Author Archives: Scalper1

The Psychology Of Investing

The longer that I’ve been at this investing thing, the more convinced I am that the difference between an average investor and a good investor is all in the mind. I’ve been investing for over 15 years now and I’ve learned a lot along the way. I think it took me the better part of a decade to work out what makes a good business and a quality investment. The much harder aspect of investing is to summon the courage to commit your capital in the face of hundreds of other people telling you otherwise. These people can be respected investment analysts, talking heads on TV, and even your own friends and family. I now have a pretty good idea of what makes my cut as a high-quality business. That tends to be a business that produces high returns on equity in excess of 20%, strong free cash flow generation and conversion of revenue to free cash flow, all combined with a strong market opportunity and rapidly growing topline growth. Now these businesses aren’t necessarily easy to find; however, when you do identify them they are easy to spot. The harder aspect of investing is to commit your capital to these high-quality opportunities that you’ve identified in the face of 101 reasons not to do so. I’ll give you an example. Celgene (NASDAQ: CELG ) is an exceptionally high-quality business with strong rates of revenue growth and good cash flow generation. However, when you look at the stock, it’s had a rough go of things over the last three months. My own purchase is down a good 10% from where I made it. There are all manner of concerns with the stock, most of which I believe will prove to be relatively immaterial over the next five years. The biggest threat is the regulation of drug pricing under the Democrats. There is also the threat that Celgene may be unsuccessful in diversifying its revenue base away from Revlimid, its chief moneymaker. All those things are likely to be unfounded. It’s not in the Democrats’ best interest to make drug discovery unattractive to commercial interests. That will just dry up funding and investment into areas of medicine that have a real human need. Celgene also managed to negotiate a deal with the generic drug manufacturer that will effectively push out its window of exclusivity to almost 2025. That’s almost 9 years for the company to explore new partnerships, invest in new R&D and acquire potential companies that can diversify its revenue base. Yet, despite of this, the company’s stock price remains stubbornly near one-year lows while other companies are now routinely making 52-week highs. I’ve committed capital to Celgene; however, I feel I twang of remorse whenever I check my trading account and see this position solidly in the red while most of my other recent growth investments are now well in the green. I was thinking further about exactly why that is in my case. I don’t think it’s an aversion to losses. Rather I believe that in general we all have a desire for positive affirmation. That’s true for us with our friends with family and even in the workplace. We all want validation that we’ve made the right choices in all aspects of my life. Unfortunately in investing, things don’t this work that way unless you happen to ride a solid growth stock that just consistently appreciates month after month and year after year. You’re not going to get positive reinforcement of your investment decision continually. If you’re looking at taking deep value positions where you have the potential for the greatest upside, you need to lose the desire for positive affirmation and that’s not easy. In fact, it’s really hard because when you see that position continuously in the red, it makes you think that others in the market know something that you don’t or that you have missed something in your analysis. Deep value investing is a pretty lonely game. Invariably it means going against the crowd in almost every bet that you make. And this is where Buffett really stands out for me . More than any other investor, he has shown a unique ability to shut out external influences on his thinking and just go with his gut conviction in purchases of American Express (NYSE: AXP ), Solomon Brothers and to a lesser extent Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO ). These investments were all done at times when those companies were on the nose. American Express suffered from the effects of a salad oil scandal which effectively cut the company’s share price in half. Solomon Brothers suffered from a devastating bond trading scandal which at one point threatened it with bankruptcy. Even Coca-Cola ( KO ) looked like a business that was heading for a sustained slowdown at the point when Buffett invested, with annual revenue growth declining from 17.1% the decade earlier to just 5.2%. I look at my own current list of holdings, and there are more than a few that have suffered