and 2011-2012. These were also some of the best years for the Market Direction Model. Indeed, the built-in fail-safes keep losses in check while the addition of profit taking rules in the VIX Volatility Model further enhance profits. So VVM can help you stay in sync with elevated levels of volatility when such shockwaves hit while also allowing you to ride trends as shown by profits made so far from the current signal. Of course, always keep in mind past performance is no guarantee of future results so the size of your positions should always be aligned with your risk tolerance levels.