or are suffering through crises where investors doubt their ability to make a comeback. CochLear ( OTC:CHEOF ) was the most recent example of a situation where a devastating company event was successfully overcome by the company. Before 2011, CochLear was a high-quality, high-growth business delivering cochlear implants across the world. In fact, the business was the market leader for implants. Unfortunately in 2011, the company suffered from a product recall that sent the company’s share price down by almost 40%. When you are a healthcare company with a reputation for high quality, a product recall event could potentially be a devastating reputational blow. I recognized the opportunity and went in guns blazing . CochLear subsequently recovered lost market share and continues to grow strongly. The net result is that the share price has more than doubled from the lows that it reached during this period of crisis. However, it wasn’t smooth sailing. In fact, the company’s share price was depressed for a period of six months after I made my investment and there was more than an occasion there where I had to reflect and think about whether I’d made the right move. In more recent times, investors have been making assumptions that Chinese economic growth is going to slide to a standstill, and with that, the prospects of Baidu (NASDAQ: BIDU ) and Alibaba (NYSE: BABA ), two of China’s great growth stories will be heading down the toilet. However, both these companies have such strong competitive advantages that I took the view that they will likely prosper for a long time and proceeded to buy. In less than a month, the market subsequently reassessed its view of the Chinese recession and, more importantly, the long-term prospects of Baidu and Alibaba, and I find both positions up more than 17% from where I made my initial investment. The one remaining position that I have which is a real test of my conviction in the company and its ability to overcome adversity is my investment in Chipotle (NYSE: CMG ) that I’ve written about here extensively. The company has significant problems in regaining customer confidence in relation to its E. coli and norovirus scandals. This is a play where you have to believe that customers will ultimately forget these incidents over time, and the company can bring back customer trust and reestablish its position as a provider of high-quality food. However, it’s hard to see this as a long-term outcome when you’re bombarded with images of empty stores and constant analyst downgrades and reminders of incidents on social media of customers getting ill. I look at this investment as a test of my long-term ability to pick a company that has the potential to rebound after significant negative company events, and also as a test of my ability to stick with a position whose outcome is uncertain but which has the potential for significant upside. Investing is as much a test of your character as anything else. It tests the level of conviction that you have in your research and your ideas, and it’s the ultimate test because you literally have to put your money where your mouth is and be prepared to wait a long time to see if your conviction was correctly placed. Those that have the ability to master their emotions and drown out the noise truly have the qualities to be successful long-term investors. Given his track record of making many such successful contrarian plays in the presence of significant negative events and placing large amounts of capital in these plays, I place Warren Buffett at the very top of investors with the greatest mastery of their psychology. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

Tesla Model 3 Reservations Hit 276,000 By Sunday; Musk Considers Options

Loading the player…   Tesla Motors ( TSLA ) CEO Elon Musk tweeted Sunday afternoon “276k Model 3 orders by end of Sat.” The electric car was unveiled Thursday night after reservations for it opened around the world that morning. The pre-order count is far more than expected and Musk said Friday “definitely going to need to rethink production planning.” “All efforts focused on accelerating the ramp,” he added Saturday on Twitter ( TWTR ). Musk gives frequent updates as @ElonMusk there. He continued: “Token of appreciation for those who lined up coming via mail. Thought maybe 20-30 people per store would line up, not 800. Gifts on order.” 276k Model 3 orders by end of Sat — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 3, 2016 The strong reception for the Model 3 spurred a congratulatory tweet to the electric car maker’s CEO Friday night from Sundar Pichai, CEO of tech giant Google, a unit of Alphabet ( GOOGL ). He replied to Musk’s update on Model 3 reservations with: “congrats, exciting times!” . @elonmusk congrats, exciting times! — sundarpichai (@sundarpichai) April 2, 2016 The Model 3, like Tesla’s Model S and Model X, will have some Autopilot self-driving capabilities. Google famously has its Google Self-Driving Car in development, expected to be more a people transporter than a car that a human would drive some of the time. The number of Model 3 reservations put Musk in the rare position of apparently not thinking big enough — though whether everyone who put down a $1,000 refundable reservation will actually pony up when it comes time to commit to ordering the car remains a question. Musk said on Twitter that reservations expectations were “maybe 1/4 to 1/2 of what happened. No one at Tesla thought it would be this high before part 2 of the unveil.” @34thrain Maybe 1/4 to 1/2 of what happened. No one at Tesla thought it would be this high before part 2 of the unveil. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 2, 2016 Musk plans another reservations update on Wednesday tallying the first week’s count. Model 3 Launch Event And Test Rides Tesla stock rose on Friday after Thursday night’s Model 3 launch party in Los Angeles tallied ramped-up reservations and revealed a good-looking design with glass on the back half of the roof clear all the way to the trunk. A reservations odometer actually spun at times during the event, moving past 134,000 while the afterparty was still going strong, outpacing the estimates of Tesla analysts. At $35,000 per car, that would amount to almost $4.7 billion in potential revenue when the Model 3 is actually delivered. The deposits are $1,000 a pop and said to be fully refundable. “According to management, reservation orders surpassed 150K during the evening (and presumably still growing beyond our two incremental reservations early this morning),” Stifel auto analyst James Albertine said in an overnight research note. That “is roughly 10x the 15-20K we expected in the first days of the launch and 50% greater than the 50-100K we expected by the end of this year.” He added: “Thoughts. We are simply awestruck by the demand surfacing for the Model 3.” CEO Musk tweeted out in early afternoon that reservations had nearly hit 200,000. Thought it would slow way down today, but Model 3 order count is now at 198k. Recommend ordering soon, as the wait time is growing rapidly. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2016 Musk’s comment about the wait time is key. Model 3 production will take time to ramp up. Even if the deliveries begin in late 2017, as scheduled, it could be well into 2018 or beyond before people reserving today actually get their Model 3. Shares rose as high as 247.90 on the stock market   Friday, the best since early October. But gains cooled, with Tesla stock closing at 237.59, up 3.4%. Tesla is not currently highly ranked by IBD, with a Composite Rating of just 34 out of a possible 99, factoring in its earnings growth record, stock market performance and other metrics. The Model 3 pre-order window opened around the world Thursday at Tesla stores. “Orders for the Model 3 in the last 24 hours have just passed 115,000,” Musk announced at the 8:30 p.m. Pacific Time launch on Thursday. Lines at some Tesla stores had stretched far. The rest of the Thursday reservations were racked up during the event, where a bevy of Tesla Model S, Model X and Roadster owners conversed over the din of a DJ. “Orders for the Model 3 in the last 24 hours have just passed 115,000,” Tesla CEO Elon Musk just said. $TSLA #Model3 pic.twitter.com/ZWWb9LmhGj — Donna Howell (@IBD_DHowell) April 1, 2016 Several people IBD spoke with who already own at least one Tesla also ordered a Model 3 at the launch party. PCs were set up to take reservations online, with the general window for online reservations opening shortly before Musk took the stage to introduce the new car. Sleek, fast (we took a test ride) and smaller than its siblings, the  Model 3 is slated to roll off the assembly line in late 2017. It’s seen competing with the BMW 3 Series and similarly priced entry-to-midrange luxury vehicles from Volkswagen ‘s ( VLKAY ) Audi,  Daimler ‘s ( DDAIF ) Mercedes-Benz and Toyota ‘s ( TM ) Lexus, as well as electrics like the General Motors ( GM ) Chevrolet Bolt and a variety of hybrids. Tesla’s challenge now is ramping up production to meet the better-than-expected demand on time, and pushing down battery costs enough to profit with a car half the price of its last two models. About half of the current Tesla owners that IBD spoke with at the launch event expect the Model 3 to come out on schedule. The others wouldn’t bet on it. Tesla’s last model unveiling, also at its design facility in Los Angeles, was the Model X crossover in February 2012. After delays, that finally started going to reservation-holders at the end of September 2015. Bob and Linda Ashmore of San Carlos, Calif., have a Roadster and a Model S, and just put in a reservation for a Model 3. “We ordered one today here, so we’re looking forward to seeing what it’s actually going to look like,” Bob Ashmore told IBD as the launch party was getting started. He expects it to be built on time, and he and Linda have visited the factory several times. “They’ve got plenty of capacity,” Bob Ashmore said. “This has been a dream and vision of Tesla from the beginning,” Linda Ashmore said. “To get an affordable car for the masses.” Tesla isn’t highly rated by IBD at moment, though it has been in the past. The company currently gets a Composite Rating of just 34 out of a possible 99, factoring in its earnings and loss history, stock price performance and a raft of other factors. The stock has been finding support around its 200-day line lately, and hit its highest point since October on Friday. RELATED:  Tesla Motors Model 3 Revealed . This Is What It’s Like To Ride In A Tesla Model 3

The Wisdom Of Twitter Crowds: Tweet-Based Asset-Allocation Strategy Outperforms Several Benchmarks

By Jacob Wolinsky Interesting study and finding from Andrew Lo re Twitter and FOMC: “The Wisdom of Twitter Crowds: Predicting Stock Market Reactions to FOMC Meetings via Twitter Feeds” Pablo D. Azar is a PhD student in the Department of Economics and Laboratory for Financial Engineering, Sloan School of Management, MIT. Email: pazar@mit.edu Andrew W. Lo is Charles E. and Susan T. Harris Professor and the Director of the Laboratory for Financial Engineering, Sloan School of Management, MIT. Email: alo-admin@mit.edu Abstract With the rise of social media, investors have a new tool to measure sentiment in real time. However, the nature of these sources of data raises serious questions about its quality. Since anyone on social media can participate in a conversation about markets—whether they are informed or not—it is possible that this data may have very little information about future asset prices. In this paper, we show that this is not the case by analyzing a recurring event that has a high impact on asset prices: Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings. We exploit a new dataset of tweets referencing the Federal Reserve and show that the content of tweets can be used to predict future returns, even after controlling for common asset pricing factors. To gauge the economic magnitude of these predictions, the authors construct a simple hypothetical trading strategy based on this data. They find that a tweet based asset-allocation strategy outperforms several benchmarks, including a strategy that buys and holds a market index as well as a comparable dynamic asset allocation strategy that does not use Twitter information. Investor sentiment has frequently been considered an important factor in determining asset prices. Traditionally, sentiment is measured by observing analyst estimates, survey data, news stories, and technical indicators such as put/call ratios and relative strength indicators. Two drawbacks of these indicators are that they are based on a relatively sparse subset of the population of investors and, except for technical indicators, are not measured in real time. The rise of social media allows us to overcome these drawbacks and measure the sentiment of a large number of individuals in real time. These data sources give the quantitative investor a new tool with which to construct portfolios and manage risk. However, because social media data is generated by individual users and not investment professionals, the following questions arise about the quality of this data: • Do user messages contain relevant information for asset pricing? • Can this information be inferred from more traditional sources, or is it truly new information? • Can social media data help predict future asset returns and shifts in volatility? To answer these questions, we focus on a single recurring event that reveals previously unknown information to the market: Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings. Eight times a year, the FOMC meets to determine monetary policy. The decisions made by the FOMC are highly watched by all market participants, and often have a significant impact on asset prices.1 To understand how investors on social media behave around FOMC meeting dates, we create a new dataset of tweets that cite the Federal Reserve. Using natural language processing techniques, we can assign a polarity score to each Twitter message, identifying the emotion in the text. We show that this polarity score can be used to predict the returns of the CRSP Value-Weighted Index, even when limiting ourselves to articles and tweets that are published at least 24 hours before the FOMC meeting. We use these results to construct trading strategies that bet more or less aggressively in a market index depending on Twitter sentiment. We find that portfolios using Twitter data can significantly outperform a passive buy-and-hold strategy. Click to enlarge Click to enlarge Full study below SSRN-id2756815